Full adhesive workflow with PANAVIA Veneer LC

By Dr Wiktor Pietraszewski BSC(HONS) DMD

INTRODUCTION

According to personal experience, the cementation of glass ceramic veneers is one of the most stressful and technique-sensitive procedures in restorative dentistry. This is not only due to the minimal margin for error, but also the high aesthetic standards that must be met to deliver a result satisfying both clinician and patient. Modern protocols emphasize conservative preparation, ideally remaining entirely within enamel, or at the very least, minimising extension into dentin. It is essential to understand that both preparation design and extent should not be planned in isolation. Instead, they must be carefully co-planned through thorough communication and collaboration between clinician and technician, ensuring the final result is both biologically respectful and aesthetically predictable.

THE CASE

The case to be discussed today is rather unique in that it arose unexpectedly, without the luxury of typical pretreatment planning steps such as a diagnostic wax-up or mock-up. These were omitted due to time and budget constraints on the patient’s part — a reality many clinicians can relate to. The rationale behind this approach will become clearer as we progress through the case. The patient is a 70-year-old retiree, whom I have been managing for several years. Treatment thus far has focused on stabilising and gradually improving her posterior restorations, with the longer-term aim of addressing the anterior dentition to enhance both function and aesthetics.

Nowadays, financial considerations often pose a significant barrier to patients accepting comprehensive treatment plans from the outset. As such, effective communication and phased treatment planning become essential tools in fostering patient trust and long-term commitment. This particular visit was an emergency appointment, with the patient presenting with a fractured porcelain veneer on her maxillary left central incisor — tooth 21 according to the FDI notation (Fig. 1). Fortunately, because of the existing phased approach to her care, we were well-positioned to transition into an aesthetic restorative phase with minimal resistance or hesitation from the patient.

Fig. 1. Pre-operative view - emergency: Chipped existing ceramic veneer.

Fig. 2. The plan - Digital Smile Design - 4 x porcelain veneers - 4 x direct composite restorations.

THE PLAN

After careful discussion, it was decided to remove and replace the four existing porcelain veneers and to replace four existing Class V stained composite restorations with fresh new direct composite (Fig. 2). Everyone involved was happy with the plan, sure it would adequately fulfil the patient’s aesthetic expectations and even surpass them. At the emergency appointment, time was so limited that only the temporary restoration of the chip with direct composite was feasible. Time was an important factor going forward: the patient wanted to proceed and have the case completed as soon as possible.

Main features of the Digital Smile Design (DSD) plan

1. Lengthening - central incisors – incisal edges to reflect the length of the canine tips
2. Equal gingival zeniths
3. Masking of the cervical defects

PREPARATION, SCAN & TEMPORISATION

The first step involved building up the teeth using a flowable composite to create a rough direct mock-up (Fig. 3), guided by the DSD plan (Fig. 2). This mock-up provided a visual and functional prototype, of which an impression was taken to aid in the fabrication of interim temporary restorations for the provisional phase of treatment.

Preparations were carried out using OptraGate isolation. The existing veneers were first removed using high-grit diamond burs at high speed. Once the bulk of the old material was cleared, gingival retraction was achieved using retraction cord, allowing for improved visibility and access. The preparations were then refined with lower-grit diamond burs at a reduced speed to ensure precision and tissue safety. The primary objectives of the preparation phase were to establish harmonious gingival zeniths and to adequately cover the cervical defects that were evident in the previous restorations (Figs. 4 and 5).

Fig. 3. Mock-up made of flowable composite.

Fig. 4. Class V composite restorations replaced on teeth 13, 23, 24 and 25.

Fig. 5. Situation after preparation of the maxillary incisors.

CEMENTS

Traditionally, glass ceramic veneers have been cemented successfully using a vast array of different luting resins available on the market.

Recently, a trend towards the use of flowable resin or heated composite to cement glass ceramic restorations has emerged. Like the abovementioned approach, this option is viable and literature-supported. The benefits of using flowable resin or a heated paste-type composite resin have been widely documented. The probably biggest advantage of this approach arises from the fact that the user is already familiar with the shades of the material used for cementation. Composite shades are often specified using the VITA classical A1 - D4 system, which dental professionals tend to be more accustomed to than to shade descriptions used for resin cements, like Warm, Light, Neutral and the like.

Some resin cement systems offer try-in pastes corresponding to the shades of the cement to overcome this obstacle and allow for precise shade evaluation at try-in to accurately aid in selecting the best cement shade available. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC is a popular example, as it matches the shades of PANAVIA™ V5 Try-In Pastes (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. PANAVIA ™ V5 Try-in Paste Universal (A2).

Using a cement shade that matches the intended final appearance is crucial when bonding glass-ceramic veneers, as it decisively affects both immediate and longterm aesthetics. This is especially important due to the light-diffusion properties of glass-ceramic materials such as IPS e.max CAD or IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent). Restorations can be as thin as 0.3 mm in minimally invasive cases. The thinner the restoration, the more translucent the material, and the greater the cement’s appearance will influence the final outcome.

Of course, the shade of the prepared tooth substantially influences cement shade selection, as well as decisions about the final restoration thickness (and thus preparation depth) and the ceramic translucency selected (IPS e.max, for example, is available in three translucency levels – LT [Light], MT [Medium], and HT [High]; Fig. 7). When the abutments are dark and a bright, white appearance is desired for the final restorations, it is wise to use a ceramic block with lower translucency. This is why taking a photograph of the prepared teeth and sending it to the ceramist is so important. In the present case, the pepared tooth structure appeared quite dark in the incisial third, so that the medium translucency variant of IPS e.max CAD in the determined shade A1 was selected, which would allow for a minimal thickness and a natural outcome.

Fig. 7. Whitewash photograph used to demonstrate the translucent properties of glass ceramic veneers.

PANAVIA™ VENEER LC

PANAVIA™ Veneer LC is a light curing resin cement. Therefore, it is indicated for ceramic and composite restorations with less than 2mm thickness. It comes in four shades – Clear, White, Universal (A2) and Brown (Fig. 8) – with matching PANAVIA™ V5 Try-In Pastes. These pastes facilitate the simulation of the restorations’ final appearance (Fig. 9). The cement system consists of four components (Fig. 10).

Fig. 8. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste shades.

Fig. 9. Matching PANAVIA™ V5 Try-In Paste shades.

Fig. 10. The kit consists of phosphoric acid etchant, resin cement paste, universal ceramic primer and tooth primer.

TRY-IN

Upon delivery of the four lithium disilicate veneers in the selected translucency and shade (MT A1; Fig. 11), it was time to select the resin cement shade for try-in. As a bright result that would still match the colour of the adjacent teeth was desired, the shade of choice was Universal (A2). Patient and practice team were happy with the simulated treatment outcome (Fig. 12), so that the veneers were cleaned and pre-treated for definitive placement.

Fig. 11. Lab work delivered: Lithium disilicate porcelain veneers - medium translucency, shade A1.

Fig. 12. Try-in with PANAVIA™ V5 Try-In Paste Universal (A2).

CEMENTATION STEPS

For adhesive cementation of the veneers, the teeth were isolated with latex-free rubber dam (Isodam HD in thickness Heavy Gauge; Fig. 13a). Clamps were placed and the veneers tried in to check the fit once more (Figs. 13b and c).

Subsequently, the tooth surfaces were pretreated, starting with the central incisors: Protecting the adjacent teeth with a metal strip, the surfaces were first treated using air abrasion with 35-micron aluminium oxide powder (Fig. 14a). Once the surface was rough (Fig. 14b), phosphoric acid etching gel was applied to the sandblasted surface for 15-30 seconds (Fig. 14c). After thorough rinsing and drying of the etched surfaces, the adjacent lateral incisors were isolated with PTFE tape to facilitate excess cement clean-up during the adhesive luting procedure (Fig. 14d).

Fig. 13a. Isolation with latex-free rubber dam.

Fig. 13b. Further retraction with B4 clamps for dry try-in.

Fig. 13c. Fit check with clamps in place to ensure full seating of the veneers.

Fig. 14a. Air-abrasion with 35-micron aluminium oxide powder.

Fig. 14b. Result of the air abrasion procedure.

Fig. 14c. Total etching with 37% phosphoric acid.

Fig. 14d. PTFE tape placement on lateral incisors to simplify clean-up.

The actual cementation steps included priming of the tooth structure with PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer, which is strong on enamel and dentin (Fig. 15a), leaving it for 20 seconds and then drying with mild air. The veneers’ intaglio surfaces were treated with hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds and - after complete removal of the etchant - primed with CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS (Fig. 15b) and dried. Now, it was time to apply the cement paste (PANAVIA™ Veneer LC) onto the pre-treated ceramic surfaces and seat the veneers carefully (Figs. 15c and d). During placement, gentle but firm pressure is ideally applied using a soft, padded instrument to ensure accurate seating. When using light-cure (LC) resin cements, tack-curing can often be avoided: Excess cement can be carefully brushed away prior to curing, avoiding flash and reducing clean-up. The resin promotes an excellent marginal blend between tooth and restoration, enhancing both the aesthetic and functional integration of the veneers. For light-curing, the restoration margins were covered with glycerine gel to prevent formation of an oxygen inhibition layer (Fig. 15e).

Fig. 15a. Priming of the tooth structure.

Fig. 15b. Etching and priming of the intaglio surfaces of the veneers.

Fig. 15c. Seating of a veneer with a cushioned instrument.

Fig. 15d. Two veneers simultaneously placed on the central incisors.

Fig. 15e. Restoration margins covered with glycerin gel for thorough light-curing from all sides.

The veneers for the lateral incisors were cemented likewise; however, floss was used instead of clamps for gingival retraction (Figs. 16a and b).

Fig. 16a. Gingival retraction for veneer placement on the lateral incisors.

Fig. 16b. Floss is used for a clampless procedure.

The above-mentioned sequenced placement procedure – starting with the central incisors and then moving on to the laterals - is highly recommended: This protocol gives the practitioner full control over the positioning of the central incisor veneers, which is particularly important as their position has a massive impact on the overall appearance of the smile. When the lateral incisor veneers are cemented first, the risk of positioning errors in the central incisor region and resulting catastrophic aesthetic issues is increased. However, any error with the positioning of the central incisor veneers can also lead to problems like the misfit of the lateral incisor veneers. Therefore, the whole procedure needs to be carried out with utmost care and precision.

A robust curing protocol with palatal, incisal and facial light exposition is crucial to ensure that the resin cement is fully set. Figures 17a to c show the veneers in place. Controlled removal of any residual excess was accomplished with ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) floss (Gorilla Floss) used to avoid damaging the margins. For final polishing of the ceramic-tooth interface, polishing rubbers were employed. Rubber dam remained stable throughout the procedure.

The immediate treatment outcome is shown in Figure 18. It is completely normal for the gums to appear red and feel slightly sore following cementation. This is a temporary response, which should improve quickly as the tissue begins to heal. With a consistent and proper oral hygiene routine, the soft tissues will recover fully over the coming days. This has to be communicated to the patient well following rubber dam removal.

Fig. 17a. Lateral incisor veneers after placement and excess removal.

Fig. 17b. All four ceramic veneers in place.

Fig. 17c. Appearance of the veneers after floss removal.

Fig. 18. Immediate post-operative appearance.

Fig. 19. Check-up after three weeks.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 20a. Final photographic records: Frontal view.

Fig. 20b. Final photographic records: Lateral view from the left.

Fig. 20c. Final photographic records: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 20d. Final photographic records: Occlusal view.

FOLLOW-UP VISIT

A check-up appointment is crucial in that it allows clinicians to assess the state of the soft tissue, which was fully recovered in the present case after three weeks (Fig. 19). Even more importantly, however, it enables us to check how our patients are adapting to their new smiles. This is also the best time to take a final photographic record (Figs. 20a to d). At this appointment, it is also essential to check for any excess material left interproximally: It can result in chronic inflammation, leading to persistent redness and an unaesthetic appearance of the final restorations. By careful inspection of the restorations from the occlusal view, it is possible to make sure all excess is removed and optimal gingival health is maintained.

Would you like to download this clinical case as a PDF? Please leave your email address below.

Dentist:

WIKTOR PIETRASZEWSKI

Dr. Pietraszewski is a general and restorative dentist working in private practice in London. He utilizes biomimetic adhesive protocols in his restorative cases and uses gold standard materials to emulate the natural appearance, bio-mechanical function, and internal structure of teeth when restoring them.

He has a special interest in direct and indirect restorations in the posterior dentition, and his dentistry is fueled by his passion for dental photography.

From The Medical University in Lodz (Poland) to private clinics in Malta and London, his dental journey reflects dedication to excellence.

• 5. jun. 2026

PANAVIA V5 Se produkt

CLEARFIL CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS Se produkt

PANAVIA Veneer LC Se produkt