By Dr Wiktor Pietraszewski BSC(HONS) DMD

INTRODUCTION

According to personal experience, the cementation of glass ceramic veneers is one of the most stressful and technique-sensitive procedures in restorative dentistry. This is not only due to the minimal margin for error, but also the high aesthetic standards that must be met to deliver a result satisfying both clinician and patient. Modern protocols emphasize conservative preparation, ideally remaining entirely within enamel, or at the very least, minimising extension into dentin. It is essential to understand that both preparation design and extent should not be planned in isolation. Instead, they must be carefully co-planned through thorough communication and collaboration between clinician and technician, ensuring the final result is both biologically respectful and aesthetically predictable.

THE CASE

The case to be discussed today is rather unique in that it arose unexpectedly, without the luxury of typical pretreatment planning steps such as a diagnostic wax-up or mock-up. These were omitted due to time and budget constraints on the patient’s part — a reality many clinicians can relate to. The rationale behind this approach will become clearer as we progress through the case. The patient is a 70-year-old retiree, whom I have been managing for several years. Treatment thus far has focused on stabilising and gradually improving her posterior restorations, with the longer-term aim of addressing the anterior dentition to enhance both function and aesthetics.

Nowadays, financial considerations often pose a significant barrier to patients accepting comprehensive treatment plans from the outset. As such, effective communication and phased treatment planning become essential tools in fostering patient trust and long-term commitment. This particular visit was an emergency appointment, with the patient presenting with a fractured porcelain veneer on her maxillary left central incisor — tooth 21 according to the FDI notation (Fig. 1). Fortunately, because of the existing phased approach to her care, we were well-positioned to transition into an aesthetic restorative phase with minimal resistance or hesitation from the patient.

Fig. 1. Pre-operative view - emergency: Chipped existing ceramic veneer.

Fig. 2. The plan - Digital Smile Design - 4 x porcelain veneers - 4 x direct composite restorations.

THE PLAN

After careful discussion, it was decided to remove and replace the four existing porcelain veneers and to replace four existing Class V stained composite restorations with fresh new direct composite (Fig. 2). Everyone involved was happy with the plan, sure it would adequately fulfil the patient’s aesthetic expectations and even surpass them. At the emergency appointment, time was so limited that only the temporary restoration of the chip with direct composite was feasible. Time was an important factor going forward: the patient wanted to proceed and have the case completed as soon as possible.

Main features of the Digital Smile Design (DSD) plan

1. Lengthening - central incisors – incisal edges to reflect the length of the canine tips
2. Equal gingival zeniths
3. Masking of the cervical defects

PREPARATION, SCAN & TEMPORISATION

The first step involved building up the teeth using a flowable composite to create a rough direct mock-up (Fig. 3), guided by the DSD plan (Fig. 2). This mock-up provided a visual and functional prototype, of which an impression was taken to aid in the fabrication of interim temporary restorations for the provisional phase of treatment.

Preparations were carried out using OptraGate isolation. The existing veneers were first removed using high-grit diamond burs at high speed. Once the bulk of the old material was cleared, gingival retraction was achieved using retraction cord, allowing for improved visibility and access. The preparations were then refined with lower-grit diamond burs at a reduced speed to ensure precision and tissue safety. The primary objectives of the preparation phase were to establish harmonious gingival zeniths and to adequately cover the cervical defects that were evident in the previous restorations (Figs. 4 and 5).

Fig. 3. Mock-up made of flowable composite.

Fig. 4. Class V composite restorations replaced on teeth 13, 23, 24 and 25.

Fig. 5. Situation after preparation of the maxillary incisors.

Would you like to continue reading as a PDF? Please leave your email address below.

Case report by Dr Mediha Isikver

Tooth fractures and secondary caries are frequently observed in posterior teeth, often resulting from occlusal stress, restoration failure, or secondary bacterial infiltration. These conditions compromise tooth integrity, function, and aesthetics. With advancements in adhesive dentistry, minimally invasive and durable restorative solutions have become achievable. Material selection plays a critical role in the success of composite restorations, influencing marginal adaptation, wear resistance, and patient satisfaction. This case report describes the step-by-step clinical management of a fractured and secondary carious permanent molar restored using materials from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 32-year-old female patient presented to the clinic with sensitivity and discomfort in the upper left posterior region. Clinical examination revealed a distal wall fracture on tooth #26 (maxillary left first molar) with a secondary carious lesion extending subgingivally. Radiographic evaluation confirmed the absence of periapical pathology. Adjacent teeth (#25 and #27) showed early carious activity, but the patient opted for the restoration of tooth #26 only. The tooth was asymptomatic to percussion and showed normal vitality on pulp testing.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical view of tooth #26 under rubber dam isolation.

TREATMENT PROTOCOL

1. Isolation and caries removal: The tooth was isolated with rubber dam. The existing defective restoration and carious tissue were carefully removed using tungsten carbide burs and a slow-speed handpiece.
2. Surface cleaning: After preparation, KATANA™ Cleaner was applied to remove contaminants and optimize bonding surface quality.
3. Bonding procedure: A single-step, self-etch adhesive, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2, was applied to both enamel and dentin following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer.
4. Restorative phase: The deep and undercut areas were resin coated with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal Low (U shade), ensuring adaptation and stress relief in undercut regions. The remaining cavity was restored incrementally using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (U shade) paste-type composite, with each 2 mm layer light-cured for 20 seconds.

Fig. 2. Clinical view of tooth #26 after removal of the defective restoration and carious tissue.

Fig. 3. Application of KATANA™ Cleaner to remove contaminants and optimize bonding surface quality after preparation.

Fig. 4. Selective enamel etching performed on tooth #26.

Fig. 5. CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2 applied to both enamel and dentin following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol.

Fig. 6. Resin coating with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal Low (U shade).

Fig. 7. Reconstruction of the mesial and distal walls with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (U shade) composite.

Fig. 8. Incremental build-up of cusps and occlusal anatomy using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal composite, refined with a brush for contour adjustment.

Fig. 9. Initial finishing of the composite restoration performed with darkcoloured TWIST™ DIA for Composite (medium) rubber points to refine surface texture and anatomy.

Fig. 10. Final polishing performed with light-coloured TWIST™ DIA for Composite (fine) rubber points to achieve a highgloss, smooth surface.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 11. Final view of the restoration after occlusal adjustment and polishing.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates that adhesive and restorative systems from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. offer a reliable, efficient and effective approach for treating fractured and secondary carious posterior teeth. The integration of self-etch adhesives and high performance composites contributes to durable and aesthetically pleasing restorations. Continuous follow-up is essential to evaluate the long-term clinical behaviour of these materials.

Case by Dr. Onur Alp Yünük 

COMBINING HIGH-PERFORMANCE TOOLS AND MATERIALS FOR A PREDICTABLE OUTCOME

Direct composite restorations are a high-quality treatment option even when large amounts of tooth structure need to be replaced. This is due to recent advancements in resin composite materials and adhesive technology. By selecting appropriate materials and layering techniques combined with modern digital tools for colour difference evaluation, it is possible to predictably produce highly aesthetic outcomes, as demonstrated in the following case example.

The challenge

A young male patient presented to our clinic requesting the replacement of his existing composite restorations on his maxillary incisors (teeth #12 and #11 according to the FDI notation). Clinical examination revealed extensive restoration loss on the lateral incisor. Furthermore, anatomical irregularities, discolouration, and loss of surface gloss were observed on tooth #11. The adjacent central incisor exhibited similar issues regarding colour and surface polish.

In consultation with the patient, it was decided to replace the existing restorations using a modern composite material specifically developed for dual-shade layering – CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). For an exact shade analysis, photographs were taken with and without a cross-polarized filter (Figs. 1 to 4).

Fig. 1: Frontal view of the teeth  with extensive restoration loss on the maxillary left lateral incisor.

Fig. 2: Cross-polarized photograph of the teeth allowing for a detailed analysis of the shade irregularities.

Fig. 3: Lateral view of the teeth.

Fig. 4: Lateral view – cross-polarized photograph.

The solution

Following removal of the existing restorations, rubber dam was placed for working field isolation. A self-etching adhesive (CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied in the selective enamel etching mode before establishing the palatal shell using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1E (Figs. 5 and 6). The mamelon structures were reconstructed with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1D, while the translucent shade Blue was applied  to the opalescent zone. Finally, yellow and white tints were used for characterization. Fig. 7 illustrates the appearance before,  Fig. 8 after finishing and polishing.

Fig. 5: Palatal shell established with the enamel shade A1E of the selected composite.

Fig. 6: Lateral view of the teeth during the restoration procedure.

Fig. 7: Restoration before finishing and polishing.

Fig. 8: Appearance of the restorations after finishing and polishing.

The outcome

To evaluate the final colour integration, another photograph was taken with a cross-polarized filter, holding a grey reference card in place for calibration (Figs. 9 and 10). The lateral view of the restored teeth (Fig. 11) reveals that not only the right colour combination, but also a natural surface texture is required for a highly aesthetic outcome.

Fig. 9: Frontal view of the restored teeth taken with a cross-polarized filter.

Fig. 10: Gray reference card calibration and the resulting L*a*b* coordinates of the restoration.

Fig. 11: Lateral view of the restored teeth stressing the importance of surface texture.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Observation, supported by modern tools for photography and image analysis (like polarized filters and L*a*b* coordinates), is  an important skill needed for the lifelike reconstruction of teeth with direct composite materials. By combining this skill with a highperformance composite system that offers fixed shade combinations and innovative light diffusion technology for a nice blend-in  with the surrounding tooth structure, creating beautiful restorations becomes a predictable business.

In the case presented, the patient was very satisfied with the outcome in terms of aesthetics and function. At regular recalls, the quality of the restorations is checked – they still offer a very nice functional and aesthetic integration.

Case by DT Vasilis Vasiliou

MICRO-LAYERING WITH CERABIEN MiLai

No matter whether young or old, male or female: Our patients deserve a beautiful smile that matches their adjacent teeth, their face, their character and their individual needs. To be able to produce beautiful restorations that change their life for the better, we (as dental technicians) have to observe closely – and to listen attentively to the stories they tell.

‘We have to observe closely – and to listen attentively to the stories our patients tell us.’
– Vasilis Vasiliou –

Mr Andreas is a perfect example. He presented in the dental office in need of a full-mouth rehabilitation and the wish to improve the aesthetics of his smile. He asked for an age-appropriate, natural restoration design.

After careful observation and listening, I decided that the best way to restore his maxillary incisors would be with zirconia restorations. The plan was to mill the frameworks using low-value KATANA™ Zirconia YML, shade D3 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). To facilitate the integration of some natural characteristic effects, a framework design with a primarily vestibular cutback was selected. The finishing technique of choice was micro-layering with CERABIEN™ MiLai (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), a porcelain designed specifically for this approach.

Important steps in the finishing procedure were:

• Characterization of the milled zirconia with colouring liquids
• Pre-treatment of the sandblasted zirconia surfaces with SS Fluoro and Margin porcelain
• Internal staining with CERABIEN™ MiLai internal stains
• Application of CERABIEN™ MiLai luster porcelains

LABORATORY WORKFLOW

Zirconia splinted crowns were designed in full contour with the aid of the Leahu Library featuring tailored tooth designs (part of the Truedental Library available for exocad DentalCAD design software; Fig. 1), cut back merely in the vestibular area using the ‘calma’ reduction option (Fig. 2), and then milled and characterized with colouring liquids to optimize the chroma.

Figure 3 shows the sintered frameworks on the model, Figure 4 the try-in in the patient’s mouth. As the fit and shape of the restorations turned out to be excellent, it was time to plan the internal staining and micro-layering procedure (Figs. 5 and 6), always trying to imitate nature as closely as possible.

The tricky part is to use the available space wisely – the reason why a detailed layering sketch is useful even when in the context of micro-layering. Once the planned layering procedure had been put to practice (Figs. 7 to 10), the surface texture was finalized and the restorations were tried in again for an aesthetic evaluation. Finally, they were cemented with the adhesive resin cement PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

The beautiful treatment outcome is shown in Figure 11.

Fig. 1. Computer-aided design of the zirconia frameworks: Splinted crows displayed in a transparent mode to show the abutment teeth.

Fig. 2. Computer-aided design of the zirconia frameworks: Outer contour of the splinted crowns with a strongly elaborated surface texture and sufficient room for micro-layering.

Fig. 3. Restorations after characterization with colouring liquids and sintering on the model.

Fig. 4. Try-in of the restorations.

Fig. 7. Internal staining – specific characteristics elaborated for a natural depth effect.

Fig. 8. Layering in the cervical and body areas.

Fig. 9. Final layering with luster porcelains to complete the morphology.

Fig. 10. Final restorations after surface finishing and polishing as well as glazing on the model.

Fig. 11. Treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

The patient was thoroughly satisfied with the treatment outcome and confident that his investment was well worth it. By tailoring my approach to his unique needs, carefully observing his teeth, smile, and facial expressions, and utilizing my extensive knowledge of materials, I was able to achieve this goal successfully.

Nonetheless, I remain committed to continuous improvement by critically evaluating each restoration and seeking areas for enhancement. My dedication to growth, supported by exceptional mentors who share innovative techniques and insights, supports me in staying at the forefront of my field, striving at consistently delivering the best possible care.

I am deeply grateful to Dr. Zinonas Evagorou for invaluable partnership and clinical expertise, which were instrumental in achieving this result.

Case by Dr. Michał Jaczewski

FLOWABLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE

What are the most important properties of a flowable composite used for the flowable injection technique? Personal experience shows that balanced optical properties are essential, with an appropriate translucency, blend-in ability and surface gloss leading the way. However, the mechanical properties are also important, not least because the restorative material will be in direct contact with the antagonist teeth. And finally, handling properties are essential: The right level of flowability is needed for proper injection, while a void-free application is required for an intact, stain-resistant surface.

For the last seven years, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Low (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) has been my go-to flowable composite for the flowable injection technique. Its level of flowability is ideal for the technique in the anterior and posterior region. Whenever a lower flowability is needed, it is possible to switch to the Super Low variant. Moreover, I like the shade offering, which – together with the superior polishability of the material – leads to natural aesthetics. Finally, its mechanical properties are so good that the product is approved for a wide indication range without load limitations.

When the company announced the introduction of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal, which comes in just two universal shades and two different levels of flowability (Low and Super Low), I immediately decided to give it a try: The prospect of balanced properties I am already familiar with, combined with a simplified shade selection sounded very promising. So far, the new product comes up to my expectations: The following case example reveals the simplicity of the procedure and the beauty of the results. The patient presented during orthodontic (aligner) treatment for a shape correction in the anterior region due to wear of the incisal edge.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation: Patient in need of a shape correction in the maxillary incisor region.

Fig. 2. Application of CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) to the enamel of a central incisor, which has been merely roughened by air abrasion with aluminium oxide (50 μm at low pressure) followed by etching with a phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 3. Transparent silicon index placed in the mouth and CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow Universal Low (U shade) already injected in the position of the maxillary right central incisor.

Fig. 4. Shape correction on the maxillary right central incisor completed.

Fig. 5. Situation after finishing and polishing of the incisor restorations.

Fig. 6. Nice shade match leading to a smooth blend-in with the surrounding natural tooth structure.

Fig. 7. Immediate treatment outcome supporting an improvement of the smile aesthetics and hence, the patient‘s quality of life during aligner therapy.

RESULTS THAT SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES

Like its related product CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow, the universal-shade version CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow Universal offers properties which are – from a personal perspective – ideal for the flowable injection technique. The shade-matching properties are astonishing; the translucency is quite high when placed in thin layers (so that enamel is very well imitated), and the polishability is as good as that of CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow. For virtually effortless, bubble-free injection, the product comes in a nicely designed syringe. And last but not least, the product’s mechanical properties provide peace of mind even in the posterior region.

Dentist:

MICHAŁ JACZEWSKI

Michał Jaczewski graduated from Wroclaw Medical University in 2006 and today runs his private practice in the city of Legnica, Poland. He specializes in minimally invasive dentistry and digital dentistry and is the founder of the Biofunctional School of Occlusion. Here he lectures and runs workshops with focus on full comprehensive patient treatments.

Case by Dr. Julien Molia

UNE NOUVELLE GÉNÉRATION DE FLUIDES

Heureusement, cela a changé : À ‚l‘instar de CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow et CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal (tous deux de Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), plusieurs composites fluides de la dernière génération sont dotés de propriétés mécaniques équivalentes à celles de nombreuses alternatives compactes. Ainsi, le champ des indications est large. Par exemple, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal présente selon la fabricant une charge élevée de 75 à 78 % en poids, une résistance à la flexion supérieure à 150 MPa et une résistance à la compression dépassant 370 MP. Grâce à sa résistance élevée, il constitue une solution fiable et permanente, qui convient même pour les zones avec tensions en flexion comme les surfaces occlusales des dents postérieures.

Ce composite fluide a toutefois encore plus à offrir : Il est disponible en deux niveaux de fluidité – LOW et SUPER LOW – pour répondre à un plus grand nombre de préférences personnelles et besoins individuels spécifiques à une indication et en seulement deux teintes (universal et universal dark). Ce concept de deux teintes offre l‘avantage d‘une sélection des teintes intuitive, même dans la zone antérieure, et est rendu possible par un mélange de technologies de correspondance des teintes comprenant la technologie optimisée de diffusion de la lumière et une translucidité semblable à celle de l‘émail.

L‘exemple de cas suivant dévoile comment CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal me facilite la vie dans les procédures de restauration postérieure.

EXEMPLE DE CAS

Ce patient s‘est présenté pour le remplacement de deux restaurations en amalgame dans les molaires mandibulaires droites (dents #46 et #47 selon la notation FDI) (Ill. 1). Afin de simplifier le remplissage et l‘adaptation aux parois de cavité, j‘ai décidé d‘utiliser CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal LOW en tant qu‘unique matériau restauratif. La position des dents à restaurer a rendu la sélection de teinte facile : La teinte U (universal) est conçue pour parfaitement fonctionner pour toutes les restaurations postérieures.

Les restaurations en amalgame ont été retirées et les caries excavées, avec conservation d‘autant de structure dentaire saine que possible (Ill. 2 et 3). Une technique de mordançage sélectif pour l‘émail a été choisie, suivie de l‘application d‘un adhésif universel (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Puis, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal en version LOW et dans la teinte sélectionnée a été appliqué dans les cavités (Ill. 4). Grâce au concept de seringue innovant, le composite f luide appliqué est littéralement sans vides. Suivant le mode d‘emploi du produit, l‘épaisseur de chaque couche ne dépassait pas les 2 millimètres afin d‘assurer une polymérisation complète (Ill. 5 et 6), ce qui a un impact déterminant sur la performance des restaurations finales sur le long terme. Chaque couche doit être polymérisée soigneusement pendant 10 à 20 secondes (en fonction de la lampe de polymérisation) avant l‘application de la couche suivante. Comme le montre l‘illustration 7, la faible fluidité du matériau sélectionné autorise un certain degré de modelage de la morphologie de surface occlusale. Quand il faut restaurer davantage de détails anatomiques, la variante plus solide SUPER LOW est envisageable. Il n‘a fallu que quelques secondes pour polir les restaurations en haute brillance (Ill. 8).

Ill. 1: Deux restaurations en amalgame à remplacer

Ill. 2: Situation après retrait des restaurations en amalgame existantes.

Ill. 3: Une tâche typique d‘amalgame est visible au fond de la plus grande cavité.

Ill. 4: Procédure de remplissage : application de la première couche de composite fluide.

Ill. 5: Seconde molaire déjà remplie, première molaire en attente d‘une autre couche de composite fluide.

Ill. 6: Remplissage terminé.

Ill. 7: Belle morphologie de surface dans laquelle s‘est fondue la teinte.

III. 8: Résultat du traitement après retrait de la digue en caoutchouc. Les restaurations se fondent joliment dans les dents alentour sur le plan de la teinte et du brillant.

ALTERNATIVE FACILE AUX COMPOSITES COMPACTS

En particulier dans les zones difficilement accessibles dans la bouche, l'utilisation d'un composite fluide avec des propriétés mécaniques bien équilibrées peut être une bonne alternative aux produits compacts. Les capacités avancées de correspondance des teintes, l'application littéralement sans vides, l'adaptation et le modelage aisés, ainsi que le polissage rapide simplifient réellement la vie du praticien dentaire.

Dentist:

JULIEN MOLIA

Diplômé en 2008 avec une thèse sur l’implantologie assistée par ordinateur, le Dr Julien Molia a établi une cabinet dentaire à Saint-Jean-de-Luz, où il se focalise sur la chirurgie implantaire et la reconstruction maxillaire. En 2017, il obtient un second diplôme universitaire en implantologie pour actualiser et approfondir son expertise. Il a également suivi une formation avancée dans le domaine de la dentisterie numérique, des mini-vis orthodontiques et de la chirurgie muco-gingivale. Très soucieux de la préservation des tissus, il s’est formé en privé auprès des Dr Gil Tirlet et Jean-Pierre Attal à Paris. Le Dr Molia est membre fondateur de Sud-Ouest BioTeam un groupe collaboratif français dédié à la recherche clinique et à l’innovation.

YES, IT WORKS!

In the minds of many dental practitioners, it has become firmly established that flowable composites are nice liner or base materials below stronger packable composites and indirect restorations or as a temporization material. Many of them assume, however, that their use is limited due to their poor mechanical properties.

A NEW GENERATION OF FLOWABLES

Luckily, this is no longer true: Several flowable composites of the latest generation – like CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) – are equipped with mechanical properties, which are on par with those of many packable alternatives. Consequently, the range of indications is extended. For example, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal, has a high filler loading of 75 to 78 wt/%, a flexural strength of more than 150 MPa and a compressive strength exceeding 370 MPa according to the manufacturer. Thanks to its high strength, it serves as a reliable and permanent solution, even suitable for stress-bearing areas such as the occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth.

However, this flowable composite has even more to offer: It is available in two levels of flowability – LOW and SUPER LOW – to serve a wider range of personal preferences and individual indication-specific needs and in just two shades (universal and universal dark). The latter offers the benefit of intuitive shade selection even in the anterior area and is enabled by a mixture of shade matching technologies, including optimized light diffusion technology and an enamel-like translucency.

The following case example reveals how CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal makes my life easier in posterior restoration procedures.

CASE EXAMPLE

This patient presented for the replacement of two amalgam restorations in the mandibular right molars (teeth # 46 and 47 according to the FDI notation) (Fig. 1). As it would facilitate filling and provide for great adaptation to the cavity walls, it was decided to use CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal LOW as the only restorative material. The position of the teeth to be restored made shade selection easy: Shade U (universal) is designed to work perfectly for all posterior restorations.

The amalgam restorations were removed and caries was excavated, while saving as much of the healthy tooth structure as possible (Figs. 2 and 3). A selective enamel etching technique was chosen, followed by the application of a universal adhesive (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Subsequently, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Universal in the LOW version and the selected shade U was applied into the cavities (Fig. 4). Thanks to the innovative syringe design, the applied flowable composite is virtually free of voids. In line with the instructions for use of the product, the thickness of each layer did not exceed 2 millimetres to provide for a complete cure (Figs. 5 and 6), which has a decisive impact on the long-term performance of the final restorations. Each layer should be thoroughly cured for 10 to 20 seconds (depending on the curing light) before the next layer is applied. As shown in Figure 7, the low flowability of the selected material allows for some modelling of the occlusal surface morphology. When more anatomical details need to be restored, the steadier SUPER LOW variant may be an option. It took just a few seconds to polish the restorations to high gloss (Fig. 8).

Fig. 1. Two amalgam restorations to be replaced.

Fig. 2. Situation after removal of the existing amalgam restorations.

Fig. 3. Typical amalgam staining is visible at the bottom of the larger cavity.

Fig. 4. Filling procedure: Application of the first layer of flowable composite.

Fig. 5. Second molar already filled, first molar in need of another layer of flowable composite.

Fig. 6. Filling completed.

Fig. 7. Nice surface morphology and shade blend-in.

Fig. 8. Treatment outcome after rubber dam removal. The restorations blend in nicely with the surrounding dentition – qua shade and surface gloss.

EASY-TO-USE ALTERNATIVE TO PACKABLE COMPOSITES

Especially in difficult-to-reach areas in the mouth, the use of a flowable composite with well-balanced mechanical properties can be a nice alternative to packable ones. Advanced shade-matching abilities, virtually void-free application, easy adaptation and modelling, and quick polishing truly simplify the life of the dental practitioner. However, many assume their use is limited due to poor mechanical properties.

JULIEN MOLIA

Dr. Julien Molia graduated in 2008 with a thesis on computer-assisted implantology. He established a general dental practice in Saint-Jean-de-Luz, where he has since focused on implant surgery and jawbone reconstruction. In 2017, he completed a second university degree in implantology to update and deepen his expertise. He has also pursued advanced training in digital dentistry, orthodontic miniscrews, and mucogingival surgery. Committed to tissue preservation, he trained privately with Drs. Gil Tirlet and Jean-Pierre Attal in Paris. Dr. Molia is a founding member of the French Southwest BioTeam, a collaborative group dedicated to clinical research and innovation.

Case by Dt. Koray Kendir, DDS, Turkey (İzmir)

INTRODUCTION

Trauma-related fractures of anterior teeth require a precise balance between aesthetics and function, often under emotional pressure from the patient. This clinical case demonstrates the restorative rehabilitation of a previously mismanaged central incisor using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium and PANAVIA™ V5 (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). The team followed a biomimetic approach to re-establish biological, functional, and aesthetic harmony.

CASE SUMMARY

A 23-year-old female patient presented one month after a traumatic injury involving tooth #11 (FDI notation). Immediate root canal treatment and a direct composite build-up had been performed elsewhere in a single visit. The existing restoration showed poor aesthetics and marginal adaptation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

CLINICAL PROCEDURE

STEP 1: ISOLATION AND REMOVAL OF OLD RESTORATION

For the planned rehabilitation, the tooth was isolated with rubber dam (Figs. 2 and 3) and the existing composite restoration was removed. Gutta-percha from the previous endodontic treatment was found to be severely coronally trimmed (Fig. 4). This poses a risk of future discolouration. Consequently, the gutta-percha was condensed apically to a more biologically appropriate level using a downpack device (Figs. 5 to 9).

Fig. 2. Isolation of the working field with rubber dam: Labial view.

Fig. 3. Isolation of the working field with rubber dam: Occlusal view.

Fig. 4. Gutta-percha from the previous treatment.

Fig. 5. Gutta-percha removed, …

Fig. 6. … placed back into the root canal …

Fig. 7. … and condensed …

Fig. 8. … with a downpack device.

Fig. 9. Result of the procedure: Occlusal view.

STEP 2: CORE BUILD-UP

Subsequently, a fiber-reinforced composite was used to provide root-anchored support for the core structure. Then, the bonding surface was treated with phosphoric acid etchant, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied as a universal adhesive and the core build-up was performed with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium A1D (Figs. 10 to 13).

Fig. 10. Etching with phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 11. Application of the universal adhesive.

Fig. 12. Core build-up after thorough light curing.

Fig. 13. Intra-oral periapical radiograph or the treated tooth.

STEP 3: PREPARATION AND DIGITAL IMPRESSION

For definitive restoration, a 3/4 crown preparation was performed and an intraoral scan was taken. Moreover, a temporary crown was fabricated (Fig. 14) and shade photos were taken to finalize the session.

Fig. 14. Temporary restoration in place.

STEP 4: FINAL CEMENTATION

Once the lithium disilicate restoration was received from the laboratory, the temporary crown was removed and the abutment tooth was evaluated (Figs. 15 and 16). Try-in was performed using PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste White to check shade and fit (Fig. 17). No modifications were required; the selected try-in paste contributed to a lifelike appearance of the restoration. For definitive placement, the intaglio surface of the crown was etched with hydrofluoric acid (Fig. 18). Figure 19 shows the appearance of the intaglio after this measure. To provide for optimal bonding conditions, the tooth surface was then cleaned with KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), which should be applied with a rubbing motion to the contaminated prepared tooth for more than ten seconds (Figs. 20 to 22). It may also be used to clean the intaglio of a restoration, which is contaminated with blood and saliva e.g. after try-in.

Fig. 15. Situation after removal of the temporary crown: Labial view.

Fig. 16. Situation after removal of the temporary crown: Occlusal view.

Fig. 17. Try-in of the lithium disilicate crown.

Fig. 18. Etching of the crown’s intaglio surface with hydrofluoric acid.

Fig. 19. Appearance of the etched surface.

Fig. 20. Cleaning of the abutment tooth …

Fig. 21. … surface covered with the cleaning agent.

Fig. 22. Thorough rinsing, which should be followed by drying with air.

Adhesive cementation itself was accomplished with the three-component PANAVIA™ V5 (Figs. 23 to 28): The prepared tooth structure and build-up was treated with PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer, the intaglio surface of the crown with CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS. Finally, PANAVIA™ V5 Universal (White) was extruded into the crown and the crown placed. Excess cement is best removed in the gel phase – i.e. after brief polymerization for 3 to 5 seconds before final light curing is performed. Alternatively, it may be removed immediately after seating the restoration with a brush or similar instrument. In this case the first option was chosen. The treatment outcome after rubber dam removal and final clinical and aesthetic evaluation is displayed in Figure 29.

Fig. 23. Priming of the tooth structure.

Fig. 24. Selected resin cement.

Fig. 25. Tooth structure ready for crown placement.

Fig. 26. Restoration in place.

Fig. 27. Lateral view of the restoration.

Fig. 28. Final light curing of the crown.

Fig. 29. Treatment outcome immediately after rubber dam removal.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights a comprehensive restorative approach to preserving a traumatized anterior tooth at risk of loss, while restoring both function and aesthetics. The strong core foundation provided by CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium and the reliable adhesive performance of PANAVIA™ V5 played a pivotal role in the successful procedure and outcome.

4 CAS CLINIQUES

Les composites avec un concept de teinte universelle, c‘est-à-dire un nombre réduit de teintes pouvant être sélectionnées sans guide nuancier, constituent une tendance marquée dans la dentisterie restaurative. Ces matériaux aux propriétés d‘adaptation spécifiques peuvent aider à rationaliser les procédures restauratives et à diminuer le temps passé au fauteuil. Cela contribue à réduire la pression exercée sur le praticien dentaire et à obtenir de bons résultats. Toutefois, certains utilisateurs restent sceptiques quant à une vaste utilisation de ces matériaux, en particulier s‘agissant de restaurer des dents dans la zone antérieure. Les raisons peuvent en être une translucidité comparativement élevée qui requiert l‘application séparée d‘un bloqueur (ou une teinte opaque) dans certaines situations ou une offre de teintes trop limitée.

L‘expérience personnelle montre que CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal  convient parfaitement pour une vaste gamme de restaurations à teinte unique dans les dents antérieures. Offrant une excellente polissabilité et une rétention de brillance longue-durée, il est disponible en seulement quatre teintes : Une teinte universelle (U) originale conçue pour les restaurations postérieures, une teinte universal light (UL) et une teinte universal dark (UD) - ces deux options l‘une claire, l‘autre foncée sont principalement conçues pour les dents antérieures - ainsi qu‘une teinte universal white (UW) pour imiter n‘importe quelle teinte de blanchiment. D‘une manière générale, les quatre options peuvent être utilisées dans les zones antérieure et postérieure. Étant donné que la capacité d‘adaptation est due à la technologie de diffusion de la lumière du fabricant et ne dépend pas d‘une translucidité accrue, l‘application d‘un bloqueur est en principe superflue et même les zones plus étendues peuvent être restaurées de manière assez discrète.

À ceux qui se demandent quand sélectionner quelle teinte dans la zone antérieure, les exemples de cas cliniques et commentaires suivants fourniront des éclaircissements. Les recommandations et conseils pratiques reposent sur l‘expérience personnelle. Tous les patients concernés étaient en traitement pour une fermeture de diastème ou correction de forme, mais les critères de sélection sont les mêmes pour d‘autres types de restaurations antérieures.

UNIVERSAL LIGHT : POUR DES RÉSULTATS NATURELS SUR LES DENTS PLUS CLAIRES

Ce jeune patient de 35 ans souffrant de microdontie s‘est présenté au cabinet dans l‘espoir d‘embellir la forme de ses dents. Ses dents étaient quasiment exemptes de caries, mais il y avait des déficits en termes d‘hygiène bucco- dentaire et des signes d‘inflammation gingivale. Une supraclusion a également été constatée. Après un nettoyage dentaire professionnel et des conseils d‘hygiène bucco-dentaire, les dents ont été restaurées avec CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal dans la teinte UL.

Fig. 1: Situation initiale.

Fig. 2: Situation initiale : Supraclusion.

Fig. 3: Dents restaurées avec un composite avec la technique de la teinte unique.

Fig. 4: Résultat immédiat du traitement.

Justification de la sélection d‘Universal light:

- Pour les jeunes patients (teintes de dent A2 et plus claires)

- Situations dans lesquelles la lumière traverse facilement le composite (par classe III, classe IV)

Propriétés d‘Universal light:

- Effet de diffusion de la lumière élevé

- Translucidité bien équilibrée

UNIVERSAL DARK : POUR DES RÉSULTATS NATURELS SUR LES DENTS PLUS FONCÉES

Cette patiente de 58 ans consultait pour une abrasion et une correction de forme également, principaux motifs pour elle de demander un traitement dentaire cosmétique. Elle n‘était pas satisfaite de l‘aspect des dents antérieures maxillaires qui montraient des signes d‘usure et de décoloration. L‘approche de traitement retenue consistait en un facettage avec CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal dans la teinte UD. La teinte a été sélectionnée sur la base de l‘indication et de la teinte un peu plus foncée des dents naturelles de la patiente.

Fig. 5: Situation clinique initiale.

Fig. 6: Résultat du traitement.

Justification de la sélection d‘Universal dark:

- Pour les patients plus âgés (teintes de dent A3 et plus foncées)

- Situations dans lesquelles la lumière traverse facilement le composite (par classe III, classe IV)

Propriétés d‘Universal dark:

- Effet de diffusion de la lumière élevé

- Translucidité bien équilibrée

UNIVERSAL: À CHAQUE FOIS QU‘ON RECHERCHE UNE TRANSLUCIDITÉ ÉLEVÉE

L‘utilisation de CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal dans la teinte U peut être une option pour les dents dont les zones à restaurer sont entourées de beaucoup de structure dentaire non-décolorée - comme cela peut être le cas pour les cavités des classes I, II et V. Les dents du patient de 28 ans qui consultait pour une fermeture dediastème avaient une translucidité comparativement basse et différentes teintes en raison d‘un tabagisme et d‘une consommation excessive de café. Le composite n‘ayant été appliqué que dans les zones d‘émail, la translucidité relativement élevée de la teinte universelle s‘est avérée avantageuse dans ce cas.

Fig. 7: Situation clinique initiale.

Fig. 8: Nouveau sourire du patient.

Justification de la sélection d‘Universal:

- Présence de grandes quantités de structure dentaire sous-jacente ou environnante

- Diffusion de la lumière moyenne désirée

Propriétés d‘Universal:

- Translucidité élevée

- Effet de diffusion de la lumière moyen

UNIVERSAL WHITE: POUR TOUS LES PATIENTS DEMANDANT UN EFFET DE BLANCHIMENT

Pour tous les cas requérant une teinte de dent particulièrement claire, par ex. chez les enfants ou patients aux dents blanchies ou souhaitant un effet dents blanchies pour leurs restaurations, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal dans la teinte UW est susceptible d‘être le premier choix. La jeune patiente de 28 ans présentée ici avait demandé une fermeture de diastème incluant une correction de forme et de teinte : Elle souhaitait avoir un sourire plus éclatant et plus harmonieux.

Fig. 9: Situation clinique initiale.

Fig. 10: Une correction de forme et de teinte était souhaitée dans ce cas.

Fig. 11: Résultat du traitement …

Fig. 12: … aboutissant au beau sourire que la patiente souhaitait.

Justification de la sélection d‘Universal white:

- Cas requérant une brillance ou valeur particulièrement élevée

- Restaurations de dents caduques

- Restaurations de dents blanchies

Propriétés d‘Universal white:

- Translucidité bien équilibrée

- Effet de diffusion de la lumière élevé

CONCLUSION

Un composite universel, quatre teintes : Dans le cas de CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, la gamme est tout à fait suffisante pour des restaurations à teinte unique, même dans la zone antérieure si exigeante sur le plan esthétique. Ses propriétés telles qu‘un bon effet d‘adaptation, une grande polissabilité et une rétention de la

brillance dans la durée aident les praticiens dentaires à créer de belles restaurations. Comme la sélection de teinte peut reposer sur seulement quelques critères, contrairement à un guide nuancier complexe, toute la procédure de restauration devient moins stressante et plus efficace. En outre, avec seulement quatre teintes et pas de bloqueur généralement, le nombre de matériaux à conserver est réduit, ce qui facilite également la gestion des stocks.

Dentist:

JUSUF LUKARCANIN

Le Dr Jusuf Lukarcanin est un praticien dentaire certifiée (« Certified Dental Technician », DCT) et dentiste diplômé (« Doctor of Dental Science », DDS). Il a étudié à la faculté dentaire de l‘université Ege à Izmir, en Turquie, où il a obtenu un master en 2011. En 2017, il a obtenu son doctorat au département de dentisterie restaurative de la même université. Entre 2012 et 2019, le Dr Lukarcanin était le médecin en chef et directeur général d‘une clinique dentaire privée à Izmir.

En tant que spécialiste de la dentisterie restaurative, il a exercé entre 2019 et 2020 à l‘hôpital Tinaztepe Galen et entre 2020 et 2022 à l‘hôpital international Medicana d‘Izmir. Actuellement, il est propriétaire d‘une clinique esthétique et cosmétique privée à Izmir.

Case by Dr. Enzo Attanasio

The selection of the restorative material is a crucial step in prosthodontics. Hybrid ceramics offer a range of properties well-suited for various therapeutic situations, both in the presence of vital teeth and of endodontically treated teeth. Using the example of a clinical case, this article will explore the advantages associated with the use of hybrid ceramics in a cracked tooth syndrome scenario.

INITIAL SITUATION

The affected tooth in this case was a mandibular right second premolar (45 according to the FDI notation) with an old amalgam restoration (Figs. 1 and 2). The patient experienced pain upon chewing (specifically upon release). Clinically, there were visible horizontal and vertical crack lines. The tooth was vital and showed no signs of pulpal pathology. It was decided to replace the amalgam restoration and restore the tooth with an overlay made of the hybrid ceramic KATANA™ AVENCIA™ Block. There were two main reasons for this decision. First, whenever root canal treatment would be necessary in the future, the hybrid ceramic material would facilitate endodontic access cavity preparation (compared to any other ceramic material) and subsequent restoration with composite filling material. Second, hybrid ceramics offer greater resistance and improved mechanical properties compared to composite filling materials applied in an incremental layering technique.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Occlusal view.

Fig. 2. Initial situation: Buccal view.

PREPARATION AND IMMEDIATE DENTIN SEALING

To remove the amalgam restoration and weakened surrounding tooth structure, the occlusal surface of the tooth was reduced by approximately 2 mm. For a smooth colour transition between the tooth and the restoration, the preparation outline was created at the level of interproximal boxes with a vestibular inclined plane (Fig. 3). Subsequently, Immediate Dentinal Sealing (IDS) was carried out (Figs. 4 to 10). This technique involves the use of a universal adhesive like CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick, which is applied to the preparation without prior etching of the peripheral enamel. In the second step, a highly filled flowable composite is applied. In the present case, the material of choice was CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low, applied in a thickness of just 0.5 mm. The preparation was refined using ultrasonic instrumentation: Sonic tips SFM7 and SFD7 (Komet Dental) for refining the boxes; SFD1F and SFM1F (Komet Dental) for margins and steps. Sharp edges were rounded with abrasive discs and then polished with fine polishers. It is crucial that the residual occlusal thickness (prosthetic space) is 1.5 mm, as required by the selected material.

Fig. 3. Prepared tooth structure prior to immediate dentin sealing.

Fig. 4. IDS: Application of the universal adhesive.

Fig. 5. IDS: Light curing of the adhesive layer.

Fig. 6. Thin layer of flowable composite applied to the preparation.

Fig. 7. Contouring, …

Fig. 8. … rounding off sharp edges …

Fig. 9. … and polishing of the sealed surface with dedicated instruments.

Fig. 10. Sealed tooth preparation ready for impression taking.

FROM SCANNING TO TRY-IN

Following digital scanning with the intraoral scanner Primescan™ (Dentsply Sirona), MDT Daniele Rondoni produced the restoration (Figs. 11 and 12). The cementation process involves an initial try in phase to assess the marginal fit of the overlay and the contact areas. Testing occlusion at this stage could be risky as it may lead to fracture of the restoration in case of excessive premature contacts. After try-in (when carried out without rubber dam), the restoration may be contaminated by blood, saliva, or glycerin gel used for the evaluation of fit and aesthetics. Therefore, it is necessary to clean the restoration before proceeding with adhesive phases. The use of a cotton pellet soaked in alcohol is an option, a cleaning agent like KATANA™ Cleaner may be even better as it chemically cleans the restoration and eliminates the contaminants.

Fig. 11. Hybrid ceramic overlay on the printed model.

Fig. 12. Separate overlay.

CONDITIONING OF THE TOOTH AND THE RESTORATION

Afterwards, the restoration was sandblasted (as recommended for most hybrid ceramics) with 50 μm aluminum oxide using AquaCare (Akura Medical) (Fig. 13), and then immersed in distilled water in an ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes. Meanwhile, rubber dam was placed over the entire sextant, the build-up was sandblasted like the intaglio of the overlay and a phosphoric acid etchant (Ultra Etch, Ultradent) was applied to the enamel, rinsed off and the area dried (Figs. 14 to 17). The clean restoration was subsequently conditioned with a silane containing 10-MDP (CLEARFIL™ Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Fig. 18). What followed was the application of the universal adhesive (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick) to the intaglio of the overlay and to the preparation and light curing on both sites (Figs. 19 and 20). One of the advantages of universal adhesives compared to three-step adhesive systems is their minimal film thickness, which does not compromise the fit of the restoration.

It is important to protect adjacent teeth with metal matrix strips during adhesive phases to provide for proper fitting. These elements do not create operational difficulties, but serve their purpose: After restoration placement, the composite or cement used for placement will be easily removable from the mesial and distal surfaces of the adjacent teeth, as they are free of adhesive.

Fig. 13. Sandblasting of the overlay …

Fig. 14. … and the tooth structure.

Fig. 15. Selective etching of the enamel, …

Fig. 16. … followed by thorough rinsing. Adjacent teeth are protected by a metal matrix strip.

Fig. 17. Tooth structure after selective etching, rinsing and drying.

Fig. 18. Silane application.

Fig. 19. Application of the universal adhesive into the overlay.

Fig. 20. Treatment of the tooth structure with the universal adhesive.

DEFINITIVE PLACEMENT

In the present case, a heated composite paste (heated to a temperature of 55 °C) was extruded into the restoration, which was then placed by applying slow, gradual, and strong pressure (Figs. 21 and 22). Excess composite was removed with a scaler in the buccal and lingual areas and floss (e.g. SuperFloss®, Oral-B) in the interproximal areas. Several pressurization phases were performed until no more composite was observed at the tooth-restoration interface.

Fig. 21. Heated composite paste used for definitive placement.

Fig. 22. Restoration placed under rubber dam isolation.

Then, the composite was polymerized for 30 seconds from the buccal and lingual sides with two curing lights, before applying glycerin gel to the margins and polymerizing from occlusal for another minute (Fig. 23). If thorough attention is given to removing excess composite during placement phases, subsequent finishing steps will be quick and easy (Figs. 24 to 27). Finishing and polishing of the interproximal areas was accomplished with an EVA handpiece and 3M™ Sof-Lex™ Finishing Strips (3M). For finishing of the buccal and lingual areas, a medium-grit, flame-shaped diamond bur (diameter 14/16) was used. Finally, the margins should be polished using composite polishers like TWIST™ DIA for Composite (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After the local anesthesia wears off, one should observe the cessation of pain symptoms, as seen in the present case. The treatment outcome is displayed in Figures 28 and 29.

Fig. 23. Light curing through a layer of glycerin gel blocking the oxygen.

Fig. 24. Finishing of the buccal and lingual margin with a medium-grid, flame-shaped diamond bur.

Fig. 25. Finishing of the interproximal areas with EVA handpiece (fine grain).

Fig. 26. Checking the occlusal contacts.

Fig. 27. Occlusal polishing.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 28. Treatment outcome – buccal view.

Fig. 29. Treatment outcome – occlusal view.

CONCLUSION

For posterior teeth restored with amalgam and a significant level of destruction, restoration replacement with hybrid ceramic overlays can be a great option. Mechanical material properties are usually superior to those of layered composites, processing is possible chairside or labside and comparatively quick (no firing required), while the clinical placement procedure is similar to that involved in placing glass ceramics – with the major difference of sandblasting instead of etching the intaglio of the restoration. One of the most important benefits of hybrid ceramics over glass ceramics, however, is the ability to modify the restoration whenever desired. Endodontic access cavities are easily prepared and closed with composite, contact points are quickly adjusted and the surface is polished or re-polished in next to no time. Moreover, the wear properties are similar to those of tooth structure and patients are happy about a natural touch and feel. The aesthetic properties are quite impressive, too.

Clinical case by Dr. Frank Heldenbergh

The advancements in zirconia in contemporary dentistry nowadays allow for a wider range of applications, including in the anterior sector, and for chairside production using dedicated CAD/CAM systems. Even without a cutback, KATANA™ Zirconia Block (STML), combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), offer an extremely satisfactory aesthetic solution.

In the present patient case, the materials were chosen to replace old PFM crowns on the maxillary central incisors. The planned treatment was in accordance with the patient's wishes, and carried out in a single appointment.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient asked for a replacement of the existing crowns on the two maxillary central incisors (teeth 11 and 21, FDI notation). The porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations had been in place for about thirty years (Figure 1). She desired aesthetic improvements and slight repositioning of these two teeth.

TREATMENT PLAN

In agreement with the patient, it was decided to perform the entire procedure in one appointment: removal of the existing crowns, digital impressions, production, and bonding of new restorations. The periodontium was healthy with no bleeding. The only uncertainty was whether the existing crowns were cemented onto inlay-cores or if they were Richmond crowns. A preliminary silicone impression was taken as a precautious measure: in case something unexpected prevented the new crowns from being bonded during the session, it would be easily possible to produce temporary crowns.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

TREATMENT

Using a diamond bur followed by a tungsten carbide bur, the existing crowns were removed, revealing that they indeed were Richmond crowns. Because the anatomy of the intra-radicular posts clearly contraindicates an attempt to remove these posts, it was decided to trim the crowns to transform them into inlay cores rather than risk further damage. The corono-peripheral preparations were reworked at the same time. One of the major challenges was related to the necessity of masking the metal of the transformed coronal-radicular reconstructions. Luckily, the space available was sufficient for the production of full zirconia crowns with a significant thickness (Figure 2). The target shade of the crowns was chosen in consultation with the patient (Figure 3).

Fig. 2. Situation after removal of the existing restorations.

Fig. 3. Shade determination using a shade tab: A2 was the appropriate shade.

Subsequently, impressions were taken using and intraoral scanner, the virtual models were checked and the crowns designed, considering the patient's request to have her two incisors slightly retracted (Figures 4 and 5).

Fig. 4. Virtual models of the patient’s teeth with the newly designed crowns, revealing the space available for a slight retraction.

Fig. 5. Designing of the two crowns.

The two crowns were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia Block 14Z A2 (Figure 6). A quick reminder: unlike lithium disilicate, zirconia prosthetic parts cannot be tried in immediately after milling, as they are around 20 percent larger than their final size after sintering. Final sintering was performed within about 18 minutes using the furnace SINTRA CS (ShenPaz Dental Ltd). After this process, the crowns may be tried on to check their fit, shape, shade and optical integration.

Fig. 6. Milled crowns in the CAD/CAM blocks.

For finishing of the restorations, different options are available. In this case, we decided not to limit ourselves to mechanical polishing of the prosthetic parts, as zirconia does not fluoresce like natural teeth. To add fluorescence as an optical feature, the surface was lightly stained and glazed with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (Figure 7).

Fig. 7. Crowns in the furnace after staining and glazing with liquid ceramics.

After firing, the two incisor crowns were tried in again using a try-in paste corresponding to the chosen resin cement system (PANAVIA™ V5, Kuraray Noritake Dental). In this way, the final appearance was simulated to validate the shade of the cement. The intaglio surfaces of the crowns were then sandblasted before applying CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS as the restoration primer. The prepared teeth were treated with KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) to decontaminate the surface from proteins in saliva and possibly blood. Those clean surfaces are ideal for bonding. After thorough rinsing and drying, PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer (containing MDP monomer for bonding with the hydroxyapatite and metal of the preparation) was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 8).

Fig. 8. Selected cementation system and try-in.

Subsequently, PANAVIA™ V5 Paste was applied into the first crown, which was then seated, followed by tack curing (brief photopolymerization for three to five seconds), excess removal and final light curing from all sides.

The procedure was then repeated for the second maxillary central incisor. The result instantly satisfied the patient, both in terms of aesthetics (adaptation, position of the new crowns, mimicry) and the comfort provided (Figures 9 and 10).

Fig. 9. Crowns immediately after placement.

Fig. 10. Aesthetically pleasing and comfortable result.

At a recall after four months, soft tissue conditions were ideal and the patient was happy with the outcome (Figures 11 to 13). The selected zirconia had nice optical properties, masking of the metal posts was successful and the natural surface texture contributed its share to a nice overall picture. The retracted position of the teeth was also perceived positively by the patient, while comfort and function were excellent.

DISCUSSION

Although lithium disilicate has so far been considered the material of choice for prosthetic work in the anterior region, zirconia is nowadays proving to be an extremely satisfactory alternative from every point of view: milling, strength, aesthetics, assembly (among other things, no hydrofluoric acid is required for bonding). KATANA™ Zirconia Blocks (STML) with a multi-layered colour structure in a single 4Y-TZP zirconia block, combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain, offer a remarkable solution. This applies to treatments around the replacement of existing crowns as well as first-line treatments with less invasive preparations (verti-prep) than those required by other types of ceramics.

Fig. 11. The patient’s smile at a recall after four months.

Fig. 12. Great optical integration.

Fig. 13. Natural surface texture contributing to success Control pictures after four months taken by Emmanuel Charleux.

Case by Aleksandra Łyżwińska DMD, Warsaw, Poland

Dental injuries can be stressful for patients, parents of pediatric patients, and dentists alike. The following tips offer support in turning the treatment of crown fractures into a simple, quick and predictable procedure. In the case described, we opted for a reattachment of fractured crown fragments.

YOUNG PATIENT WITH A FRACTURED CENTRAL INCISOR

A 16-year-old patient presented immediately after an accident. Her maxillary left central incisor was fractured, involving half of the coronal enamel and dentin (Fig. 1). The pulp was not involved, but the fracture line was quite close to the pulp (Fig. 2). After examination and radiographic evaluation, the patient was anesthetized. When placing the rubber dam, it tore between the left central and lateral incisor (Figs. 3 and 4). Due to the patient’s young age and limited willingness to cooperate, the decision was made to proceed without replacing the rubber dam. This was expected to work well in this specific region due to the limited flow of saliva from the palate and a low associated risk of contamination.

Fig. 1. Fractured maxillary left central incisor at the day of the accident.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the maxillary anterior teeth with the pulp of the fractured central incisor shining through.

Fig. 3. Rubber dam placed and torn between the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 4. Occlusal view of the teeth isolated with rubber dam.

REMOVAL OF UNSUPPORTED ENAMEL PRISMS

In order to provide for a high-quality bond and natural aesthetics, unsupported enamel prisms should be removed. As the use of burs might be too invasive (removing too much structure) and thus hinder the alignment of crown fragments, air-abrasion with 50 μm alumina particles was the method of choice. To avoid iatrogenic pulp exposure, the deepest part of the affected tooth was protected with a colored flowable composite before sandblasting (Fig. 5). The adjacent teeth were protected using a metal strip (Fig. 6). Several seconds of air abrasion were sufficient to remove the enamel prisms and obtain a homogeneous enamel surface (Fig. 7). Subsequently, the colored flowable composite was removed from the dentin surface and the tooth fragment was treated in the same way.

Fig. 5. Preparations for sandblasting: Dentin area near the pulp protected with flowable composite.

Fig. 6. Protection of the adjacent teeth with a metal strip.

Fig. 7. Homogeneous enamel surface after air abrasion.

JOINING OF THE FRAGMENT WITH THE REMAINING TOOTH STRUCTURE

After air-abrasion treatment, the fit of the tooth and the fragment was checked and approved (Fig. 8). To improve retention of the fractured crown portion, it was bonded to a micro applicator using composite resin. Alternatively, prefabricated prosthetic carriers may be used. Then, selective etching of the enamel was performed on the tooth and the fragment (Figs. 9 and 10). During this procedure, the adjacent teeth were protected with a celluloid strip (Fig. 11). To better adapt the strip to the distal surface, a curved wedge was placed interproximally (Fig. 12).

The bonding system of choice was CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After applying this adhesive to the tooth and the fragment (Fig. 13), a small portion of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A2 was applied to the part of the fragment treated with adhesive.* After careful repositioning of the fragment and while holding it in place with the micro applicator, the composite was light cured.

Fig. 8. Perfect fit of the fragment to the tooth.

Fig. 9. Selective etching of the enamel on the tooth …

Fig. 10. … and the fragment.

Fig. 11. Position of the wedge …

Fig. 12. … used for better adaptation to the distal surface.

Fig. 13. Fragment treated with CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 PRIMER and BOND, which were both carefully air-dried, while the Bond was also light cured.

Fig. 14. Fragment back in place.

Fig. 15. Occlusal view of the teeth with the reattached fragment perfectly fitting the mould.

EXCESS REMOVAL AND POLISHING

Excess composite was removed with a scalpel blade and abrasive discs. The entire restoration was then polished using TWIST™ DIA for Composite (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Fig. 16). A nice optical integration was obtained immediately after finishing due to fact that the fragment was stored in water during the waiting time and treatment. As observed with teeth isolated with rubber dam during treatment, teeth undergo dehydration outside the oral cavity. The effect is much stronger in the latter setting, making a fragment become chalky white. By keeping the fragment in water, dehydration is limited to a minimum and it is possible to properly evaluate the aesthetic outcome. This has a positive impact on patient satisfaction. In the present case, the fragment and the tooth structure had a similar appearance, both showing a slightly increased brightness as a result of manipulation under rubber dam or in the air, respectively.

Fig. 16. Immediately after polishing, the fragment has almost the same brightness as the tooth thanks to water storage. A slight dehydration effect is visible.

TREATMENT OUTCOME

To achieve optimal aesthetics and long-lasting gloss, the composite was repolished one week later (Fig. 17). This was accomplished with a light blue high-shine rubber polisher of the TWIST™ DIA for Composite system, followed by polishing with diamond paste and a goat hair brush.

Fig. 17. Treatment outcome after one week.

Teeth previously isolated with a rubber dam and the fractured crown fragment had undergone rehydration and returned to their natural colour. The colour adaptation is satisfactory. Harmonious light reflections on the labial surface of the treated tooth a beautiful, natural shine have made the fracture site nearly invisible. In addition to aesthetic value, good therapeutic results were also achieved - the tooth responds appropriately to stimuli and is pain-free.

CONCLUSION

The described approach is a valuable treatment option for anterior trauma cases with relatively large fragments that are still available. By reattaching the natural structure, the need for complicated and time-consuming multi-shade layering and free-hand modeling is eliminated, while all the remaining natural tooth structure is saved. Instead of preparing the tooth, a removal of the unsupported enamel prisms and roughening of the surface is absolutely sufficient. Key elements for a great optical integration and long-lasting success are the proper use of a high-performance adhesive as well as the selection of a composite that has the ability to properly blend into its environment and offers a nature-like gloss retention. The selected materials offer precisely these features, so that the great outcome may be expected to last.

*CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low is indicated for cementation purposes. The cementation of tooth fragments, however, is not explicitly mentioned in the instructions for use. The decision to use the product in this context was made by the dental practitioner in charge of the treatment.