429 Too Many Requests

Clinical case by Dr. Frank Heldenbergh

The advancements in zirconia in contemporary dentistry nowadays allow for a wider range of applications, including in the anterior sector, and for chairside production using dedicated CAD/CAM systems. Even without a cutback, KATANA™ Zirconia Block (STML), combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), offer an extremely satisfactory aesthetic solution.

In the present patient case, the materials were chosen to replace old PFM crowns on the maxillary central incisors. The planned treatment was in accordance with the patient's wishes, and carried out in a single appointment.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient asked for a replacement of the existing crowns on the two maxillary central incisors (teeth 11 and 21, FDI notation). The porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations had been in place for about thirty years (Figure 1). She desired aesthetic improvements and slight repositioning of these two teeth.

TREATMENT PLAN

In agreement with the patient, it was decided to perform the entire procedure in one appointment: removal of the existing crowns, digital impressions, production, and bonding of new restorations. The periodontium was healthy with no bleeding. The only uncertainty was whether the existing crowns were cemented onto inlay-cores or if they were Richmond crowns. A preliminary silicone impression was taken as a precautious measure: in case something unexpected prevented the new crowns from being bonded during the session, it would be easily possible to produce temporary crowns.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

TREATMENT

Using a diamond bur followed by a tungsten carbide bur, the existing crowns were removed, revealing that they indeed were Richmond crowns. Because the anatomy of the intra-radicular posts clearly contraindicates an attempt to remove these posts, it was decided to trim the crowns to transform them into inlay cores rather than risk further damage. The corono-peripheral preparations were reworked at the same time. One of the major challenges was related to the necessity of masking the metal of the transformed coronal-radicular reconstructions. Luckily, the space available was sufficient for the production of full zirconia crowns with a significant thickness (Figure 2). The target shade of the crowns was chosen in consultation with the patient (Figure 3).

Fig. 2. Situation after removal of the existing restorations.

Fig. 3. Shade determination using a shade tab: A2 was the appropriate shade.

Subsequently, impressions were taken using and intraoral scanner, the virtual models were checked and the crowns designed, considering the patient's request to have her two incisors slightly retracted (Figures 4 and 5).

Fig. 4. Virtual models of the patient’s teeth with the newly designed crowns, revealing the space available for a slight retraction.

Fig. 5. Designing of the two crowns.

The two crowns were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia Block 14Z A2 (Figure 6). A quick reminder: unlike lithium disilicate, zirconia prosthetic parts cannot be tried in immediately after milling, as they are around 20 percent larger than their final size after sintering. Final sintering was performed within about 18 minutes using the furnace SINTRA CS (ShenPaz Dental Ltd). After this process, the crowns may be tried on to check their fit, shape, shade and optical integration.

Fig. 6. Milled crowns in the CAD/CAM blocks.

For finishing of the restorations, different options are available. In this case, we decided not to limit ourselves to mechanical polishing of the prosthetic parts, as zirconia does not fluoresce like natural teeth. To add fluorescence as an optical feature, the surface was lightly stained and glazed with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (Figure 7).

Fig. 7. Crowns in the furnace after staining and glazing with liquid ceramics.

After firing, the two incisor crowns were tried in again using a try-in paste corresponding to the chosen resin cement system (PANAVIA™ V5, Kuraray Noritake Dental). In this way, the final appearance was simulated to validate the shade of the cement. The intaglio surfaces of the crowns were then sandblasted before applying CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS as the restoration primer. The prepared teeth were treated with KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) to decontaminate the surface from proteins in saliva and possibly blood. Those clean surfaces are ideal for bonding. After thorough rinsing and drying, PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer (containing MDP monomer for bonding with the hydroxyapatite and metal of the preparation) was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 8).

Fig. 8. Selected cementation system and try-in.

Subsequently, PANAVIA™ V5 Paste was applied into the first crown, which was then seated, followed by tack curing (brief photopolymerization for three to five seconds), excess removal and final light curing from all sides.

The procedure was then repeated for the second maxillary central incisor. The result instantly satisfied the patient, both in terms of aesthetics (adaptation, position of the new crowns, mimicry) and the comfort provided (Figures 9 and 10).

Fig. 9. Crowns immediately after placement.

Fig. 10. Aesthetically pleasing and comfortable result.

At a recall after four months, soft tissue conditions were ideal and the patient was happy with the outcome (Figures 11 to 13). The selected zirconia had nice optical properties, masking of the metal posts was successful and the natural surface texture contributed its share to a nice overall picture. The retracted position of the teeth was also perceived positively by the patient, while comfort and function were excellent.

DISCUSSION

Although lithium disilicate has so far been considered the material of choice for prosthetic work in the anterior region, zirconia is nowadays proving to be an extremely satisfactory alternative from every point of view: milling, strength, aesthetics, assembly (among other things, no hydrofluoric acid is required for bonding). KATANA™ Zirconia Blocks (STML) with a multi-layered colour structure in a single 4Y-TZP zirconia block, combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain, offer a remarkable solution. This applies to treatments around the replacement of existing crowns as well as first-line treatments with less invasive preparations (verti-prep) than those required by other types of ceramics.

Fig. 11. The patient’s smile at a recall after four months.

Fig. 12. Great optical integration.

Fig. 13. Natural surface texture contributing to success Control pictures after four months taken by Emmanuel Charleux.

Dentist:

FRANK HELDENBERGH

Dr. Frank Heldenbergh graduated with a Doctor of Dental Surgery degree from the University of Reims in 1988.Driven by a passion for prosthetics, he pursued further specialization as a Prosthetic Resident at the UFR Odontology of Reims from 1990 to 1992. Dr. Heldenbergh’s dedication to advancing dental practices led him to join the Board of the Academy of Adhesive Dentistry in 1999. His commitment to this field has been unwavering, and he currently serves as the Vice President of A.D.D.A.-R.C.A.

Recognized for his expertise in ceramic veneers, inlays and onlays, Dr. Heldenbergh supervised practical work for the Paris Odontological Society from 2000 to 2018, shaping the skills of many aspiring dentists. His influence extended to the A.D.F. Congress, where he supervised practical work on ceramic veneers from 2000 to 2016. In 2017, he was the Head of Practical Work at A.D.F., a role that allowed him to further contribute to the advancement of dental education and practices. In 2018, he was the Head of Practical Work for ceramic veneers at the Paris Odontological Society.

Recognizing the importance of technology in modern dentistry, Dr. Heldenbergh pursued a University Degree in CAD/CAM from Toulouse in 2022. This addition to his qualifications highlights his dedication to staying at the forefront of dental innovation.

Case by Aleksandra Łyżwińska DMD, Warsaw, Poland

Dental injuries can be stressful for patients, parents of pediatric patients, and dentists alike. The following tips offer support in turning the treatment of crown fractures into a simple, quick and predictable procedure. In the case described, we opted for a reattachment of fractured crown fragments.

YOUNG PATIENT WITH A FRACTURED CENTRAL INCISOR

A 16-year-old patient presented immediately after an accident. Her maxillary left central incisor was fractured, involving half of the coronal enamel and dentin (Fig. 1). The pulp was not involved, but the fracture line was quite close to the pulp (Fig. 2). After examination and radiographic evaluation, the patient was anesthetized. When placing the rubber dam, it tore between the left central and lateral incisor (Figs. 3 and 4). Due to the patient’s young age and limited willingness to cooperate, the decision was made to proceed without replacing the rubber dam. This was expected to work well in this specific region due to the limited flow of saliva from the palate and a low associated risk of contamination.

Fig. 1. Fractured maxillary left central incisor at the day of the accident.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the maxillary anterior teeth with the pulp of the fractured central incisor shining through.

Fig. 3. Rubber dam placed and torn between the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 4. Occlusal view of the teeth isolated with rubber dam.

REMOVAL OF UNSUPPORTED ENAMEL PRISMS

In order to provide for a high-quality bond and natural aesthetics, unsupported enamel prisms should be removed. As the use of burs might be too invasive (removing too much structure) and thus hinder the alignment of crown fragments, air-abrasion with 50 μm alumina particles was the method of choice. To avoid iatrogenic pulp exposure, the deepest part of the affected tooth was protected with a colored flowable composite before sandblasting (Fig. 5). The adjacent teeth were protected using a metal strip (Fig. 6). Several seconds of air abrasion were sufficient to remove the enamel prisms and obtain a homogeneous enamel surface (Fig. 7). Subsequently, the colored flowable composite was removed from the dentin surface and the tooth fragment was treated in the same way.

Fig. 5. Preparations for sandblasting: Dentin area near the pulp protected with flowable composite.

Fig. 6. Protection of the adjacent teeth with a metal strip.

Fig. 7. Homogeneous enamel surface after air abrasion.

JOINING OF THE FRAGMENT WITH THE REMAINING TOOTH STRUCTURE

After air-abrasion treatment, the fit of the tooth and the fragment was checked and approved (Fig. 8). To improve retention of the fractured crown portion, it was bonded to a micro applicator using composite resin. Alternatively, prefabricated prosthetic carriers may be used. Then, selective etching of the enamel was performed on the tooth and the fragment (Figs. 9 and 10). During this procedure, the adjacent teeth were protected with a celluloid strip (Fig. 11). To better adapt the strip to the distal surface, a curved wedge was placed interproximally (Fig. 12).

The bonding system of choice was CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After applying this adhesive to the tooth and the fragment (Fig. 13), a small portion of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A2 was applied to the part of the fragment treated with adhesive.* After careful repositioning of the fragment and while holding it in place with the micro applicator, the composite was light cured.

Fig. 8. Perfect fit of the fragment to the tooth.

Fig. 9. Selective etching of the enamel on the tooth …

Fig. 10. … and the fragment.

Fig. 11. Position of the wedge …

Fig. 12. … used for better adaptation to the distal surface.

Fig. 13. Fragment treated with CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 PRIMER and BOND, which were both carefully air-dried, while the Bond was also light cured.

Fig. 14. Fragment back in place.

Fig. 15. Occlusal view of the teeth with the reattached fragment perfectly fitting the mould.

EXCESS REMOVAL AND POLISHING

Excess composite was removed with a scalpel blade and abrasive discs. The entire restoration was then polished using TWIST™ DIA for Composite (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Fig. 16). A nice optical integration was obtained immediately after finishing due to fact that the fragment was stored in water during the waiting time and treatment. As observed with teeth isolated with rubber dam during treatment, teeth undergo dehydration outside the oral cavity. The effect is much stronger in the latter setting, making a fragment become chalky white. By keeping the fragment in water, dehydration is limited to a minimum and it is possible to properly evaluate the aesthetic outcome. This has a positive impact on patient satisfaction. In the present case, the fragment and the tooth structure had a similar appearance, both showing a slightly increased brightness as a result of manipulation under rubber dam or in the air, respectively.

Fig. 16. Immediately after polishing, the fragment has almost the same brightness as the tooth thanks to water storage. A slight dehydration effect is visible.

TREATMENT OUTCOME

To achieve optimal aesthetics and long-lasting gloss, the composite was repolished one week later (Fig. 17). This was accomplished with a light blue high-shine rubber polisher of the TWIST™ DIA for Composite system, followed by polishing with diamond paste and a goat hair brush.

Fig. 17. Treatment outcome after one week.

Teeth previously isolated with a rubber dam and the fractured crown fragment had undergone rehydration and returned to their natural colour. The colour adaptation is satisfactory. Harmonious light reflections on the labial surface of the treated tooth a beautiful, natural shine have made the fracture site nearly invisible. In addition to aesthetic value, good therapeutic results were also achieved - the tooth responds appropriately to stimuli and is pain-free.

CONCLUSION

The described approach is a valuable treatment option for anterior trauma cases with relatively large fragments that are still available. By reattaching the natural structure, the need for complicated and time-consuming multi-shade layering and free-hand modeling is eliminated, while all the remaining natural tooth structure is saved. Instead of preparing the tooth, a removal of the unsupported enamel prisms and roughening of the surface is absolutely sufficient. Key elements for a great optical integration and long-lasting success are the proper use of a high-performance adhesive as well as the selection of a composite that has the ability to properly blend into its environment and offers a nature-like gloss retention. The selected materials offer precisely these features, so that the great outcome may be expected to last.

*CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low is indicated for cementation purposes. The cementation of tooth fragments, however, is not explicitly mentioned in the instructions for use. The decision to use the product in this context was made by the dental practitioner in charge of the treatment.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA DMD

Aleksandra Łyżwińska graduated from the Medical University of Warsaw, where she later served as a lecturer and assistant in the Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics. In her daily practice, she focuses on the broad field of adhesive dentistry. She is passionate about minimally invasive techniques and vital pulp therapy. Since 2020, she has been conducting courses in conservative dentistry, collaborating with major training centers in Poland and around the world. She is a key opinion leader for Kuraray Noritake. In her training sessions, she demonstrates that dental caries management doesn‘t have to be boring, and that the bond in the bottle is just as exciting as a spy movie. Instagram users know her as the creator of the educational profile for dentist @aleksandra.lyzwinska.

Case by Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin

For all cases that require a particularly bright tooth shade – e.g. children or patients with bleached teeth / asking for a bleached effect in their restorations – CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade UW is likely to be the first choice. The young patient aged 28 shown below asked for diastema closure including shape and shade correction: She wanted to have a brighter, more beautiful smile.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Shape and shade correction were desired in this case.

Fig. 3. Treatment outcome …

Fig. 4. … leading to the beautiful smile the patient desired.

Reasons for selecting universal white:

- Cases requiring a particularly high brightness or value

- Restorations in deciduous teeth

- Restorations in bleached teeth

Universal white properties:

- Well-balanced translucency

- High light-scattering effect

CONCLUSION

One universal composite, four shades: In the case of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, this portfolio is absolutely sufficient for single-shade restorations even in the aesthetically demanding anterior region. Properties such as a nice blend-in effect, a great polishability and gloss retention over time support dental practitioners in creating beautiful restorations. As shade determination may be based on very few criteria instead of a complex shade guide, the whole restoration procedure becomes less stressful and more efficient. Furthermore, with only four shades to stock and usually no blocker needed, the number of materials on stock is reduced, leading to facilitations in stock management as well.

Dentist:

JUSUF LUKARCANIN

Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin is a Certified Dental Technician (DCT) and a Doctor of Dental Science (DDS). He studied dentistry at the Ege University Dental Faculty in Izmir, Turkey, where he obtained a Master‘s degree in 2011. In 2017, he received a Ph.D. degree from the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the same university. Between 2012 and 2019, Dr. Lukarcanin was the head doctor and general manager at a private clinic in Izmir.

Between 2019 and 2020, he worked at Tinaztepe GALEN Hospital as a Restorative Dentistry specialist, between 2020-2022 he worked at MEDICANA International Hospital Izmir as a Restorative Dentistry specialist. Currently he is an owner of a private clinic for aesthetics and cosmetics in Izmir.

Case by Dr. Enzo Attanasio

The introduction of new-generation composites, equipped with nanofillers and highly loaded, has opened doors to new techniques for managing direct and semi-direct restorations. In particular, over the last ten years, there has been a significant revolution in the world of flowable composites. Nowadays, these materials offer a filler percentage very similar to packable composites through precise interventions in resin matrix management. They come in various viscosities, offering numerous advantages both in terms of handling and clinical use, as well as beneficial mechanical and physical characteristics.

FLOWABLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE

This new era of flowable composites has seen the development of a technique known as the Flowable Injection Technique (also referred to as injection moulding). It enables dental practitioners to reproduce anatomical forms created by a dental technician in the laboratory through a diagnostic wax-up. The shapes planned on the model are transferred directly in the patient's mouth using transparent silicone matrices or indexes, into which the composite is injected through specific injection holes.

The main difference compared to traditional mock-ups is that the reproduced dental elements remain separate from each other. This technique provides predictable results identical to those developed on the technician's wax-up, requiring less chair time than direct veneering and offering a longevity similar to traditional composite restorations.

BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

The major benefit of this technique is the faithful reproduction of morphological details that the technician creates on the diagnostic wax-up, which the clinician can reproduce with minimal effort. The restoration produced through the flowable injection technique, if all steps are followed correctly, requires minimal finishing by the clinican, who only needs to focus on polishing the composite.

However, one limitation is the difficulty in isolating the operative field, often requiring a split-dam technique or labial retractors, with all the associated adhesive challenges. The use of a rubber dam is only feasible if the peripheral dental tissues around the restoration are euchromatic, allowing the technician to create a wax-up with supragingival preparation margins.

Another compromise with the flowable injection technique is the management of the composite as a single mass. This makes it only possible to reproduce natural incisal translucencies typical of young patients by performing complex cutbacks and subsequent incisal painting. Without specific operator skills, the outcomes of this time-consuming manual procedure are unpredictable.

HYBRID TECHNIQUE: BEST.FIT

To leverage the advantages of both classical direct anterior restoration and flowable injection techniques and eliminate the limitations, a hybrid technique known as BEST.FIT (Buccal Enamel Shade Through Flow Injection Technique) has emerged. This technique allows the operator to manage the delicate phase of reproducing the buccal enamel layer of the anterior restoration through the flowable injection technique, keeping certain aspects in mind during the injection phase.

PROCEDURE

The transparent silicone key used for the creation of the buccal enamel layer is similar to the one used in the original flowable injection technique. The initial phase of restoration management follows all the classical steps of direct technique, requiring isolation with rubber dam. The palatal enamel layer is recreated with a highly translucent packable composite, and the palatal portion of the interproximal walls is produced using a suitable matrix system. Then, the core of the restoration is defined with opaque masses, creating mamelons and adding incisal effects. It's crucial to control the residual enamel thickness using a vestibular silicone index, aiming for about 0.3 mm of space. The buccal portion is finally reconstructed during the injection phase. The transparent silicone index created on the wax-up should be tested after each reconstruction phase to ensure passive insertion.

After creating the restoration core, the element to be injected is separated from the contiguous ones with thin PTFE tape. The transparent mask is then inserted, and fluid composite is injected through the injection holes to precisely reconstruct the buccal enamel thickness. The composite tip should be positioned at least halfway through the buccal surface, and the injection should be slow and controlled to avoid air bubbles in the material.

FINISHING

Following a 40-second polymerization vestibularly and occlusally, the transparent matrix is carefully removed, and excess interproximal composite above the PTFE tape as well as any remaining composite cylinder from the injection holes are removed. After completing all restorative elements, the rubber dam is dismantled, and composite excess is finished. After checking the occlusion, the composite is polished, usually requiring no further intervention.

CASE EXAMPLE

Fig. 1. Female patient with discoloured anterior restorations desiring a smile makeover.

Fig. 2. Close-up of her maxillary anterior teeth.

Fig. 3. Restorations in need of replacement: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 4. Restorations in need of replacement: Lateral view from the left.

Fig. 5. Printed model based on a digital diagnostic wax-up based on a digital impression.

Fig. 6. Palatal silicone index produced for the conventional direct restoration steps.

Fig. 7. Transparent matrix with injection holes produced for the build-up of the buccal enamel layer using the flowable injection technique.

Fig. 8. Operative field isolated with rubber dam.

Fig. 9. Existing restorations removed and tooth surfaces roughened at the start of treatment.

Fig. 10. Palatal silicone index positioned intraorally for the build-up of the palatal wall.

Fig. 11. Checking of the space available in the vestibular area with a second silicone index.

Fig. 12. Etching with phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 13. Application of a universal adhesive (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 14. Palatal walls built up with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1E with the aid of the palatal silicone index.

Fig. 15. Build-up of the interproximal walls with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1D and establishing of the contact points using anatomical sectional matrices for the posterior area placed vertically.

Fig. 16. Dentin core built up with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A2D. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low in the shade XW was applied on the mamelons, while CHROMA ZONE™ COLOR STAIN Blue (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was used to reproduce incisal translucencies in the spaces not covered by the dentin core.

Fig. 17. Try-in of the transparent matrix for flowable injection.

Fig. 18. Isolation of the adjacent teeth with PTFE tape for a one-by-one injection.

Fig. 19. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES FLOW Low in the shade A2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) injected for the anatomical shaping of the maxillary right central incisor.

Fig. 20. Situation after flowable injection for all four anterior teeth, light curing through the matrix, final matrix removal and excess removal.

Fig. 21. Treatment outcome …

Fig. 22. … with visible mamelons, natural incisal translucencies …

Fig. 23. … and a lifelike anatomical shape …

Fig. 24. … of the restorations.

CONCLUSION

Each work phase must be executed with extreme care to lay the foundations for a passive linking of all subsequent steps without creating difficult management situations. The BEST.FIT technique is a convenient and useful method for dental practitioners to manage multiple direct anterior restorations simply and predictably, especially in situations requiring complex rehabilitations with large restorations.

Dentist:

ENZO ATTANASIO

Enzo Attanasio graduated in 2008 in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics from the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro. In 2009, he went on to specialize in the use of laser and new technologies in the treatment of oral and perioral tissues at the University of Florence. That year he also attended Prof. Arnaldo Castellucci’s course in Clinical Endodontics at the Teaching Center of Microendodontics in Florence where, in 2012, he went on to complete his training in Surgical Microendodontics. In 2017 he attended a course on Direct and indirect Adhesive Restorations at Prof. Riccardo Becciani’s Think Adhesive training center in Florence where he later become a tutor. Today, as a member of the Italian AIC and based in Lamezia Terme, Italy, Dr Attanasio has a special interest in Endodontics and Aesthetic Conservative.

Case by Andreas Chatzimpatzakis

Observe and copy: This is the key to nature-like dental restorations. There are many optical effects, colour transitions and morphological details in natural teeth that need to be taken in and understood – and replicating them is only possible for those who know exactly how their materials work. Once these skills are acquired, however, they enable a dental technician to produce their restorations as truly beautiful copies of nature. Even when restoring a single maxillary central incisor, the technique delivers outstanding – or inconspicuous - outcomes, as revealed by the following example.

Using high-quality, translucent and gradient-shaded zirconia frameworks and porcelains, the layering technique does not have to be highly complicated. Two bakes and a number of selected effect liquids, internal stains and porcelains are usually sufficient for outcomes that exceed expectations.

CASE EXAMPLE

In the present case, a young male patient had a quite opaque crown on his maxillary right central incisor that needed to be replaced. During shade selection in the dental laboratory (Fig. 1), it was observed that the cervical third of the adjacent central incisor is lighter than the rest. Its shade in other areas corresponded to B4 on the VITA classical A1-D4^® Shade Guide. Hence, it was decided to use a somewhat lighter material for the framework and darken the restoration especially in the middle and incisal areas with internal stains.

The concrete plan was to mill a coping made of KATANA™ Zirconia STML (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A3, characterize it with Esthetic Colorant (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) and sinter the piece (Figs 2 to 4). In the following layering procedure including just two bakes, a combination of internal stains and selected porcelains (CERABIEN™ ZR, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied as illustrated in Figures 5 to 12. Figures 13 to 17 display the result on the model, minor adjustments during try-in and the final treatment outcome.

Fig. 1. Shade selection. The cervical third of the adjacent central incisor is lighter than usual compared to the middle and incisal areas.

Fig. 2. Coping made of KATANA™ Zirconia STML in the shade A3.

Fig. 3. Intensification of some shade characteristics of the multi-layered blank using Esthetic Colorant in the shades Grey (middle) and Blue and Grey (incisal area).

Fig. 4. Coping after sintering.

Fig. 5. Colour map for internal staining, using CERABIEN™ ZR Internal Stains.

Fig. 6. Result of the use of Shade Base Stain Modifier Fluoro to increase the fluorescence and internal staining as planned.

Fig. 7. Application of Opacious Body OBA2, …

Fig. 8. … Translucent Tx …

Fig. 9.: … and Luster CCV-2.

Fig. 10. Crown after the first bake.

Fig. 11. Crown after the application of CERABIEN™ ZR Internal Stains: A+, Aqua Blue 2, White mixed with Cervical 2 (ratio: 30/70) for the cracks, and Cervical 2.

Fig. 12. Application of Luster LT1 to finalize the shape.

Fig. 13. Finished crown after the second bake on the model.

Fig. 14. Evaluation of the surface texture: Observing and copying the surface details is as important as the imitation of the shade characteristics.

Fig. 15. Minor texture adjustments during try-in.

Fig. 16. Final restoration in place after cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 17. Treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

Mastering the art of observing natural teeth is the key to lifelike restorations. It allows a dental technician to develop a deep understanding of shade and morphology, which is – apart from knowing the selected materials very well – the only talent needed to reach a high level of excellence. Those who are observant and take in every detail with their eyes can be sure that their mind will understand and their hands will automatically follow.

Dental technician:

ANDREAS CHATZIMPATZAKIS

Andreas graduated from the Dental Technology Institute (TEI) of Athens in 1999. During his studies he followed a program at the Helsinki Polytechnic Department of Dental Technique, where he trained on implant superstructures and all ceramic prosthetic restorations. As of 2000, he is running the ACH Dental Laboratory in Athens, Greece, specialized on refractory veneers, zirconia and long span implant prosthesis. In 2017 Andreas visited Japan where he trained under the guidance of Hitoshi Aoshima, Naoto Yuasa and Kazunabu Yamanda and become International Trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc..

Case by Vasiliki Tsertsidou

What kind of resin composite is recommended for core build-up procedures? While there are specific dual-cure core build-up resin composites available on the market, it is not mandatory to use them. Light curing is advisable to be applied even for materials with dual-cure polymerization. Some conventional resin composites demonstrate more favourable properties for a core build-up compared to specific core build-up resin composites itself.¹ Hence, it is possible to utilize a composite generally used in the dental office, provided it is indicated to and it is not applied deep within the root canal, where proper light curing would be impossible. The critical material properties for core build-ups are high filler load, sufficient flexural modulus and flexural strength.

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 composite series (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) are suitable option for this case. With a filler load weight percentage of 78 and a flexural strength of 118 MPa (according to manufacturer), CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic corresponds to core build-up prerequisites*. The following case is illustrating the clinical procedure.

*The indication range of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 composite does not cover core build-up. In the specific case it is used for creating a large Class II filling where all conditions from the IFU, such as curing depth, are met.

Fig. 1. Endodontically treated tooth with a vertical fracture of palatal wall on maxillary right second premolar.

Fig. 2. Buccal view of the tooth.

Fig. 3. Clinical image, directly after removal of fragment.

Fig. 4. Fragment of the maxillary right second premolar.

Fig. 5. Circumferential matrix band for build-up to assist endodontic retreatment.

Fig. 6. Build-up of the missing walls (margin relocation) with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (A3).

Fig. 7. Temporary filling of the cavity.

Fig. 8. Replacement of the temporary filling material with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic.

Fig. 9. Crown preparation.

Fig. 10. Proximal carious lesion present on the adjacent fist premolar.

Fig. 11. Situation after rubber dam placement and caries removal.

Fig. 12. Cavity restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic.

Fig. 13. Prepared crown.

Fig. 14. Crown after sandblasting of the intaglio.

Fig. 15. Mechanically cleaned abutment tooth ready for pre-treatment.

Fig. 16. Intaglio of the crown treated with CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS.

Fig. 17. Etching of the composite surface with phosphoric acid gel.

Fig. 18. Air-drying of PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer on the abutment tooth.

Fig. 19. Crown in place after cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 Paste and excess removal.

A GOOD CHOICE

Dual-cure core build-up resin composites are two-component materials that need to be mixed homogeneously, which obstracts composition from containing high filler load. However, to prevent deformation of the core, a highly filled composite is advisable. This better simulates the flexural modulus of natural tissues compared to materials with low filler load. Consequently, a light-curing material like CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 might be a better option. Applied in 2-mm increments in the core area (and not in the root canal), it performs well and provides the desired outcomes. Additionaly, the option of utilising the same material as for any other type of direct restorations is simplifying the stock management and supporting dental practitioners striving for a simplification of clinical procedures.

References

1. Spinhayer L, Bui ATB, Leprince JG, Hardy CMF. Core build-up resin composites: an in-vitro comparative study. Biomater Investig Dent. 2020 Nov 3;7(1):159-166. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1838283. PMID: 33210097; PMCID: PMC7646551.

Dentist:

VASILIKI TSERTSIDOU

Tohtori Clarence Tam, HBSC, DDS, AAACD, FIADFE

Posliinilaminaatteja käytetään yleisesti esteettisissä hammashoidoissa etuhampaiden muodon, sävyn ja asennon korjaamiseen. Biomimeettisellä hampaiden korjauksella pyritään parantamaan hampaiden ulkonäön lisäksi myös niiden toiminnallisia ominaisuuksia. On tärkeää pitää mielessä, että etuhampaiden luontainen taivutusmurtolujuus on pitkälti riippuvainen ehjästä suulaki- ja fakiaalipintojen kiillekerroksesta. Jos hammas on vaurioitunut endodonttisen toimenpiteen, karieksen ja/tai trauman seurauksena, on pyrittävä säilyttämään jäljelle jäänyt hammasrakenne mahdollisimman hyvin, ja palauttamaan luonnonhampaan lähtötason ominaisuudet, tai parantamaan niitä.

TAUSTA

55-vuotias naispuolinen potilas, joka hakeutui vastaanotolle hampaiden valkaisua varten. ASA II -luokka. Hampaiden valkaisun ei arvioitu vaikuttavan olemassa olevan hampaan 1,2 posliinilaminaatin sävyyn. Laminaattikäsittely olisi uusittava toimenpiteen jälkeen, etenkin jos sävyarvojen muutokset olisivat merkittäviä. Potilaan yläetuhampaiden lähtötasosävyinä oli VITA* 1M1 ja 2M1 (50:50) ja alaetuhampaiden 1M1. Käytettyään karbamidiperoksidia (10 %) sisältävää valkaisulusikkaa öisin 3-4 viikon ajan potilas onnistui saavuttamaan valkaisutuloksen VITA* 0M3 sekä ylä- että ala hammaskaaressa. Valkaisun seurauksena hampaan 1,2 laminaatilla ja viereisellä hampaalla oli huomattava kirkkausero, minkä lisäksi kontralateraalisessa hampaassa 2,2 havaittiin kroman lisäystä fakiaalipintoihin vaikuttavan luokan III yhdistelmämuovipaikan vuoksi. Jälkimmäinen hammas ei myöskään vastannut kontralateraalihampaan mittoja, minkä vuoksi molempiin lateraaliseen kakkoshampaaseen päätettiin laittaa sidostetut litiumdisilikaattilaminaatit. Viereisessä kulmahampaassa (2,3) oli havaittavissa vähäistä tai kohtalaista kuspien kärkien kulumista, mutta potilas ei halunnut käsitellä asiaa ennen aiemmin mainittujen laminaattien asentamista. Esteettisen hammashoidon päätavoitteena oli tässä vaiheessa bilateraalisen harmonian saavuttaminen. Lähitulevaisuudessa hampaaseen 2,3 oli tarkoitus lisätä epäsuora täyte kuspien kärkien ja fakiaalipintojen normaalin muodon palauttamiseksi.

TOIMENPIDE

Lateraalisten kakkoshampaiden hammaskohtaiseen hoitoon (ensimmäinen hoidonaihe) ei tarvittu Digital Smile Design -protokollaa. Pieni vaihtelu hyväksytään tällaisessa hammastyypissä, sillä se tekee hymystä persoonallisemman ja ilmentää henkilön sukupuolta. Tavoitesävy valittiin ennen anestesiaa polarisoitujen ja polarisoitumattomien kuvien perusteella, jotka oli otettu retraktoria käyttämällä. Valokuvat valmisteltiin digitaalista sävyjen kalibrointia varten ottamalla vertailukuvia, joissa käytettiin 18 % neutraalia harmaavalkotasopainokorttia (kuva 1).

Kuva 1. Vertailukuva, jonka ottamiseen on käytetty 18 % neutraalia harmaakorttia.

Rungon perussävy oli VITA* 0M2 ja aihion sävy BL2. Potilaan anestesiaan käytettiin 1,5 ampullia 2-prosenttista lidokaiiniliuosta ja 1:100 000 adrenaliinia, ennen kuin suuhun asetettiin kofferdamkumi split dam -tekniikalla. Hampaan 1,2 laminaatti leikattiin ja poistettiin hampaasta 1,2. Hampaalle 2,2 tehtiin minimaalisesti invasiivinen laminaattipreparointi (kuva 2). Osa hampaan 1,2 vanhasta mesioinsisiaalibukkaalipalataalipuolisesta yhdistelmämuovipaikasta korvattiin. Ehjä osuus jätettiin paikoilleen. Vanhan yhdistelmämuovipaikan ja uuden täytteen sidostamiseen käytettiin sekä mikrohiukkasabraasiota että silaaniperustaista kiinnitysainetta (CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS). Saumat viimeisteltiin, ja retraktiolankoja liotettiin aluminiinikloridiliuoksessa ennen niiden asettamista ientaskuihin. Preparoitujen tynkien sävyt kirjattiin muistiin. Lopullisten jäljennösten ottamiseen käytettiin metallialustaa ja kevyt- ja paksujuoksuista polyvinyylisiloksaania. Potilaalle asennettiin tilapäislaminaatit, ja mukaan annettiin ohjeet, joissa kehotettiin tarkistamaan sävy laboratoriossa raakapolttovaiheessa (bisque-poltto). Laboratorion valmistamat mallit ovat osoitus tapauksen minimaalisesti invasiivisesta luonteesta.

Kuva 2. Laminaattia varten preparoidut hampaat 1,2 ja 2,2

Tapauksen vastaanoton jälkeen potilas nukutettiin ja tilaspäislaminaatit poistettiin. Preparoidut hampaat revidoitiin, ja sidostettavat pinnat hiekkapuhallettiin, jossa käytettiin 27 mikronin hiukkaskoon alumiinioksidijauhetta 30-40 psi:n (0,2–0,29 Mpa) paineella. Laminaattien lopullisen tuloksen arviointiin käytettiin läpinäkyvää glyseriinipohjaista sovituspastaa (PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste Clear, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) Retraktiolangat asetettiin ientaskuihin ja restauraatioiden sisäpinnan (intaglio) käsittelyyn käytettiin 5-prosenttista fluorivetyhappoa, jonka annettiin vaikuttaa 20 sekuntia, minkä jälkeen hampaalle levitettiin 10-MDP-monomeeria sisältävää silaaniperustaista kiinnitysainetta (CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS) (kuva 3). Hampaan pinta etsattiin 33-prosenttisella ortofosforihapolla, jonka annettiin vaikuttaa 20 sekuntia, minkä jälkeen aine huuhdeltiin pois. Hampaaseen levitettiin 10-DMP-monomeeria sisältävää esikäsittelyainetta (PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer) (kuva 4), joka ilmakuivattiin valmistajan ohjeiden mukaisesti. Laminaattisementtiä (PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste Clear) (kuva 5) lisättiin, ja laminaatit asetettiin paikoilleen. Laminaatti pysyi hyvin paikoillaan ylimääräisen sementin jähmeyden ansiosta kaikkien sauman tarkistustoimenpiteiden aikana ennen 1 sekunnin pistekovetusta (kuva 6).

Kuva 3. CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS -esikäsittelyainetta on lisätty laminaattien sisäpinnoille.

Kuva 4. PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer -esikäsittelyainetta lisätään etsatuille hampaan pinnoille.

Kuva 5. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste Clear -pastaa lisätään preparoitujen laminaattien sisäpinnoille.

Kuva 6. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste heti laminaatin paikoilleen asettamisen jälkeen. Huomaa paksujuoksuisen sementin jähmeys, mikä helpottaa sen poistamista sekä nestemäisessä että geelimäisessä olomuodossa.

Kovetuksen jälkeen sementti oli geelimäistä, joten ylimääräinen sementti oli helppo poistaa, eikä puhdistusta juurikaan tarvittu (kuva 7). Saumat peitettiin läpinäkyvällä glyseriinigeelillä ennen lopullista kovetusta happi-inhibitiokerroksen poistamiseksi (kuva 8).

Kuva 7. Ylimääräisen sementin poisto 1 sekunnin pistekovetuksen jälkeen.

Kuva 8. Laminaattien palataali- ja fakiaalipintojen samanaikainen lopullinen kovetus.

Saumat viimeisteltiin, ja ne kiillotettiin korkeakiiltoisen lopputuloksen saamiseksi. Restauraatioiden purennan sopivuus varmistettiin. Postoperatiiviset kuvat todistavat, että saumat sulautuvat erinomaisesti hammasrakenteeseen (kuva 9).

Kuva 9. Laminaattien 1,2 ja 2,2 postoperatiivinen esteettinen integraatio.

Uutta hymyä arvioitiin polarisoiduilla kuvilla, jotka osoittavat, että restauraatiot sopivat uuteen hymyyn hyvin sekä esteettisiltä että toiminnallisilta ominaisuuksiltaan (kuva 10). Enää puuttuu vain hampaan 2,3 esteettinen augmentaatio, jotta hampaan ulkonäkö vastaisi kontralateraalista kulmahammasta.

VALMIS RESTAURAATIO

Kuva 10. Uudelleenarvioinnissa käytettävä polarisoitu kuva, joka näyttää lopullisen lopputuloksen.

Dentist:

CLARENCE TAM

References

1. Magne P, Douglas WH. Rationalization of esthetic restorative dentistry based on biomimetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(1):5-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00371.x. PMID: 10337285.
2. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):111-21. PMID: 10371912.
3. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. The elastic moduli across various types of resin/dentin interfaces. Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Mar 4. PMID: 18304626.
4. Source: Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. Samples (beam shape; 25 x 2 x 2 mm): The solvents of each material were removed by blowing mild air prior to the test.

Abrasion and shape correction was also the major reason for this 58-year-old female patient to ask for cosmetic dental treatment. She was unhappy with the appearance of the anterior teeth in the maxilla, which showed signs of tooth wear and discolouration. The selected treatment approach was composite veneering with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade UD. The shade was selected based on the indication and the somewhat darker shade of the patient’s natural teeth.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Treatment outcome.

Reasons for selecting universal dark:

- For older patients (tooth shades A3 and darker)

- Situations in which light easily passes through the composite (e.g., Class III, Class IV)

Universal dark properties:

- High light scattering effect

- Well-balanced translucency

Dentist:

JUSUF LUKARCANIN

Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin is a Certified Dental Technician (DCT) and a Doctor of Dental Science (DDS). He studied dentistry at the Ege University Dental Faculty in Izmir, Turkey, where he obtained a Master‘s degree in 2011. In 2017, he received a Ph.D. degree from the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the same university. Between 2012 and 2019, Dr. Lukarcanin was the head doctor and general manager at a private clinic in Izmir.

Between 2019 and 2020, he worked at Tinaztepe GALEN Hospital as a Restorative Dentistry specialist, between 2020-2022 he worked at MEDICANA International Hospital Izmir as a Restorative Dentistry specialist. Currently he is an owner of a private clinic for aesthetics and cosmetics in Izmir.

4 Clinical cases by Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin

Composites with a universal shade concept, a reduced number of shades that may be selected without any shade guide are a clear trend in restorative dentistry. With specific blend-in properties, these materials can help streamline restorative procedures and reduce chair time, take some pressure off the dental practitioner and contribute to potentially good outcomes. Some users, however, are skeptical about a wide-scale use of the materials, particularly when it comes to restoring teeth in the anterior region. The reasons may be a comparatively high translucency requiring the separate application of a blocker (or opacious shade) in certain situations, or a too limited shade offering.

Personal experience shows that CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal is perfectly suitable for a wide range of single-shade restorations in anterior teeth. It offers great polishability and long-term gloss retention and is available in just four shades: One universal shade (U) originally designed for posterior restorations, universal light (UL) and universal dark (UD) as the two major options for anterior teeth and, finally, universal white (UW) for the imitation of any bleached shade. In general, all four options may be used in the anterior and posterior region. As the blend-in ability is due to proprietary light-diffusion technology and not managed via an increased translucency, the application of a blocker is usually not necessary and even larger areas can be restored quite inconspicuously.

For those asking themselves when to select which shade in the anterior region, the following clinical case examples and comments may provide some useful guidance. The recommendations and practical tips are based on personal experience. All patients were in treatment for diastema closure or shape correction, but the selection criteria are the same for other types of anterior restorations, too.

UNIVERSAL LIGHT: FOR NATURAL RESULTS IN BRIGHTER TEETH

This young patient aged 35 with microdontia presented in the dental office with the desire to have more beautifully shaped teeth. His teeth were almost free of dental caries, but with deficiencies in oral hygiene and signs of gingival inflammation. A deep bite was also evident. After professional tooth cleaning and oral hygiene advice, the teeth were restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade UL.

Fig. 1. Initial situation.

Fig. 2. Initial situation: Deep bite.

Fig. 3. Teeth restored with composite in the single-shade technique.

Fig. 4. Immediate treatment outcome.

Reasons for selecting universal light:

- For younger patients (tooth shades A2 and lighter)

- Situations in which light easily passes through the composite (e.g., Class III, Class IV)

Universal light properties:

- High light scattering effect

- Well-balanced translucency

UNIVERSAL DARK: FOR NATURAL RESULTS IN DARKER TEETH

Abrasion and shape correction was also the major reason for this 58-year-old female patient to ask for cosmetic dental treatment. She was unhappy with the appearance of the anterior teeth in the maxilla, which showed signs of tooth wear and discolouration. The selected treatment approach was composite veneering with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade UD. The shade was selected based on the indication and the somewhat darker shade of the patient’s natural teeth.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Treatment outcome.

Reasons for selecting universal dark:

- For older patients (tooth shades A3 and darker)

- Situations in which light easily passes through the composite (e.g., Class III, Class IV)

Universal dark properties:

- High light scattering effect

- Well-balanced translucency

UNIVERSAL: WHENEVER A HIGH TRANSLUCENCY IS DESIRED

In teeth in which the areas to be restored are surrounded by a lot of non-discoloured tooth structure - as may be the case in Class I, II and Class V cavities - the use of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade U may be an option. The 28-year-old patient, who presented for diastema closure, had teeth with a comparatively low translucency and different shades due to smoking and excessive coffee consumption. As the composite was applied in enamel areas only, the relatively high translucency of the universal shade seemed beneficial in this case.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. New smile of the patient.

Reasons for selecting universal:

- Large amounts of underlying or surrounding tooth structure present

- Medium light-scattering desired

Universal properties:

- High translucency

- Medium light-scattering effect

UNIVERSAL WHITE: FOR ALL PATIENTS ASKING FOR A BLEACHED EFFECT

For all cases that require a particularly bright tooth shade – e.g. children or patients with bleached teeth / asking for a bleached effect in their restorations – CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade UW is likely to be the first choice. The young patient aged 28 shown below asked for diastema closure including shape and shade correction: She wanted to have a brighter, more beautiful smile.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Shape and shade correction were desired in this case.

Fig. 3. Treatment outcome …

Fig. 4. … leading to the beautiful smile the patient desired.

Reasons for selecting universal white:

- Cases requiring a particularly high brightness or value

- Restorations in deciduous teeth

- Restorations in bleached teeth

Universal white properties:

- Well-balanced translucency

- High light-scattering effect

CONCLUSION

One universal composite, four shades: In the case of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, this portfolio is absolutely sufficient for single-shade restorations even in the aesthetically demanding anterior region. Properties such as a nice blend-in effect, a great polishability and gloss retention over time support dental practitioners in creating beautiful restorations. As shade determination may be based on very few criteria instead of a complex shade guide, the whole restoration procedure becomes less stressful and more efficient. Furthermore, with only four shades to stock and usually no blocker needed, the number of materials on stock is reduced, leading to facilitations in stock management as well.

Dentist:

JUSUF LUKARCANIN

Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin is a Certified Dental Technician (DCT) and a Doctor of Dental Science (DDS). He studied dentistry at the Ege University Dental Faculty in Izmir, Turkey, where he obtained a Master‘s degree in 2011. In 2017, he received a Ph.D. degree from the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the same university. Between 2012 and 2019, Dr. Lukarcanin was the head doctor and general manager at a private clinic in Izmir.

Between 2019 and 2020, he worked at Tinaztepe GALEN Hospital as a Restorative Dentistry specialist, between 2020-2022 he worked at MEDICANA International Hospital Izmir as a Restorative Dentistry specialist. Currently he is an owner of a private clinic for aesthetics and cosmetics in Izmir.

Case by Dr. Ioannis Memis

Single-shade or two-shade approach? Using modern resin composites, it is possible to treat virtually every patient in need of a direct restoration in an aesthetic way using one of those two techniques. If the defect is rather small, a single shade of composite restorative in a body opacity may be sufficient – especially when the tooth to be restored is in the posterior region. Larger defects and those located in the aesthetic zone may require a combination of two different shades – one as a dentin replacement and one as translucent as enamel – to closely imitate the optical characteristics of the natural tooth.

With CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. offers a complete composite system designed to simplify procedures in bot, the single-shade and the two-shade approach. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic is a typical composite for the single-shade technique consisting of 18 shades offered in a single universal opacity. Shade determination is brightness-based, meaning that the brightness is selected first and the hue and colour saturation in a second step (using the VITA Classical A1 – D4 shade guide). For those who want to skip shade determination completely, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal has been introduced. It consists of only two shades for the anterior and one shade for the posterior region, selectable without using shade tabs. For the two-shade technique, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium is the solution: It allows users to copy natural enamel and dentin layers with a total of seven enamel, seven dentin and four translucent shades. Its exceptional feature: pre-defined colour combinations with one Premium shade combination covering three VITA Classical shades. A natural blending into the environment is achieved with the Light Diffusion Technology in the formulation.

All three versions of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 are compatible with each other and offer the same favourable handling properties. The use of different techniques, shades and opacities is demonstrated using the following patient case.

YOUNG PATIENT WITH MULTIPLE CARIOUS LESIONS

A 24-year-old female patient was referred from undergraduate clinic of Operative Dentistry of the Aristotle’s University of Thessaloniki - School of Dentistry (Greece). Patient presented multiple interproximal carious lesions in need of restorative treatment. In the clinical and radiographic examination, the following defects were identified:

Quadrant 1 (maxillary right):

- Distal lesion on the lateral incisor (Class III)

- Mesial and distal lesions on the first premolar (Class II)

- Mesial and distal lesions on the second premolar (Class II)

- Mesial lesion on the first molar (Class II)

Quadrant 2 (maxillary left):

- Distal lesion on the lateral incisor (Class III)

- Mesial lesion on the first premolar (Class II)

- Mesial and distal lesions on the second premolar (both Class II)

- Mesial lesion on the first molar (Class II)

Quadrant 3 (mandibular left):

- Distal lesion on the first molar (Class II)

- Mesial lesion on the second molar (Class II)

In a stepwise procedure, the teeth were restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 either in a single-shade or in a two-shade approach depending on the size of the lesions.

INITIAL SITUATION

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Frontal view.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the maxilla.

Fig. 3. Occlusal view of the mandible.

RESTORING THE TEETH IN QUADRANT 1

The six carious lesions in this quadrant were restored in three steps. At first, the focus was on the first molar and second premolar. Opening the larger cavity mesially of the first molar provided access to the smaller lesion on the premolar’s distal surface. After caries excavation and cavity preparation, rubber dam was placed and fixed with a clamp on the second molar. The enamel in the cavities was treated with phosphoric acid etchant for 15 seconds before CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For a morphologically correct designing of the proximal contact point and area, the use of a sectional matrix system with rings was utilized. Both cavities were restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shades A3D and A2E. Finishing and polishing of the occlusal surface accomplished with silicon cups and Twist Dia disks on a slow speed handpiece.

In the second step, the distal lesion on the first and mesial lesion on the second premolar were restored in an identical procedure with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A3D and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A3. A different approach was selected in step 3 for the lesions on the distal part of the lateral incisor and the mesial part of the first premolar. Due to the small size and the all-but-prominent position of the lesions, a single-shade technique using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A3 was selected. Between the lateral incisor and canine, a posterior sectional matrix was placed in an upright position and fixed with a wedge to support a proper restoration of the contact point, while both elements were used in the usual way between the canine and first premolar.

Fig. 4. Simultaneous restoration of the mesial lesion on the first molar and the distal lesion on the second premolar with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium.

Fig. 5. Restoration of the distal lesion on the lateral incisor and the mesial lesion on the first premolar with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic.

RESTORING THE TEETH IN QUADRANT 2

For the small disto-palatal lesion on the maxillary left lateral incisor, a single-shade technique with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A3 also produced aesthetic outcomes. The four lesions at the posterior region of the quadrant were restored in two steps – one for each pair of proximal lesions – with a combination of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A3D and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A1.

Fig. 6. A single-shade technique is sufficient to aesthetically restore this small lesion on the left lateral incisor.

Fig. 7. Simultaneous restoration of the mesial lesion on the second premolar and the distal lesion on the first premolar.

Fig. 8. Simultaneous restoration of the mesial lesion on the first molar and distal lesion on the second premolar.

RESTORING THE TEETH IN QUADRANT 3

In this quadrant, only a single pair of proximal lesions needed treatment. A simultaneous restoration procedure was selected once again due to the favourable space conditions. Although the size of the lesion was like those in the posterior region of the maxilla, a single-shade restoration was selected with the use of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (shade A3).

Fig. 9. Treatment of the lesions in quadrant 3.

CONCLUSION

In the present patient case, several different shades, opacities, and combinations of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 were utilized either in a single- or in a two-shade approach. All combinations and techniques produced good outcomes. As shown in Figure 4, the enamel opacity of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium is visibly more translucent than the universal opacity of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic. Experience shows that enamel shades translucency is highly valuable for aesthetic anterior restorations, while in posterior restorations, the universal shade approach is aesthetically adequate, particularly for medium-sized restorations, as shown in Figure 9. This is clearly an evidence of Light Diffusion Technology which is blending hue and colour saturation to the surrounding tooth structure.

Handling of all selected composite pastes is comfortable: non-sticky, adaptable to cavity walls and allowing precise occlusal sculpting. Polishing with Silicone Cups and TWIST DIA for Composite is easy, quick and leaves a natural gloss on the surface.Dentist:

DR. IOANNIS MEMIS

Postgraduate Student, Operative Dentistry Dept., School of Dentistry
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece