Compact, time-saving and aesthetic

How many different shades of composite do you need to create appealing restorations in virtually every clinical situation? If you opt for “CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2” Universal shade concept, a few shades will do the trick.

With wonderful support of our internationally recognized key opinion leaders, we have prepared a Clinical Case brochure of “CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2” Universal for you. The brochure highlights a variety of clinical cases in the anterior and posterior region to show the all about excellent properties of our latest composite. Let the pictures speak for themselves!

Click here to view. Enjoy!

Start Reading: Special MAJESTY ES-2 Universal - Clinical Cases Brochure

Case by Dr. Nicola Scotti

When restoring posterior teeth with resin composite, functional aspects such as tight and anatomically correct proximal contacts and a naturally shaped occlusal surface that is wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly are even more important than a perfect optical integration. This is why every dental practitioner should avoid spending a lot of time on shade selection in these cases and focus on the factors that have an impact on the reliability and longevity of the restoration. Great support in accomplishing this task is offered by CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, a resin composite with a single universal shade (U) for the posterior region that eliminates the need for shade taking and selection. At the same time, it offers good marginal adaptation, low shrinkage stress and high wear resistance needed for great long-term results.

Fig. 1. Initial situation with a wide primary carious lesion in the distal aspect of the second premolar.

Fig. 2. Premolar after isolation of the working field with rubber dam, caries excavation and cavity preparation.

Fig. 3. Placement of a sectional matrix and a wedge to optimize the fit. Both are held in place with a separation ring, which increases the interproximal space and hence ensures tight, anatomically correct proximal contacts.

Fig. 4. Build-up of the proximal wall with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (U shade) following selective enamel etching with phosphoric acid (K-ETCHANT Syringe) and bonding with CLEARFIL™ SE Bond.

Fig. 5. A thin layer of flowable composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES FLOW High) applied to the cavity floor to act as a resin coat.

Fig. 6. Restoration completed with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (U shade). While the universal shade composite blends in very well with the surrounding tooth structure, the natural look is completed by adding a tiny bit of brown tint to the fissure.

Fig. 7. Treatment outcome immediately after rubber dam removal. The proximal contact is tight and the occlusal anatomy well-shaped for the patient’s individual masticatory dynamics. The margin of the restoration is virtually invisible, while the buccal cusp appears lighter due to dehydration of the natural tooth structure.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 8. Treatment outcome after two months.

Conclusion

The present case demonstrates that the selected composite is well-suited for simplified restoration procedures in the posterior region. The material handles well, offers the same mechanical properties as other materials from the CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 series and blends in harmoniously with the surrounding structures without being too translucent. This way, it is possible to waive the shade-taking process without compromising the treatment outcome. The time saved in this context may be spent on functional aspects – or even on another patient.

Dentist:

DR. NICOLA SCOTTI

By Paul de Kok, Amsterdam (KVPA) Periodontic Clinic & ACTA

Picture 1

The Patient
Joris reported to the clinic with two discoloured composite two discoloured class IV composite restorations in tooth 11 and 21 11 and 21 (picture 1). These vital teeth were traumatized in his childhood. He was not satisfied with the aesthetics of the restorations neither with the overall shape and colour of the two teeth. It was therefore decided to make porcelain facings for tooth 11 and 21.

Picture 2

The preparation
In order to limit the sacrifice of healthy tooth tissue while still creating sufficient space for the porcelain, a preparation was chosen with an incisal reduction of 1.5mm and a buccal reduction of 0.5mm. A so-called depth cutter – a diamond drill with 0.5mm deep recesses – was used to achieve this (picture 2).

Picture 3

To be able to adjust the shape of the mid-line to the new facings, cutting was carried out centrally through the contact. From the distal aspect the contactpoint was remained. The thin shoulder was positioned equi-gingivally, so that a dry operative field could be achieved without damage to the gingiva.

The preparations were then finished using fine drills and polishing discs. The existing, well bonded diamonds composite restorations were left in situ (picture 3).

Picture 4

Since the transparent facings are very thin, the colour of the cut teeth is significant. The colour of the cores was therefore matched using the Natural Die colour guide (picture 4). Finally, impressions were made. Temporary restorations were placed by means of 4 spot etching points and bonding.

Picture 5

Cementation
To combine superior aesthetics with adequate strength, pressed lithium disilicate restorations were chosen for Joris. Prior to cementing the facings, they were tried for size and checked for marginal integrity, contact points, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Then the correct cement colour was established by testing the facings with various try-in colours PANAVIATM V5 Universal (A2); Universal (A2) appeared to be the most appropriate colour in Joris’s case. The teeth were then polished with pumice and the facings were cleaned with alcohol, after which the teeth from 14 up to and including 24 were isolate by a rubber dam.
An incisor clamp was placed on the first teeth to be cemented. The facing was tried for fitting once more to ensure that it was free of contact with the rubber dam or the clamp and that the operative field of the preparation was totally dry (picture 5).

Picture 6

The facing was etched with 9% fluoricacid (picture 6) for 20 seconds to achieve micro-mechanical retention.

Picture 7

It was then rinsed with water for 20 seconds before being neutralised in a solution containing ceramic neutralising powder. CLEARFILTM CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS was then applied to the facing. This ensures chemical bonding between the facing and the composite cement thanks to the incorporated silane and MDP. The adjacent teeth were separated by means of a transparent strip, after which the preparation was etched with 35% phosphoric acid (picture 7). TOOTH PRIMERTM was applied after thorough rinsing with water and drying after it had taken effect for 20 seconds.

Picture 8

A thin layer of PANAVIA V5 cement was then applied to the facing. The facing was placed on the preparation with the application of light finger pressure. A microbrush was used to remove the major excess along the margins. The cement of the buccal and palatal aspect was light cured for 5 seconds. A sharp scaler and floss were used to remove the final excess. Glycerine gel was then applied to the outline to avoid oxygen inhibition during curing. The cement was finally light cured from both sides for 20 seconds, the glycerine gel was rinsed away and the margins were finished by means of a composite polishing stone. After placement of the first facing, the rubber dam clamp was moved to the neighbouring tooth so the cementation of the second facing could proceed. This facing was once more tried for fit, pre-treated and cemented in an identical manner (picture 8).

Picture 9

The result
The facings were checked a few weeks later (picture 9). Joris was very satisfied with the aesthetics of his two central incisors. The transitions from tooth to restoration were invisible and the gingiva was healthy.

Picture 10

The transparency, surface structure and gloss are better adjusted to the neighbouring elements and to Joris’s smile (picture 10).