LabLine magazine is an English language publication catering to the field of lab-side dentistry. It provides comprehensive coverage of the latest techniques and trends in dental laboratory technology and materials, showcasing them via sophisticated, challenging and aesthetic clinical cases done by some of the most known experts in Europe. With its expertly curated content, LabLine serves as an invaluable resource for dental professionals seeking to enhance their knowledge and stay at the forefront of the industry.

In the SPRING edition of LabLine you can find a wonderful AESTHETIC CASE by Mikel Villar Gonzales and DT Pilar Ballesteros Galan. The patient, a 21-year-old female had a hypoplasia defect on her permanent teeth, 1.1 and 1.2., presumably due to trauma on her deciduous anterior teeth. Click the image below and check out how the case was done!

Case by Dr. David Garcia Baeza and DT. Pilar Ballesteros Galan

Shade determination in the planning phase, shade evaluation at try-in: How is it possible to accomplish these highly important tasks in the production of lifelike anterior restorations without meeting the patient in person? A computer-based shade documentation and try-in system is a great solution. Download this clinical case example describing the aesthetic restoration of two maxillary anterior teeth to learn more about one such system and its use!

Case by Dr. Yohei Sato, DMD, PhD, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, JAPAN and Dr. Keisuke Ihara, CDT, i-Dental Lab, JAPAN

Fig. 1. The patient was referred to our hospital by an orthodontist. The chief complaints were improper esthetics of the teeth due to black triangles at the edges of the gaps between the teeth and occlusal wear of the teeth.

Fig. 2. On the basis of the pre-treatment diagnosis using a mockup, the abutments were prepared without anesthesia, keeping in mind that the enamel should be preserved to the extent possible.

Fig. 3. Since a fixation retainer was installed on the palate side, it was difficult to take impressions using silicone. Therefore, an intraoral scanner for impression taking was used.

Fig. 4. A layer of porcelain on each of KATANA™ Zirconia STML substrates was applied to complete the laminate veneer resto-rations. The inner surface of each restoration was sandblasted, being careful to prevent chipping.

Fig. 5. After trial fitting, bonding inhibiting substances as blood and saliva were removed using KATANA™ Cleaner.

Fig. 6. Milling. CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, which contains the phosphoric ester monomer MDP, was applied and dried using compressed air.

Fig. 7. The surface of each tooth was cleaned and treated with K-ETCHANT Syringe for 10 seconds before washing it away with water and compressed air-dried the area.

Fig. 8. PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer was applied and left it for 20 seconds, then compressed air-dried it.

Fig. 9. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste was applied and the laminate veneer was seated. For this case, we treated six teeth during one session.

Fig. 10. The unpolymerized excess paste was removed with a brush. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste is a light-cured type, which was designed to provide sufficient working time.

Fig. 11. This photo shows the results after the final light curing. Since the excess cement was easily removed, there were almost no cement residues.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 12. The photo shows the inside of the oral cavity one month after the fitting of the laminate veneer restorations. It can also be noted that the teeth’s marginal gingiva has been improved, thanks to the good fit of the laminate veneer restorations.

The vacation period is over and we all are slowly returning back to our everyday routines and work. With all the travel and holidays in the last months you might have missed this great article in the LabLine Summer edition: Graftless solutions and implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses.

It is an extensive, beautiful and detailed case report created and documented by team of well known and respected KOLs: Fortunato Alfonsi, Antonio Barone, Marco Stoppaccioli, Romeggio Stefano and Vincenzo Marchio.

Check it out by clicking here.

Case by MDT Daniele Rondoni and Dr. Enzo Attanasio.

Veneers made of zirconia? In some cases, like the one presented below, monolithic zirconia veneers may be an option. Reasons for selecting a latest-generation zirconia such as “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML include its very high translucency and a wall thickness of only 0.3 to 0.4 mm supporting minimally invasive tooth preparation. Due to a highly automated production procedure, the manual effort involved may be reduced, while highly aesthetic outcomes are possible.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Young female patient with misshaped and misaligned maxillary incisors. Digital smile design is used to reveal the ideal proportions and positions of the anterior teeth.

Fig. 2. Ideal tooth proportions and positions displayed over a picture of the teeth after orthodontic treatment and the creation of a mock-up. The positions are ideal and the tooth shapes obtained with the mock-up only need some minor adjustments.

Fig. 3. Facial view of the patient with the planned veneers blended in.

Fig. 4. Guided tooth structure removal with the aid of a silicone index. The minimum wall thickness of the selected material – “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML – is 0.4 mm.

Fig. 5. Matched digital impressions of the maxilla and mandible taken after tooth preparation.

Fig. 6. Monolithic restoration made of “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML placed on the resin model after the 7-hour final sintering.

Fig. 7. Lateral view of the master cast with the six veneers individualized with the liquid ceramic system CERABIEN™ FC Paste Stain.

Fig. 8. Tooth-like translucency of the veneers on the model.

Fig. 9. Intra-oral try-in with two different shades of the PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste: A2 is used in the right and Clear in the left quadrant. It was decided by the dentist to use A2 shade.

Fig. 10. Lateral view of the cemented veneers. The result is a natural surface texture, which contributes to a natural appearance of the restorations.

Fig. 11. Frontal view of the veneers in place.

Fig. 12. Treatment outcome immediately after rubber dam removal.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 13. Treatment outcome with healthy soft tissues two weeks after treatment.

Fig. 14. Gums are healthy and the restorations show a great optical integration with the adjacent posterior teeth.

Dentists: