429 Too Many Requests

Case report by Dr. Wissam Dirawi, DDS

During the last decade, zirconia has increasingly established itself as the material of choice in oral prosthodontic rehabilitation. Its great mechanical and inert properties are the main reason for this trend. Since the introduction of multi-layered zirconia blanks more than ten years ago, the optical properties have been improved dramatically. The multi-layered zirconia used nowadays (e.g. KATANA™ Zirconia YML from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) offers well-balanced mechanical properties, translucency and colour. It allows dental technicians from all over the world to produce aesthetic full-contour restorations that are merely stained.

Even in the anterior region, stained monolithic restorations may be an option. Factors such as the age of the patient, the internal colour structure of the adjacent dentition, the number of teeth to be restored (one versus all four or six maxillary anterior teeth), the aesthetic demands of the patient and financial aspects should be taken into account in the material selection process. In the case described below, full-contour zirconia was selected for several reasons.

BACKGROUND

The 71-year-old female presented in the clinical due to aesthetic problems in the maxillary anterior region. Oral hygiene was good and the patient was a non-smoker. Infraposition of the existing implant-based crown (Nobel Biocare Brånemark RP fixture) in the position of the right central incisor (tooth #11 according to the FDI notation) was evident. Moreover, gingival retraction was observed on the maxillary right lateral incisor (tooth #12), while the left lateral incisor (tooth #22) has a major composite filling with discolouration. The patient expressed the desire to adjust the gingival level differences and to restore the four maxillary incisors with all-ceramic crowns for optimal aesthetics.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Frontal view.

Fig. 2. Initial situation: Facial view.

Fig. 3. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the maxilla.

Fig. 4. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the mandible.

MATERIAL SELECTION

Due to the decision to restore all four anterior incisors, monolithic zirconia was a suitable material option. It would allow the team to obtain the desired results within the financial framework. In order to meet the aesthetic demands of the patient, provide for the required mechanical properties and allow for proper masking of the underlying structures, KATANA™ Zirconia YML was selected. It offers colour, translucency and flexural strength gradation throughout the multi-layered blank.

TREATMENT PROCEDURE: FROM PREP TO TEMPORIZATION

In order to design the indirect restorations, a digital impression was taken with an intraoral scanner and the data was transferred to the dental laboratory Teknodont in Malmoe, Sweden. There, a digital wax-up was created. After patient approval, a matrix was produced and sent to the clinic. Here, the old restorations were removed and the three maxillary incisors (all but the one replaced by an implant) prepared for full coverage restorations. A healing abutment was placed on the implant and a temporary bridge produced chairside using the matrix and Protemp 4 Temporization Material (3M) in the shade A3. Subsequently, a gingivectomy was carried out with a ceramic burr (Ceratip, Kt.314.016 – KOMET) in the buccal aspect of the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 5. Chairside-produced temporary in the patient’s mouth.

After the patient’s approval of the aesthetics, phonetics and function of the temporary restoration, the situation was captured with an intraoral scanner again. This allowed the team to duplicate the shape of the construction. Based on the acquired data, a new set of splinted temporary crowns made of PMMA (HUGE Multilayer PMMA) in the shade A3 was milled in laboratory. They were placed to allow the patient to further evaluate the aesthetic appearance and function for a couple of weeks. The patient was happy with the phonetics, function and appearance of the crowns, which were merely slightly too bright in comparison to the adjacent teeth, and approved the shape for the production of the permanent restorations.

Fig. 6. Printed model …

Fig. 7. … with splinted PMMA crowns.

Fig. 8. Lab-made temporary restorations.

Fig. 9. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 10. Long-term temporary in place: Frontal view.

Fig. 11. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the left.

FINAL RESTORATIONS: PRODUCTION AND CEMENTATION

Based on the dataset of the temporary restorations, four separate crowns – one implant and three tooth-based – were designed in full contour. Without any anatomical reduction, the restorations were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML. Based on the evaluation of the temporary restoration, the shade selected this time was A3.5. CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain was used for external staining and glazing of the surface. Still in the laboratory, the implant-based crown was cemented to the gold-shaded titanium abutment (Elos Medtech) with PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade opaque for an improved masking effect.

While the abutment crown was screwed onto the implant and the screw hole closed with composite, the three tooth-based crowns were placed using PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 12. Final restorations on the model.

Fig. 13. Intraoral situation prior to restoration placement.

CONCLUSION

Multilayered zirconia is a suitable material for many clinical situations. Due to the availability of modern types of highly translucent, multi-layered blanks, it is possible to produce aesthetic outcomes even when using the material monolithically – not only in the posterior region, but also in the aesthetic zone in some indications. The present case shows that very good results and patient satisfaction can be obtained. And due to outstanding mechanical properties, these outcomes may be expected to last for a long time.

Fig. 14. Immediate treatment outcome: Facial view.

Fig. 15. Immediate treatment outcome: Frontal view.

Fig. 16. Immediate treatment outcome: Occlusal view.

Dentist:

WISSAM DIRAWI

Dr. Wissam Dirawi, Malmoe, Sweden. DDS.
Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics and Senior Adviser at Aqua Dental.

2000 Master´s degree in dentistry.
2000 - 2018 General Dentist in public dental care and private practice.
2011 - 2018 Part-time teacher and researcher at Malmö University, Faculty of Dentistry.
2018 Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics. Senior clinical adviser. Lecturer.

References

- Alfadhli R, Alshammari Y, Baig MR, Omar R. Clinical outcomes of single crown and 3-unit bi-layered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: An up to 6- year retrospective clinical study: Clinical outcomes of zirconia FDPs. J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104321.
- Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80.
- Alammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):117-135.
- Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mat 2020; 36: 1–8.
- Mazza LC, Lemos CAA, Pesqueira AA, Pellizzer EP. Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 128: 566–74.
- Passia N, Mitsias M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Bond strength of a new generation of universal bonding systems to zirconia ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 62:268–274.
- Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31:603-623.
- Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31:624–639.

Case by Kanstantsin Vyshamirski

A male patient (47 years of age) presented to his dentist with severe damage to his teeth. His main request was to increase aesthetics, to achieve a more pleasing envisaged aesthetic area. A side request was to achieve a ‘whitening but natural look’. This was achieved by using a lighter colour palette of zirconia and porcelain materials.

The final result was achieved through the creation of a wax-up, followed by a mock-up, provisional restoration and finally adhesive bonding of the zirconia crowns.

INITIAL SITUATION

Fig. 1. Initial situation. Male patient (47 years of age).

Fig. 2. Planning the new smile according to patient’s aesthetic and functional parameters.

Fig. 3. Mock-up in place to check the new look in the patient’s mouth.

Fig. 4. KATANA™ Zirconia YML shade A1 crowns with labial cutback after milling.

Fig. 5. Crowns after sintering on the plaster model.

Fig. 6. Noritake CERABIEN™ ZR porcelain layering map.

Fig. 7. Finishing the labial surface using both polishing and selfglaze. On the palatal side of the crowns only CERABIEN™ FC Paste Stain stains and glaze were used for finishing. To aid in optimisation of the soft tissue condition the palato-cervical and near proximal areas were polished.

Fig. 8. Finished crowns on the plaster model.

Fig. 9. Try-in using PANAVIA™ V5 White try-in paste, to confirm the proper appearance. For the final adhesive cementation PANAVIA™ V5 White has been used.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 10. Situation after seven months. The result is aesthetically pleasing and the gingival condition excellent.

Fig. 11. Recall after 1.5 years.

Dentist:

KANSTANTSIN VYSHAMIRSKI

Kanstantsin started his dental technician career in 2014. His speciality is aesthetic prosthetic porcelain works. Kanstantsin is an experienced user of KATANA™ Zirconia and Noritake porcelains. He owns his lab in Riga, Latvia.

LabLine magazine is an English language publication catering to the field of lab-side dentistry. It provides comprehensive coverage of the latest techniques and trends in dental laboratory technology and materials, showcasing them via sophisticated, challenging and aesthetic clinical cases done by some of the most known experts in Europe. With its expertly curated content, LabLine serves as an invaluable resource for dental professionals seeking to enhance their knowledge and stay at the forefront of the industry.

In the SPRING edition of LabLine you can find a wonderful AESTHETIC CASE by Mikel Villar Gonzales and DT Pilar Ballesteros Galan. The patient, a 21-year-old female had a hypoplasia defect on her permanent teeth, 1.1 and 1.2., presumably due to trauma on her deciduous anterior teeth. Click the image below and check out how the case was done!

Case by Dr. David Garcia Baeza and DT. Pilar Ballesteros Galan

Shade determination in the planning phase, shade evaluation at try-in: How is it possible to accomplish these highly important tasks in the production of lifelike anterior restorations without meeting the patient in person? A computer-based shade documentation and try-in system is a great solution. Download this clinical case example describing the aesthetic restoration of two maxillary anterior teeth to learn more about one such system and its use!

Case by Dr. Yohei Sato, DMD, PhD, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, JAPAN and Dr. Keisuke Ihara, CDT, i-Dental Lab, JAPAN

Fig. 1. The patient was referred to our hospital by an orthodontist. The chief complaints were improper esthetics of the teeth due to black triangles at the edges of the gaps between the teeth and occlusal wear of the teeth.

Fig. 2. On the basis of the pre-treatment diagnosis using a mockup, the abutments were prepared without anesthesia, keeping in mind that the enamel should be preserved to the extent possible.

Fig. 3. Since a fixation retainer was installed on the palate side, it was difficult to take impressions using silicone. Therefore, an intraoral scanner for impression taking was used.

Fig. 4. A layer of porcelain on each of KATANA™ Zirconia STML substrates was applied to complete the laminate veneer resto-rations. The inner surface of each restoration was sandblasted, being careful to prevent chipping.

Fig. 5. After trial fitting, bonding inhibiting substances as blood and saliva were removed using KATANA™ Cleaner.

Fig. 6. Milling. CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, which contains the phosphoric ester monomer MDP, was applied and dried using compressed air.

Fig. 7. The surface of each tooth was cleaned and treated with K-ETCHANT Syringe for 10 seconds before washing it away with water and compressed air-dried the area.

Fig. 8. PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer was applied and left it for 20 seconds, then compressed air-dried it.

Fig. 9. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste was applied and the laminate veneer was seated. For this case, we treated six teeth during one session.

Fig. 10. The unpolymerized excess paste was removed with a brush. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste is a light-cured type, which was designed to provide sufficient working time.

Fig. 11. This photo shows the results after the final light curing. Since the excess cement was easily removed, there were almost no cement residues.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 12. The photo shows the inside of the oral cavity one month after the fitting of the laminate veneer restorations. It can also be noted that the teeth’s marginal gingiva has been improved, thanks to the good fit of the laminate veneer restorations.

The vacation period is over and we all are slowly returning back to our everyday routines and work. With all the travel and holidays in the last months you might have missed this great article in the LabLine Summer edition: Graftless solutions and implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses.

It is an extensive, beautiful and detailed case report created and documented by team of well known and respected KOLs: Fortunato Alfonsi, Antonio Barone, Marco Stoppaccioli, Romeggio Stefano and Vincenzo Marchio.

Check it out by clicking here.

Case by MDT Daniele Rondoni and Dr. Enzo Attanasio.

Veneers made of zirconia? In some cases, like the one presented below, monolithic zirconia veneers may be an option. Reasons for selecting a latest-generation zirconia such as “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML include its very high translucency and a wall thickness of only 0.3 to 0.4 mm supporting minimally invasive tooth preparation. Due to a highly automated production procedure, the manual effort involved may be reduced, while highly aesthetic outcomes are possible.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Young female patient with misshaped and misaligned maxillary incisors. Digital smile design is used to reveal the ideal proportions and positions of the anterior teeth.

Fig. 2. Ideal tooth proportions and positions displayed over a picture of the teeth after orthodontic treatment and the creation of a mock-up. The positions are ideal and the tooth shapes obtained with the mock-up only need some minor adjustments.

Fig. 3. Facial view of the patient with the planned veneers blended in.

Fig. 4. Guided tooth structure removal with the aid of a silicone index. The minimum wall thickness of the selected material – “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML – is 0.4 mm.

Fig. 5. Matched digital impressions of the maxilla and mandible taken after tooth preparation.

Fig. 6. Monolithic restoration made of “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML placed on the resin model after the 7-hour final sintering.

Fig. 7. Lateral view of the master cast with the six veneers individualized with the liquid ceramic system CERABIEN™ FC Paste Stain.

Fig. 8. Tooth-like translucency of the veneers on the model.

Fig. 9. Intra-oral try-in with two different shades of the PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste: A2 is used in the right and Clear in the left quadrant. It was decided by the dentist to use A2 shade.

Fig. 10. Lateral view of the cemented veneers. The result is a natural surface texture, which contributes to a natural appearance of the restorations.

Fig. 11. Frontal view of the veneers in place.

Fig. 12. Treatment outcome immediately after rubber dam removal.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 13. Treatment outcome with healthy soft tissues two weeks after treatment.

Fig. 14. Gums are healthy and the restorations show a great optical integration with the adjacent posterior teeth.

Dentists: