429 Too Many Requests

By Dr Alessandro Devigus

Fig. 1. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown.

Fig. 2. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown – problem of deep bite.

Fig. 3. Situation after removal of old crowns and placement of retraction cord.

Fig. 4. Milled crowns before sintering with Speedfire.

Fig. 5. Crowns after sintering.

Fig. 6. Try-in of sintered crowns.

Fig. 7. Crowns after glaze and stain.

Fig. 8. Try-in of finished crowns.

Fig. 9. Crowns after adhesive cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 A2.

FINAL SITUATION

Dentist:

DR. ALESSANDRO DEVIGUS

Dr. Alessandro Devigus received his degree from Zurich University, Switzerland, in 1987. Since 1990 his working in his own private practice with a focus on CAD CAM and Digital Dentistry. He is also CEREC Instructor at the Zurich Dental School.

Dr. Alessandro Devigus is an active member of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), founder of the Swiss Society of Computerized Dentistry, Neue Gruppe member, ITI fellow and speaker.

Dr. Devigus is editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, author of various publications and an international lecturer.

By Dr Luca Dusi

For purely aesthetic reasons, this patient asked for the reconstruction of her cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12). The patient was offered a treatment including a first phase of orthodontic therapy aimed at recovering the space necessary to be able to reconstruct the lateral incisor to its ideal size. As the patient refused to undergo this orthodontic therapy, it was decided to restore the tooth with resin composite and match its size to the space already available.

The adhesive system used was CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2, while the restoration was created with the new composite CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal. Although this material is designed for the single-shade technique with only two shades matching the anterior tooth shades, I decided to combine both pastes to achieve the best possible outcome. The shade UD (Universal Dark) was used to reconstruct the cervical and central portion of the lateral incisor. The incisal portion was restored with UL (Universal Light).

Fig. 1. Initial situation with a cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12).

Fig. 2. Image of the initial situation taken with a polarising filter for shade evaluation purposes.

Fig. 3. The new CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal composite with only two shades for the anterior region was chosen. It offers a good optical integration thanks to Kuraray Noritake Dental’s Light Diffusion Technology.

Fig. 4. Shade determination with the aid of cured samples of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal UL (Universal Light) and UD (Universal Dark) on the tooth surfaces.

Fig. 5. Isolation with rubber dam.

Fig. 6. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 used for the establishment of a strong bond between the tooth structure and the composite material.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 7. The universal composite blends in well with the adjacent teeth regarding its colour and surface finish.

Dentist:

• Graduated with honors in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics at the University of Milan in 2010.
• In 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 he held the position of Adjunct Professor for the teaching of Prosthetic Technologies at the University of Milan-Bicocca.
• Member of SIdp (Italian Society of Periodontology) and AIC (Italian Academy of Conservation).

By Magdalena Osiewicz, DDS, MSc, PhD

Fig. 1 Defective composite resin restoration in molars.

Fig. 2 Application of CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 to cavities.

Fig. 3 Restoration of the cavities with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior in the A2 Classic shade.

Fig. 4 Final restorations of Class I and II with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior and polish with CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA.

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior is a resin composite with high strength and great optical properties developed for posterior restorations and suitable even for the most demanding patients. Figure 1 shows the initial clinical situation with insufficient resin composite restorations in the lower molars. After removal of the old fillings, the cavities were treated with CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 (Figure 2).

Then, I restored them with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior in the A2 Classic shade (Figure 3). The fissures were highlighted with brown color modifier. Finally, finishing was performed in three steps: The excess of composite resin was removed with a fine-grained diamond bur. Final contouring was accomplished with a carbide bur, before CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA was used to obtain a natural gloss (Figure 4).

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior is characterized by high mechanical strength, hardness and bending strength, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, low polymerization shrinkage and good aesthetics. Due to these features and a reliable long-term behavior, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior should have a place in every dental office for direct posterior restorations. Excellent outcomes are achievable and therefore I recommend its use.

Dentist:

Magdalena Osiewicz, DDS, MSc, PhD

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

By Julian Leprince, UCLouvain

PROXIMAL RESTORATION
POSTERIOR // 26 DEEP DISTAL

• Patient stated they experienced occasional sensitivity to heat/cold.
• Preoperative bite-wing X-ray. Carious lesions in 26 M and D.
• Decided to monitor 26 M (caries limited to the outer dentin zone > just 35% of these lesions were cavitated; per Hintze et al., Caries Res 1998).
• Decided to treat 26 D; treatment classified as difficult due to the limited juxtaosseous space.

• Clinical preoperative situation.
• Rubber dam positioned (clamp on 27, ligatures at elements 25-26-27), limited connection at the height of 27 palatally. Deemed acceptable due to the absence of blood and saliva.
• A gray discoloration can be observed at the height of the mesial marginal ridge (limited) and distally (extensive). An old composite restoration is visible in the distal fossa.

• Positioning a protective system – a combination of a plastic wedge and a straight small metal plate – to prevent damage to the neighboring element during the mounting process.

• Drilling through the enamel to access the softened dentin, which can be excavated with a hand tool.

• First phase of removing the proximal enamel.

• Removing the unsupported proximal enamel.
• Excavating the softened dentin. The difference in texture in the dentin is visible.
• Note the damage to the protective system, which appears to justify its use.

• Cleaned cavity after removing the protection system.
• The current recommendations from the ORCA (European Organisation for Caries research) state that where caries is deep, partial excavation is required but restricted to the softened dentin. With regard to the pulp, work must be carried out to ensure that it is not exposed (Carvalho et al., Caries Res 2016). The successes achieved with this approach outweigh those achieved with complete excavation. In contrast, the cavity edges (enamel and dentin; as per JAD) are treated so that only hard and healthy tissue is present, which is more favorable for marginal contact.

• Positioning a matrix band with box.
• A wooden wedge is used to position the matrix band against the element on the palatal side, while Teflon is used on the vestibular side.

• Contact between the matrix band and the bottom of the proximal cavity.
• The matrix band runs precisely until beyond the edge of the cavity.
• The cavity is deep enough so that the concavity between the root is visible distovestibularly and palatally.
• The connection of the matrix band is incomplete due to the concavity, but the seal that is achieved by the matrix and improved by using Teflon is thereby deemed to be adequate, including as no contamination is observed. The bonding procedure is then begun.

• Selective etching of the enamel with 37% phosphoric acid (K-Etchant Syringe) for 20 seconds, followed by thorough flushing with the multifunction spray.

• After drying, the etched enamel has a chalky appearance.
• In this case study, the preferred choice was the type of selfetching adhesive system used here (CLEARFIL™ SE BOND). This is because the technology used appears to have a favorable outcome when used on eroded dentin, thanks to the ability of MDP to bond chemically to calcium in the partially demineralized dentin (Perdigao, Dent Mater 2010).
• This procedure was chosen to create an optimum bond.

• It is clearly visible at the height of the cavity edge that the excavation extends to the hard dentin. In the axial section, excavation is limited to as far as the soft dentin to reduce the risk of exposing pulp.

• Applying the self-etching primer to the dentin for 20 seconds, followed by drying.
• Applying the bonding (B), followed by light curing for 10 seconds.
• Applying a small amount of flowable composite (F) (e.g. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow), restricted to the interradicular concavity.
• Note the change in the appearance of the dentin, from matt to glossy.

• Positioning a horizontal layer of composite (max. 2 mm) to raise the proximal margin.
• Light curing of each layer with an output of 1,000 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds (Leprince et al., Oper Dent 2010).

• Positioning a sectional matrix, in conjunction with a separating ring and a wooden wedge, to achieve an accurate anatomy of the proximal restoration.
• The composite is positioned by adding successive 2-mm layers (the number of bonded surfaces must be minimized).

• After removing the matrix band, defects can be observed in the shape (slight oversize); this should be corrected carefully with a curved scalpel and/or the drill.
• A paro curette is used, in conjunction with floss wire and a fine abrasive strip, to remove any excess adhesive, for example.

FINAL SITUATION

• Correcting the anatomy is followed by adjustment of the occlusion and polishing.
• The composite chosen for the restoration (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior) has a high filler loading (weight percentage of inorganic filler >80%), which produces an elasticity modulus of >16 GPa; this is comparable to the elasticity modulus values reported for dentin (Randolph et al., Dent Mater 2016).

Dentist:

JULIAN LEPRINCE
UCLouvain

Julian Leprince studied dentistry at UCLouvain, and is now head of the division of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics at Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium), associate professor at UCLouvain and head of the DRIM research group (www.drim-ucl.be).

By Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD

This patient required the replacement of an insufficient composite restoration of the mandibular right second premolar. It was planned to restore the tooth using a combination of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow – Super Low A3 and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic A3 with some tints. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 was the adhesive of choice. It produces a reliable chemical adhesion to dentin and enamel as it contains 10-MDP. The best results are obtained after selective enamel etching.

Fig. 1 Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2 Removal of the existing restoration reveals carious tissue underneath.

Fig. 3 Appearance of the cavity after caries excavation and preparation.

Fig. 4 Dried tooth structure after selective enamel etching with a sectional matrix in place.

Fig. 5 Build-up of the interproximal wall with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (shade A3) after the use of CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2.

Fig. 6 Successful transformation of a Class II cavity to Class I.

Fig. 7 Cavity filled with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (Super Low A3).

Fig. 8 Appearance of the tooth after the application of a final layer of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (shade A3) and some tints.

Fig. 9 Polished restoration on the mandibular right second premolar.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 10 Treatment result ...

Fig. 11 ... after rubber dam removal.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA
Warsaw, Poland

Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD, is a passionate aesthetic and adhesive dentist. Driven by Evidence Based Dentistry, her goal includes using modern composite materials and bonding agents in her clinical practise. In addition to her primary job, she worked as a lecturer and an assistant professor at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of Medical University of Warsaw, her alma mater.

By Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD

INITIAL SITUATION

Fig. 1 MOD filling with marginal leakage, secondary caries, and significant mechanical weakening.

Fig. 2 Cavity preparation extending over the buccal and palatal cusps.

Fig. 3 Direct restoration created with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic, shade A2, and stains.

Fig. 4 Appearance of the restoration after polishing with CLEARFIL™ TWIST DIA.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 5 Repolishing during check-up one week later. The restoration shows an excellent color integration and natural gloss.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA
Warsaw, Poland

Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD, is a passionate aesthetic and adhesive dentist. Driven by Evidence Based Dentistry, her goal includes using modern composite materials and bonding agents in her clinical practise. In addition to her primary job, she worked as a lecturer and an assistant professor at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of Medical University of Warsaw, her alma mater.

By Dr Adham Elsayed

This video illustrates the Treatment Concepts for minimal-invasive Composit-Overlay.

Dr. Elsayed uses KATANA AVENCIA, PANAVIA SA Cement Universal, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick, K-ETCHANT, KATANA Cleaner and CLEARFIL Twist DIA and shows how to use different flowable composites for techniques like cervical margin relocation and cavity design optimization. Then an overlay was milled from KATANA AVENCIA and luted with PANAVIA SA Cement Universal, after cleaning with KATANA Cleaner.

By Dr Adham Elsayed

This video explains the concept of doing class I restorations in less than 10 minutes.

Dr. Elsayed uses Clearfil Majesty ES Flow, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick and Clearfil Twist Dia and shows one of the advantages of flows over conventional composites. Using stamp technique (optional), fast and easy restorations can be done using Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (no waiting time) and different viscosities of flows. This is very practical for composite restorations in the molar area.

By Dr Alessandro Devigus

Close up of insufficient crown on tooth 11.

After removal of old crown – discolored stump (endo treatment).

Try-in of the crown after sintering – no intrinsic fluorescence.

Try-in of the crown after glazing.

Try-in of the crown after glazing under cross polarized light to check the shade match.

Try-in of the crown after staining under cross polarized light to check the shade match.

Retraction cord in situ for adhesive cementation with PANAVIA™ V5.

Adhesive cementation using PANAVIA™ V5 opaque to mask dark stump.

Control after 1 week.

Control after 1 week – cross polarized light to check shade.

Control after 1 week – fluorescence check.

FINAL SITUATION

Dentist:

Dr Alessandro Devigus received his degree from Zurich University, Switzerland, in 1987. Since 1990 his working in his own private practice with a focus on CAD CAM and Digital Dentistry. He is also CEREC Instructor at the Zurich Dental School.

Dr Alessandro Devigus is an active member of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), founder of the Swiss Society of Computerized Dentistry, Neue Gruppe member, ITI fellow and speaker.

Dr Devigus is editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, author of various publications and an international lecturer.

By Drs. Mart Ramaekers

A 20-year-old patient was dissatisfied with her discolored composite restorations on her maxillary central incisors and the right lateral incisor. The original restorations had been placed after an accident with traumatic dental injuries approximately five years ago. We went through all available options that would enable us to improve the aesthetics of her anterior teeth and finally opted for replacement of the existing restorations by new direct restorations made of composite resin.

Prior to the restorative procedure, a home bleaching procedure was carried out with Opalescence 10% (Ultradent). In addition, a palatal silicon index was produced to record the shape and morphology of the existing restorations and dentition.

Initial situation

Frontal view of the initial situation.

Lateral view: The discolorations are particularly visible on the maxillary right central and lateral incisor.

Close-up view of the upper anterior teeth.

The existing restorations were removed after the administration of local anesthesia. Then, labial and palatal bevels were created, followed by sandblasting of the prepared tooth structure with alumina (50 μm). Hereafter, the enamel was etched for 30 seconds (K-Etchant Syringe, Kuraray Noritake Dental), before the primer and bond of CLEARFIL™ SE BOND (Kuraray Noritake Dental) were used according to the instructions.

Build-up of the palatal walls with a first increment of ‘enamel’ composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium A2E, Kuraray Noritake Dental) using the silicon index.

Creation of the mesial and distal marginal ridges in A2E enamel composite. The procedure was facilitated by the vertical placement of sectional matrices (Contact Matrices Stiff Flex Large, Danville) in the interproximal space.

Creation of the dentin core and the dentinal mamelons by placement of an opaque composite increment (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium, A2D). It increases the opacity in the middle third of the restoration.

Filling of the space between the mamelons with translucent composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium, Translucent Clear).

Labial finishing of the restorations with a layer of semi-translucent composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium, A2E).

Application of glycerin gel on top of the last layer of composite to prevent formation of an oxygen inhibited layer during the final light-curing procedure. Final contouring and polishing were performed by using red (fine) and yellow (x-fine) finishing diamonds followed by high gloss polishing with CLEARFIL™ TWIST DIA (Kuraray Noritake Dental).

Final situation

Frontal view of the final situation.

Lateral view: No shade differences or restoration margins are visible.

Close-up view of the new restorations on the upper anterior teeth.

Ceramist:

Drs. Mart Ramaekers

Academic education
2002 - 2007   Tandheelkunde, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

Non-academic education
2013 - 2014   Academy of Reconstructive Dentistry, Beuningen
2019              Biomimetic Dentistry, Los Angeles

Career
2008 - 2013    Mondzorg Jekerdal Maastricht
2013 - 2015    De Drietand Maastricht
2009 - 2020    Amalia Kliniek Kerkrade
2020 - now      Espenbos Kliniek Cadier en Keer

Materials used: Kuraray Noritake Dental: CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2, K-Etchant Syringe, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium Enamel A2E, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium Dentin A2D , CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium Translucent Clear and CLEARFIL™ TWIST DIA. Heavy Putty (Provil Novo, Heraeus Kulzer), Glycerine gel (K-Yelly Johnson&Johnson), Rubberdam non-latex Heavy (Sigma), Contact Matrices Stiff Flex Large (Danville), Optragate Regular (Ivoclar)