429 Too Many Requests

Case by Max Andrup

This patient had requested for an emergency appointment and presented with severe erosive tooth wear in several teeth, a crack in the mesial wall of the maxillary first molar and a failing direct restoration with recurrent decay on the adjacent second premolar. I decided to replace the direct resin composite restoration immediately as this was the main cause of discomfort. It was decided to restore the other defects during the next appointment.

The resin composite of choice was CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 (Universal shade concept), an innovative material with a single universal shade designed for posterior restorations. The manufacturer claims that, due to the integration of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.’s light diffusion technology, this universal shade nicely blends in with the surrounding tooth structure virtually independent of its colour. Curious about the real potential of this concept, I wanted to put the material to a test.

Fig. 1. Pre-operative situation revealing signs of severe erosive tooth wear, a cracked mesial wall of the first molar and a failed filling on the second premolar with recurrent decay.

Fig. 2. Appearance of the tooth after removal of the direct composite restoration. The recurrent caries is obvious.

Fig. 3. Caries Detector applied to the decayed tooth structure.

Fig. 4. Establishing of a peripheral zone totally free of caries with the aid of Caries Detector. It may be useful to apply the dye several times.

Fig. 5. The final situation after several applications of Caries Detector. The peripheral zone is completely free of caries, which is a strict requirement for the establishment of a perfect seal during bonding. Affected caries stained light pink is not removed not to risk going near the pulp.

Fig. 6. Build-up of the proximal wall with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 (U shade) after the application of CLEARFIL™ SE Protect and a small layer of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow in a thickness of about 0,5 mm. By focusing on the proximal wall connecting to enamel first, the hybrid layer is given the time needed to mature. Not putting a new increment on top of the hybrid layer for the first five minutes will lead to an increased bond strength to dentin.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 7. Appearance of the tooth immediately after finishing and polishing. Although the rubber dam is still in place and the tooth structure is not yet rehydrated, it is evident that the composite blends in very well with the remaining tooth structure to form a seamless margin.

Dentist:

Max Andrup graduated from the University of Umeå in 2010 and today runs his private practice in the city of Hudiksvall, Sweden. He has a passion for restorative dentistry with a biomimetic approach.

By Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD

The MOD restoration on the maxillary left second premolar of this patient was in need of replacement. It was decided to create a direct composite overlay with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow - Super Low A3, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic A2. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 was used after selective etching of the enamel to establish a chemical bond to enamel and dentin. For the finishing and polishing procedure, abrasive discs were used first, followed by silicon carbide rubber instruments and the CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA system.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation revealing the composite restoration to be replaced on the second premolar.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the teeth after cavity preparation including cusp reduction.

Fig. 3. Lateral view of the teeth after cavity preparation.

Fig. 4. Matrix band held in place with wedges and two rings.

Fig. 5. Situation after etching, bonding, removal of one ring, and build-up of the interproximal walls with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A2.

Fig. 6. Cavity filled with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow - Super Low A3.

Fig. 7. Occlusal surface restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic in the shade A2.

Fig. 8. Polishing with the pre-polisher of the CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA system.

Fig. 9. Polishing with the high-shine polisher of the CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA system.

Fig. 10. Appearance of the restoration immediately after rubber dam removal and checking of the occlusal contacts.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 11. Linguo-occlusal view of the treatment outcome.

Fig. 12. Lateral view of the treatment outcome.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA
Warsaw, Poland

Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD, is a passionate aesthetic and adhesive dentist. Driven by Evidence Based Dentistry, her goal includes using modern composite materials and bonding agents in her clinical practise. In addition to her primary job, she worked as a lecturer and an assistant professor at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of Medical University of Warsaw, her alma mater.

By Dr. Michał Sucholdolski

This patient was concerned about the discoloration that had appeared on the occlusal surface of the mandibular left first molar. In an intraoral examination, caries was diagnosed in this area.

As the occlusal surface was almost intact initially, it was decided to restore the tooth with resin composite using the stamp technique. For this purpose, the occlusal anatomy was recorded using CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow in the shade A3, which was stamped onto the occlusal surface and fixed to an applicator by light curing. Afterwards, the carious tissue was removed with the aid of caries-detector dye. Following cleaning of the prepared cavity and application of the bonding agent (CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2), CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (A3) was applied to the cavity floor. The final occlusal layer was created with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 in the shade A3. The stamp was used to transfer the original occlusal anatomy to the new surface before light curing. A natural gloss was obtained by polishing of the surface with the CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA system.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation with an occlusal surface affected by caries.

Fig. 2. Appearance of the tooth after the application of caries detector dye during cavity preparation.

Fig. 3. Stamp created with flowable resin composite.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 4. Treatment outcome.

Dentist:

Dr. Michał Sucholdolski is a graduate of Silesia Medical University in Zabrze, Poland. He has attended various national and international conferences on microscopic dentistry, endodontic treatment and aesthetic restorative dentistry.

He makes use of innovative dental approaches such as Digital Smile Design, the MicroVision preparation concept, minimally invasive preparation techniques and modern direct restoration techniques.

He is a Member of the Polish Association of Endodontic Treatment and author of scientific work and publications in dental magazine.

By Dr Alessandro Devigus

Fig. 1. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown.

Fig. 2. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown – problem of deep bite.

Fig. 3. Situation after removal of old crowns and placement of retraction cord.

Fig. 4. Milled crowns before sintering with Speedfire.

Fig. 5. Crowns after sintering.

Fig. 6. Try-in of sintered crowns.

Fig. 7. Crowns after glaze and stain.

Fig. 8. Try-in of finished crowns.

Fig. 9. Crowns after adhesive cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 A2.

FINAL SITUATION

Dentist:

DR. ALESSANDRO DEVIGUS

Dr. Alessandro Devigus received his degree from Zurich University, Switzerland, in 1987. Since 1990 his working in his own private practice with a focus on CAD CAM and Digital Dentistry. He is also CEREC Instructor at the Zurich Dental School.

Dr. Alessandro Devigus is an active member of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), founder of the Swiss Society of Computerized Dentistry, Neue Gruppe member, ITI fellow and speaker.

Dr. Devigus is editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, author of various publications and an international lecturer.

By Dr Luca Dusi

For purely aesthetic reasons, this patient asked for the reconstruction of her cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12). The patient was offered a treatment including a first phase of orthodontic therapy aimed at recovering the space necessary to be able to reconstruct the lateral incisor to its ideal size. As the patient refused to undergo this orthodontic therapy, it was decided to restore the tooth with resin composite and match its size to the space already available.

The adhesive system used was CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2, while the restoration was created with the new composite CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal. Although this material is designed for the single-shade technique with only two shades matching the anterior tooth shades, I decided to combine both pastes to achieve the best possible outcome. The shade UD (Universal Dark) was used to reconstruct the cervical and central portion of the lateral incisor. The incisal portion was restored with UL (Universal Light).

Fig. 1. Initial situation with a cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12).

Fig. 2. Image of the initial situation taken with a polarising filter for shade evaluation purposes.

Fig. 3. The new CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal composite with only two shades for the anterior region was chosen. It offers a good optical integration thanks to Kuraray Noritake Dental’s Light Diffusion Technology.

Fig. 4. Shade determination with the aid of cured samples of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal UL (Universal Light) and UD (Universal Dark) on the tooth surfaces.

Fig. 5. Isolation with rubber dam.

Fig. 6. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 used for the establishment of a strong bond between the tooth structure and the composite material.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 7. The universal composite blends in well with the adjacent teeth regarding its colour and surface finish.

Dentist:

• Graduated with honors in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics at the University of Milan in 2010.
• In 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 he held the position of Adjunct Professor for the teaching of Prosthetic Technologies at the University of Milan-Bicocca.
• Member of SIdp (Italian Society of Periodontology) and AIC (Italian Academy of Conservation).

By Magdalena Osiewicz, DDS, MSc, PhD

Fig. 1 Defective composite resin restoration in molars.

Fig. 2 Application of CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 to cavities.

Fig. 3 Restoration of the cavities with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior in the A2 Classic shade.

Fig. 4 Final restorations of Class I and II with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior and polish with CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA.

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior is a resin composite with high strength and great optical properties developed for posterior restorations and suitable even for the most demanding patients. Figure 1 shows the initial clinical situation with insufficient resin composite restorations in the lower molars. After removal of the old fillings, the cavities were treated with CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 (Figure 2).

Then, I restored them with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior in the A2 Classic shade (Figure 3). The fissures were highlighted with brown color modifier. Finally, finishing was performed in three steps: The excess of composite resin was removed with a fine-grained diamond bur. Final contouring was accomplished with a carbide bur, before CLEARFIL™ Twist DIA was used to obtain a natural gloss (Figure 4).

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior is characterized by high mechanical strength, hardness and bending strength, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, low polymerization shrinkage and good aesthetics. Due to these features and a reliable long-term behavior, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior should have a place in every dental office for direct posterior restorations. Excellent outcomes are achievable and therefore I recommend its use.

Dentist:

Magdalena Osiewicz, DDS, MSc, PhD

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

By Julian Leprince, UCLouvain

PROXIMAL RESTORATION
POSTERIOR // 26 DEEP DISTAL

• Patient stated they experienced occasional sensitivity to heat/cold.
• Preoperative bite-wing X-ray. Carious lesions in 26 M and D.
• Decided to monitor 26 M (caries limited to the outer dentin zone > just 35% of these lesions were cavitated; per Hintze et al., Caries Res 1998).
• Decided to treat 26 D; treatment classified as difficult due to the limited juxtaosseous space.

• Clinical preoperative situation.
• Rubber dam positioned (clamp on 27, ligatures at elements 25-26-27), limited connection at the height of 27 palatally. Deemed acceptable due to the absence of blood and saliva.
• A gray discoloration can be observed at the height of the mesial marginal ridge (limited) and distally (extensive). An old composite restoration is visible in the distal fossa.

• Positioning a protective system – a combination of a plastic wedge and a straight small metal plate – to prevent damage to the neighboring element during the mounting process.

• Drilling through the enamel to access the softened dentin, which can be excavated with a hand tool.

• First phase of removing the proximal enamel.

• Removing the unsupported proximal enamel.
• Excavating the softened dentin. The difference in texture in the dentin is visible.
• Note the damage to the protective system, which appears to justify its use.

• Cleaned cavity after removing the protection system.
• The current recommendations from the ORCA (European Organisation for Caries research) state that where caries is deep, partial excavation is required but restricted to the softened dentin. With regard to the pulp, work must be carried out to ensure that it is not exposed (Carvalho et al., Caries Res 2016). The successes achieved with this approach outweigh those achieved with complete excavation. In contrast, the cavity edges (enamel and dentin; as per JAD) are treated so that only hard and healthy tissue is present, which is more favorable for marginal contact.

• Positioning a matrix band with box.
• A wooden wedge is used to position the matrix band against the element on the palatal side, while Teflon is used on the vestibular side.

• Contact between the matrix band and the bottom of the proximal cavity.
• The matrix band runs precisely until beyond the edge of the cavity.
• The cavity is deep enough so that the concavity between the root is visible distovestibularly and palatally.
• The connection of the matrix band is incomplete due to the concavity, but the seal that is achieved by the matrix and improved by using Teflon is thereby deemed to be adequate, including as no contamination is observed. The bonding procedure is then begun.

• Selective etching of the enamel with 37% phosphoric acid (K-Etchant Syringe) for 20 seconds, followed by thorough flushing with the multifunction spray.

• After drying, the etched enamel has a chalky appearance.
• In this case study, the preferred choice was the type of selfetching adhesive system used here (CLEARFIL™ SE BOND). This is because the technology used appears to have a favorable outcome when used on eroded dentin, thanks to the ability of MDP to bond chemically to calcium in the partially demineralized dentin (Perdigao, Dent Mater 2010).
• This procedure was chosen to create an optimum bond.

• It is clearly visible at the height of the cavity edge that the excavation extends to the hard dentin. In the axial section, excavation is limited to as far as the soft dentin to reduce the risk of exposing pulp.

• Applying the self-etching primer to the dentin for 20 seconds, followed by drying.
• Applying the bonding (B), followed by light curing for 10 seconds.
• Applying a small amount of flowable composite (F) (e.g. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow), restricted to the interradicular concavity.
• Note the change in the appearance of the dentin, from matt to glossy.

• Positioning a horizontal layer of composite (max. 2 mm) to raise the proximal margin.
• Light curing of each layer with an output of 1,000 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds (Leprince et al., Oper Dent 2010).

• Positioning a sectional matrix, in conjunction with a separating ring and a wooden wedge, to achieve an accurate anatomy of the proximal restoration.
• The composite is positioned by adding successive 2-mm layers (the number of bonded surfaces must be minimized).

• After removing the matrix band, defects can be observed in the shape (slight oversize); this should be corrected carefully with a curved scalpel and/or the drill.
• A paro curette is used, in conjunction with floss wire and a fine abrasive strip, to remove any excess adhesive, for example.

FINAL SITUATION

• Correcting the anatomy is followed by adjustment of the occlusion and polishing.
• The composite chosen for the restoration (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Posterior) has a high filler loading (weight percentage of inorganic filler >80%), which produces an elasticity modulus of >16 GPa; this is comparable to the elasticity modulus values reported for dentin (Randolph et al., Dent Mater 2016).

Dentist:

JULIAN LEPRINCE
UCLouvain

Julian Leprince studied dentistry at UCLouvain, and is now head of the division of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics at Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium), associate professor at UCLouvain and head of the DRIM research group (www.drim-ucl.be).

By Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD

This patient required the replacement of an insufficient composite restoration of the mandibular right second premolar. It was planned to restore the tooth using a combination of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow – Super Low A3 and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic A3 with some tints. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 was the adhesive of choice. It produces a reliable chemical adhesion to dentin and enamel as it contains 10-MDP. The best results are obtained after selective enamel etching.

Fig. 1 Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2 Removal of the existing restoration reveals carious tissue underneath.

Fig. 3 Appearance of the cavity after caries excavation and preparation.

Fig. 4 Dried tooth structure after selective enamel etching with a sectional matrix in place.

Fig. 5 Build-up of the interproximal wall with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (shade A3) after the use of CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2.

Fig. 6 Successful transformation of a Class II cavity to Class I.

Fig. 7 Cavity filled with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (Super Low A3).

Fig. 8 Appearance of the tooth after the application of a final layer of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (shade A3) and some tints.

Fig. 9 Polished restoration on the mandibular right second premolar.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 10 Treatment result ...

Fig. 11 ... after rubber dam removal.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA
Warsaw, Poland

Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD, is a passionate aesthetic and adhesive dentist. Driven by Evidence Based Dentistry, her goal includes using modern composite materials and bonding agents in her clinical practise. In addition to her primary job, she worked as a lecturer and an assistant professor at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of Medical University of Warsaw, her alma mater.

By Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD

INITIAL SITUATION

Fig. 1 MOD filling with marginal leakage, secondary caries, and significant mechanical weakening.

Fig. 2 Cavity preparation extending over the buccal and palatal cusps.

Fig. 3 Direct restoration created with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic, shade A2, and stains.

Fig. 4 Appearance of the restoration after polishing with CLEARFIL™ TWIST DIA.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 5 Repolishing during check-up one week later. The restoration shows an excellent color integration and natural gloss.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA
Warsaw, Poland

Aleksandra Łyżwińska, DMD, is a passionate aesthetic and adhesive dentist. Driven by Evidence Based Dentistry, her goal includes using modern composite materials and bonding agents in her clinical practise. In addition to her primary job, she worked as a lecturer and an assistant professor at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics of Medical University of Warsaw, her alma mater.

By Dr Adham Elsayed

This video illustrates the Treatment Concepts for minimal-invasive Composit-Overlay.

Dr. Elsayed uses KATANA AVENCIA, PANAVIA SA Cement Universal, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick, K-ETCHANT, KATANA Cleaner and CLEARFIL Twist DIA and shows how to use different flowable composites for techniques like cervical margin relocation and cavity design optimization. Then an overlay was milled from KATANA AVENCIA and luted with PANAVIA SA Cement Universal, after cleaning with KATANA Cleaner.