Case by CDT Mathias Berger, France

Every patient is unique. Their specific backgrounds, functional needs and aesthetic demands need to be respected in any prosthodontic treatment plan. However, the importance of an individual treatment approach increases with the number of teeth to be replaced: After all, the impact of the restorations on facial aesthetics and on the patient’s quality of life is never greater than when all teeth are missing. Fortunately, adequate dental materials and techniques are available for a patient-centered, individual approach, no matter what challenges need to be overcome.

A patient with bruxism

In the present case, an elderly male patient with bruxism was in need of a new maxillary denture. Since the placement of five implants in the maxilla, he had no proprioception in this jaw. This lack of sensation had an impact on the overdenture to be produced: material and design needed to be carefully selected in a way that it would withstand uncontrolled chewing forces. As technical complications are easier to repair than biological complications, the overdenture should not be unbreakable – instead, the replacement of single units should be easily manageable.

Two-part denture design

The solution was a two-part design with a milled bar consisting of the gum area and tooth abutments (fig. 1) combined with single crowns. The material of choice for the bar was KATANA™ Zirconia HTML Plus (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) with a uniform flexural strength of 1,150 MPa throughout the disc, while the single crowns were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML that offers natural translucency and strength gradation. While a monolithic design was selected for the posterior crowns, the six crowns for the anterior region received a micro-cutback for aesthetic micro-layering with CERABIEN™ ZR Porcelain. The shade scheme for individualization of the anterior crowns is shown in fig. 2. In a nutshell, customization was performed with the Internal Stains Cervical 1, Grayish Blue, Dark Grey and A+. The finishing layer on the incisors was created mainly using LT0 materials with some CCV-3 on the cervical and LT Natural on the mesial and distal lobes. On the canines, LT1 was used instead of LT0. The posterior crowns were merely finished with liquid ceramics (CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 1. Sintered bar milled from KATANA™ Zirconia HTML Plus.

Fig. 2. Chroma map for micro-layering in the anterior region.

Fig. 3 shows the finished single crowns with their individual, age-appropriate shade effects on the sintered bar. After checking the fit of the crowns, the gum areas of the bar were individualized using CERABIEN™ ZR Tissue Porcelain (fig. 4). Subsequently, the crowns were luted to the zirconia abutments (fig. 5), leaving screw access holes in aesthetically uncritical positions (fig. 6). The final overdenture ready for try-in is shown in fig. 7. Due to an excellent fit on the implants (fig. 8), it was possible to immediately fix the overdenture with the screws, close the access holes with composite and discharge the patient. The final appearance is shown in fig. 9.

Fig. 3. Finished crowns on the sintered bar.

Fig. 4. Bar with individualized gum areas.

Fig. 5. Placement of the central incisor crowns on the bar.

Fig. 6. Occlusal screw access hole in the finished overdenture.

Fig. 7. Overdenture ready for try-in.

Fig. 8. Intraoral try-in of the aesthetic overdenture.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 9. Treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

This patient case is a good example of how important it is to respect the patient’s background, age and specific demands when producing dental restorations. Thanks to the great variety of restorative materials with different mechanical and optical properties available, it is possible to create suitable prosthetics for virtually every patient. However, for this purpose, it is important to stay up to date regarding new products launched and techniques developed. This way, it is often even possible to create beautiful and durable solutions in a simplified and efficient procedure such as micro-layering on innovative zirconia with a high aesthetic potential.

Dentist:

CDT MATHIAS BERGER

Case by MDT Daniele Rondoni and Dr. Enzo Attanasio.

Veneers made of zirconia? In some cases, like the one presented below, monolithic zirconia veneers may be an option. Reasons for selecting a latest-generation zirconia such as “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML include its very high translucency and a wall thickness of only 0.3 to 0.4 mm supporting minimally invasive tooth preparation. Due to a highly automated production procedure, the manual effort involved may be reduced, while highly aesthetic outcomes are possible.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Young female patient with misshaped and misaligned maxillary incisors. Digital smile design is used to reveal the ideal proportions and positions of the anterior teeth.

Fig. 2. Ideal tooth proportions and positions displayed over a picture of the teeth after orthodontic treatment and the creation of a mock-up. The positions are ideal and the tooth shapes obtained with the mock-up only need some minor adjustments.

Fig. 3. Facial view of the patient with the planned veneers blended in.

Fig. 4. Guided tooth structure removal with the aid of a silicone index. The minimum wall thickness of the selected material – “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML – is 0.4 mm.

Fig. 5. Matched digital impressions of the maxilla and mandible taken after tooth preparation.

Fig. 6. Monolithic restoration made of “KATANA™ Zirconia” YML placed on the resin model after the 7-hour final sintering.

Fig. 7. Lateral view of the master cast with the six veneers individualized with the liquid ceramic system CERABIEN™ FC Paste Stain.

Fig. 8. Tooth-like translucency of the veneers on the model.

Fig. 9. Intra-oral try-in with two different shades of the PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste: A2 is used in the right and Clear in the left quadrant. It was decided by the dentist to use A2 shade.

Fig. 10. Lateral view of the cemented veneers. The result is a natural surface texture, which contributes to a natural appearance of the restorations.

Fig. 11. Frontal view of the veneers in place.

Fig. 12. Treatment outcome immediately after rubber dam removal.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 13. Treatment outcome with healthy soft tissues two weeks after treatment.

Fig. 14. Gums are healthy and the restorations show a great optical integration with the adjacent posterior teeth.

Dentists:

Clinical case by Dr. Frank Heldenbergh

The advancements in zirconia in contemporary dentistry nowadays allow for a wider range of applications, including in the anterior sector, and for chairside production using dedicated CAD/CAM systems. Even without a cutback, KATANA™ Zirconia Block (STML), combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), offer an extremely satisfactory aesthetic solution.

In the present patient case, the materials were chosen to replace old PFM crowns on the maxillary central incisors. The planned treatment was in accordance with the patient's wishes, and carried out in a single appointment.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient asked for a replacement of the existing crowns on the two maxillary central incisors (teeth 11 and 21, FDI notation). The porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations had been in place for about thirty years (Figure 1). She desired aesthetic improvements and slight repositioning of these two teeth.

TREATMENT PLAN

In agreement with the patient, it was decided to perform the entire procedure in one appointment: removal of the existing crowns, digital impressions, production, and bonding of new restorations. The periodontium was healthy with no bleeding. The only uncertainty was whether the existing crowns were cemented onto inlay-cores or if they were Richmond crowns. A preliminary silicone impression was taken as a precautious measure: in case something unexpected prevented the new crowns from being bonded during the session, it would be easily possible to produce temporary crowns.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

TREATMENT

Using a diamond bur followed by a tungsten carbide bur, the existing crowns were removed, revealing that they indeed were Richmond crowns. Because the anatomy of the intra-radicular posts clearly contraindicates an attempt to remove these posts, it was decided to trim the crowns to transform them into inlay cores rather than risk further damage. The corono-peripheral preparations were reworked at the same time. One of the major challenges was related to the necessity of masking the metal of the transformed coronal-radicular reconstructions. Luckily, the space available was sufficient for the production of full zirconia crowns with a significant thickness (Figure 2). The target shade of the crowns was chosen in consultation with the patient (Figure 3).

Fig. 2. Situation after removal of the existing restorations.

Fig. 3. Shade determination using a shade tab: A2 was the appropriate shade.

Subsequently, impressions were taken using and intraoral scanner, the virtual models were checked and the crowns designed, considering the patient's request to have her two incisors slightly retracted (Figures 4 and 5).

Fig. 4. Virtual models of the patient’s teeth with the newly designed crowns, revealing the space available for a slight retraction.

Fig. 5. Designing of the two crowns.

The two crowns were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia Block 14Z A2 (Figure 6). A quick reminder: unlike lithium disilicate, zirconia prosthetic parts cannot be tried in immediately after milling, as they are around 20 percent larger than their final size after sintering. Final sintering was performed within about 18 minutes using the furnace SINTRA CS (ShenPaz Dental Ltd). After this process, the crowns may be tried on to check their fit, shape, shade and optical integration.

Fig. 6. Milled crowns in the CAD/CAM blocks.

For finishing of the restorations, different options are available. In this case, we decided not to limit ourselves to mechanical polishing of the prosthetic parts, as zirconia does not fluoresce like natural teeth. To add fluorescence as an optical feature, the surface was lightly stained and glazed with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain (Figure 7).

Fig. 7. Crowns in the furnace after staining and glazing with liquid ceramics.

After firing, the two incisor crowns were tried in again using a try-in paste corresponding to the chosen resin cement system (PANAVIA™ V5, Kuraray Noritake Dental). In this way, the final appearance was simulated to validate the shade of the cement. The intaglio surfaces of the crowns were then sandblasted before applying CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS as the restoration primer. The prepared teeth were treated with KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) to decontaminate the surface from proteins in saliva and possibly blood. Those clean surfaces are ideal for bonding. After thorough rinsing and drying, PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer (containing MDP monomer for bonding with the hydroxyapatite and metal of the preparation) was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 8).

Fig. 8. Selected cementation system and try-in.

Subsequently, PANAVIA™ V5 Paste was applied into the first crown, which was then seated, followed by tack curing (brief photopolymerization for three to five seconds), excess removal and final light curing from all sides.

The procedure was then repeated for the second maxillary central incisor. The result instantly satisfied the patient, both in terms of aesthetics (adaptation, position of the new crowns, mimicry) and the comfort provided (Figures 9 and 10).

Fig. 9. Crowns immediately after placement.

Fig. 10. Aesthetically pleasing and comfortable result.

At a recall after four months, soft tissue conditions were ideal and the patient was happy with the outcome (Figures 11 to 13). The selected zirconia had nice optical properties, masking of the metal posts was successful and the natural surface texture contributed its share to a nice overall picture. The retracted position of the teeth was also perceived positively by the patient, while comfort and function were excellent.

DISCUSSION

Although lithium disilicate has so far been considered the material of choice for prosthetic work in the anterior region, zirconia is nowadays proving to be an extremely satisfactory alternative from every point of view: milling, strength, aesthetics, assembly (among other things, no hydrofluoric acid is required for bonding). KATANA™ Zirconia Blocks (STML) with a multi-layered colour structure in a single 4Y-TZP zirconia block, combined with CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain, offer a remarkable solution. This applies to treatments around the replacement of existing crowns as well as first-line treatments with less invasive preparations (verti-prep) than those required by other types of ceramics.

Fig. 11. The patient’s smile at a recall after four months.

Fig. 12. Great optical integration.

Fig. 13. Natural surface texture contributing to success Control pictures after four months taken by Emmanuel Charleux.

Dentist:

FRANK HELDENBERGH

Dr. Frank Heldenbergh graduated with a Doctor of Dental Surgery degree from the University of Reims in 1988.Driven by a passion for prosthetics, he pursued further specialization as a Prosthetic Resident at the UFR Odontology of Reims from 1990 to 1992. Dr. Heldenbergh’s dedication to advancing dental practices led him to join the Board of the Academy of Adhesive Dentistry in 1999. His commitment to this field has been unwavering, and he currently serves as the Vice President of A.D.D.A.-R.C.A.

Recognized for his expertise in ceramic veneers, inlays and onlays, Dr. Heldenbergh supervised practical work for the Paris Odontological Society from 2000 to 2018, shaping the skills of many aspiring dentists. His influence extended to the A.D.F. Congress, where he supervised practical work on ceramic veneers from 2000 to 2016. In 2017, he was the Head of Practical Work at A.D.F., a role that allowed him to further contribute to the advancement of dental education and practices. In 2018, he was the Head of Practical Work for ceramic veneers at the Paris Odontological Society.

Recognizing the importance of technology in modern dentistry, Dr. Heldenbergh pursued a University Degree in CAD/CAM from Toulouse in 2022. This addition to his qualifications highlights his dedication to staying at the forefront of dental innovation.

Case by Dr. Enzo Attanasio

The introduction of new-generation composites, equipped with nanofillers and highly loaded, has opened doors to new techniques for managing direct and semi-direct restorations. In particular, over the last ten years, there has been a significant revolution in the world of flowable composites. Nowadays, these materials offer a filler percentage very similar to packable composites through precise interventions in resin matrix management. They come in various viscosities, offering numerous advantages both in terms of handling and clinical use, as well as beneficial mechanical and physical characteristics.

FLOWABLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE

This new era of flowable composites has seen the development of a technique known as the Flowable Injection Technique (also referred to as injection moulding). It enables dental practitioners to reproduce anatomical forms created by a dental technician in the laboratory through a diagnostic wax-up. The shapes planned on the model are transferred directly in the patient's mouth using transparent silicone matrices or indexes, into which the composite is injected through specific injection holes.

The main difference compared to traditional mock-ups is that the reproduced dental elements remain separate from each other. This technique provides predictable results identical to those developed on the technician's wax-up, requiring less chair time than direct veneering and offering a longevity similar to traditional composite restorations.

BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

The major benefit of this technique is the faithful reproduction of morphological details that the technician creates on the diagnostic wax-up, which the clinician can reproduce with minimal effort. The restoration produced through the flowable injection technique, if all steps are followed correctly, requires minimal finishing by the clinican, who only needs to focus on polishing the composite.

However, one limitation is the difficulty in isolating the operative field, often requiring a split-dam technique or labial retractors, with all the associated adhesive challenges. The use of a rubber dam is only feasible if the peripheral dental tissues around the restoration are euchromatic, allowing the technician to create a wax-up with supragingival preparation margins.

Another compromise with the flowable injection technique is the management of the composite as a single mass. This makes it only possible to reproduce natural incisal translucencies typical of young patients by performing complex cutbacks and subsequent incisal painting. Without specific operator skills, the outcomes of this time-consuming manual procedure are unpredictable.

HYBRID TECHNIQUE: BEST.FIT

To leverage the advantages of both classical direct anterior restoration and flowable injection techniques and eliminate the limitations, a hybrid technique known as BEST.FIT (Buccal Enamel Shade Through Flow Injection Technique) has emerged. This technique allows the operator to manage the delicate phase of reproducing the buccal enamel layer of the anterior restoration through the flowable injection technique, keeping certain aspects in mind during the injection phase.

PROCEDURE

The transparent silicone key used for the creation of the buccal enamel layer is similar to the one used in the original flowable injection technique. The initial phase of restoration management follows all the classical steps of direct technique, requiring isolation with rubber dam. The palatal enamel layer is recreated with a highly translucent packable composite, and the palatal portion of the interproximal walls is produced using a suitable matrix system. Then, the core of the restoration is defined with opaque masses, creating mamelons and adding incisal effects. It's crucial to control the residual enamel thickness using a vestibular silicone index, aiming for about 0.3 mm of space. The buccal portion is finally reconstructed during the injection phase. The transparent silicone index created on the wax-up should be tested after each reconstruction phase to ensure passive insertion.

After creating the restoration core, the element to be injected is separated from the contiguous ones with thin PTFE tape. The transparent mask is then inserted, and fluid composite is injected through the injection holes to precisely reconstruct the buccal enamel thickness. The composite tip should be positioned at least halfway through the buccal surface, and the injection should be slow and controlled to avoid air bubbles in the material.

FINISHING

Following a 40-second polymerization vestibularly and occlusally, the transparent matrix is carefully removed, and excess interproximal composite above the PTFE tape as well as any remaining composite cylinder from the injection holes are removed. After completing all restorative elements, the rubber dam is dismantled, and composite excess is finished. After checking the occlusion, the composite is polished, usually requiring no further intervention.

CASE EXAMPLE

Fig. 1. Female patient with discoloured anterior restorations desiring a smile makeover.

Fig. 2. Close-up of her maxillary anterior teeth.

Fig. 3. Restorations in need of replacement: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 4. Restorations in need of replacement: Lateral view from the left.

Fig. 5. Printed model based on a digital diagnostic wax-up based on a digital impression.

Fig. 6. Palatal silicone index produced for the conventional direct restoration steps.

Fig. 7. Transparent matrix with injection holes produced for the build-up of the buccal enamel layer using the flowable injection technique.

Fig. 8. Operative field isolated with rubber dam.

Fig. 9. Existing restorations removed and tooth surfaces roughened at the start of treatment.

Fig. 10. Palatal silicone index positioned intraorally for the build-up of the palatal wall.

Fig. 11. Checking of the space available in the vestibular area with a second silicone index.

Fig. 12. Etching with phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 13. Application of a universal adhesive (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 14. Palatal walls built up with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1E with the aid of the palatal silicone index.

Fig. 15. Build-up of the interproximal walls with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A1D and establishing of the contact points using anatomical sectional matrices for the posterior area placed vertically.

Fig. 16. Dentin core built up with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A2D. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low in the shade XW was applied on the mamelons, while CHROMA ZONE™ COLOR STAIN Blue (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was used to reproduce incisal translucencies in the spaces not covered by the dentin core.

Fig. 17. Try-in of the transparent matrix for flowable injection.

Fig. 18. Isolation of the adjacent teeth with PTFE tape for a one-by-one injection.

Fig. 19. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES FLOW Low in the shade A2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) injected for the anatomical shaping of the maxillary right central incisor.

Fig. 20. Situation after flowable injection for all four anterior teeth, light curing through the matrix, final matrix removal and excess removal.

Fig. 21. Treatment outcome …

Fig. 22. … with visible mamelons, natural incisal translucencies …

Fig. 23. … and a lifelike anatomical shape …

Fig. 24. … of the restorations.

CONCLUSION

Each work phase must be executed with extreme care to lay the foundations for a passive linking of all subsequent steps without creating difficult management situations. The BEST.FIT technique is a convenient and useful method for dental practitioners to manage multiple direct anterior restorations simply and predictably, especially in situations requiring complex rehabilitations with large restorations.

Dentist:

ENZO ATTANASIO

Enzo Attanasio graduated in 2008 in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics from the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro. In 2009, he went on to specialize in the use of laser and new technologies in the treatment of oral and perioral tissues at the University of Florence. That year he also attended Prof. Arnaldo Castellucci’s course in Clinical Endodontics at the Teaching Center of Microendodontics in Florence where, in 2012, he went on to complete his training in Surgical Microendodontics. In 2017 he attended a course on Direct and indirect Adhesive Restorations at Prof. Riccardo Becciani’s Think Adhesive training center in Florence where he later become a tutor. Today, as a member of the Italian AIC and based in Lamezia Terme, Italy, Dr Attanasio has a special interest in Endodontics and Aesthetic Conservative.

Case by Andreas Chatzimpatzakis

Observe and copy: This is the key to nature-like dental restorations. There are many optical effects, colour transitions and morphological details in natural teeth that need to be taken in and understood – and replicating them is only possible for those who know exactly how their materials work. Once these skills are acquired, however, they enable a dental technician to produce their restorations as truly beautiful copies of nature. Even when restoring a single maxillary central incisor, the technique delivers outstanding – or inconspicuous - outcomes, as revealed by the following example.

Using high-quality, translucent and gradient-shaded zirconia frameworks and porcelains, the layering technique does not have to be highly complicated. Two bakes and a number of selected effect liquids, internal stains and porcelains are usually sufficient for outcomes that exceed expectations.

CASE EXAMPLE

In the present case, a young male patient had a quite opaque crown on his maxillary right central incisor that needed to be replaced. During shade selection in the dental laboratory (Fig. 1), it was observed that the cervical third of the adjacent central incisor is lighter than the rest. Its shade in other areas corresponded to B4 on the VITA classical A1-D4^® Shade Guide. Hence, it was decided to use a somewhat lighter material for the framework and darken the restoration especially in the middle and incisal areas with internal stains.

The concrete plan was to mill a coping made of KATANA™ Zirconia STML (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A3, characterize it with Esthetic Colorant (both Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) and sinter the piece (Figs 2 to 4). In the following layering procedure including just two bakes, a combination of internal stains and selected porcelains (CERABIEN™ ZR, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied as illustrated in Figures 5 to 12. Figures 13 to 17 display the result on the model, minor adjustments during try-in and the final treatment outcome.

Fig. 1. Shade selection. The cervical third of the adjacent central incisor is lighter than usual compared to the middle and incisal areas.

Fig. 2. Coping made of KATANA™ Zirconia STML in the shade A3.

Fig. 3. Intensification of some shade characteristics of the multi-layered blank using Esthetic Colorant in the shades Grey (middle) and Blue and Grey (incisal area).

Fig. 4. Coping after sintering.

Fig. 5. Colour map for internal staining, using CERABIEN™ ZR Internal Stains.

Fig. 6. Result of the use of Shade Base Stain Modifier Fluoro to increase the fluorescence and internal staining as planned.

Fig. 7. Application of Opacious Body OBA2, …

Fig. 8. … Translucent Tx …

Fig. 9.: … and Luster CCV-2.

Fig. 10. Crown after the first bake.

Fig. 11. Crown after the application of CERABIEN™ ZR Internal Stains: A+, Aqua Blue 2, White mixed with Cervical 2 (ratio: 30/70) for the cracks, and Cervical 2.

Fig. 12. Application of Luster LT1 to finalize the shape.

Fig. 13. Finished crown after the second bake on the model.

Fig. 14. Evaluation of the surface texture: Observing and copying the surface details is as important as the imitation of the shade characteristics.

Fig. 15. Minor texture adjustments during try-in.

Fig. 16. Final restoration in place after cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 17. Treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

Mastering the art of observing natural teeth is the key to lifelike restorations. It allows a dental technician to develop a deep understanding of shade and morphology, which is – apart from knowing the selected materials very well – the only talent needed to reach a high level of excellence. Those who are observant and take in every detail with their eyes can be sure that their mind will understand and their hands will automatically follow.

Dental technician:

ANDREAS CHATZIMPATZAKIS

Andreas graduated from the Dental Technology Institute (TEI) of Athens in 1999. During his studies he followed a program at the Helsinki Polytechnic Department of Dental Technique, where he trained on implant superstructures and all ceramic prosthetic restorations. As of 2000, he is running the ACH Dental Laboratory in Athens, Greece, specialized on refractory veneers, zirconia and long span implant prosthesis. In 2017 Andreas visited Japan where he trained under the guidance of Hitoshi Aoshima, Naoto Yuasa and Kazunabu Yamanda and become International Trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc..

Case by Martin Laurik, MDT

There are so many different restorative materials out there and so many design and finishing concepts available that it often seems difficult to select the best option for a specific case. Using an allrounder like KATANA™ Zirconia YML can facilitate decision making: It is a great choice for single- to multi-unit restorations, works on teeth and implants alike, and can be adapted to individual needs by selecting a suitable design concept and adequate finishing technique. In this way, it is even possible to solve aesthetically challenging cases as the one illustrated below.

Initial situation and temporization

This patient was in need for treatment after the loss of her maxillary right central incisor and the placement of an implant in this region. As a replacement of the restorations on the other three maxillary incisors was necessary as well, it was decided to produce four crowns made of the same material – KATANA™ Zirconia YML. For aesthetic evaluation of the restorations’ length, angulations and shape in the mouth and a functional test drive, the crowns were digitally designed in full contour and milled from PMMA in the determined tooth shade A2 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Full-contour PMMA crowns on the master cast.

Design, milling and effect dyeing of the zirconia crowns

Once the appearance and functional aspects of the temporary restorations were approved by the patient and the restorative team, the definitive crowns were produced. Their design was based on the full-contour design of the temporaries; however, a facial reduction of 0.6 mm was carried out by the software to create space for individualization with a small layer of veneering porcelain. The crowns were then milled from a KATANA™ Zirconia YML disc in the shade A1 – approximately one shade lighter than the determined tooth shade. To mask the uneven colour from the tooth stumps and the implant abutment, the intaglio of the crowns was treated with Esthetic Colorant in the shade Opaque. Some individual and intensified colour effects on the vestibular surface were also created with Esthetic Colorant.

Internal staining and porcelain layering

To slightly adjust the chroma and lightness, a first layer of CERABIEN™ ZR Internal Stains was added, followed by a wash bake. After the application of a first layer of CERABIEN™ ZR porcelains (Body, Enamel and Translucent) and baking (Fig. 2) – the central incisors received a layer of A1B, the lateral incisors a mixture of A1B and A2B (slightly darker to provide for a better match with the canines) with LT1, LT Natural completing the picture – additional internal staining was carried out (Fig. 3). The final layer of CERABIEN™ ZR luster porcelains (LT1, ELT2 used on the convex line angles to achieve an external reflection) was added and fixed in a fourth bake (Fig. 4).

After adjustments and very rough polishing, a self-glaze firing programme was selected (firing temperature 915 °C, holding time 5 seconds). On the highly polished incisal and palatal parts of the crowns and for contact point adjustment, CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain Glaze was applied and fixed with the same bake. The finished crowns on the model are shown in Figure 5, while Figure 6 displays the final treatment outcome.

Fig. 2. Crowns milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML with a facial cutback of 0.6 mm after individualization with Esthetic Colorant, sintering, internal staining and the application of a first layer of porcelain.

Fig. 3. This picture shows the subtle internal stain adjustment to the ceramic mostly on the incisal part.

Fig. 4. Crowns prior to final shape adjustments and polishing.

Fig. 5. Finished crowns on the model.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 6. Treatment outcome.

Easy approach to beautiful restorations

The presented approach is a relatively easy way of producing highly aesthetic anterior restorations. Using an allrounder zirconia combined with a few selected effect liquids, internal stains and luster porcelains, it is possible to achieve a great optical integration even in a situation where teeth and implants need to be restored. The natural shape and surface texture of the restorations plays an important role in this context, as does the base material – a naturally shaded, highly translucent zirconia.

Dentist:

MARTIN LAURIK, MDT

Martin started working as a dental technician in 2014. In the time since, he never stopped training and learning from renowned colleagues. Continuing education courses focused on dental ceramics and occlusion in the functional concept of Slavicek. Fascinated by the beauty of natural teeth, developing an understanding of their complexity and learning how to mimic nature’s design as closely as possible has always been his primary goal, while he is well aware that there is still a lot to be learned and explored on the road to excellence.

With PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and KATANA™ Zirconia

By using PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and its proprietary dual-monomer technology, you can now simplify the bonding of restoration to implant abutments without the use of separate primers or silane. Independent research has confirmed this new dual-monomer technology does not sacrifice adhesion or durability on glass-based ceramics or zirconia. The technique, in this case study, is for custom fabricated abutment & KATANA™ Zirconia YML crown, however, the basic technique on the treatment of the abutment and restoration may be used with any implant restoration combination as long as the proper surface treatments for type of material is followed.

INITIAL FIT OF ABUTMENT & RESTORATION

Basic technique on the treatment of the abutment and restoration.

Fig. 1. Check Initial Fit of Abutment & Restoration: abutment & crown margins should be checked to ensure proper fit.

Fig. 2. Protect base of implant with putty or light-cure block-out resin. The base of the implant should be covered so that it is not air abraded accidentally.

Fig. 3. Abrade titanium abutment with 50 μm alumina oxide powder.

Fig. 4. Clean abutment with KATANA™ Cleaner: Apply KATANA™ Cleaner by rubbing each area for 10 seconds.

KATANA™ Cleaner is a universal cleaner that is indicated to clean metal, zirconia & glass-based restorations. It is also an intra oral cleaner that may be used on dentin and enamel.

TREATMENT OF KATANA™ Zirconia RESTORATION WORKFLOW

Bonding to zirconia has been proven to be durable in research going back to the 1990’s with the original MDP adhesive monomer in the PANAVIA™ resin cements. The three requirements to bonding zirconia are:

1. Air abrade zirconia with 50 μm alumina oxide powder.
2. Clean zirconia
3. Apply an MDP-Based Primer or resin cement. PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal contains the original MDP that was developed & patented in 1981 by Kuraray Dental.

Fig. 1. Air abrade KATANA™ Zirconia at 14-58 psi.

Fig. 2. Dispense & mix PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal (it is available in automix or handmix formulations).

Fig. 3. Apply PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal to the abutment or inside the crown.

Fig. 4. Seat restoration on abutment.

Fig. 5. Remove excess resin with a dry micro-applicator or brush.

Fig. 6. You may light-cure the margins after cleaning up all excess resin. If you fully cure excess resin, It can be difficult to remove. If difficult to remove, change curing time or distance with your light.

Fig. 7. Leave restoration on abutment to self-cure fully for approximately 10 minutes at room temperature.

Fig. 8. Final check of custom abutment KATANA™ Zirconia YML crown on model.

Dentist:

JEAN CHIHA

Technician Jean Chiha CDT, Santa Ana, CA USA

Mr. Chiha is the owner of North Star Dental Laboratory and Milling Center, Santa Ana, CA, and has served as President of the Dental Lab Owners Association of California since 2013. He is a 1985 graduate of Institut Dento Technic, a private dental technology school in France. Mr. Chiha lectures internationally on dental communication and case planning. Jean lectures around the world on a variety of topics and has carved out a niche with his extensive knowledge of zirconia. Affectionately referred to as “Mr. Katana” due to his involvement in the creation of the material.

With PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal

By using PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and its proprietary dual-monomer technology, you can now simplify the bonding of any restoration to implant abutments without the use of separate primers or silane. Independent research has confirmed this new dual-monomer technology does not sacrifice adhesion or durability on glass-based ceramics or zirconia. The technique, in this case study, is for Ti-Base Implants, however, the basic technique on the treatment of the abutment and restoration may be used with any implant restoration combination.

TREATMENT OF TITANIUM ABUTMENT

Fig. 1. After attaching the abutment to the implant analog.

Fig. 2. Protect the base of the abutment with block out resin & light-cure.

Fig. 3. Air abrade the Titanium Abutment with 30-50 μm Alumina Powder @ 32 PSI.

Fig. 4. Clean abutment with KATANA™ Cleaner (10’s Rubbing, Rinse & Dry).

KATANA™ Cleaner is a universal cleaner that is indicated to clean metal, zirconia & glass-based restorations. It is also an intra oral cleaner that may be used on dentin and enamel.

REFERENCE INDEX POINTS TO ENSURE ACCURATE SEATING

Fig. 1. Mark Index position on implant analog.

Fig. 2. Mark index position (notch) on crown.

TREATMENT OF RESTORATION & BONDING TO THE ABUTMENT

Fig. 1. If Lithium Disilicate, HF acid etch Internal Surfaces, with 5% HF etch for 20’seconds then rinse & dry. If Zirconia, air abrade, at 14-58 PSI.

Fig. 2. Inject PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal (White Shade) onto treated & cleaned abutment.

Fig. 3. Align index points & seat crown onto abutment.

Fig. 4. Place crown & implant into clamps & lightly tighten.

Fig. 5. Tack-Cure Clean-Up: Light-Cure excess cement for 2-5 seconds (time depends on light output & distance held).

Fig. 6. Remove excess cement & block-out resin with an explorer. PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal has extremely easy clean-up.

Fig. 7. Wipe off remaining resin with gauze.

Fig. 8. Remove index mark with alcohol & gauze.

Fig. 9. Clean & polish restoration prior to seating. Surfaces coming in contact with soft-tissue should be polished.

Dentist:

GREG CAMPBELL

Dentist Greg Campbell DDS, Long Beach, CA USA

Greg Campbell, DDS is recognized internationally as an expert on integrating CAD/CAM dentistry into offices and is frequently sought out by industry leaders to lecture about Digital Dentistry. Dr. Campbell has a great understanding of Digital Technology and trains other dentists how to use this technology and is a certified Advanced CEREC Trainer. He is a former Beta tester for Sirona Dental and has authored two books on CAD/CAM dentistry. Dr. Campbell has created multiple polishing kits used for ceramics and has been trained on advanced adhesion materials, research & techniques and utilizing them clinically for over 8 years. Dr Campbell was an Alpha and Beta Tester for KATANA™ STML.

Dr. Campbell graduated from the University of Southern California School of Dentistry and completed advanced training in Cosmetic Dentistry at UCLA and maintains a private practice in Long Beach California.

Case report by Dr. Wissam Dirawi, DDS

During the last decade, zirconia has increasingly established itself as the material of choice in oral prosthodontic rehabilitation. Its great mechanical and inert properties are the main reason for this trend. Since the introduction of multi-layered zirconia blanks more than ten years ago, the optical properties have been improved dramatically. The multi-layered zirconia used nowadays (e.g. KATANA™ Zirconia YML from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) offers well-balanced mechanical properties, translucency and colour. It allows dental technicians from all over the world to produce aesthetic full-contour restorations that are merely stained.

Even in the anterior region, stained monolithic restorations may be an option. Factors such as the age of the patient, the internal colour structure of the adjacent dentition, the number of teeth to be restored (one versus all four or six maxillary anterior teeth), the aesthetic demands of the patient and financial aspects should be taken into account in the material selection process. In the case described below, full-contour zirconia was selected for several reasons.

BACKGROUND

The 71-year-old female presented in the clinical due to aesthetic problems in the maxillary anterior region. Oral hygiene was good and the patient was a non-smoker. Infraposition of the existing implant-based crown (Nobel Biocare Brånemark RP fixture) in the position of the right central incisor (tooth #11 according to the FDI notation) was evident. Moreover, gingival retraction was observed on the maxillary right lateral incisor (tooth #12), while the left lateral incisor (tooth #22) has a major composite filling with discolouration. The patient expressed the desire to adjust the gingival level differences and to restore the four maxillary incisors with all-ceramic crowns for optimal aesthetics.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Frontal view.

Fig. 2. Initial situation: Facial view.

Fig. 3. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the maxilla.

Fig. 4. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the mandible.

MATERIAL SELECTION

Due to the decision to restore all four anterior incisors, monolithic zirconia was a suitable material option. It would allow the team to obtain the desired results within the financial framework. In order to meet the aesthetic demands of the patient, provide for the required mechanical properties and allow for proper masking of the underlying structures, KATANA™ Zirconia YML was selected. It offers colour, translucency and flexural strength gradation throughout the multi-layered blank.

TREATMENT PROCEDURE: FROM PREP TO TEMPORIZATION

In order to design the indirect restorations, a digital impression was taken with an intraoral scanner and the data was transferred to the dental laboratory Teknodont in Malmoe, Sweden. There, a digital wax-up was created. After patient approval, a matrix was produced and sent to the clinic. Here, the old restorations were removed and the three maxillary incisors (all but the one replaced by an implant) prepared for full coverage restorations. A healing abutment was placed on the implant and a temporary bridge produced chairside using the matrix and Protemp 4 Temporization Material (3M) in the shade A3. Subsequently, a gingivectomy was carried out with a ceramic burr (Ceratip, Kt.314.016 – KOMET) in the buccal aspect of the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 5. Chairside-produced temporary in the patient’s mouth.

After the patient’s approval of the aesthetics, phonetics and function of the temporary restoration, the situation was captured with an intraoral scanner again. This allowed the team to duplicate the shape of the construction. Based on the acquired data, a new set of splinted temporary crowns made of PMMA (HUGE Multilayer PMMA) in the shade A3 was milled in laboratory. They were placed to allow the patient to further evaluate the aesthetic appearance and function for a couple of weeks. The patient was happy with the phonetics, function and appearance of the crowns, which were merely slightly too bright in comparison to the adjacent teeth, and approved the shape for the production of the permanent restorations.

Fig. 6. Printed model …

Fig. 7. … with splinted PMMA crowns.

Fig. 8. Lab-made temporary restorations.

Fig. 9. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 10. Long-term temporary in place: Frontal view.

Fig. 11. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the left.

FINAL RESTORATIONS: PRODUCTION AND CEMENTATION

Based on the dataset of the temporary restorations, four separate crowns – one implant and three tooth-based – were designed in full contour. Without any anatomical reduction, the restorations were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML. Based on the evaluation of the temporary restoration, the shade selected this time was A3.5. CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain was used for external staining and glazing of the surface. Still in the laboratory, the implant-based crown was cemented to the gold-shaded titanium abutment (Elos Medtech) with PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade opaque for an improved masking effect.

While the abutment crown was screwed onto the implant and the screw hole closed with composite, the three tooth-based crowns were placed using PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 12. Final restorations on the model.

Fig. 13. Intraoral situation prior to restoration placement.

CONCLUSION

Multilayered zirconia is a suitable material for many clinical situations. Due to the availability of modern types of highly translucent, multi-layered blanks, it is possible to produce aesthetic outcomes even when using the material monolithically – not only in the posterior region, but also in the aesthetic zone in some indications. The present case shows that very good results and patient satisfaction can be obtained. And due to outstanding mechanical properties, these outcomes may be expected to last for a long time.

Fig. 14. Immediate treatment outcome: Facial view.

Fig. 15. Immediate treatment outcome: Frontal view.

Fig. 16. Immediate treatment outcome: Occlusal view.

Dentist:

WISSAM DIRAWI

Dr. Wissam Dirawi, Malmoe, Sweden. DDS.
Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics and Senior Adviser at Aqua Dental.

2000 Master´s degree in dentistry.
2000 - 2018 General Dentist in public dental care and private practice.
2011 - 2018 Part-time teacher and researcher at Malmö University, Faculty of Dentistry.
2018 Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics. Senior clinical adviser. Lecturer.

References

- Alfadhli R, Alshammari Y, Baig MR, Omar R. Clinical outcomes of single crown and 3-unit bi-layered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: An up to 6- year retrospective clinical study: Clinical outcomes of zirconia FDPs. J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104321.
- Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80.
- Alammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):117-135.
- Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mat 2020; 36: 1–8.
- Mazza LC, Lemos CAA, Pesqueira AA, Pellizzer EP. Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 128: 566–74.
- Passia N, Mitsias M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Bond strength of a new generation of universal bonding systems to zirconia ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 62:268–274.
- Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31:603-623.
- Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31:624–639.

Case by MDT Daniele Rondoni and MDT Roberto Rossi

Full-contour or an anatomically reduced design? When we need to decide how we want to design and finish a zirconia restoration we are asked to produced, many factors need to be taken into account – from aesthetics to function and from time- to budget-related ones. As the outcomes are strongly dependent on the optical and mechanical properties of the zirconia used, however, we are convinced that the first thing to do is to select a portfolio of high-quality zirconia materials. By experimenting with them in the dental laboratory, using different designs and finishing approaches with aligned materials and by comparing the results, you will be able to select the most appropriate concepts for your everyday work. In addition, you will develop a clear idea on when to use which concept.

Our own selection

The zirconia portfolio used in our dental laboratory consists of the KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered Series from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. It consists of three materials with a multi-layered colour structure designed to meet different needs with regard to flexural strength and translucency (KATANA™ Zirconia UTML, STML and HTML PLUS) and one material with colour, translucency and flexural strength gradation (KATANA™ Zirconia YML). Due to the favourable optical properties of this series and new effect liquids, it is often possible to opt for a full-contour design or – in the anterior region – for a slight cutback limited to the vestibular area plus a micro-layer of porcelain.

The effect liquids – Esthetic Colorant for KATANA™ Zirconia – were introduced n early 2023. They are applied to the surface of the milled zirconia to pre-treat tissue areas of large restorations, to add specific individual characteristics to the restoration or to prevent a greyish effect caused by the shining through of discoloured abutment teeth or metal parts. While most liquids are used on the outer surface of the restorations, the latter effect is achieved by applying Esthetic Colorant OPAQUE or WHITE to the intaglio.

Case example

The following case example describes the use of Esthetic Colorant in the context of producing a full-contour screw-retained implant bridge made of zirconia with a titanium bar. The zirconia part was milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML, the vestibular morphology refined with rotating instruments and then, the vestibular, palatal and occlusal surfaces were treated with Esthetic Colorant as shown in Figures 1 and 2. The true colour effect is revealed after sintering.

Fig. 1. Frontal view of the milled zirconia structure after the application of Esthetic Colorant in the shades BLUE, GRAY, ORANGE and PINK.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the milled zirconia structure after the application of Esthetic Colorant BLUE, GRAY, ORANGE and PINK.

Fig. 3. Nicely pre-treated zirconia structure after sintering.

By adding some CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain and Glaze in the vestibular area and to the tissue parts, it is possible to finish this restoration in a nice way. The contact areas are always just polished to a high gloss in our approach, as it is the most antagonist-friendly way of treating the surface. As a final measure, the zirconia structure was connected to the titanium bar before it was sent to the dental office for try-in.

Fig. 4. Frontal view of the finalized zirconia part.

Fig. 5. Occlusal view of the structure after finishing.

Fig. 6. Connecting the zirconia superstructure and titanium bar.

Conclusion

With a well-selected zirconia portfolio and aligned finishing solutions, it is easy to establish concepts that allow you to respond to the needs of virtually every patient in a streamlined way. In our experience, the use of high-quality products with good aesthetic properties – a high translucency and naturally pre-shaded multi-layer structure – pays off as it allows us to reduce the thickness or do without a porcelain layer. In this way, we are able to increase the efficiency of our procedures without compromising the outcomes.

The KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered Series and the new Esthetic Colorant for KATANA™ Zirconia support us in an ideal way by allowing us to efficiently produce a perfect base for whatever finishing approach we select.

Dentists: