Eight-time DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product selection provides effective relief for a painful condition

Dentine hypersensitivity is a painful condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It generally occurs when tubules are exposed for any number of reasons, including gingival recession, dental erosion or excessive tooth brushing. It can also be a side effect of professional tooth cleaning, scaling and root planning, tooth whitening, or restorative procedures.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER, which was honored by DENTAL ADVISOR every year from 2015 to 2022 as a Top Product selection, allows an effective non-invasive approach to the treatment of hypersensitivity when used as directed by dental professionals.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER is designed to crystalize hydroxyapatite (HAp), a mineral that is naturally found in enamel and dentin, and is the human body’s strongest material. When applied to exposed, mechanically treated, or freshly prepared dentin, the calcium phosphate based mixture blocks the exposed tubules and provides immediate pain relief. During setting, HAp is formed, providing for long-term prevention of hypersensitivity. Further, when used in the context of restorative treatment, TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER does not have a negative effect on the bond strength of subsequently utilized dental adhesives or cements.

DENTAL ADVISOR clinical study found TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER effective in providing hypersensitivity relief immediately following and for up to six months after application. The study evaluated 27 patients diagnosed with gingival recession-related hypersensitivity, which was diagnosed using thermal testing with cold air. For the initial assessment, patients were asked to evaluate their level and frequency of hypersensitivity per tooth on a five-point scale. They were questioned about their level of sensitivity immediately after TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER was applied, according to the instructions for use, and again six months later. At baseline, 91 percent of the patients stated that they had no or only mild, sporadic sensitivity, which was still the case for 85 percent after six months.

This natural, tissue-friendly product is highly biocompatible and is free of gum irritants such as glutaraldehyde or methacrylates. It is indicated for use by dental professionals for all  sensitivity challenges in everyday practice, including prevention of cervical hypersensitivity before/after bleaching, scaling or root planning, and underneath restorations.

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to support potential users in identifying high-quality dental materials and determining which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements. Awards are based on results of its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests, which are conducted shortly after product launch.

Among products honored this year are five from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.: CLEARFIL™ SE Protect, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (Low), and PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal were selected as Top Products; and CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick and CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS were chosen as Preferred Products.

Article by Dr. Adham Elsayed

High-performance adhesive resin cements are often the enablers of minimally invasive prosthodontic treatments. When the main aim is to save as much healthy tooth structure as possible, preparation designs that offer sufficient macro-mechanical retention for conventional cements are usually abandoned. The designs chosen instead need to rely on a strong and durable chemical adhesion established between the tooth structure and the restorative material – a task successfully accomplished by modern adhesive resin cement systems.

An excellent example of a minimally invasive, non-retentive preparation and restoration design is the single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDPs), nowadays usually made of 3Y-TZP zirconia. With its single cantilever bonded to the oral and proximal enamel surface of an adjacent tooth, it requires minimal to no healthy tooth structure removal. The RBFDP is often used to replace a congenitally missing tooth – in many cases a maxillary lateral incisor – in young patients with incomplete dentoalveolar development and narrow edentulous spaces unsuitable for conventional implant placement¹ (Fig. 1 and 2). Additional factors hindering implant therapy – like an insufficient bone volume or angulated roots – are also not an issue for this type of restoration. And compared to orthodontic gap closure, the treatment approach with a RBFDP is less risky, as it does not affect the vertical jaw relationship, prevent canine guidance or compromise the aesthetic appearance². Finally, it is much less invasive than conventional FDPs, which is usually not a treatment option for young patients in the anterior region. The level of patient satisfaction and the success rates of this treatment approach are impressive^3-7.

Fig. 1-2. Replacement of both congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors with single-retainer zirconia RBFDPs after soft tissue augmentation and gingival margin correction.

Despite the numerous advantages and excellent clinical performance – single-retainer RBFDP made of zirconia showed a survival of 98.2 percent and a success rate of 92.0 percent after ten years⁴ – many dental practitioners still opt for alternative treatment options. The reason may be a lack of trust in the bond strength and durability to zirconia. However, this bond can be very strong and durable – provided that a few rules are respected.

HOW TO ESTABLISH A STRONG BOND TO THE TOOTH STRUCTURE

In order to decide whether a missing tooth may be successfully replaced by a single-retainer RBFDP made of zirconia, the abutment tooth should be examined carefully. It needs to be vital and largely free of caries or direct restorations, while the oral enamel surface must be large enough for resin bonding¹. In addition, the space required for the placement of a retainer wing (thickness: about 0.7 mm) needs to be available, as a non-contact design is important for the success of the restoration. Among the preparation designs described in the literature is a lingual veneer and small proximal box preparation with retentive elements located in the enamel only¹, or no preparation at all⁷. For restoration placement, the abutment tooth is treated as usual: after cleaning e.g., with fluoride-free prophylaxis paste, phosphoric acid etchant is applied to the bonding surface, which is then thoroughly rinsed and dried.

HOW TO ESTABLISH A STRONG BOND TO THE RESTORATION

The recommended pre-treatment for the bonding surface of the retainer wing made of zirconia is small-particle (50 μm) aluminium oxide air-abrasion at a low pressure (approx. 1 bar)^8,9, followed by ultrasonic cleaning. Figures 3 (A-E) shows the sequence of surface treatment of zirconia restorations. As a visual aid for a controlled air-abrasion treatment, the marking of the surface with a pen has proven its worth. The whole air-abrasion procedure should be carried out after try-in, during which the tooth surface and the restoration usually becomes contaminated through contact with saliva and sometimes blood. Proteins present in saliva and blood that contaminate the bonding surface are safely removed in this way, while the required surface modification necessary to establish a strong and durable bond to the selected resin cement system is achieved¹⁰.

FIGURE 3: SEQUENCE OF SURFACE TREATMENT OF ZIRCONIA RESTORATION.

Fig. 3A. Cleaning of the restoration prior to luting with water steam cleaner.

Fig. 3B. Marking of the bonding surface as an visual aid for the air-abrasion.

Fig. 3C. Air-abrasion with 50-μm Al₂O₃ particles with 1 bar pressure.

Fig. 3D. Application of a primer containing 10-MDP.

Fig. 3E. Application of the composite resin cement.

WHICH RESIN CEMENT SYSTEM TO CHOOSE

Subsequently, the components of the resin cement system are applied. Regarding the selection of the system, it is generally recommended to use a restoration primer or resin cement that contains 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP)¹¹. In this way, a high-quality chemical bond is established. Among the resin cement systems used in the available long-term clinical studies is PANAVIA™ 21 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.)^4-6. Launched in 1993, this anaerobic-curing adhesive resin cement contains several important technologies like the MDP monomer and the Touch Cure Technology found in PANAVIA™ V5, the state-of-the art dual-cure multi-bottle adhesive resin cement system of the company. In order to further improve the bonding performance of this present product, however, the team of developers reviewed the basic composition, updated existing technologies and combined them with completely new ingredients.

Even with PANAVIA™ 21 introduced 30 years ago, high success rates were obtained^4-6. The few observed failures were mainly due to chipping of the veneering ceramic or debonding. Sometimes caused by traumatic incidents, the debondings resulted in no further damage and the restorations were simply rebonded using the same cementation system and procedure.

One might expect that with its improved formulation, PANAVIA™ V5 will offer an even stronger and more durable bond than predecessor products, so that it is even better suited for such demanding applications as the resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis. In a pilot study, this assumption was confirmed⁷. Without any preparation of the abutment tooth, but a defined size of the bonding surface of at least 35 mm², the team of researchers placed 24 monolithic zirconia resin-bonded bridges (made of KATANA™ Zirconia HT) to replace congenitally missing lateral incisors. The palatal sides of the central incisors were cleaned with pumice paste and treated with phosphoric acid, while the bonding surfaces of the restorations were sandblasted with aluminum oxide particles (50 μm, 2.5 bar pressure). Afterwards, twelve restorations were luted with PANAVIA™ V5, the other twelve with PANAVIA™ F2.0 (another earlier-version resin cement from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After an observation period of 32 to 50.47 months, the success and survival rates in the PANAVIA™ V5 group were 100 percent. In the other group, a connector fracture, a chipping and two debondings occurred. Based on these results, the authors of the publication concluded that “it has been seen that the new generation cement (PANAVIA™ V5) is more successful”⁷.

CONCLUSION

For many years, minimally invasive indirect restorative approaches like the replacement of missing incisors with resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses have been performed successfully by some dental practitioners. Many others, however, still seem to be hesitant whether these approaches will lead to the desired results in their hands. The available clinical study results, however, have confirmed that the procedure is highly advantageous and successful, while ongoing development efforts in the field of adhesive resin cements have led to products further decreasing the failure rates related to debonding. Even if a debonding occurs, however, no damage is usually done, so that the restoration can be rebonded again with little effort. These findings – together with the well-known benefits of minimally invasive dentistry in general – should encourage dental practitioners to start exploring the full potential of adhesive dentistry for themselves. In this context, PANAVIA™ V5 is definitely an excellent choice.

References

1. Sasse M, Kern M. All-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: treatment planning, clinical procedures, and outcome. Quintessence Int. 2014 Apr;45(4):291-7. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a31328. PMID: 24570997.
2. Tetsch J, Spilker L, Mohrhardt S, Terheyden H (2020) Implant Therapy for Solitary and Multiple Dental Ageneses. Int J Dent Oral Health 6(6): dx.doi. org/10.16966/2378-7090.332.
3. Wei YR, Wang XD, Zhang Q, Li XX, Blatz MB, Jian YT, Zhao K. Clinical performance of anterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with different framework designs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 11. PMID: 26875611.
4. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 5. PMID: 28688950.
5. Kern M. Fifteen-year survival of anterior all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017 Jan;56:133-135.
6. Sasse M, Kern M. Survival of anterior cantilevered all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses made from zirconia ceramic. J Dent. 2014 Jun;42(6):660-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 5. PMID: 24613605.
7. Bilir H, Yuzbasioglu E, Sayar G, Kilinc DD, Bag HGG, Özcan M. CAD/CAM single-retainer monolithic zirconia ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures bonded with two different resin cements: Up to 40 months clinical results of a randomized-controlled pilot study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Oct;34(7):1122-1131. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12945. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35920051.
8. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater. 2015 Jan;31(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PMID: 25059831.
9. Kern M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R, Kohal RJ, Kunzelmann KH, Mehl A, Pospiech P, Reis B. All-ceramics at a glance. An introduction to the indications, material selection, preparation and insertion techniques for all-ceramic restorations. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Keramik in der Zahnheilkunde. 3rd English edition, January 2017.
10. Comino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 22;14(11):2751.
11. Al-Bermani ASA, Quigley NP, Ha WN. Do zirconia single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses present a viable treatment option for the replacement of missing anterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Dec 7:S0022-3913(21)00588-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.015. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34893319.

Article by Dr. Bassem Jaidane

Among the most common problems in modern dentistry is that of restoring a patient‘s lost aesthetic dental appearance. To do this, new technologies are available to practitioners. For anterior teeth where aesthetics are paramount, dentists prefer the least invasive treatments possible, such as layered dental veneers (cut-back). In cosmetic dentistry, practitioners are often faced with cases requiring a multidisciplinary treatment plan or different types of restorative materials to be used at the same time. For cases of prosthetic restoration combining dental veneers, dental crowns and dental bridges, dentists are often faced with situations where the difference in shade is noticeable in the final result, this is explained by the difference in restorative material, product, adhesion technique, the thickness of the prosthetic element and the colour of the abutment, whether it is a living natural tooth, devitalized, or even an implant abutment^1-2.

In the presence of a treatment plan requiring dental veneers, crowns and dental bridges, choosing zirconia as the only restorative material is no longer an option but an obligation. The is due to the limited mechanical properties of lithium disilicate and feldspar porcelain restorations, which contraindicate their use as dental bridges. There are different factors explaining the reluctance of practitioners to use the zirconia dental veneer technique³: One is the absence of the vitreous phase. It makes impossible to create an optimal adhesion surface with hydrofluoric acid at the level of the intaglio of the zirconia veneers. Another is the lack of translucency of the first zirconia generations.

Modern zirconia materials, however, are particularly well-suited for cases requiring a combination of veneers, crowns and dental bridges of the same optical appearance. This is due to their increased translucency and excellent mechanical properties. The following article describes and discusses the realization of a clinical case treated with dental veneers and a crown using KATANA™ Zirconia UTML (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). the veneers were placed with PANAVIA™ Veneer LC (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). The patient presented an aesthetic problem at the level of an anterior implant-supported crown.

CASE OBSERVATION

Patient S, from the Tunisian Sahel, engineer in France, with no significant pathological history and aged 29, presented in January 2023 due to an aesthetic problem negatively affecting her smile. The extraoral examination was without abnormalities, while the intraoral examination showed good oral hygiene, healthy gums, a thin free gingiva and a protruded zirconia crown on an implant in the region of the maxillary right central incisor (figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view revealing the volume and position of the crown on the central incisor.

During the preliminary interview, it turned out that the implant in the region of the right central incisor had been placed in 2020. The patient’s former dentist had left Tunisian territory. The patient does not have any document or reference on the dental implant, and she wishes to “straighten” the crown and improve the aesthetics of her smile before her planned wedding ten days after her first consultation.

TREATMENT PLAN

After having had the informed consent of the patient and after having asked the indication of dental veneers for aesthetic reasons, the treatment was initiated. According to the treatment plan, seven maxillary anterior teeth (from first premolar to first premolar) should receive an incisal overlap preparation (depth: 0.1 to 0.3 mm) for the placement of veneers made of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML. For the implant in the region of the right central incisor, it was planned to replace the existing crown by a crown made of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML without replacing the abutment. This was due to the lack of information about the implant type and the lack of time.

TREATMENT

After taking the preoperative photos (fig 3), choosing the color of the veneers and anesthetizing the maxillary anterior region, the incisal overlap preparation was carried out on the seven maxillary teeth and the zirconia crown was removed from the implant. A cylindrical diamond bur was used to separate the zirconia part from the abutment. Subsequently, a bite record and impressions were taken using the wash technique. In addition, a temporary crown was produced and placed on the abutment.

Fig. 3. Preoperative picture.

In the dental laboratory, virtual models were created based on the conventional impressions (fig. 4). Then, the zirconia restorations were designed in full contour, cut back for the veneering porcelain and finished by layering with CERABIEN™ ZR porcelain (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). At try-in during the second session, we checked the insertion, the gingival margins, and the contact points between the veneers and the crown on the implant. Given the superior mechanical properties of the zirconia veneer, the shape and thickness of the veneers were modified chairside to have a harmonious anterior curve and a better aesthetic rendering. After determining the colour of the resin cement, the temporary crown was put back in place.

Fig. 4. Virtual model.

After glazing and preparation of the bonding surfaces in the dental laboratory, the upper veneers were cemented according to the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC protocol. We ended the session by removing excess cement. An occlusion check and postoperative photos were taken after three days.

DISCUSSION

In this case, the dental veneers and the crown on the implant were produced using a KATANA™ Zirconia UTML disc. This type of zirconia has an yttrium oxide proportion of 5 mol%, leading to about 70 % cubic zirconia phase, and therefore a higher translucency than earlier generations of zirconia. With a translucency of 51 % (light transmission, illuminant: D65, specimen thickness: 1.0 mm. Source: Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc); this zirconia allows us to have remarkable optical properties (fig 5).

Fig. 5. Remarkable optical properties of the final restorations.

The patient chose color BL1 and requested a transparent incisal edge. For this reason, a cutback design of the zirconia (fig. 6) and porcelain layering was the technique of choice. Figure 7 shows the slight transparency in the incisal edge region of the new restorations. The zirconia veneers technique was chosen to avoid the color difference between the crown on the implant and the veneers. The pleasant aesthetic appearance and a harmonious smile are confirmed by the post-operative picture (fig 8). According to the manufacturer, the flexural strength of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML is 557 MPa, which is higher than that of lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelains. As zirconia veneers will be more resistant to shear forces, it is possible to eliminate contact points that interfere during try-in or even safely modify the shape of the restorations in vivo. This is done with specific burs adapted to zirconia during different stages of the fittings according to the wishes of the patient⁴.

Fig. 6. Cutback design of the restorations.

Fig. 7. Slight transparency at the incisal edges of the restorations.

Fig. 8. Immediate post-operative picture.

In the present case, we were able to adjust the crown until we had a perfect anterior line. It was thus possible to optimize the inclination of the crown without replacing the dental implant, in just one week.

Given the significant shear resistance, the dental laboratory technician made zirconia dental veneers with an average thickness of 0.3 mm. Such a thin veneer requires less preparation of the dental tissue, which will be limited to enamel instead of extending into the dentin, where the adhesion value is lower due to its low chemical composition in minerals⁵.

The expected difficulty in bonding zirconia veneers is explained by the absence of a vitreous phase given the poor adhesion of the crystalline phase to the bonding cement. However, the desired surface modification can be achieved with a different procedure: tribochemical silica coating. It was used in the present case to improve the adhesion of the zirconia veneers to the resin cement system. Indeed, it was found in an in-vitro evaluation that the tribochemical preparation technique and the application of MDP provide an optimized adhesive interface⁶. In this study, dual-beam focused ion-beam technology followed by scanning electron microscopy were used to compare the resin/zirconia bonding interface with tribochemical preparation/MDP and the bonding interface between resin/zirconia without this preparation.

The tribochemical process consists of an aero-abrasion of the zirconia surface with particles coated with silica combined with a silane primer containing MDP. The phosphate ester groups of this silane bind to the surface oxides of the zirconia, and the methacrylate group makes covalent bonds with the resin matrix of the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC cement⁷.

In the present clinical cases, the KATANA™ Zirconia UTML veneers were abraded with silicon dioxide with the formula SiO2. As a primer, we chose CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), because it contains the original MDP monomer, developed Kuraray Co., Ltd.⁸.

To clean the veneers before applying CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was used. The presence of saliva and residues from fittings can alter the interface with the resin cement, which presents a risk of bonding failure of Zirconia veneers⁹.

One of the most important challenges in this case was to be able to hide the greyish color of the implant abutment which was visible through the zirconia crown. To hide the gray of the abutment, a resin opaker was applied. These techniques combined with the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC white gave us an optimal result (figs. 9 and 10)¹⁰.

Fig. 9. Treatment outcome.

Fig. 10. New smile designed according to the individual desires of the patient.

CONCLUSION

KATANA™ Zirconia UTML veneers have better mechanical properties than conventional veneers, so that the zirconia veneers technique allows users to combine bridges, crowns and dental veneers without a noticeable difference in shade. It offers acceptable translucency and aesthetics according to our observation. The technique of bonding the zirconia veneers with PANAVIA™ Veneer LC combined with a tribochemical treatment and the application of MDP on the adhesion surfaces allowed for a secure bonding, while the dyschromia caused by the implant abutment was effectively concealed.

Dentist:

DR. BASSEM JAIDANE

Born in Sousse, Tunisia, on June 12, 1983, Dr. Bassem Jaidane obtained his Doctorate in Dental Medicine in 2010 at the Faculty of Monastir. He opened his own clinic in 2010, specializing in aesthetics and dental implants, as well as dental veneers. Omni-patrician and passionate about all areas of dentistry, he has also developed advanced knowledge in dental prosthetics: 3D design, ceramic layering, finishing and glazing of crowns, bridges and veneers…

Dr. Bassem Jaidane has therefore acquired a certain expertise on the different types of dental veneers, whether pressed ceramic veneers, machined veneers, layereded veneers with the cut-back technique and lumineers veneers, after having carried out numerous cases. in feldspathic and lithium disilicate veneers, Dr. Bassem Jaidane has become one of the pioneers of the technique of dental veneers on zirconia.

References

1. Restaurations esthétiques grâce à la technique du cut-back Par Fleur Nadal, Geoffrey Di Bacco, Julien Chesnot Publié le 01.06.2019. Paru dans L‘Information Dentaire n°23 – 12 juin 2019 (page 28-29).
2. Effects of ceramic layer thickness, cement color, and abutment tooth color on color reproduction of feldspathic veneers Christopher Igiel, Michael Weyhrauch, Barbara Mayer, Herbert Scheller, Karl Martin Lehmann PMID: 29379907 Int J Esthet Dent 2018;13(1):110-119.
3. Influence of Air-Particle Deposition Protocols on the Surface Topography and Adhesion of Resin Cement to Zirconia. Acta Odontol: Sarmento, H.R.; Campos, F.; Sousa, R.S.; Machado, J.P.B.; Souza, R.O.A.; Bottino, M.A.; Ozcan, M: Acta Odontol Scand . 2014 Jul;72(5):346-53.doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.837958. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
4. Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Translucent Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate:Kwon, S.J.; Lawson, N.C.; McLaren, E.E.; Nejat, A.H.; Burgess, J.O. J.Prosthet:: J Prosthet Dent . 2018 Jul;120(1):132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.004. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
5. The Success of Dental Veneers According To Preparation Design and Material Type:Yousef Alothman, Maryam Saleh Bamasoud: Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):2402-408.doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.353. eCollection 2018 Dec 20.
6. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics: Blatz, M.B.; Vonderheide, M.; Conejo, J: J Dent Res 2018 Feb;97(2):132-139. doi: 10.1177/0022034517729134. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7. Ultra-thin monolithic zirconia veneers: reality or future? Report of a clinical case and one-year follow-up: Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza, Fernanda Pinheiro Barbosa, Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo, Eduardo Miyashita, Marco Antonio Bottino, Renata Marques de Melo, and Yu Zhang :Oper Dent :2018 ;43(1) :3_11.doi :10.234/16-350-T.
8. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance :Kumiko Yoshihara 1 , Noriyuki Nagaoka, Takumi Okihara , Manabu Kuroboshi, Satoshi Hayakawa, Yukinori Maruo, Goro Nishigawa, Jan De Munck, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Bart Van Meerbeek : Dent Mater : 2015 Dec;31(12):1493-501.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9. Effect of decontamination materials on bond strength of saliva-contaminated CAD/CAM resin block and dentin Kei Takahashi, Tomohiro Yoshiyama, Akihito Yokoyama, Yasushi Shimada, Masahiro Yoshiyama : Dent Mater J 2022 Jul 30;41(4):601-607. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-268. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10. Masking ability of implant abutment substrates by using different ceramic restorative systems Pablo Machado Soares , Ana Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues , Maria Gabriela Packaeser , Atais Bacchi , Luiz Felipe Valandro , Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira , Marília Pivetta Rippe J Prosthet Dent 2022 Sep;128(3):496.e1-496.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 Aug 16. Affiliations PMID: 35985853 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.010.

DENTAL ADVISOR Editor’s Choice and 2023 Preferred Product award recipient, quickly provides durable bond in a single procedure

CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick has been named a 2023 Editor’s Choice by DENTAL ADVISOR, which evaluates dental products and equipment and publishes its findings annually. It has also received recognition as DENTAL ADVISOR’s Preferred Product this year in the category of Universal Bonding Agents. The 31 consultants who evaluated its application during 1,065 usages gave it the excellent overall rating of 98%.

CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick is a single-bottle fluoride-releasing, universal adhesive with MDP monomer and amide monomer chemistry called rapid bond technology. This combination of the MDP monomer, which creates a strong chemical bond to hydroxyapatite, and newly developed hydrophilic amide monomer, which is highly hydrophilic, is responsible for fast chemical bonding and quick penetration into dental tissue. Because the amide monomer rapidly permeates dentin and enamel, it eliminates the need for long rubbing application of the adhesive into the dentin and reduces the wait time after application. After curing, the innovative amide monomer forms a moisture-resistant cross-linked polymer network.

As a result, the bonding is moisture-resistant and stable, with durable results. This method, which reduces application time without compromising bond strengths, sealing, or desensitizing, also reduces technique sensitivity.

A fast and versatile agent that bonds directly to dentin, enamel, metals, zirconia and lithium disilicate restorative materials, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick is suitable for bonding direct and indirect restoration and can be used for total-etch, selective-etch, or self-etch methods. When mixed with CLEARFIL™ DC Activator, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick becomes dual-cure and has universal use with both self- and dual-cured resin cements and core build-up resins. 

The practitioners evaluating the product commented on its ease in dispensing and placement, viscosity, suitability for all bonding procedures, and convenience. Among their remarks were: “Perfect viscosity. Ease of use and speed were great.” and “Great for replacement of silane to prime crowns for cementation with resin cement - will self-cure with the dual-cured resin.”

Honors such as Editor’s Choice that are conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to help busy practitioners make sense of the numerous new solutions indicated for less invasive techniques, standardized or simplified procedures, and better outcomes on a regular basis. DENTAL ADVISOR conducts its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests shortly after product launch, and publishes results annually online to help potential users identify high-quality new dental materials and determine which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements.

A pioneer in digital dental photography, the editor-in-chief of the “International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry” and a supporter of universal products: We are talking about Dr Alessandro Devigus, the owner of a private practice in Bülach, Switzerland. At the International Dental Show 2023 in Cologne, we had a conversation with him about his favourite products from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. and the concept of universal excellence.

Dr Adham Elsayed, Clinical and Scientific Manager at Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., interviewing Dr Alessandro Devigus.

Dr Devigus, why did universal products attract your attention?

We all would like to reduce the number of products and components used in our dental offices to make our lives easier and more predictable. Several years ago, when the first universal products started entering the dental market, I realized that these products and the concept behind them are able to help me achieve this goal.

For what kinds of treatments do you currently use universal products?

The main field of application is restorative dentistry, in indirect and direct restorative workflows, which often go hand in hand. Whenever possible and in accordance with the needs and desires of the patient, I opt for minimally invasive direct composite restorations, often realized using universal products. Cosmetic corrections or tooth wear treatments in the lower jaw, for example, are often carried out in a prepless procedure with resin composite applied with a single-shade technique. For anterior restorations in the upper jaw of the same patient, however, I might opt for ceramic restorations, luted with a universal resin cement.

What are your favourite indirect restorative materials, for which indications do you use them and when do universal products come into play?

I produce most of my single-tooth restorations chairside with CEREC. In the anterior region, the choice is usually between different types of glass ceramic materials. In some indications, when two central incisors or all four maxillary incisors need to be restored, zirconia is also a suitable option. In these cases and for indirect restorations in the posterior region, KATANA™ Zirconia Block is my preferred material. Having tested many different types of chairside zirconia, I can say that this product simply offers the most natural colour gradation and the desired vitality. Hence, finishing is quick and easy. At the same time, the high flexural strength of the material supports me in my striving for minimally invasive preparations. For definitive placement of the produced overlays and crowns, PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. is my dual-cure resin cement of choice. It bonds to virtually every surface including lithium disilicate without a separate primer and offers a good flowability that facilitates restoration placement. An additional feature contributing to a quick and stress-free clinical procedure is its easy and gingiva-friendly excess removal after tack curing.

What about direct restorations?

One of my favourite resin composites is CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Its single shade for the posterior and two shades for the anterior region offer just the right combination of translucency and intrinsic colour to imitate a large number of tooth shades. The effect is that it blends in nicely with the surrounding tooth structure without appearing grayish. In the posterior region, I was able to observe a certain masking potential, so that discoloured abutment teeth do not cause any problems. With this material, the shade determination step is eliminated. Clinical workflows are also simplified by the use of CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick. The universal adhesive is not only versatile as it is suitable for many indications and all etching techniques, but also extraordinarily quick in its application, as the need for an extensive rubbing into the tooth structure is eliminated. In this way, it is possible to streamline direct restorative procedures.

Why do you use so many products from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.?

I simply like products from Japanese companies. They stand for quality, integrity and clinical relevance. Japanese people seem to be deeply committed to the company they work for and to their work, pay attention to every detail and try to deliver the best outcomes possible. This attitude is reflected in Kuraray’s mission “For people and the planet—to achieve what no one else can.”, and it is reflected in the products of the company as well. They offer the properties I need to deliver high-quality dental treatments.

You said that making your life easier and more predictable is the main reason for you to opt for universal materials. Please explain.

In the first place, using fewer products and components that are easy and quick in their application allows me to get a grip on costs. With fewer steps and fewer bottles, shortened application times and standardized workflows, the time a patient needs to sit in the chair is reduced, which allows me to save the most valuable factor in the office: my time. At the same time, material storage and order management are streamlined, so that it is much easier to keep track of dates of expiry, hence saving material costs as well. And the best thing about it is that all these savings are possible without compromising treatment quality. Provided that the user is able to handle the materials properly – which is facilitated by the minimal number of steps and ease of use – the quality of the outcomes is extremely high!

Dr Devigus, we thank you for sharing your insights with us.

Article by Michael Braian DDS, CDT, PHD

Digital advancements revolutionized dentistry, providing efficient, precise dental care¹. Intraoral scanners replace traditional impressions, enabling virtual models for procedures like implant placement, orthodontics, and prosthodontics². Scan bodies aid in digitizing implants, while CAD/CAM improves prosthesis design and fabrication³. Milling and 3D printing offer speed, accuracy, and complexity in creating dental prostheses⁴. These innovations promise a bright future for dental professionals and patients.

The integration of digital technologies in dentistry has brought about significant advancements in dental care1. This case study presents a comprehensive dental rehabilitation of a patient utilizing a digital workflow, including extraction, dentures, implant surgery, intraoral scanning, 3D printed try-ins, and the fabrication of the final monolithic prosthetic construction.

EXTRACTION OF SEVERELY DECAYED TEETH

The first step in the patient‘s dental rehabilitation involved the extraction of severely decayed teeth. This procedure was necessary to eliminate the source of infection and discomfort and to prepare the oral cavity for the subsequent steps in the rehabilitation process. The dentures are later used to simplify the guided surgery planning⁵. Following the extraction, the patient was provided with appropriate postoperative care instructions and a healing period was allowed before proceeding with the next steps (Fig.1).

Fig. 1. Severely decayed teeth prior to extraction.

DENTURES DURING THE HEALING PERIOD

During the healing period of approximately seven months, the patient was fitted with dentures to replace the extracted teeth. This temporary solution allowed the patient to maintain oral function, appearance, and confidence while the extraction sites healed, and the oral tissues prepared for the implant surgery⁶.

IMPLANT SURGERY

In the upper jaw, six implants were placed, while only four were placed in the lower jaw (Fig.2). This decision was based on the patient‘s individual needs and oral anatomy. Studies have shown that the number of implants required for optimal support and stability depends on various factors, including bone quality and quantity, implant position, and prosthesis design⁷. Research suggests that six implants in the upper jaw and four in the lower jaw are sufficient to provide adequate support for a full-arch fixed prosthesis, with high success rates and patient satisfaction reported⁷. Additionally, placing fewer implants can help reduce surgical time and cost, as well as minimize the risk of complications associated with multiple implant placements. Therefore, this approach was deemed appropriate for this particular patient‘s case.

2023 DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product is an everyday cement that eliminates the need for a separate primer

PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal adheres to virtually all substrates, including lithium disilicate, in a single procedure without the need for a separate primer or silane, and it also offers easy, gingival-friendly removal of excess cement and requires no refrigeration. Therefore it is no wonder that this year DENTAL ADVISOR gave PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal Top Product award in the category of Indirect Restoratives.

What makes its strong and durable bond possible without the added step of applying a separate substrate is that PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal combines two innovative technologies in a single product. The silane coupling agent, LCSi monomer, establishes a durable, chemical bond with porcelain, lithium disilicate, and composite resin; and the original MDP monomer provides for chemical reactiveness with zirconia, dentin and enamel.

The result is a convenient, versatile, and efficacious single solution to practitioners’ everyday cementation needs for a wide variety of indications, including cementation of crowns/bridges, inlays/onlays, posts, splints, and even adhesion bridges.

The significant benefits and quality of PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal are reflected in the study findings and feedback of the 31 DENTAL ADVISOR clinical evaluators who used the cement in 516 applications and gave it an overall clinical rating of 96 percent. Their comments on its ease of use, handling characteristics, and aesthetics included: “Good flow and film thickness;” “Amazing viscosity, tack cure-ability, and very easy cleanup;” and “Great color match, and I liked the universal ability to work with so many substrates.”

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to help busy practitioners make sense of the numerous new solutions indicated for less invasive techniques, standardized or simplified procedures, and better outcomes on a regular basis. DENTAL ADVISOR conducts its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests shortly after product launch, and publishes results annually online to help potential users identify high-quality new dental materials and determine which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements.

For more information visit the website of DENTAL ADVISOR: www.dentaladvisor.com.

Five-time DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product delivers more than a reliable bond

For the fifth time CLEARFIL™ SE Protect has made DENTAL ADVISOR’S list of Top Products for 2023, placing it among dental materials and equipment deemed to deliver the best practice-based performance based on the publication’s annual review of such products.

Featured in the Bonding Agent Self-etch category, CLEARFIL™ SE Protect is a self-etch adhesive that offers more than just a reliable bond. It is:

• Antibacterial (self-etch) primer thanks to containing MDPB monomer
• Built on the same system of the gold standard adhesive CLEARFIL™ SE BOND
• Possible to use it for extended indications of core build-up and indirect restoration with CLEARIFL™ DC Activator.

All in all - surely a great addon to your dental toolbox.

Application of CLEARFIL SE Protect is also truly versatile – you can use it for any direct restorations, but in particular when treating hypersensitive teeth. It is also widely used for core build-up with self- or dual-cured resin materials and for cementation with composite resin cement in combination with CLEARFIL™ DC Activator.

CLEARFIL™ SE Protect offers you following features:

• Virtually no post-operative sensitivity
• Excellent bond strength for enamel and dentin
• Fast and simple procedure with low technique sensitivity

These attributes are reflected in the study findings and comments of the 13 DENTAL ADVISOR editors and consultants—seven of whom had previously used CLEARFIL™ SE BOND in their practices. After CLEARFIL™ SE Protect was assessed over a six-week period during which over 150 restorations were placed, it received a 98% clinical rating by consultants using a 1-5 rating scale,

The practitioners evaluating the product found no post-operative sensitivity. Among their observations mentioned in the online DENTAL ADVISOR report were the fact that the primer and bond wet the tooth evenly. They also mentioned that CLEARFIL™ SE BOND is effective in the reduction of sensitivity when placed on areas of recession or similar areas of sensitive tooth structure.

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to help busy practitioners make sense of the numerous new solutions indicated for less invasive techniques, standardized or simplified procedures, and better outcomes on a regular basis. DENTAL ADVISOR conducts its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests shortly after product launch, and publishes results annually online to help potential users identify high-quality new dental materials and determine which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements.

For more information visit the website of DENTAL ADVISOR: www.dentaladvisor.com

DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product to address everyday dental challenges

For the 8^th straight year, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow has been included among DENTAL ADVISOR’S Top Products, which is made up of dental materials and equipment deemed to deliver the best practice-based performance based on the publication’s annual review of such products.

Featured in the Direct Restorative category, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow comes in three different levels of flowability designed to cover a range of flowable composite indications that cannot be addressed with a single viscosity. Whether the practitioner needs the product to be firm enough to stay put where applied, malleable enough to create a specific shape, or runny enough to flow into every corner or undercut, one of the three versions is appropriate for the job. For example, the high flowability variant is the perfect choice for cavity linings and as a resin coat in immediate dentin sealing (IDS) procedures, while the super low flowability option is suitable for direct veneer procedures and for build-up of posterior cusps etc.

Equipped with Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.’s Light Diffusion Technology, the universal flowable composite integrates seamlessly with the surrounding tooth structure. If no recontouring required, then a glossy surface can be obtained simply by wiping with a cotton roll soaked in alcohol.

The version tested by the 29 DENTAL ADVISOR consultants in more than 900 applications in their dental practices was the medium flowability variant (Low) of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow. They evaluated properties including placement/handling, aesthetics, viscosity, and polishability and rated all to be “excellent,” with no running during placement and a good adaptation to the cavity walls and when flowed into narrow areas. This led to a recommendation rate of 100 percent and a 98 percent overall clinical rating.

Among their comments were: “The material blended so well with the tooth structure that you had to look hard to find the interface;” “Syringe design prevents oozing from the tip;” and “Readily apparent on radiographs.”

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to help busy practitioners make sense of the numerous new solutions indicated for less invasive techniques, standardized or simplified procedures, and better outcomes on a regular basis. DENTAL ADVISOR conducts its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests shortly after product launch. It publishes results annually online in its January/February issue to help potential users identify high-quality new dental materials and determine which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements.

For more information visit the website of DENTAL ADVISOR: www.dentaladvisor.com.

WEBINAR BY PROF. DR. SVEN RINKE

Enhance your knowledge and skills in the field of all-ceramic restorations! We invite you to watch the recording of the recent webinar titled "Cementation of All-Ceramic Restorations" by the esteemed Professor Dr. Sven Rinke.

Whether you currently incorporate all-ceramic restorations in your daily practice or aspire to offer them, this webinar recording is a valuable resource that you shouldn't miss. Professor Dr. Rinke, an expert in the field, delves into the key aspects of implementing an all-ceramic treatment concept that guarantees predictable long-term success and superior aesthetic outcomes while utilizing a limited number of materials and straightforward treatment strategies.

During the webinar, two types of cementation techniques are showcased: self-adhesive cement (PANAVIA SA Cement Universal, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) and adhesive composite material (PANAVIA V5, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Professor Dr. Rinke provides a comprehensive step-by-step concept that offers easy-to-follow instructions, which you can readily incorporate into your daily routine.

The webinar recording covers a wide range of important topics, including:

• An update on material-specific recommendations for preparing all-ceramic restorations, ensuring you stay up-to-date with the latest advancements.
• Established procedures and materials for adhesive cementation of glass-ceramic and zirconia restorations, enabling you to implement best practices in your clinical work.
• A discussion on the relevance of conventional cementation and its viability in today's dental landscape.
• Valuable tips and strategies for avoiding failures and flaws in all-ceramic restorations, ultimately improving your treatment outcomes.

Don't miss out on this chance to elevate your skills and expand your expertise in all-ceramic restorations. We are confident that the knowledge shared in this webinar recording will have a positive impact on your daily practice and help you achieve superior outcomes.

Watch now at your own convenience!

DR. SVEN RINKE

Sven Rinke’s vast experience and expertise in the field of Prosthodontics and Implantology has seen him taking on a wide range of roles in universities, private practice, and the dental industry.

In 1992, he joined the School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, and later worked as Senior Lecturer for Material Sciences and Prosthetic Dentistry before taking on the role of Associate Professor. Sven has also been a Visiting Assistant Professor at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine’s Department of Restorative Dentistry.

Since 1996 Sven has run a private practice specializing in prosthodontics and implantology as well as being a scientific consultant for Degussa Dental. He was Head of Clinical Research at Degussa Dental GmbH where, from 2002, he headed up the Foundation of EC EviDent Consulting (Clinical research and scientific transfer management).

Other achievements include membership of the Assigned Board Specialist of Oral Implantology and Assigned Board Specialist of Periodontics plus a MSc in Oral Implantology and another in Periodontology.

Since 2013, Sven has worked in the Venia Legendi for Dentistry, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany, and the university’s Department of Prosthodontics.

He has also won numerous awards, recognising his extensive expertise in Prosthodontics and Implantology.