Noen selskaper gjør hovedsaklig bruk av grunnleggende teknologier som er utviklet av andre for å forbedre produktene sine og lansere nye, mens andre produsenter utfører grunnleggende forskning og teknologiutvikling i egen bedrift. Er denne forskjellen relevant for dem som gjør daglig bruk av de resulterende produktene på tannklinikken eller på det tanntekniske laboratoriet? Vi mener det, siden produsenter med en dypere forståelse for de underliggende komponentene, kjemien og teknologiene er i stand til å løse utfordringer og respondere på brukernes behov raskere og mer fleksibelt. Artikkelen beskriver påvirkningen som flere grunnleggende teknologier utviklet av Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., har hatt på sementeringen av indirekte restaureringer.

Adhesiv sementering før og nå

Muligheten for å frese dentale restaureringer av diverse keramer har åpnet nye muligheter innen protetikken. Svært estetiske restaureringer kan fremstilles og sementeres. Noe som ofte undervurderes i denne sammenhengen, er den rollen som adhesive sementer spiller. Ikke bare muliggjør de translucente, estetiske, tannfargede restaureringer, men de baner også vei for mindre invasive prepareringer og design av restaureringer. Tidligere systemer for adhesiv sementering med kjemisk binding mellom tann og restaurering hadde dessverre dårlige langtidsresultater og høy teknikksensitivitet, samtidig som arbeidsprosedyren var ekstremt komplisert. Teknologi som er utviklet av Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., har gjort signifikante bidrag til bedre langtidsresultater og forenklet arbeidsprosess.

Optimalisering av langtids bonding-resultater

For å oppnå bedre langtidsresultater av tidlige bondingprosedyrer (spesielt til dentin), bestemte Kuraray, en forløper for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., seg for å fokusere på utviklingen av en kraftigere adhesiv monomer på 1970-tallet. Det første trinnet på utviklingen som ledet frem til suksess, var introduksjonen av fosfat-monomeren Phenyl-P i 1976. Fem år senere, etter fortsatte anstrengelser for å forbedre og raffinere molekylstrukturen, kunne man så introdusere den poulære MDP monomeren som er i stand til å gi sterk og holdbar binding til emalje, dentin, metaller og zirkonium.

Det faktum at MDP monomeren fremdeles inngår i alle adhesiver og adhesive sementeringssystemer fra Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., og i mellomtiden er tatt i bruk av andre produsenter for å optimalisere bindingsstyrken og holdbarheten på bindingen for produktene, viser bare hvor genial denne oppfinnelsen var. I motsetning til MDP som er produsert andre steder, fremhever den Originale MDP seg takket være en renhet som ingen har kunnet matche. Studier viser at dette nivået på renhet har en positiv effekt på ytelsen1. Ved at den tilbyr stabilitet i fuktige omgivelser, har MDP monomeren bidratt til en mere konsistent ytelse for de produktene som inneholder den.

Ulike MDP monomerer har ulik renhetsgrad og ulik bindingsstyrke.

Tre eksperimentelle, selvetsende primere ble fremstilt. De inneholdt 15 vekt% 10-MDP som ble levert fra ulike kilder. KN (Kuraray Noritake), PCM (Tyskland) og DMI (Designer molecules Inc. USA). Data med tillatelse fra Dr. Kumiko Yushihara.

For at adhesive resinsementer skal kunne levere sterk binding og god marginal forsegling, er det imidlertid ikke nok å inneholde en adhesiv monomer. Effektiv
polymerisering av denne monomeren er også viktig- og dette er ikke alltid så lett å oppnå. For å kunne oppnå effektiv lysherding og kjemisk herding av PANAVIA™ V5, utviklet Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. Touch-Cureteknologien. Nøkkelkomponenten i denne teknologien er en nylig utviklet, svært aktiv polymerisasjonsakselerator i PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer som virker i samspill med den sure MDP monomeren. Straks sementen kommer i kontakt med den allerede primede tannoverflaten, starter polymeriseringen. I PANAVIA™ Veneer LC, en lysherdende sement som bruker desamme primerne, får vi samme virkningsmekanisme. Polymeriseringen starter umiddelbart i kontaktsonen mellom sement og primet tann, mens PANAVIA™ Veneer LC sementpastaen har den egenskapen at den har lang arbeidstid i rombelysning og polymeriseres ved lysherding.

For eksempel ble dette fenomenet evaluert for PANAVIA™ F2.0., forgjengeren til PANAVIA™ V5. Resultatet av studien var at PANAVIA™ F2.0 viste mye bedre marginal forsegling enn andre sementer som ble testet2. Denne dokumenterte, sikre forseglingen av spalten fører til lavere marginal lekkasje, til en høy polymerisasjonsgrad selv i selvherdende modus (uten lysherding eller hvor lyset fra herdelampen er blokkert), og derfor til en spesielt sterk binding.

En annen fordel ved å inkorporere av polymerisasjons-akseleratoren, er at den virker som et sterkt reduksjonsmiddel. Det nøytraliserer natrium-hypokloritt som er hyppig brukt som irrigasjonsmiddel ved endodontisk behandling, slik at den negative påvirkningen dette stoffet har på bindingsstyrken til senere anvendt sement elimineres.

Forenkler sementeringen av glass-keramikk

Færre flasker, færre trinn og strømlinjeformede sementeringsprosedyrer: Dette er grunnen til at selv-adhesive resinsementer har blitt utviklet og introdusert fra tidlig på 2000-tallet. De fleste av disse produktene har imidlertid et begrenset indikasjonsområde. De virker bra på zirkonium, metall, emalje og dentin, men de er enten ikke indisert, eller trenger en ekstra silan-primer, for bonding av glass-keramikk. PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal, som inneholder MDP, er annerledes takket være en annen proprietær teknologi fra Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.: LCSi monomeren, et silan -koblende middel med lang karbonkjede. Denne monomeren danner en sterk kjemisk binding med komposittresin, porselen og silikatkeramikk (som f.eks. litium disilikat). Slik elimineres behovet for en separat silankomponent (primer eller adhesiv). Ved å øke fordelene ved denne teknologien, skiller PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal seg klart fra andre selv-adhesive resinsementer som en ekte én-komponent sement som også kan brukes til glass-keramikk.

Hvis ønskelig, kan produktets bindingsstyrke til tannen økes ved å bruke den populære universaladhesiven CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick som inneholder Rapid Bond Technology. Denne teknologien har blitt utviklet av Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. for å løse problemene som er relatert til den langsomme penetrasjonen av, særlig fuktig dentin, som kjennetegner universaladhesivene. For å oppnå skikkelig penetrasjon må disse adhesivene gnugges aktivt inn i tannen i lang tid, eller brukeren må vente en tid før lysherding. Rapid Bond Technology består av den originale MDP monomeren kombinert med hydrofile amid monomerer. Dette gjør at bondingen trenger raskt og dypt inn i fuktig dentin. Resultatet er kortere appliseringstid og enklere arbeidsgang uten at bindingsstyrken påvirkes negativt.

Konklusjon

Teknologier utviklet av Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. har bidratt sterkt til forbedret bindingsstyrke ved adhesiv sementering og til at selvadhesive resinsementer virkelig har blitt egnet til universelt bruk.. Selskapet tilbyr et strømlinjeformet produktutvalg av høyeffektive resinsementer for alle brukere og for alle typiske kliniske kasus. Færre komponenter og færre trinn er nødvendige og prosedyrene er forenklet. Dette fører til færre feilslag og estetiske restaureringer med lang levetid. I tillegg til de teknologi-relaterte fordelene, tilbyr de nevnte produktene mange andre fordelaktige egenskaper. En detaljert beskrivelse finnes på kuraraynoritake.eu.   

Referanser

*) Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance.; Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, De Munck J,
Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1493-501.
**) Touch-Cure Polymerization at the Composite Cement-Dentin Interface.; Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Benino Y, Nakamura A, Hara T, Maruo Y, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek
B.J Dent Res. 2021 Aug;100(9):935-94

Noen selskaper nyttiggjør seg hovedsaklig av grunnleggende teknologier som er utviklet av andre for å forbedre produktene sine og lansere nye, mens andre selskaper utfører grunnleggende forskning og teknologiutvikling i egen bedrift. Er denne forskjellen relevant for den som bruker de ferdigutviklede produktene i sitt daglige virke på tannklinikker og tanntekniske laboratorier? Det er den så absolutt- siden produsenter som utvikler alt fra bunnen av vanligvis har en dypere forståelse av produktene og produksjonsprosessene, og dette gjør det enklere å modifisere spesifikke egenskaper, løse problemer som oppstår og respondere på markedets behov. Denne artikkelen beskriver hvordan flere grunnleggende teknologier som er utviklet av Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. har forandret arbeidsgangen ved fremstilling av direkte komposittrestaureringer.

Direkte restaureringer- fra komplisert til enkelt

Adhesiv restorativ tannbehandling med bruk av høyeffektive dentale adhesiver og resinkompositter, er for tiden en av de mest populære metodene å behandle kariøse tenner på. I dag er en enkelt flaske med universaladhesiv og én eller to farger og opasiteter med universalkompositt vanligvis tilstrekkelig for å skape estetiske og holdbare resultater, vel å merke hvis man velger de riktige produktene. Slik har det imidlertid ikke alltid vært. I lang tid var teknikkene for å legge direkte komposittfyllinger temmelig kompliserte. Adhesivene var teknikksensitive og besto av flere flasker og flere trinn med lange appliseringstider. Fyllingsmaterialene, på sin side, kunne bare gi naturtro resultater hvis flere farger og opasiteter ble kombinert på en riktig måte. Og selv om de kompliserte prosedyrene ble utført på en korrekt måte, var risikoen for mikrolekkasje, misfarging og eventuell sekundærkaries-utvikling relativt høy. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. fokuserte tidlig på å løse disse problemene, og det startet med Original MDP Monomer som ble utviklet i 1981.

Optimalisering av kvaliteten på bondingen

Den Originale MDP Monomeren adresserte problemet med langtidsresultatene for adhesive systemer. MDPs hydrofile (fosfat) grupper danner en spesielt sterk og varig binding med kalsium i hydroksylapatitt,
hovedkomponenten i emalje og dentin. MDP-Ca saltet som dannes, skaper grunnlaget for et stabilt, sterkt og holdbart hybridlag. I kombinasjon med resinet i bondingen, dannes en tett forsegling av kaviteten etter lysherding. Frem til i dag er MDP en essensiell komponent av et hvilket som helst adhesivt produkt fra Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., og er nøkkelkomponenten som gjør at CLEARFIL™ SE Bond har blitt Gullstandarden for selvetsende adhesiv-systemer.

Imidlertid var vi i Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. overbeviste om at dentale adhesiver burde sørge for mer enn bare en sterk og holdbar binding, og derfor begynte vi å fokusere på å løse et annet problem, nemlig demineralisering og kariesutvikling som skyldes gjenværende bakterier i kaviteten. Basert på erfaringen fra utviklingen av andre adhesive monomerer, oppfant Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. MDPB monomeren som har en antibakteriell, kavitetsrensende effekt. Til forskjell fra antibakterielle midler som kan risikere å hemme bindingsstyrken til den påfølgende bondingen, dreper MDPB de gjenværende bakteriene uten å påvirke bondingprosessen. Den finnes i primeren til det selvetsende toflaske-systemet CLEARFIL™ SE Protect og immobiliseres ved polymeriseringen.

Den baktericide mekanismen til MDPB er antatt å ligne den til det velkjente antibakterielle midlet CPC (cetylpyridinklorid), som finnes i mange tannpastaer og munnskyllevæsker.

Mens to-flaske selvetsende adhesiver allerede har forenklet den adhesive prosedyren, tar en-flaske universaladhesiver det hele et skritt videre. Det er en utfordring å samle ingrediensene fra multi-step systemene i én flaske uten å ødelegge for stabiliteten til produktet. Dagens teknologi gjør det imidlertid mulig. For å forsegle overflaten så raskt som mulig etter appliseringen, må penetrasjonen av monomerene inn i tannvevet være så rask og effektiv som mulig. Imidlertid blir penetrasjonen ofte forsinket av monomerer som trenger lengre tid på å trenge inn i tannstrukturen,og særlig inn i fuktig dentin. Noen ganger må også middelet gnugges inn. Dette er grunnen til at Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. fokuserte på å utvikle Rapid Bond Technology. Denne består av den originale MDP monomeren kombinert med nylig utviklede hydrofile tverrbundne amid monomerer, og er integret i CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick. De hydrofile amid monomerene sørger for rask, dyp og fullstendig penetrasjon av dentinet og etter herding dannes et sterkt tverrbundet polymer-nettverk som er ansvarlig for en sterk og holdbar binding. Således er ventetid og gnugging eliminert, og en tett forsegling med lang levetid oppnås etter lysherding.

Vanwege hun hydrofiliciteit (wateraffiniteit) dringen de amidemonomeren van de Rapid Bond Technology goed door in het dentine. Na lichtuitharding heeft de bonding een lage waterabsorptie en daarmee een hoge verouderingsbestendigheid.

Optimalisering av direkte restaureringer

Kombinasjon av flere sjikt, farger og opasiteter: Bruken av svært kompliserte sjikt-teknikker for å skape naturtro komposittrestaureringer, er heldigvis for mange kliniske situasjoner noe som hører fortiden til. Årsaken er høyt utviklede resin-kompositter som går i ett med omgivende tannstruktur. For å oppnå denne fordelaktige egenskapen, har Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. utviklet sin egen Light Diffusion Technology (LDT). Denne teknologien er bygd inn spesielle prepolymeriserte fillerpartikler som virker som millioner av mikroprismer som sprer og refelekter lys og farge fra den omgivende tannstrukturen. Fillerpartiklene er optimalisert i størrelse, fordeling og brytningsindeks, og går i ett med omgivelsene på en uovertruffen måte. Hele CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ produktserien inneholder denne proprietære filler-teknologien. Det seneste produktet, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES 2 Universal hvor Kuraray Noritake Dental inc. tar i bruk neste bnivå av LDT, tillater ensingelfarge teknikk med forenklet fargeuttak. Det finnes i to farger for anteriort bruk og én enkelt farge for det posteriore området, men den smelter inn så flott at så å si alle fargen i VITA Classic A1-D4 skalaen er dekket.

Refleksjon og lysgjennomgang på riktig måte gir fremragende optisk integrasjon . Lysdiffusjons-fillerne i CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES 2 fra Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.Inc.

Siden gode optiske kvaliteter ikke bare er avhengige av optisk integrasjon og usynlige restaureringsgrenser, har Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.nogså utviklet fillere som sørger for resten- en naturlig overflateglans og gode poleringsresultater som holder lenge. Løsningen, som er innebygd i CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES flow med tre ulike viskositeter, kalles Submicron Filler Technology. Den består av skinnende fillerpartikler av submikron størrelse. Disse fillerpartiklene er så små at lysrefleksjonen gir en naturlig effekt selv etter slitasje. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.s eksepsjonelle silanteknologi brukes til å forene millioner av disse submikron fillerpartiklene og holde dem sammen over tid. Dette tillater høyt fillerinnhold i komposittene med lav viskositet, og reduserer vannopptaket som ellers ville føre til nedbryting av den herdede kompositten. Den perfekte balansen mellom de blanke submikron fillerne, lysdiffusjonsfillerne, resinmatrisen og proprietær silan-teknologi er ansvarlig for en balansert kombinasjon av mekaniske og optiske egenskaper.

Eksempel på en singel-farge restaurering fremstilt med CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal.

Konklusjon

Adhesive monomerer, fillerteknologier og silan-teknologi sørger for en solid kombinasjon av fillerpartikler, klynger og resinmatrise. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. er helt klart en ekspert med høy tillit når det gjelder adhesive restaureringer.. De proprietære teknologiene som er utviklet i de site ti-årene har definitivt bidratt til en bedre (langtids) kvalitet for direkte restaureringer, slik at pålitelige og estetiske resultater har blitt enklere å oppnå.

Interview with Andreas Chatzimpatzakis

Fewer bakes, fewer ceramic powders - there is clearly a trend toward simplification in the production of zirconia-based prosthetic work. This is also true for implant-based restorations, which often involve gum parts. DT Andreas Chatzimpatzakis, international trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., and the owner of ACH Dental Laboratory in Athens, Greece, shares his approach to high aesthetics in implant prosthodontics in the following conversation.

You are a user of the CERABIEN™ ZR portfolio from the outset. When did you test the products for the first time and why?

Well, it was many years ago when I finished my very first zirconia-based restoration. The reason to test CERABIEN™ ZR was that when I asked the dental technician who had milled the framework which porcelain system to use. He suggested to use CERABIEN™ ZR, which I did. I was immediately impressed by the system and by the outcome I was able to achieve on the first attempt.

Did you ever test any other porcelain systems for ceramic layering?

Yes. Before I becoming an international trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., I had the opportunity to test many other porcelain systems for layering on zirconia. Based on this experience, I can say that CERABIEN™ ZR is unique and the best system I have ever used. The reason is that its translucency and chroma are extremely close to natural teeth. In addition, due to a controlled firing shrinkage, a One-Bake Technique may be employed even in long-span restorations.

Your hands-on demonstration at the Kuraray Noritake Dental booth during the IDS 2023 in Cologne focused on White and Pink Aesthetics achieved with CERABIEN™ ZR. Is there a specific concept you use?

Nowadays, everyone producing dental restorations – no matter whether based on natural teeth or on implants – is confronted with increasing aesthetic demands of patients and dental practitioners. The high demands are developed because life-like restorations and cosmetic dental treatment outcomes are presented everywhere in the web and on social media. The showcased quality of outcomes is simply expected, even if the financial budget is limited. To be able to fulfil these demands in the field of implant-based prosthodontics, I have developed an approach that allows me to achieve high aesthetics with little effort. My concept is based on using not too many ceramic powders. For extra chroma and special characterization, I rely on the power of the internal live stain technique, first introduced by Hitoshi Aoshima-sensei.

Please summarize the most important details of your presentation.

The first important detail is the design and characterization of the framework. Before sintering, I apply Esthetic Colorant for KATANA™ Zirconia. After the sintering process, shade base stain and internal stains are mixed and applied. In this way, I create a nice canvas that helps me to achieve a life-like result with only a few selected ceramic powders. In most cases, three to five powders are enough to produce a great result. Among the powders used most frequently are Opacious Body, Body, LTX, Mamelon and CCV. After the first bake and a little grinding, I make use of internal stains again. They offer support in the controlling of the chroma and the integration of special characteristics. When this step is completed, the final build-up is done with one or two ceramic powders, most of the times LT1 and Enamel or LT0. Pink aesthetics are usually created with Tissue 1, 3 and 5. For the free gingiva, LT Coral is my go-to solution. The major goal is always to obtain maximum quality in a minimum of time. To achieve this, a good knowledge of the materials and of course practicing – on both, porcelain build-up and morphology – are strictly required.

Fig. 1. Complex implant-based restoration: Framework design.

Fig. 2. Esthetic Colorant …

Fig. 3.  … applied prior to the final sintering procedure.

Fig. 4. Appearance after sintering.

Fig. 5. Final outcome.

Are there any concrete tips and tricks you would like to share?

For the characterization of the framework, I mix the internal stains with shade base stain powders; mostly with SS Fluoro. For the first bake, especially when the restoration is large and the amount of ceramic to be applied huge, I reduce the heating rate up to 38 degrees per minute. I also increase the drying process up to 17 or even 20 minutes depending to the restoration. Experience shows that these measures optimize the aesthetic outcomes.

You often mention that it is extraordinarily important to understand the morphology of natural teeth to be able to produce beautiful restorations. Why is this the case?

A successful prosthetic restoration needs to offer proper function and aesthetics. Function means a precise fit, perfect contact points and occlusion, a proper emergence profile and interproximal embrasures for self-cleaning etc. All this is described by the term morphology. Aesthetics, on the other hand, is guided by shape and colour. The effort required to establish a proper morphology is much higher (about 70 percent of the total work) than the effort involved in obtaining the right translucency, opalescence and chroma.

What instruments do you use to imitate the morphology of natural teeth and how do you do it?

I usually make use of the Optimum™ Spring Ceramic Brush Size 8 (MPF Brush Co.), stones and diamond burs for detailed grinding and carving after the final bake. I studied morphology at the Osaka Ceramic Training Centre in Japan with Shigeo Kataoka-sensei. According to him, a key factor in creating a perfect macro and micro morphology lies in the shadows. To be able to take into account the interference of light and shadow during grinding, a light source is placed on one side of the restoration.

How many bakes do you need to produce highly aesthetic restorations?

It depends on the case, although in many situations, I nowadays opt for some kind of micro-layering. Lately, I have used micro-layering a lot with internal stain directly on the zirconia framework. In other cases, I do a quick first bake, then the internal staining, a final bake and glazing. For small or single-unit restorations in the posterior region, a One-Bake Technique is often sufficient. Even a Zero-Bake approach using Esthetic Colorant on a monolithic zirconia restoration may be appropriate here, and it is very convenient. If there is a restoration with high aesthetic demands – these are typically single anterior restorations – the technique I select depends on the shade. In some cases, using only the internal stain technique is enough to reach a high aesthetic level, while in other cases, additional steps need to be taken. To my mind, there is no single technique that fits all cases. As mentioned before, I try to achieve high aesthetics in a minimum of time.

Fig. 6. Clinical example of achieving high aesthetics in a minimum of time: Before …

Fig. 7. … and after crown placement.

Fig. 8. High aesthetics …

Fig. 9. … achieved in a minimum of time.

Did your approach change due to the availability of high-translucency zirconia materials with colour (and flexural strength) gradation?

Well, yes! My overall approach changed more to micro-layering. Several years ago, we needed to consider how to mask the framework and how to achieve translucency in areas with limited space. The problem was solved for single-unit and small anterior bridge restorations with the availability of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML and STML. With the introduction of KATANA™ Zirconia YML, a high-translucency material became available for long-span or implant-based restorations as well. We have strength and translucency all in one disc. In most of my cases, the framework material replaces the dentin with regard to morphology and shade. Hence, I need to focus on adding the enamel by applying the transparent and translucent powders. The powders of the internal stain technique are used to characterize the framework, and with a micro-layer of porcelain, the goal of creating an aesthetic restoration in the minimum of time is achieved. This is exactly why I am sure that micro-layering is the future.

What drives you to share your knowledge with others?

My passion! I love my work! And I love to see technicians become better and better. Dental technology is an exciting journey, a journey that begins when the first impression arrives in the dental laboratory, and it ends when the final restoration is cemented into the patient’s mouth. And this journey is so exciting because we change lives. We change people’s personalities, we give them back their smile, we give them back their self-respect. Consider that every day, every single moment working on our bench trying to imitate nature… there is nothing more exciting than that!!!

My approach as an instructor is to lead dental technicians to master the art of observing natural teeth. This is the way every individual will understand morphology and shade. You need no special talent to be a very good dental technician. You need to observe! Your eyes see, your mind understands, and your hands will follow.

Alexander (Alek) Aronin is a master dental technician who dedicated himself to the creation of high-end, handmade porcelain restorations. He runs a dental laboratory and morphology school in Spain, and travels the world as a lecturer and teacher.

The greatest source of inspiration in his professional life is the book Collection of Ceramic Works by Hitoshi Aoshima. Through reading it in 1996, he discovered superb outcomes of working with dental ceramics. Moreover, the book’s content made him realize that the creation of handmade porcelain work is a result of special education and manual skills. Those who want to become masters need a lot of commitment and a striving for continuous improvement, which Alek shows in his work and his classes. We talked to him about his philosophy and his enthusiasm for the creation of lifelike restorations. He shared with us his perspective on the future of dental technology and gave some practical tips on how to achieve a high level of professional satisfaction.

Photo courtesy of Dennis Debiase

Alek, many dental technicians decide to focus on CAD/CAM technology and automated processing of dental ceramics. Due to improvements on the material side, a handmade porcelain layer is no longer necessary in many clinical cases. In this context, the manual refinement process is reduced to a minimum. Why did you decide to take a completely different path and focus on fully manual dental craftsmanship?

The shift towards automated processing is not a matter of choice for dental technicians rather, it is a natural response to the evolution of technology. The high-end manual refinement process remains unchanged. The human element, from communication to hand crafting among skilled individuals and demanding clients, has been a constant so far throughout history. This traditional connection remains stable for centuries.

Digitalisation is not the revolution in the dental industry, and I do not see the benefit of it in our narrow specialization yet. In the area we are working, we do all steps of our case faster, incomparably more precise and more profitable. But we are keeping eye on machines and waiting for a suitable one.

Machines and automated processes widely serve mass production businesses focused on fast, affordable and uniform results in a highly competitive field. Our goal and workflow are different - we provide individual work and personal attention to each of our partners and patients.

So, we do not compete with the production labs and do not interrupt each other, we coexist in parallel worlds as always. A small number of dentists and their patients will always demand personal attention and valued restorations and service of the highest quality.

Many dental technicians admire your work. Yet, you continue to strive for improvement. Why is this the case?

On one side, we are limited by static ceramic material used to mimic dynamic natural teeth that keep changing for a lifetime. On the other side, we are limited by our manual skills. I am still far away from my teachers and Japanese colleagues. My target is to improve the fabrication process. My goal is to achieve the simplicity and imperfectness like Aoshima-sensei.

Alek lecturing at the IDS 2023 in Cologne.
Photo courtesy of Dennis Debiase

We are enjoying the outcome, but prefer to focusing on the improvement of the process, and move on to create a better one. This is what I am learning in Japan, and this is what I teach my students.

Talking about learning: What are the most important aspects a dental technician who wants to improve his skills should have in mind when looking for a good teacher?

Manual skills are very important, but not the only aspect that should be taken into account. Every individual should be motivated and guided and this is a teacher’s job.

I love the traditional Japanese way of teaching and learning: The teachers are passionate, leading the way by evoking emotions and manual skills to bring the best out of every single student. My personal advice for dental technicians who want to become masters in the creation of lifelike high-end dental restorations is to select their teachers carefully and go to a private school or courses whenever they have the chance.

What are the most important tools a dental technician needs to use when trying to create high-end lifelike restorations?

I suggest to focus on four aspects:

1. Documentary dental photography - required for documentation and communication with the dental office and patients using constant (once set and never changed) parameters of the photo equipment.
2. Focus to the biomimetic additive dentistry. This is a minimum machine invasive field. Dental technicians and dentists should be able to develop a deep knowledge about clinical and lab-side procedures to be able communicate with each other.
3. Mastering morphology and function (shape carving), and anatomy (internal staining), which comes with value control and mimicking fine tooth details for best integration in the mouth.
4. Written communication (stop phone calls) is very important, this is the way how to exchange the information between the patient, clinic and lab by strict protocols.

I teach these complex skills in my morphology school and in many of my trainings worldwide. Focusing on the four aspects, a dental technician has a great chance to become a good specialist in a relatively short period of time in a narrow field.

Is material selection important for achieving great results?

I’ve been using Noritake ceramic for most of my life, and the reason is simple: Noritake created their EX-3 porcelain over 40 years ago, and it was so well-made that it has not needed any changes since.

This is showing their consistently high quality and creates unbroken succession in the valuable tradition of passing on techniques and knowledge.

Today, among different generations of dental technicians, we can use and share the same methods, vocabulary and abbreviations, powders, and temperature charts developed by our skilled teachers 30 to 40 years ago. This unique feature sets Noritake and Creation porcelains apart from all other brands and systems in the world.

The other Noritake porcelain I use quite frequently is CERABIEN™ ZR, which is also well-tried and tested and has even some more advantages than EX3.

Is there any final advice you would like to give?

To become a good professional, I suggest to developing in four parallel directions:

1. Practicing on phantoms - fabricating cases and ceramic samples. It helps to experiment and practice with varied materials and techniques.
2. Implementing the achieved techniques in clinical cases.
3. Working with case presentation PowerPoint or Keynote: documenting the working steps in pictures and videos from beginning to end.
4. Mastering the communication using e-mails. Constantly calibrate and adjust the information exchange process between the clinic and lab. Acquire deeper knowledge about the work of each other.

Good luck!

Interview with Mitsunobu Kawashima
Manager, Technology Division of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.

In 1983 – exactly 40 years ago – PANAVIA™ EX was introduced in Japan as the first product of the PANAVIA™ family and the first product containing the original MDP monomer. Since then, the PANAVIA™ family of resin cements has been continuously expanded by developing new resin-cement materials that are precisely adjusted to the contemporary demands of dental practitioners. The current line-up of easy-to-use, high-performance adhesive luting materials is globally available and used by dental practitioners with high quality standards.

We had a conversation with Mr. Mitsunobu Kawashima about PANAVIA™ EX as a ground-breaking innovation in the field of dental resin cements and subsequent steps toward the current well-balanced resin cement portfolio. He is currently responsible for the development of chair-side materials in the Technology Division of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. (Kuraray Noritake Dental) and has been part of the team developing the many products of the PANAVIA™ family for more than 30 years.

The resin cements developed by the company before the introduction of PANAVIA™ EX contained the adhesive monomer Phenyl-P. Why did you decide not to use Phenyl-P in the new formulation?

At the time we decided to develop PANAVIA™ EX, we were engaged in the development of new adhesive monomers to replace Phenyl-P. The main aim of this project was an improvement of our products’ bond strength to metal alloys and dentin. Among the new adhesive monomers being developed, we decided to use the MDP monomer, because it features excellent bonding to tooth structure and metal alloys used in dentistry, as well as superb resistance to water. Incidentally, our first products to contain the original MDP monomer were the resin cement PANAVIA™ EX and the bonding agent CLEARFIL™ NEW BOND.

Where did the name PANAVIA™ come from?

The name “PANAVIA™” is a compound word consisting of “PAN” and “VIA”. The former is of Greek origin, and the latter is of Latin origin. “PAN” means “everything” and “VIA” means “way” or “method”. Consequently, the name “PANAVIA” describes a “method for bonding everything”; it represents our desire to have products launched under the umbrella of the PANAVIA™ brand recognized as dental materials that can bond to all types of restoration and tooth structure.

Would you please tell us the story behind the development of PANAVIA™ EX?

Back in the early 1980s, it was indispensable for us to develop new adhesive monomers as a part of our project to develop a new resin cement with unprecedented adhesive properties. In this context, we conducted a comprehensive literature search for compounds thought to be involved in adhesion. At the same time, we carried out a variety of R&D activities, including basic research to quantitatively clarify the relationship between the molecular structures of monomers and their adhesive qualities, synthesis trials of various monomers and bond strength tests. Consequently, we succeeded in developing the MDP monomer that had the physical properties we were working to obtain. Following the development of that MDP adhesive monomer, we were finally able to create PANAVIA™ EX in our laboratory. In early 1982, we completed the first prototype of PANAVIA™ EX for external evaluation and asked a dental college in Japan to evaluate it. He found that the prototype cement might cure too quickly in clinical use. This was due to the fact that we had not taken into account the difference between room temperature and intraoral temperature, which has a huge impact on the curing time. This error led us to recognize how important clinical evaluations are during the development of dental materials. To this day, we continue to place great importance on the opinions of clinicians whenever a new material is being developed.

The name “PANAVIA™” is a compound word consisting of “PAN” and “VIA”. The former is of Greek origin, and the latter is of Latin origin. “PAN” means “everything” and “VIA” means “way” or “method”.

What were the key technological features of this new PANAVIA™ EX cementation system?

The system had five key features: Appropriate film thickness, appropriate flow properties of the paste, radiopacity, improved bond strength and improved surface-cure characteristics. At the time that PANAVIA™ EX was developed, a film thickness of 30 μm or less was desired for luting cements. The largest components we wanted to use in the formulation – the silica filler particles present in our composite resin – had a maximum particle diameter of 50 μm. We were able to achieve a film thickness of 30 μm or less by significantly extending the silica grinding time, which made the filler particles much finer. An appropriate paste consistency – a low level of viscosity and good flowability – was achieved by using low-viscosity monomers for PANAVIA™ EX. In order to make the cement radiopaque, we dispersed radiopaque filler within the powder component. In fact, we were convinced that it was essential to be able to check for the presence of excess cement under the gingival margins after a restoration was placed. The increase in bond strength was achieved by blending the MDP monomer into the liquid component.

What about the surface-cure characteristics of the cement?

Every dental practitioner knows that the surface of resin cements must be protected from oxygen in the air in order to cure properly. For this purpose, we developed OXYGUARD, a water-soluble gel material. It is applied to the restoration margins to cover the unpolymerized resin cement surface and protect it from exposure to oxygen. In this way, the formation of an oxygen inhibition layer – a layer of uncured resin on the surface that compromises the marginal integrity of the restoration – is prevented and an intact, fully polymerized cement surface can develop. In this way, the use of OXYGUARD has contributed greatly to improving the cure characteristics of cements.

What do today’s PANAVIA™ products and PANAVIA™ EX have in common?

The PANAVIA™ family of products, including PANAVIA™ EX, share the concept of “being a resin cement product that opens new dimensions in dentistry”. PANAVIA™ EX was our first resin cement, and it was conceived as a cement for a new era. It can bond to tooth structure and dental metals very well, thanks to the use of the MDP monomer. This important adhesive monomer is still used today in many of our products. Ever since the launch of PANAVIA™ EX, Kuraray Noritake Dental has continued to take on new challenges and has developed many new products in the growing PANAVIA™ family. These include PANAVIA™ 21, a cement in paste form that has a self-etching primer as an accessory; PANAVIA™ Fluoro Cement, a dual-cure cement paste that releases fluoride; and PANAVIA™ F2.0, which can be used with an LED curing unit. The current portfolio consists of PANAVIA™ V5, which features the substantially improved bonding performance that was achieved after a major review of the basic composition of the series, PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal, which works as a standalone product without separate primers, and PANAVIA™ Veneer LC, PANAVIA™ family’s latest product. The latter is a light-curing resin cement with the specialized purpose of bonding laminate veneers.

In retrospect, what did the introduction of PANAVIA™ EX mean to Kuraray Noritake Dental?

In the development of new resin cements, it is important to quickly respond to the rapidly changing trends in the market. Whenever new prosthodontic treatment concepts appear – like adhesive bridges as a minimally invasive treatment option replacing a single tooth – or new restorative materials are introduced, such as different types of ceramics – we need to check if our resin cement systems are compatible with the tasks that come with these changes, as well as possibly developing new ones. Following the launch of PANAVIA™ EX, we received a wide range of feedback from experts working at dental clinics and laboratories. We leveraged this feedback in subsequent development projects, always striving to stick close to the clinical setting. After Kuraray Medical Inc. merged with Noritake Dental Supply Co., Limited, this ethos was embedded in the work ethic of all employees of Kuraray Noritake Dental.

Can you give us a brief history of the PANAVIA™ EX journey to the currently available PANAVIA™ family portfolio?

Since the launch of PANAVIA™ EX 40 years ago, six different PANAVIA™ products have been released. Each of them has received high acclaim for their unique features, both in the Japanese resin cement market and abroad. For 40 years, we have been improving PANAVIA™ in response to the demands of the times. We developed a product with increased adhesion when non-retentive preparation designs (adhesive bridges) and smaller bonding surfaces (due to less invasive preparations) became popular. And for users concerned about secondary caries, we developed a material with fluoride-releasing properties. At the same time, we focused strongly on making dental cementation easier by finding ways to make our resin cements bond well to various types of crown-restoration materials, including precious metals and ceramics. During these drives towards improvement, “achieving reliable general luting” has always been at the forefront of our goals. We believe that the successful evolution of the PANAVIA™ brand owes a great deal to our incessant efforts to obtain a high level of bond strength to dentin after chemical polymerisation”.

How did the R&D department evolve over the years?

Initially, our efforts in the development of dental materials had focused on bonding agents and restorative composite resins. PANAVIA™ EX was just one of our new development projects and only a few staff members were assigned to that product. After PANAVIA™ EX was launched in 1983 and it was accepted worldwide, our product line-up of resin cements was expanded considerably. Consequently, we have increased the number of development staff assigned to resin cements and set up a special development team responsible for the self-adhesive resin cement product line that includes PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. As a result, the size of the team assigned to resin cements has expanded substantially.

How did production change?

When PANAVIA™ EX was launched in 1983, the product was manufactured exclusively for the Japanese market in a relatively small facility. Today, in order to produce all products of the PANAVIA™ family for the global market, we have automated our production facilities and increased the production equipment and systems dedicated to producing the resin cement paste. To support our product quality, we have also set up a quality control system that assures we turn out safe and high-quality products, drawing on over 40 years of technical knowhow and experience in the production of resin cements.

For 40 years, we have been improving PANAVIA™ in response to the demands of the times.

When did external researchers start showing interest in PANAVIA™?

The development of PANAVIA™ EX was carried out with the active participation of researchers at a dental college in Japan, involving such activities as performing basic adhesion tests and experimenting with clinical applications using adhesive bridges. At that time, resin cements that provided a strong bond to tooth structure or metal alloys were not widely used. I believe that overseas researchers were interested in the development of PANAVIA™ EX at a relatively early stage, for this reason.

What current concept do you have in mind as you continue developing your adhesive cements?

We have two basic central concepts: “Achieving greater bond strength” and “Delivering easier handling characteristics”. I think that the shades of resin cements are also devised in each product in order to get the most of the characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. At our company, we have embodied “achieving greater bond strength” in PANAVIA™ V5, and “delivering easier handling characteristics” in PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. We will continue to explore the development and introduction of various new technological applications, to bring even higher performance products to market.

What do you think is the strength of Kuraray Noritake Dental’s R&D team?

We conduct R&D activities continuously, focusing on the development of luting materials. In our product development department, the same person is often responsible for one product category over long period of time. For example, I have been engaged in the development of PANAVIA™ products for much of my time with the company. The result is that each person in the development department can be said to be an expert in a certain category of products. They leverage the technical knowledge acquired in the past for the development of new products, resulting in entirely new discoveries.

Do you have any ideas about what the future of PANAVIA™ will be?

We will continue to focus on the development of even simpler, easier-to-use resin cements suitable for a wide range of applications – products based on the concept of universality. This should allow users to focus more on the actual treatment than ever before, while of course delivering a strong and durable bond between the tooth structure and the restoration.

MITSUNOBU KAWASHIMA

By Dr. Clarence Tam, HBSC, DDS, AAACD, FIADFE

The use of both porcelain veneers to improve and restore the shape, shade and visual position of anterior teeth is a common technique in esthetic dentistry. The biomimetic aim in the restoration of teeth is not only the cosmetic domain, but also functional considerations. It is critical to note that the intact enamel shell of the palatal and facial walls with respect to anterior teeth are responsible for its innate flexural resistance. When dental structure has been violated by endodontic access, caries and/or trauma, every effort must be made to preserve the residual structure and strive to restore or exceed the baseline performance levels of a virgin tooth.

BACKGROUND

A 55 year old ASA II female with a medical history significant only for controlled hypertension presented to the practice for teeth whitening. It was foreseen that dental bleaching would not have an effect on the shade of a pre-existing porcelain veneer on tooth 1.2, and that this would need to be retreated following the procedure especially if the shade value changes were significant. The patient started with a baseline shade of VITA* 1M1:2M1; 50:50 ratio in the upper anterior region and 1M1 in the lower anterior region. Following a nightguard bleaching protocol with 10% carbamide peroxide worn overnight for 3-4 weeks, the patient succeeded in achieving a VITA* 0M3 shade in both upper and lower arches. As a result, there was a significant value discrepancy between the veneered tooth 1.2 and the adjacent teeth, and also increased chroma noted on the contralateral tooth 2.2 due to a facially-involved Class III composite restoration. This latter tooth also did not match the contralateral tooth in dimension and thus the decision was made to treat both lateral incisors with bonded lithium disilicate laminate veneers. The canine adjacent (2.3) featured localized mild to moderate cusp tip attrition, but the patient did not want to address this until following the currently-discussed veneers were placed. The goal of smile design at this stage is to ultimately establish bilateral harmony with the view to place an additional indirect restoration restoring the facial volume and cusp tip deficiency of tooth 2.3 in the near future.

PROCEDURE

A digital smile design protocol was not required for the initial intention, which was individual treatment of the lateral incisors, as slight variation is permitted in this tooth type, being a personality and gender marker of the smile. Prior to anesthesia, the target shade was selected using retracted photos featuring both polarized and unpolarized selections. The photographs were prepared for digital shade calibration by taking reference views with an 18% neutral gray white balance card (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Reference photograph taken with a 18% neutral gray card.

The basic body shade was VITA* 0M2 with an ingot shade of BL2. The patient was anesthetized using 1.5 carpules of a 2% Lignocaine solution with 1:100,000 epinephrine before affixing a rubber dam in a split dam orientation. The veneer on tooth 1.2 was sectioned and removed from tooth 1.2 and a minimally-invasive veneer preparation completed on tooth 2.2 (Fig. 2). Partial replacement of the old composite resin restoration was completed on the mesioincisobuccopalatal aspect of tooth 12 with the intact segment maintained. Adhesion to old composite was achieved using both micro particle abrasion and a silane coupling agent (CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Margins were refined and retraction cords soaked in an aluminum chloride solution and packed. Preparation stump shades were recorded. Final impressions were taken using both light and heavy body polyvinylsiloxane in a metal tray. The patient was provisionalized and sent away with instructions to verify the shade at the laboratory at the bisque bake stage. The models prepared by the laboratory verify the minimally-invasive nature of the case.

Fig. 2. Veneer preparation tooth 1.2, 2.2.

On receipt of the case, the patient was anesthetized and the provisionals removed. The preparations were debrided and prepared for bonding by abrading the surfaces using a 27 micron aluminum oxide powder at 30-40 psi. The veneers were assessed using a clear glycerin try-in paste (PANAVIA™ V5 Try-in Paste Clear, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Retraction cords were packed and the intaglio surface of the restorations treated using a 5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds prior to application of a 10-MDP-containing silane coupling agent (CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) (Fig. 3). The tooth surface was etched using 33% orthophosphoric acid for 20 seconds and rinsed. A 10-MDP-containing primer was applied to the tooth (PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) (Fig. 4) and air dried as per manufacturer’s instructions. Veneer cement was loaded (PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste Clear, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) (Fig. 5) and the veneer seated. The excess cement featured a non-slumpy character and maintained the veneer well in place during all margin verification exercises prior to a 1 second tack cure (Fig. 6).

Fig. 3. CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS applied to intaglio surfaces of veneers.

Fig. 4. PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer application to etched tooth surfaces.

Fig. 5. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste Clear shade loaded onto prepared intaglio surfaces of veneers.

Fig. 6. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste immediately after seating. Note the viscous, non-slumpy nature of the cement, which allows for ease of removal under both wet and gel-phase options.

The cement was rendered into a gel state, which facilitated “clump” or en masse removal of cement with minimal cleanup required (Fig. 7). The margins were coated using a clear glycerin gel prior to final curing to eliminate the oxygen inhibition layer (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7. Excess cement removal after tack curing for 1 second.

Fig. 8. Final curing of veneers from both palatal and facial aspects simultaneously.

The margins were finished and polished to high shine and the occlusion of the restorations verified as conformative. The post-operative views show excellent esthetic marginal integration (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9. Post-operative esthetic integration of veneers on 1.2 and 2.2.

On polarized photograph reassessment, the restorations are well-integrated into the new smile esthetically and functionally (Fig. 10), now awaiting esthetic augmentation of tooth 2.3 to match the contralateral canine.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 10. Final result with polarized photography on reassessment.

RATIONALE FOR MATERIAL SELECTION

Porcelain is often the chosen material for prosthetic dental veneers due to its innate stiffness in thin cross section, ability to modify and transmit light for optimal internal refraction and its bondability by way of adhesive protocols to composite resin. This trifecta allows for a maximal preservation of residual tooth structure whilst bolstering its physical function relative to flexural performance¹. The elastic modulus of a tooth can be restored to 96% of its control virgin value if the facial enamel is replaced with a bonded porcelain laminate veneer². The elastic modulus of lithium disilicate is 94 GPa whereas that of intact enamel is 84 GPa. The elastic modulus of dentin has been found to range from 10-25 GPa, whereas that of the hybrid layer can vary widely, indeed from 7.5 GPa to 13.5 GPa in a study by Pongprueska et al³. This low flexural resistance range reflects that of deep dentin and not that of superficial dentin, which does not reflect an ideal situation where a laminate veneer is bonded in as much enamel as possible, or in the worst case to superficial dentin. Maximal flexural strength of the hybrid layer is invaluable from a biomimetic standpoint. PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) incorporates the use of the original 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) monomer, which elicits a pattern of stable calcium-phosphate nanolayering known as Superdentin, an acid-base resistant zone that is about 600x more insoluble than the monomer 4-MET, which is found in many other adhesives. Indeed, PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer is used solely in conjunction with Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. PANAVIA™ V5 cement and PANAVIA™ Veneer LC which both allow the primer to act as a bond without the need to cure the layer prior to cementation of the indirect restoration due to its dual cure potential when married together. If a bonding agent would be preferred, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), a multi-modal adhesive that also contains the essential amide monomer and 10-MDP components created by Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., can be used. Of note, CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick features exceptional flexural strength due to the accentuated cross-linking during polymerization afforded by the amide monomers, on the order of 120 MPa by itself⁴. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC is a cement system that features cutting edge technology that provides excellent esthetics and adhesive stability of your indirect restorations, whilst allowing a stress free workflow. It is a cement system that is a game changer; one that allows you to restore confidence in the patient, strength in the tooth-restoration interface, and bolsters your clinical confidence in the delivery of biomimetic excellence.

Dentist:

CLARENCE TAM

References

1. Magne P, Douglas WH. Rationalization of esthetic restorative dentistry based on biomimetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(1):5-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00371.x. PMID: 10337285.
2. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):111-21. PMID: 10371912.
3. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. The elastic moduli across various types of resin/dentin interfaces. Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Mar 4. PMID: 18304626.
4. Source: Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. Samples (beam shape; 25 x 2 x 2 mm): The solvents of each material were removed by blowing mild air prior to the test.

Eight-time DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product selection provides effective relief for a painful condition

Dentine hypersensitivity is a painful condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It generally occurs when tubules are exposed for any number of reasons, including gingival recession, dental erosion or excessive tooth brushing. It can also be a side effect of professional tooth cleaning, scaling and root planning, tooth whitening, or restorative procedures.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER, which was honored by DENTAL ADVISOR every year from 2015 to 2022 as a Top Product selection, allows an effective non-invasive approach to the treatment of hypersensitivity when used as directed by dental professionals.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER is designed to crystalize hydroxyapatite (HAp), a mineral that is naturally found in enamel and dentin, and is the human body’s strongest material. When applied to exposed, mechanically treated, or freshly prepared dentin, the calcium phosphate based mixture blocks the exposed tubules and provides immediate pain relief. During setting, HAp is formed, providing for long-term prevention of hypersensitivity. Further, when used in the context of restorative treatment, TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER does not have a negative effect on the bond strength of subsequently utilized dental adhesives or cements.

DENTAL ADVISOR clinical study found TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER effective in providing hypersensitivity relief immediately following and for up to six months after application. The study evaluated 27 patients diagnosed with gingival recession-related hypersensitivity, which was diagnosed using thermal testing with cold air. For the initial assessment, patients were asked to evaluate their level and frequency of hypersensitivity per tooth on a five-point scale. They were questioned about their level of sensitivity immediately after TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER was applied, according to the instructions for use, and again six months later. At baseline, 91 percent of the patients stated that they had no or only mild, sporadic sensitivity, which was still the case for 85 percent after six months.

This natural, tissue-friendly product is highly biocompatible and is free of gum irritants such as glutaraldehyde or methacrylates. It is indicated for use by dental professionals for all  sensitivity challenges in everyday practice, including prevention of cervical hypersensitivity before/after bleaching, scaling or root planning, and underneath restorations.

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to support potential users in identifying high-quality dental materials and determining which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements. Awards are based on results of its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests, which are conducted shortly after product launch.

Among products honored this year are five from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.: CLEARFIL™ SE Protect, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (Low), and PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal were selected as Top Products; and CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick and CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS were chosen as Preferred Products.

“Veldig gode håndteringsegenskaper”

PAVANIA™ Veneer LC belønnet med 4.6 rating i REALITY’s Five Star Award

Etter en FirstLook evaluering publisert i mai 2022, har en gruppe testere fra  REALITY RATINGS & REVIEWS foretatt en grundig test PANAVIA™ Veneer LC i kliniske omgivelser – med ypperlig resultat. Denne lysherdende resinsementen mottok 4.6 av 5 stjerner i Five Star Award. De mest overbevisende egenskapene var håndteringsegenskapene og viskositeten.

Mens de fleste testerne brukte PANAVIA™ Veneer LC for permanent sementering av skallfasetter, var det også noen som testet onlay-indikasjonen (bare for høy-translucente materialer inntil en gitt materialspesifikk tykkelse) . De som valgte å polere kantene (43 %) fant at resinsementen enkelt lot seg polere . Blant de fremhevede håndteringsegenskapene  var at restaureringene var enkle å plassere uten at de gled ,og at sementen ikke var klebrig og at det var enkelt å fjerne overskudd- både etter kort herding og uherdet . I tillegg lovpriste testerne den lave filmtykkelsen og en gunstig viskositet., noe som har en betydelig innvirkning på hvor enkelt det er å plassere restaureringene. Alle testerne syntes at arbeidstiden var tilstrekkelig uansett hvordan de arbeidet (filtrering/blokkering av operasjonslampen eller ikke, sementering av flere fasetter om gangen eller én og én).

Utvalget av farger – PANAVIA™ Veneer LC fås i fire farger Clear, Universal/A2, Brown/A4 og White – ble ansett å være tilstrekkelig av de fleste testerne (79 %), den mest populære fargen var  Clear. En tester uttalte at “jeg tror at Clear -fargen er min nye favoritt. Den virker å ha en sterkere lysstyrke enn andre translucente sementer.”. Ved å være den eneste fargen med høy opacitet, viste fargen White seg å ha stor innvirkning på utseendet på den ferdige restaureringen. Innprøvingspastaene ble godt mottatt på grunn av håndteringsegenskapene og at de var lette å skylle vekk.

PANAVIA™ Veneer LC settet som er tilgjengelig i Europa består av  PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste, PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer og CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS.  Derfor inngir det tillit at den deler primere med den velprøvde PANAVIA™ V5, mens den lange arbeidstiden og spesifikke egenskaper tilfører ekstra fordeler som er meget verdifulle ved sementering av skallfasetter. Klikk her for å lese hele evalueringen!

Article by Dr. Bassem Jaidane

Among the most common problems in modern dentistry is that of restoring a patient‘s lost aesthetic dental appearance. To do this, new technologies are available to practitioners. For anterior teeth where aesthetics are paramount, dentists prefer the least invasive treatments possible, such as layered dental veneers (cut-back). In cosmetic dentistry, practitioners are often faced with cases requiring a multidisciplinary treatment plan or different types of restorative materials to be used at the same time. For cases of prosthetic restoration combining dental veneers, dental crowns and dental bridges, dentists are often faced with situations where the difference in shade is noticeable in the final result, this is explained by the difference in restorative material, product, adhesion technique, the thickness of the prosthetic element and the colour of the abutment, whether it is a living natural tooth, devitalized, or even an implant abutment^1-2.

In the presence of a treatment plan requiring dental veneers, crowns and dental bridges, choosing zirconia as the only restorative material is no longer an option but an obligation. The is due to the limited mechanical properties of lithium disilicate and feldspar porcelain restorations, which contraindicate their use as dental bridges. There are different factors explaining the reluctance of practitioners to use the zirconia dental veneer technique³: One is the absence of the vitreous phase. It makes impossible to create an optimal adhesion surface with hydrofluoric acid at the level of the intaglio of the zirconia veneers. Another is the lack of translucency of the first zirconia generations.

Modern zirconia materials, however, are particularly well-suited for cases requiring a combination of veneers, crowns and dental bridges of the same optical appearance. This is due to their increased translucency and excellent mechanical properties. The following article describes and discusses the realization of a clinical case treated with dental veneers and a crown using KATANA™ Zirconia UTML (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). the veneers were placed with PANAVIA™ Veneer LC (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). The patient presented an aesthetic problem at the level of an anterior implant-supported crown.

CASE OBSERVATION

Patient S, from the Tunisian Sahel, engineer in France, with no significant pathological history and aged 29, presented in January 2023 due to an aesthetic problem negatively affecting her smile. The extraoral examination was without abnormalities, while the intraoral examination showed good oral hygiene, healthy gums, a thin free gingiva and a protruded zirconia crown on an implant in the region of the maxillary right central incisor (figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view revealing the volume and position of the crown on the central incisor.

During the preliminary interview, it turned out that the implant in the region of the right central incisor had been placed in 2020. The patient’s former dentist had left Tunisian territory. The patient does not have any document or reference on the dental implant, and she wishes to “straighten” the crown and improve the aesthetics of her smile before her planned wedding ten days after her first consultation.

TREATMENT PLAN

After having had the informed consent of the patient and after having asked the indication of dental veneers for aesthetic reasons, the treatment was initiated. According to the treatment plan, seven maxillary anterior teeth (from first premolar to first premolar) should receive an incisal overlap preparation (depth: 0.1 to 0.3 mm) for the placement of veneers made of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML. For the implant in the region of the right central incisor, it was planned to replace the existing crown by a crown made of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML without replacing the abutment. This was due to the lack of information about the implant type and the lack of time.

TREATMENT

After taking the preoperative photos (fig 3), choosing the color of the veneers and anesthetizing the maxillary anterior region, the incisal overlap preparation was carried out on the seven maxillary teeth and the zirconia crown was removed from the implant. A cylindrical diamond bur was used to separate the zirconia part from the abutment. Subsequently, a bite record and impressions were taken using the wash technique. In addition, a temporary crown was produced and placed on the abutment.

Fig. 3. Preoperative picture.

In the dental laboratory, virtual models were created based on the conventional impressions (fig. 4). Then, the zirconia restorations were designed in full contour, cut back for the veneering porcelain and finished by layering with CERABIEN™ ZR porcelain (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). At try-in during the second session, we checked the insertion, the gingival margins, and the contact points between the veneers and the crown on the implant. Given the superior mechanical properties of the zirconia veneer, the shape and thickness of the veneers were modified chairside to have a harmonious anterior curve and a better aesthetic rendering. After determining the colour of the resin cement, the temporary crown was put back in place.

Fig. 4. Virtual model.

After glazing and preparation of the bonding surfaces in the dental laboratory, the upper veneers were cemented according to the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC protocol. We ended the session by removing excess cement. An occlusion check and postoperative photos were taken after three days.

DISCUSSION

In this case, the dental veneers and the crown on the implant were produced using a KATANA™ Zirconia UTML disc. This type of zirconia has an yttrium oxide proportion of 5 mol%, leading to about 70 % cubic zirconia phase, and therefore a higher translucency than earlier generations of zirconia. With a translucency of 51 % (light transmission, illuminant: D65, specimen thickness: 1.0 mm. Source: Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc); this zirconia allows us to have remarkable optical properties (fig 5).

Fig. 5. Remarkable optical properties of the final restorations.

The patient chose color BL1 and requested a transparent incisal edge. For this reason, a cutback design of the zirconia (fig. 6) and porcelain layering was the technique of choice. Figure 7 shows the slight transparency in the incisal edge region of the new restorations. The zirconia veneers technique was chosen to avoid the color difference between the crown on the implant and the veneers. The pleasant aesthetic appearance and a harmonious smile are confirmed by the post-operative picture (fig 8). According to the manufacturer, the flexural strength of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML is 557 MPa, which is higher than that of lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelains. As zirconia veneers will be more resistant to shear forces, it is possible to eliminate contact points that interfere during try-in or even safely modify the shape of the restorations in vivo. This is done with specific burs adapted to zirconia during different stages of the fittings according to the wishes of the patient⁴.

Fig. 6. Cutback design of the restorations.

Fig. 7. Slight transparency at the incisal edges of the restorations.

Fig. 8. Immediate post-operative picture.

In the present case, we were able to adjust the crown until we had a perfect anterior line. It was thus possible to optimize the inclination of the crown without replacing the dental implant, in just one week.

Given the significant shear resistance, the dental laboratory technician made zirconia dental veneers with an average thickness of 0.3 mm. Such a thin veneer requires less preparation of the dental tissue, which will be limited to enamel instead of extending into the dentin, where the adhesion value is lower due to its low chemical composition in minerals⁵.

The expected difficulty in bonding zirconia veneers is explained by the absence of a vitreous phase given the poor adhesion of the crystalline phase to the bonding cement. However, the desired surface modification can be achieved with a different procedure: tribochemical silica coating. It was used in the present case to improve the adhesion of the zirconia veneers to the resin cement system. Indeed, it was found in an in-vitro evaluation that the tribochemical preparation technique and the application of MDP provide an optimized adhesive interface⁶. In this study, dual-beam focused ion-beam technology followed by scanning electron microscopy were used to compare the resin/zirconia bonding interface with tribochemical preparation/MDP and the bonding interface between resin/zirconia without this preparation.

The tribochemical process consists of an aero-abrasion of the zirconia surface with particles coated with silica combined with a silane primer containing MDP. The phosphate ester groups of this silane bind to the surface oxides of the zirconia, and the methacrylate group makes covalent bonds with the resin matrix of the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC cement⁷.

In the present clinical cases, the KATANA™ Zirconia UTML veneers were abraded with silicon dioxide with the formula SiO2. As a primer, we chose CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), because it contains the original MDP monomer, developed Kuraray Co., Ltd.⁸.

To clean the veneers before applying CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, KATANA™ Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was used. The presence of saliva and residues from fittings can alter the interface with the resin cement, which presents a risk of bonding failure of Zirconia veneers⁹.

One of the most important challenges in this case was to be able to hide the greyish color of the implant abutment which was visible through the zirconia crown. To hide the gray of the abutment, a resin opaker was applied. These techniques combined with the PANAVIA™ Veneer LC white gave us an optimal result (figs. 9 and 10)¹⁰.

Fig. 9. Treatment outcome.

Fig. 10. New smile designed according to the individual desires of the patient.

CONCLUSION

KATANA™ Zirconia UTML veneers have better mechanical properties than conventional veneers, so that the zirconia veneers technique allows users to combine bridges, crowns and dental veneers without a noticeable difference in shade. It offers acceptable translucency and aesthetics according to our observation. The technique of bonding the zirconia veneers with PANAVIA™ Veneer LC combined with a tribochemical treatment and the application of MDP on the adhesion surfaces allowed for a secure bonding, while the dyschromia caused by the implant abutment was effectively concealed.

Dentist:

DR. BASSEM JAIDANE

Born in Sousse, Tunisia, on June 12, 1983, Dr. Bassem Jaidane obtained his Doctorate in Dental Medicine in 2010 at the Faculty of Monastir. He opened his own clinic in 2010, specializing in aesthetics and dental implants, as well as dental veneers. Omni-patrician and passionate about all areas of dentistry, he has also developed advanced knowledge in dental prosthetics: 3D design, ceramic layering, finishing and glazing of crowns, bridges and veneers…

Dr. Bassem Jaidane has therefore acquired a certain expertise on the different types of dental veneers, whether pressed ceramic veneers, machined veneers, layereded veneers with the cut-back technique and lumineers veneers, after having carried out numerous cases. in feldspathic and lithium disilicate veneers, Dr. Bassem Jaidane has become one of the pioneers of the technique of dental veneers on zirconia.

References

1. Restaurations esthétiques grâce à la technique du cut-back Par Fleur Nadal, Geoffrey Di Bacco, Julien Chesnot Publié le 01.06.2019. Paru dans L‘Information Dentaire n°23 – 12 juin 2019 (page 28-29).
2. Effects of ceramic layer thickness, cement color, and abutment tooth color on color reproduction of feldspathic veneers Christopher Igiel, Michael Weyhrauch, Barbara Mayer, Herbert Scheller, Karl Martin Lehmann PMID: 29379907 Int J Esthet Dent 2018;13(1):110-119.
3. Influence of Air-Particle Deposition Protocols on the Surface Topography and Adhesion of Resin Cement to Zirconia. Acta Odontol: Sarmento, H.R.; Campos, F.; Sousa, R.S.; Machado, J.P.B.; Souza, R.O.A.; Bottino, M.A.; Ozcan, M: Acta Odontol Scand . 2014 Jul;72(5):346-53.doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.837958. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
4. Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Translucent Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate:Kwon, S.J.; Lawson, N.C.; McLaren, E.E.; Nejat, A.H.; Burgess, J.O. J.Prosthet:: J Prosthet Dent . 2018 Jul;120(1):132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.004. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
5. The Success of Dental Veneers According To Preparation Design and Material Type:Yousef Alothman, Maryam Saleh Bamasoud: Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):2402-408.doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.353. eCollection 2018 Dec 20.
6. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics: Blatz, M.B.; Vonderheide, M.; Conejo, J: J Dent Res 2018 Feb;97(2):132-139. doi: 10.1177/0022034517729134. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7. Ultra-thin monolithic zirconia veneers: reality or future? Report of a clinical case and one-year follow-up: Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza, Fernanda Pinheiro Barbosa, Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo, Eduardo Miyashita, Marco Antonio Bottino, Renata Marques de Melo, and Yu Zhang :Oper Dent :2018 ;43(1) :3_11.doi :10.234/16-350-T.
8. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance :Kumiko Yoshihara 1 , Noriyuki Nagaoka, Takumi Okihara , Manabu Kuroboshi, Satoshi Hayakawa, Yukinori Maruo, Goro Nishigawa, Jan De Munck, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Bart Van Meerbeek : Dent Mater : 2015 Dec;31(12):1493-501.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9. Effect of decontamination materials on bond strength of saliva-contaminated CAD/CAM resin block and dentin Kei Takahashi, Tomohiro Yoshiyama, Akihito Yokoyama, Yasushi Shimada, Masahiro Yoshiyama : Dent Mater J 2022 Jul 30;41(4):601-607. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-268. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10. Masking ability of implant abutment substrates by using different ceramic restorative systems Pablo Machado Soares , Ana Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues , Maria Gabriela Packaeser , Atais Bacchi , Luiz Felipe Valandro , Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira , Marília Pivetta Rippe J Prosthet Dent 2022 Sep;128(3):496.e1-496.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 Aug 16. Affiliations PMID: 35985853 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.010.

Case report with Dr. José Ignacio Zorzin

Rationalizing clinical workflows: This is the main reason for the use of universal products in adhesive dentistry. They are suitable for a wide range of indications and different application techniques, fulfil their tasks with fewer components than conventional systems and often involve fewer steps in the clinical procedure. Universal adhesives are a prominent example.

How do universal adhesives contribute to a streamlining of workflows?

When restoring teeth with resin composite, the restorative material will undergo volumetric shrinkage upon curing. By bonding the restorative to the tooth structure with an adhesive, the negative consequences of this shrinkage – marginal gap formation, marginal leakage and staining, hypersensitivity issues and the development of secondary caries – are prevented. The first bonding systems available on the dental market were etch-and-rinse adhesives, which typically consisted of three components: an acid etchant, a primer and a separate adhesive. Later generations combined the primer and the adhesive in one bottle, or were two or one-bottle self-etch adhesives. Universal adhesives (also referred to as multi-mode adhesives) may be used with or without a separate phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 1. Volumetric shrinkage of resin composite restoratives and its clinical consequences.

Which technique to choose depends on the indication and the clinical situation. In most cases, the best outcomes are obtained after selective etching of the enamel¹. Bonding to enamel is generally found more effective when the enamel is etched with phosphoric acid, while the application of phosphoric acid on large areas of dentin involves the risk of etching deeper than the adhesive is able to hybridize. When the cavity is small, however, selective application of the phosphoric acid etchant to the enamel surface may not be possible, so that a total-etch approach is most appropriate. Finally, in the context of repair, the self-etch approach may be the first choice, as phosphoric acid might impair the bond strength of certain restorative materials by blocking the binding sites. By using a universal adhesive, all these cases may be treated appropriately, as the best suitable etching technique can be selected in every situation.

Apart from the differences related to the use or non-use of phosphoric acid etchant on the enamel or enamel-and-dentin bonding surface, the clinical procedure is always similar with the same universal adhesive. The following clinical case is used to illustrate how to proceed with CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the selective enamel etch mode, and it includes some details about the underlying mechanism of adhesion.

How to proceed with selective enamel etching?

A clinical example.

This patient presented with a fractured maxillary lateral incisor, luckily bringing the fragment with him. Hence, it was decided to adhesively lute the fragment to the tooth with an aesthetic flowable resin composite.

Fig. 2. Patient with a fractured maxillary lateral incisor.

Fig. 3. Close-up of the fractured tooth.

Fig. 4. Working field isolated with rubber dam.

As proper isolation of the working field makes the dental practitioner’s life easier, a rubber dam was placed using the split-dam technique. It works well in the anterior region of the maxilla, as the risk of contamination with saliva from the palate is minimal. Once the rubber dam was placed, the bonding surfaces needed to be slightly roughened to refresh the dentin. As the surfaces were also slightly contaminated with blood and it is important to have a completely clean surface for bonding, KATANA™ Cleaner was subsequently applied to the tooth structure, rubbed into the surfaces for ten seconds and then rinsed off. The cleaning agent contains MDP salt with surface-active characteristics that remove all the organic substances from the substrate. The fragment was fixed on a ball-shaped plugger with (polymerised) composite and also cleaned with KATANA™ Cleaner.

Fig. 5. Cleaning of the tooth …

Fig. 6. … and the fragment with KATANA™ Cleaner.

What followed was selective etching of the enamel on the tooth and the fragment for 15 seconds. Whenever selective enamel etching is the aim, it is essential to select an etchant with a stable (non runny) consistency – a property that is offered by K-ETCHANT Syringe (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). Both surfaces were thoroughly rinsed and lightly dried before applying CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick with a rubbing motion. This adhesive is really quick: Study results show that the bond established immediately after application is as strong and durable as after extensive rubbing into the tooth structure for 20 seconds.^2,3 The adhesive layer was carefully air-dried to a very thin layer and finally polymerized on the tooth and on the fragment.

Fig. 7. Selective etching of the enamel of the tooth …

Fig. 8. … and the fragment with phosphoric acid etchant.

Fig. 9. Application …

Fig. 10. … of the universal bonding agent.

Fig. 11. Polymerization of the ultra-thin adhesive layer on the tooth …

Fig. 12. … and the fragment.

What happens to dentin in the selective enamel etch (or self-etch) mode?

After surface preparation or roughening, there is a smear layer on the dentin surface that occludes the dentinal tubules, forms smear plugs that protect the pulp and prevents liquor from affecting the bond. When self-etching the dentin with a universal adhesive, this smear layer is infiltrated and partially dissolved by the mild self-etch formulation (pH > 2) of the universal adhesive. At the same time, the adhesive infiltrates and demineralizes the peritubular dentin. The acid attacks the hydroxyapatite at the collagen fibrils, dissolves calcium and phosphate and hence enlarges the surface. Then, the 10-MDP contained in the formulation reacts with the positively loaded calcium (and phosphate) ions. This ionic interaction is responsible for linking the dentin with the methacrylate and thus for the formation of the hybrid layer.^4,5

In the total-etch mode, the phosphoric acid is responsible for dissolving the smear layer and demineralising the hydroxyapatite. This leads to a collapsing of the collagen fibrils, which need to be rehydrated by the universal adhesive that is applied in the next step. Whenever the acid penetrates deeper into the structures than the adhesive, the collagen fibrils will remain collapsed. This will most likely result in clinical issues including post-operative sensitivity⁶.

When applying the adhesive system, a dental practitioner rarely thinks about what is happening at the interface⁷. However, every user of a universal adhesive should be aware of the fact that a lot is happening there. This is why it is so important to use a high-performance material with well-balanced properties and strictly adhere to the recommended protocols.

Fig. 13. Schematic representation of dentin after tooth preparation: The smear layer on top with its smear plugs occluding the dentinal tubules protects the pulp and prevents liquor from being released into the cavity.

Fig. 14. Schematic representation of dentin after the application of a universal adhesive containing 10-MDP: The mild self-etch formulation partially dissolves and infiltrates the smear layer, while at the same time demineralizing and infiltrating the peritubular dentin5.

In the present case, the tooth and the fragment now needed to be reconnected. For this purpose, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-Flow (A2 Low) was applied to the tooth structure. The fragment was then repositioned with a silicone index, held in the right position with a plier and light cured. To obtain a smooth margin and glossy surface, the restoration was merely polished. The patient presented after 1.5 years for a recall and the restoration was still in a perfect condition.

Fig. 15. Reconnecting the fragment with the tooth structure.

Fig. 16. Treatment outcome.

Why is it important to adhere to the product-specific protocols?

Universal adhesives contain lots of different technologies in a single bottle. While this fact indeed allows users to rationalize their clinical procedures, it also requires some special attention. As every highly developed material, universal adhesives need to be used according to the protocols recommended by the manufacturer. In general, materials may only be expected to work well on absolutely clean surfaces, while contamination with blood and saliva is likely to decrease the bond strength significantly. Depending on the type of universal adhesive, active application is similarly important, as is proper air-drying and polymerization of the adhesive layer. In addition, care must be taken to use the material in its original state, which means that it needs to be applied directly from the bottle to avoid premature solvent evaporation or chemical reactions. When adhering to these rules, universal adhesives offer several benefits from streamlined procedures to simplified order management and increased sustainability, as fewer bottles are needed and likely to expire before use.

Dentist:

DR. JOSÉ IGNACIO ZORZIN

Dr. José Ignacio Zorzin graduated as dentist at the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, in 2009. He obtained his Doctorate (Dr. med. dent.) in 2011 and 2019 his Habilitation and venia legendi in conservative dentistry, periodontology and pediatric dentistry (“Materials and Techniques in Modern Restorative Dentistry”). Dr. Zorzin works since 2009 at the Dental Clinic 1 for Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Erlangen. He lectures at the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg in the field of operative dentistry where he leads clinical and pre-clinical courses. His main fields of research are self-adhesive resin luting composites, dentin adhesives, resin composites and ceramics, publishing in international peer-reviewed journals.

References

1. Van Meerbeek, B.; Yoshihara, K.; Van Landuyt, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Peumans, M. From Buonocore‘s Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent 2020, 22, 7-34.
2. Kuno Y, Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Klein Junior CA, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Incorporation of a hydrophilic amide monomer into a one-step self-etch adhesive to increase dentin bond strength: Effect of application time. Dent Mater J. 2019 Dec 1;38(6):892-899.
3. Nagura Y, Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Baruth AG, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Effect of Reduced Universal Adhesive Application Time on Enamel Bond Fatigue and Surface Morphology. Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):42-53.
4. Fehrenbach, J., C.P. Isolan, and E.A. Münchow, Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dental Materials, 2021. 37(10): 1463-1485.
5. Van Meerbeek, B., et al., State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dental Materials, 2011. 27(1): 17-28.
6. Pashley, D.H., et al., State of the art etchand-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater, 2011. 27(1): 1-16.
7. Vermelho, P.M., et al., Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21(5): 1707-1715.