429 Too Many Requests

Case by Dr. Aleksandra Łyżwińska, Warsaw, Poland

ABSTRACT

Indirect overlays are the contemporary restoration standard for posterior teeth with extensive hard tissue loss. They provide for cuspal coverage, which decreases the likeliness of coronal and/or root fracture. At the same time and in contrast to crowns, overlay preparations minimize the removal of sound tooth structure especially in the cervical region, which is a critical factor.¹ Modern dental resin composites allow for direct cuspal coverage in a single-visit appointment. The results of in-vitro studies suggest that these direct overlays are a suitable alternative to their indirect counterparts in specific situations.^2-6 The following case report is used to describe the direct restoration procedure by means of a maxillary right molar with an extensive, deep MOD lesion.

INTRODUCTION

In the context of treating a tooth with an extensive carious lesion, a biomechanical risk assessment should be performed. The primary method of reducing the likeliness of tooth fracture is treatment with a restoration that provides cuspal coverage. The contemporary gold standard for biomechanically compromised teeth are adhesively cemented overlays as an alternative to crowns.¹ Another option that does not involve labwork is a direct overlay restoration.^2-6 The direct approach is especially suitable for long-term temporization, which may be required during orthodontic treatment, for example.

CLINICAL CASE

The 40-year-old male patient was referred to my office before an orthodontic and prosthetic treatment. Intraoral examination (Figs. 1 and 2) revealed:

• Tetracycline discolouration,
• Multiple extensive composite restorations with marginal leakage,
• Primary and secondary carious lesions, and
• Significant mechanical weakness^7,8 (mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities, cusp loss, cracks).

Fig. 1. Initial situation – extensive MOD composite resin restoration.

Fig. 2. Initial situation – unacceptable contact points, palatal wall crack line.

Based on a clinical and radiological examination (Fig. 3), it was decided to restore the maxillary right first molar with a direct overlay, which should serve as a long-term temporary for the duration of orthodontic treatment. Once the local anaesthetic had been administered, rubber dam was placed in the first quadrant and the cusps of the affected first molar were reduced. For subgingival tooth preparation, a rubber dam sheet was temporarily moved behind the second upper molar (Fig. 4). In order to obtain a good emergence profile of the restoration and a tight fit of the sectional matrix, the gingivectomy was performed with an electric surgical knife (Surtron 50D, LED SPA) (Fig. 5). The main advantages of a diathermal cut are instant tissue coagulation and hemostasis⁹.

Fig. 3. Bite-wing radiograph: Maxillary fist molar with an overhang and negative profile of the distal wall.

Fig. 4. Initial preparation with reduction of the cusps and exposure of gingiva.

Fig. 5. Gingivectomy performed using a surgical electric knife.

In accordance with the European Society of Endodontology’s guidelines on the management of deep caries¹⁰, the deepest part of the cavity was cleaned in full rubber dam isolation (Nic Tone Dental Dam, MDC Dental) (Fig. 6). Carious-tissue excavation was carried out using round burs, then the enamel and dentin were air-abraded with 50-μm aluminum oxide (Microetcher IIa, Danville). Multiple cracks, penetrating through the enamel and partially the dentin, occurred within the mesial and palatal walls. The presence of cracks crossing the dentin-enamel junction is an absolute indication to cuspal coverage^8,11.

An appropriate rubber dam isolation is essential in adhesive dentistry. Beyond the obvious advantage of a clean operation field uncontaminated by saliva and moisture, the rubber dam contributes to keeping periodontal tissues at a distance form a tooth. In order to ensure both, maximum retraction and sufficient space to work, the rubber dam was inverted (introduced to the gingival sulcus) and stabilized using PTFE tape (Fig. 7). The mesial wall was restored using a blue 3D Composite-Tight 3D Fusion matrix ring (Garrison) and a medium standard Sectional Contoured Metal Matrix (TOR VM, Fig. 8). Due to its extensiveness and shape, restoration of the distal wall was more difficult to perform.

Fig. 6. Rubber dam newly placed in the interproximal area. Full isolation is essential for the excavation of the infected dentin in the deepest part of the cavity.

Fig. 7. PTFE tape placement for improving isolation in the gingival area. Al₂O₃ sandblasting.

Fig. 8. Mesial matrix fit.

The first attempt to adapt an elongated Sectional Contoured Metal Matrix and the green 3D Composite-Tight 3D Fusion (Garrison) ended with failure (Fig. 9). The matrix was changed for a longer and more curved one (Fig. 10). The ring was replaced by a smaller Palodent V3 Ring (Dentsply Sirona, Fig. 11). Due to the depth of the carious lesion, an antibacterial adhesive system was used (CLEARFIL™ SE Protect, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). It contains the MDPB monomer, which offers an antibacterial effect that lasts even after hybrid layer formation^12-14. Furthermore, the fluoride included in the bond liquid intensifies the cariostatic mechanism of CLEARFIL™ SE Protect and supports the so-called “Super Dentin” formation¹⁵.

Fig. 9. Insufficient fit of the distal matrix.

Fig. 10. New, longer and more curved matrix in place.

Fig. 11. Different matrix ring placed in the distal area.

After polymerization of the bonding agent, the nanohybrid flowable composite resin (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow High, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) was applied in a thin layer. The proximal wall was restored using both packable (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) and flowable composite resin (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) (Figs. 12 and 13). Core build-up was performed with bulk-fill type composite. The cusps were reconstructed free-hand with the previously used CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (Figs. 14 and 15). The universality of this product provides for a good optical integration and blending with the adjusted tissue, regardless of the colour of the underlying tooth structure. The fissures were gently highlighted using brown tints.

Fig. 12. Thin layer of flowable composite resin CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow High (A2) applied on the cavity floor. The proximal walls are built up with build-up by CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low (A2).

Fig. 13. Proximal walls build-up – palatal view.

Fig. 14. Core build-up. Free-hand cusp coverage with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, palatal view.

Fig. 15. Cusp coverage – occlusal view.

The initial polishing was performed with the rubber dam still in place. The excesses of composite resin were removed with the aid of abrasive discs, diamond burs and a “Brownie” polisher (BAL, Nevadent). Pre-polishing and high-shine polishing were executed with TWIST™ DIA for Composite (Kuraray Europe GmbH.) supported by a goat hair brush (Micerium) (Figs. 16 to 17).

Fig. 16. Occlusal surface after surface modeling with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal and initial polishing.

Fig. 17. Occlusal surface after modeling with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal and initial polishing – palatal view.

After removal of the rubber dam, the occlusal contact points of the direct overlay were adjusted (Figs. 18 and 19). Every spot touched by the burr was subsequently repolished according to the previously described protocol (Figs. 20 and 21).

Fig. 18. Occlusal adjustment. Contact points recorded with articulation paper (100 μm).

Fig. 19. Occlusal adjustment. Contact points recorded with articulation paper (100 μm= and articulation foil (16 μm).

Fig. 20. Final effect after polishing with TWIST™ DIA for Composite.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 21. Final effect – palatal view.

CONCLUSION

As a result of decades of improvements mainly with regard to the filler density and polishability, modern dental composites offer a great gloss retention and favourable wear properties. In addition, polymerization shrinkage has been decreased due to the integration of nanohybrid filler technology. Those features allow us to restore biomechanically compromised teeth using a direct restoration technique.

Direct overlays are a suitable alternative for a conventional indirect restoration in many situations.^18,19 According to researchers, the advantages of direct restorations with cuspal coverage include minimal tooth preparation, vital pulp-oriented treatment, the possibility to treat patients in a single appointment and a potentially lower cost of the treatment.^18-20 However, it should be emphasized that the presented technique requires advanced restorative skills that need to be acquired first before starting to implement it.

REFERENCES

1. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature--Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007 Oct;38(9):733-43.
2. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00010-5. PMID: 10785294.
3. Mondelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, de Oliveira Filho O, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):161-5.
4. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Multiple cuspal-coverage direct composite restorations: functional and esthetic guidelines. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(5):300-8; discussion 309-12.
5. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7.
6. Mincik J, Urban D, Timkova S, Urban R. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored by Various Direct Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9138945.
7. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989 Nov;15(11):512-6.
8. Banerji S, Mehta SB, Millar BJ. The management of cracked tooth syndrome in dental practice. Br Dent J. 2017 May 12;222(9):659-666.
9. Bashetty K, Nadig G, Kapoor S. Electrosurgery in aesthetic and restorative dentistry: A literature review and case reports. J Conserv Dent. 2009 Oct;12(4):139-44.
10. European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by:, Duncan HF, Galler KM, Tomson PL, Simon S, El-Karim I, Kundzina R, Krastl G, Dammaschke T, Fransson H, Markvart M, Zehnder M, Bjørndal L. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019 Jul;52(7):923-934.
11. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. The cracked tooth syndrome. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002 Sep;68(8):470-5.
12. Hashimoto M, Hirose N, Kitagawa H, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S. Improving the durability of resindentin bonds with an antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):620-627.
13. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Torii M, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Incorporation of antibacterial monomer MDPB into dentin primer. J Dent Res. 1997 Mar;76(3):768-72.
14. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater. 2003 Jun;19(4):313-9.
15. Nakajima M, Okuda M, Ogata M, Pereira PN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. The durability of a fluoride-releasing resin adhesive system to dentin. Oper Dent. 2003 Mar-Apr;28(2):186-92.
16. Bore Gowda V, Sreenivasa Murthy BV, Hegde S, Venkataramanaswamy SD, Pai VS, Krishna R. Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study. Scientifica (Cairo). 2015;2015:896507.
17. Oficjalne informacje producenta Kuraray Noritake Dental https://www.kuraraynoritake.eu/pl/clearfil-majesty-es-flow (dostęp 08.02.2022).
18. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Oct;53:12-21.
19. Dhadwal AS, Hurst D. No difference in the long-term clinical performance of direct and indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. Evid Based Dent. 2017 Dec 22;18(4):121-122.
20. Banerji S, Mehta SB, Millar BJ. Cracked tooth syndrome. Part 2: restorative options for the management of cracked tooth syndrome. Br Dent J. 2010 Jun;208(11):503-14.
21. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Loomans BA, Bronkhorst EM. Seven-year clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):808-11.
22. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306.

Case by CDT Daniele Rondoni

When planning to replace Class II restorations, many things need to be considered. In order to select the most appropriate restorative technique and preparation design, it is essential to evaluate the amount and state of the remaining tooth structure, first. After repeated restoration replacement or in teeth originally restored with amalgam, for example, the remaining walls and cusps are often weakened and prone to fractures and cracks. When the cavity walls appear to be too thin or the structure is weak at the time of restoration replacement, it may be better to remove walls and cusps and opt for indirect adhesive restorations (overlays) instead of direct composite restorations. Due to favourable material properties – in particular a high flexural and compressive strength while being gentle to the opposing dentition and not too rigid for the surrounding tooth structures – we often opt adhesive restorations made of KATANA™ AVENCIA™ Block in those situations.

The following clinical case is used to describe the replacement of two composite restorations with overlays made of the innovative hybrid ceramic material.

Fig. 1. Initial clinical situation with composite restorations on the second premolar and first molar in need of replacement. The tooth structure particularly of the first molar was weak, with the distobuccal cusp already fractured.

Fig. 2. Prepared tooth structure ...

Fig. 3. Restorations milled from a KATANA™ AVENCIA™ Block after high-gloss polishing and characterization.

Fig. 4. Finalized restorations on a resin model.

Fig. 5. Adhesively cemented restorations in the patient’s mouth.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 6. Treatment outcome with a nice transition from the tooth structure to the restoration.

Case by Dr. Jusuf Lukarcanin

Restoring posterior cavities is a standard task we perform virtually every day. Yet, it is a challenging procedure as access to the affected teeth is often limited. This fact complicates many steps from working field isolation to material application and sculpting. By streamlining procedures and establishing protocols that are followed every time, it is possible to achieve predictable outcomes even in difficult situations, as shown below.

Fig. 1. Class II cavity in a second molar after caries removal and cavity preparation.

Fig. 2. Working field isolation.

Fig. 3. Application of adhesive (e.g. CLEARFIL S³ BOND PLUS) into the cavity.

Fig. 4. Build-up of the proximal wall with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Classic (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A2.

Fig. 5. Build-up of the dentin core using the incremental technique with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A2D.

Fig. 6. Contouring of the occlusal enamel layer made of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Premium in the shade A2E.

Fig. 7. Polishing of the restoration with Twist DIA for Composite.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 8. Treatment outcome.

Compact, time-saving and aesthetic

How many different shades of composite do you need to create appealing restorations in virtually every clinical situation? If you opt for “CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2” Universal shade concept, a few shades will do the trick.

With wonderful support of our internationally recognized key opinion leaders, we have prepared a Clinical Case brochure of “CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2” Universal for you. The brochure highlights a variety of clinical cases in the anterior and posterior region to show the all about excellent properties of our latest composite. Let the pictures speak for themselves!

Click here to view. Enjoy!

Start Reading: Special MAJESTY ES-2 Universal - Clinical Cases Brochure

KLINISKT FALL MED
DR. NICOLA SCOTTI

Vid restauration av posteriora tänder med komposit, är funktionella aspekter, som täta och anatomiskt korrekta proximala kontakter och en naturligt utformad ocklusalyta som är nötningstålig och antagonistvänlig, ännu viktigare än en perfekt optisk integration. Därför ska varje tandläkare undvika att spendera för mycket tid på färgval i dessa fall och fokusera på de faktorer som har påverkan på pålitligheten och hållbarheten för restaurationen. En god hjälp för att uppnå detta mål erbjuds av
CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal, en komposit med en enda universalfärg (U) för det posteriora området som eliminerar behovet av färgtagning och färgval. Samtidigt, erbjuder den utmärkt marginal adaption, låg krympningsspänning och högt nötningsmotstånd, vilket behövs för långsiktigt goda resultat.

Fig. 1. Initial situation med en stor karieslesion i den distala delen av andra premolaren.

Fig. 2. Premolar efter isolering av arbetsfältet med kofferdam, exkavering av karies och preparation av kaviteten.

Fig. 3. Placering av en sektionsmatris och en kil för att optimera utformningen. Båda hålls på plats med en separationsring, som ökar det interproximala utrymmet och därmed försäkrar en tät, anatomiskt korrekt proximal kontakt.

Fig. 4. Uppbyggnad av den proximala väggen med CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (färg U) efter selektiv emaljetsning med fosforsyra (K-ETCHANT Syringe) och bonding med CLEARFIL™ SE Bond.

Fig. 5. Ett tunt lager flytande komposit (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES FLOW High) applicerat på kavitetsbotten för att fungera som ett resinskikt.

Fig. 6. Restaurationen avslutad med CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal (färg U). Universalfärgen smälter in mycket bra med den omgivande tandstrukturen och det naturliga utseendet förstärks genom applicering av en liten aning brun stain i fissuren.

Fig. 7. Behandlingsresultat omedelbart efter avlägsnande av kofferdam. Den proximala kontakten är tät och den ocklusala anatomin väl utformad för patientens egen tuggdynamik. Restaurationens marginal är praktiskt taget osynlig, medan den buckala kuspen ser ljusare ut på grund av dehydrering av den naturliga tandstrukturen.

SLUTLIG SITUATION

Fig. 8. Behandlingsresultat efter två månader.

Slutsats

Det aktuella fallet visar att den valda kompositen är väl lämpad för förenklade restaurationsprocedurer i det posteriora området. Materialet är bra att hantera, har samma mekaniska egenskaper som de andra materialen i serien CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 och smälter harmoniskt in med den omgivande strukturen utan att vara för translucent. På detta sätt, är det möjligt att undvika processen med färgtagning utan att kompromissa med behandlingsresultatet. Den tid som sparas i denna kontext, kan läggas på funktionella aspekter – eller till och med på en annan patient.

DR. NICOLA SCOTTI

By Paul de Kok, Amsterdam (KVPA) Periodontic Clinic & ACTA

Picture 1

The Patient
Joris reported to the clinic with two discoloured composite two discoloured class IV composite restorations in tooth 11 and 21 11 and 21 (picture 1). These vital teeth were traumatized in his childhood. He was not satisfied with the aesthetics of the restorations neither with the overall shape and colour of the two teeth. It was therefore decided to make porcelain facings for tooth 11 and 21.

Picture 2

The preparation
In order to limit the sacrifice of healthy tooth tissue while still creating sufficient space for the porcelain, a preparation was chosen with an incisal reduction of 1.5mm and a buccal reduction of 0.5mm. A so-called depth cutter – a diamond drill with 0.5mm deep recesses – was used to achieve this (picture 2).

Picture 3

To be able to adjust the shape of the mid-line to the new facings, cutting was carried out centrally through the contact. From the distal aspect the contactpoint was remained. The thin shoulder was positioned equi-gingivally, so that a dry operative field could be achieved without damage to the gingiva.

The preparations were then finished using fine drills and polishing discs. The existing, well bonded diamonds composite restorations were left in situ (picture 3).

Picture 4

Since the transparent facings are very thin, the colour of the cut teeth is significant. The colour of the cores was therefore matched using the Natural Die colour guide (picture 4). Finally, impressions were made. Temporary restorations were placed by means of 4 spot etching points and bonding.

Picture 5

Cementation
To combine superior aesthetics with adequate strength, pressed lithium disilicate restorations were chosen for Joris. Prior to cementing the facings, they were tried for size and checked for marginal integrity, contact points, occlusion/articulation and aesthetics. Then the correct cement colour was established by testing the facings with various try-in colours PANAVIATM V5 Universal (A2); Universal (A2) appeared to be the most appropriate colour in Joris’s case. The teeth were then polished with pumice and the facings were cleaned with alcohol, after which the teeth from 14 up to and including 24 were isolate by a rubber dam.
An incisor clamp was placed on the first teeth to be cemented. The facing was tried for fitting once more to ensure that it was free of contact with the rubber dam or the clamp and that the operative field of the preparation was totally dry (picture 5).

Picture 6

The facing was etched with 9% fluoricacid (picture 6) for 20 seconds to achieve micro-mechanical retention.

Picture 7

It was then rinsed with water for 20 seconds before being neutralised in a solution containing ceramic neutralising powder. CLEARFILTM CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS was then applied to the facing. This ensures chemical bonding between the facing and the composite cement thanks to the incorporated silane and MDP. The adjacent teeth were separated by means of a transparent strip, after which the preparation was etched with 35% phosphoric acid (picture 7). TOOTH PRIMERTM was applied after thorough rinsing with water and drying after it had taken effect for 20 seconds.

Picture 8

A thin layer of PANAVIA V5 cement was then applied to the facing. The facing was placed on the preparation with the application of light finger pressure. A microbrush was used to remove the major excess along the margins. The cement of the buccal and palatal aspect was light cured for 5 seconds. A sharp scaler and floss were used to remove the final excess. Glycerine gel was then applied to the outline to avoid oxygen inhibition during curing. The cement was finally light cured from both sides for 20 seconds, the glycerine gel was rinsed away and the margins were finished by means of a composite polishing stone. After placement of the first facing, the rubber dam clamp was moved to the neighbouring tooth so the cementation of the second facing could proceed. This facing was once more tried for fit, pre-treated and cemented in an identical manner (picture 8).

Picture 9

The result
The facings were checked a few weeks later (picture 9). Joris was very satisfied with the aesthetics of his two central incisors. The transitions from tooth to restoration were invisible and the gingiva was healthy.

Picture 10

The transparency, surface structure and gloss are better adjusted to the neighbouring elements and to Joris’s smile (picture 10).