Trauma case: Cementation of a fractured crown fragment

Case by Aleksandra Łyżwińska DMD, Warsaw, Poland

Dental injuries can be stressful for patients, parents of pediatric patients, and dentists alike. The following tips offer support in turning the treatment of crown fractures into a simple, quick and predictable procedure. In the case described, we opted for a reattachment of fractured crown fragments.

YOUNG PATIENT WITH A FRACTURED CENTRAL INCISOR

A 16-year-old patient presented immediately after an accident. Her maxillary left central incisor was fractured, involving half of the coronal enamel and dentin (Fig. 1). The pulp was not involved, but the fracture line was quite close to the pulp (Fig. 2). After examination and radiographic evaluation, the patient was anesthetized. When placing the rubber dam, it tore between the left central and lateral incisor (Figs. 3 and 4). Due to the patient’s young age and limited willingness to cooperate, the decision was made to proceed without replacing the rubber dam. This was expected to work well in this specific region due to the limited flow of saliva from the palate and a low associated risk of contamination.

Fig. 1. Fractured maxillary left central incisor at the day of the accident.

Fig. 2. Occlusal view of the maxillary anterior teeth with the pulp of the fractured central incisor shining through.

Fig. 3. Rubber dam placed and torn between the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 4. Occlusal view of the teeth isolated with rubber dam.

REMOVAL OF UNSUPPORTED ENAMEL PRISMS

In order to provide for a high-quality bond and natural aesthetics, unsupported enamel prisms should be removed. As the use of burs might be too invasive (removing too much structure) and thus hinder the alignment of crown fragments, air-abrasion with 50 μm alumina particles was the method of choice. To avoid iatrogenic pulp exposure, the deepest part of the affected tooth was protected with a colored flowable composite before sandblasting (Fig. 5). The adjacent teeth were protected using a metal strip (Fig. 6). Several seconds of air abrasion were sufficient to remove the enamel prisms and obtain a homogeneous enamel surface (Fig. 7). Subsequently, the colored flowable composite was removed from the dentin surface and the tooth fragment was treated in the same way.

Fig. 5. Preparations for sandblasting: Dentin area near the pulp protected with flowable composite.

Fig. 6. Protection of the adjacent teeth with a metal strip.

Fig. 7. Homogeneous enamel surface after air abrasion.

JOINING OF THE FRAGMENT WITH THE REMAINING TOOTH STRUCTURE

After air-abrasion treatment, the fit of the tooth and the fragment was checked and approved (Fig. 8). To improve retention of the fractured crown portion, it was bonded to a micro applicator using composite resin. Alternatively, prefabricated prosthetic carriers may be used. Then, selective etching of the enamel was performed on the tooth and the fragment (Figs. 9 and 10). During this procedure, the adjacent teeth were protected with a celluloid strip (Fig. 11). To better adapt the strip to the distal surface, a curved wedge was placed interproximally (Fig. 12).

The bonding system of choice was CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After applying this adhesive to the tooth and the fragment (Fig. 13), a small portion of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade A2 was applied to the part of the fragment treated with adhesive.* After careful repositioning of the fragment and while holding it in place with the micro applicator, the composite was light cured.

Fig. 8. Perfect fit of the fragment to the tooth.

Fig. 9. Selective etching of the enamel on the tooth …

Fig. 10. … and the fragment.

Fig. 11. Position of the wedge …

Fig. 12. … used for better adaptation to the distal surface.

Fig. 13. Fragment treated with CLEARFIL™ SE Bond 2 PRIMER and BOND, which were both carefully air-dried, while the Bond was also light cured.

Fig. 14. Fragment back in place.

Fig. 15. Occlusal view of the teeth with the reattached fragment perfectly fitting the mould.

EXCESS REMOVAL AND POLISHING

Excess composite was removed with a scalpel blade and abrasive discs. The entire restoration was then polished using TWIST™ DIA for Composite (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Fig. 16). A nice optical integration was obtained immediately after finishing due to fact that the fragment was stored in water during the waiting time and treatment. As observed with teeth isolated with rubber dam during treatment, teeth undergo dehydration outside the oral cavity. The effect is much stronger in the latter setting, making a fragment become chalky white. By keeping the fragment in water, dehydration is limited to a minimum and it is possible to properly evaluate the aesthetic outcome. This has a positive impact on patient satisfaction. In the present case, the fragment and the tooth structure had a similar appearance, both showing a slightly increased brightness as a result of manipulation under rubber dam or in the air, respectively.

Fig. 16. Immediately after polishing, the fragment has almost the same brightness as the tooth thanks to water storage. A slight dehydration effect is visible.

TREATMENT OUTCOME

To achieve optimal aesthetics and long-lasting gloss, the composite was repolished one week later (Fig. 17). This was accomplished with a light blue high-shine rubber polisher of the TWIST™ DIA for Composite system, followed by polishing with diamond paste and a goat hair brush.

Fig. 17. Treatment outcome after one week.

Teeth previously isolated with a rubber dam and the fractured crown fragment had undergone rehydration and returned to their natural colour. The colour adaptation is satisfactory. Harmonious light reflections on the labial surface of the treated tooth a beautiful, natural shine have made the fracture site nearly invisible. In addition to aesthetic value, good therapeutic results were also achieved - the tooth responds appropriately to stimuli and is pain-free.

CONCLUSION

The described approach is a valuable treatment option for anterior trauma cases with relatively large fragments that are still available. By reattaching the natural structure, the need for complicated and time-consuming multi-shade layering and free-hand modeling is eliminated, while all the remaining natural tooth structure is saved. Instead of preparing the tooth, a removal of the unsupported enamel prisms and roughening of the surface is absolutely sufficient. Key elements for a great optical integration and long-lasting success are the proper use of a high-performance adhesive as well as the selection of a composite that has the ability to properly blend into its environment and offers a nature-like gloss retention. The selected materials offer precisely these features, so that the great outcome may be expected to last.

*CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low is indicated for cementation purposes. The cementation of tooth fragments, however, is not explicitly mentioned in the instructions for use. The decision to use the product in this context was made by the dental practitioner in charge of the treatment.

Dentist:

ALEKSANDRA ŁYŻWIŃSKA DMD

Aleksandra Łyżwińska graduated from the Medical University of Warsaw, where she later served as a lecturer and assistant in the Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics. In her daily practice, she focuses on the broad field of adhesive dentistry. She is passionate about minimally invasive techniques and vital pulp therapy. Since 2020, she has been conducting courses in conservative dentistry, collaborating with major training centers in Poland and around the world. She is a key opinion leader for Kuraray Noritake. In her training sessions, she demonstrates that dental caries management doesn‘t have to be boring, and that the bond in the bottle is just as exciting as a spy movie. Instagram users know her as the creator of the educational profile for dentist @aleksandra.lyzwinska.

• 22 okt. 2024

CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow View Product

TWIST DIA for Composite View Product