429 Too Many Requests

Is it safe to use the single-component PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal to lute virtually all your indirect restorations?

Did you ever ask yourself how many components are really needed to safely cement your silicate-ceramic, zirconia or resin-based restorations? With PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal, a single component is usually sufficient. Containing an unreacted silane coupling agent – the LCSi monomer – and the original MDP monomer, the dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cement adheres to tooth structure and to various restorative materials including the popular silica-based ceramics without the need for a separate primer.

For those wondering how it works and if it really works as well as desired, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. has created a scientific brochure. It contains in-depth information about the drivers of chemical adhesion contained in PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and its characteristic properties. The main part, however, focuses on the results of scientific studies – most of which have been conducted in external laboratories. With the aid of artificial aging, different testing devices and various experimental set-ups, the researchers have checked the resin cement thoroughly. The study results shed light on the behaviour of the material when used in the context of bonding to different restorative materials and different types of tooth structure. Self- and light-curing modes are compared, aging effects investigated and different moisture conditions taken into account.

As a whole, the collected data allows for a precise prediction of the clinical behaviour of PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. This valuation has already been confirmed by clinical experience of dental practitioners from all around the world. Moreover, the results of a first clinical study, which is also found in this compilation, are a proof of its exceptional performance.

Download the brochure to learn more about the properties and behaviour of the single-component universal resin cement!

ADHESIVE LUTING: A DRIVER OF INNOVATION

What would modern restorative treatments be like without the availability of high-performance (self-)adhesive resin cements? Tooth preparations would still be much more invasive due to the need for sufficient mechanical retention between the tooth and the restoration. At the same time, it would be impossible to restore teeth with many innovative, tooth-coloured materials such as low-strength ceramics and composite. In short, restorative dentistry would be much less developed than it is today.

When the first resin cements were introduced several decades ago, however, the achieved progress came at the expense of simplicity: Adhesive luting procedures were highly complex and the many different components quite technique sensitive. Luckily, this has changed over the years due to continued development efforts ultimately resulting in the products that are currently available. The resin cement line-up of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. consists of three main products: the dual-cure three-component system PANAVIA™ V5, the single-component dual-cure universal resin cement PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and the light-curing PANAVIA™ Veneer LC.

For those who would like to learn more about the three systems, this 10^th issue of the BOND Magazine is definitely worth reading. It reveals important details about the 40-year history of the PANAVIA™ brand, sheds light on the strengths of each resin cement to facilitate indication-specific cement selection and provides in-depth information about their clinical use. In addition, two articles are dedicated to hot topics around the luting of restorations made of zirconia, a popular restorative material that some still consider to be unsuitable for adhesive luting procedures. For everyone wondering how it is possible to successfully lute minimally invasive restorations made of zirconia, the article titled “Innovative resin cements forming the basis of minimally invasive prosthodontics” is highly recommended. Those unsure about how to proceed with 5Y-TZP should read the article “How to cement restorations made of high-translucency zirconia”. Interesting information about cleaning options prior to adhesive luting rounds out the content of this magazine.

Click here to read. Enjoy reading!

Start Reading: BOND | VOLUME 10 | 10/2023

Previous versions:

BOND | VOLUME 9 | 08/2022

BOND | VOLUME 8 | 12/2021

BOND | VOLUME 7 | 10/2020

Photo credits to Giuliano Moustakis

Can you imagine a world without multi-layered zirconia? The invention of a zirconia material with natural colour gradation and well-balanced translucency and strength led to fundamental changes in the way zirconia-based restorations are produced. When the first product of its kind – KATANA™ Zirconia ML – was introduced to the dental market exactly ten years ago, dental technicians all over the world suddenly started rethinking their manufacturing concepts.

Since then, the trend towards a decreased thickness of the porcelain layer, a limiting of this layer to the vestibular area and the production of monolithic restorations is clearly perceivable. Technicians have developed their own concepts of micro-layering, which allow for more patient-centred approaches. This is also due to the fact that the total wall thicknesses of the restorations may be decreased without compromising the aesthetics. The line-up of multi-layered zirconia currently available from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. (KATANA™ Zirconia UTML, STML, HTML Plus and KATANA™ Zirconia YML with additional translucency and strength gradation) enables users to make indication-related material choices for the production of restorations that are precisely aligned to the individual demands of each case.

The reasons to choose KATANA™ quality

But why choose KATANA™ Zirconia instead of any other multi-layered zirconia disc? According to experienced users of the KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered series, there are many reasons to opt for KATANA™.

For Jean Chiha, owner at North Star Dental Laboratories and Milling Center in Santa Ana, California, it is the combination of optical and mechanical properties that makes the difference: 

“KATANA™ Zirconia is the game changing material with well-balanced esthetics and strength!”. 

Naoki Hayashi, president of Ultimate Styles Dental Laboratory in Irvine, California, aesthetics is the most decisive argument to opt for the discs from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. He states:

“KATANA™ Zirconia discs offer trusted esthetics which gives me confidence in my clinical cases”.

Naoto Yuasa, chief ceramist at Otani Dental Clinic in Tokyo, adds predictability as an important factor:

“KATANA™ sustains my passions for aesthetic restorations and those of a predictable future in the long run”, whereas dependability is the key element.

For Hiroki Goto, the laboratory manager at Sheets and Paquette Dental Practice in Newport Beach, California reports:

“Without KATANA™ there is no pride. Haven’t experienced it yet? You have to see how reliable it is!”

Finally, we have asked Kazunobu Yamada, a pioneer in making porcelain laminate veneers using complementary color techniques and a first-hour user of KATANA™ Zirconia, what comes to his mind when thinking about KATANA™ Zirconia. According to the president of CUSP Dental Laboratory in Nagoya City, there is a clear link between the product name and its characteristics:

“Did you know that the word "KATANA" also means "protection against misfortune and evil"? Katana zirconia, the culmination of many years of research and development by Kuraray Noritake, has an unparalleled quality. KATANA™, for me, is truly "Protection for all technicians".”

The origin of well-balanced properties

It seems that the KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered line-up stands out due to set of valuable properties enabling a dental technician to produce beautiful, high-quality restorations every time. The secret of success lies in meticulous raw material selection and controlled processing from the powder to the pre- sintered blank carried out at the production facilities of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. in Japan. They provide for the high product quality that is responsible for the materials’ outstanding behaviour supporting the best possible outcomes.

Daži uzņēmumi galvenokārt izmanto citu izstrādātās pamattehnoloģijas, lai uzlabotu savus produktus un ieviestu jaunus, savukārt citi uzņēmumi veic fundamentālus pētījumus un tehnoloģiju izstrādi paši. Vai šī atšķirība ir nozīmīga speciālistiem, kuri katru dienu izmanto iegūtos produktus zobārstniecības praksē vai zobu tehniskajā laboratorijā? Protams, ka ir, jo šādiem uzņēmumiem ir dziļa izpratne par pamatā esošajiem komponentiem, ķīmiju un tehnoloģijām, kā arī tās spēj atrisināt problēmas un elastīgi un ātri reaģēt uz tirgus vajadzībām. Šajā rakstā ir aprakstīta vairāku Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izstrādāto pamattehnoloģiju ietekme uz netiešo restaurāciju cementēšanu.

Adhezīvā cementēšana toreiz un tagad

Iespēja frēzēt zobu restaurācijas no dažāda veida keramikas ir pavērusi jaunas iespējas protezēšanai: ir iespējams izgatavot un cementēt ļoti estētiskas restaurācijas. Tas, kas šajā kontekstā bieži tiek novērtēts par zemu, ir adhezīvu cementēšanas sistēmu nozīme, kas ne tikai veicina zobu krāsas restaurāciju estētiski caurspīdīgo izskatu, bet arī paver ceļu mazāk invazīvai slīpēšanai un restaurācijām. Agrīnās sistēmas, kas nodrošināja ķīmisko saķeri starp zobu audiem un netiešām restaurācijām, diemžēl nespēja nodrošināt paredzamu ilgtermiņa rezultātu un tās bija saistītas ar augstu tehnikas jutīgumu, kā arī cementēšanas procedūra bija ārkārtīgi sarežģīta. Tehnoloģiju attīstība uzņēmumā Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. sniedza būtisku ieguldījumu cementēšanas sistēmu ilgtermiņa adhēzijas veiktspējā un darbplūsmas vienkāršošanā.

Ilgtermiņa adhēzijas veiktspējas optimizēšana

Lai panāktu agrīno cementēšanas sistēmu ilglaicīgu adhēziju ar zoba struktūru (īpaši dentīnu), Kuraray (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. mātesuzņēmums) pagājušā gadsimta 70. gados nolēma pievērsties jaudīgāka adhezīvā monomēra izstrādei. Kā pirmo soli ceļā uz izcilību tas 1976. gadā ieviesa fosfāta monomēru Phenyl-P. Piecus gadus vēlāk, pēc nepārtrauktiem centieniem uzlabot un pilnveidot tā molekulāro struktūru, tika izveidots populārais MDP monomērs, kas spēj izveidot īpaši spēcīgu un ilgstošu saiti ar emalju, dentīnu, metālu un cirkoniju.

Šī izgudrojuma atjautību uzsver fakts, ka tas joprojām ir daļa no katras Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. adhezīvās un adhezīvās cementēšanas sistēmas, un to izmanto arī citi ražotāji, lai optimizētu savu produktu adhēzijas stiprību un savienojuma izturību. Salīdzinot ar citur sintezēto MDP, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. oriģinālais MDP monomērs izceļas ar nepārspējamu produkta tīrības līmeni. Neatkarīgi pētījumi liecina, ka šādam tīrības līmenim ir pozitīva ietekme uz tā spēju veidot saiti1. Piedāvājot stabilitāti mitrā vidē, MDP monomērs ir veicinājis to saturošo produktu konsekventāku darbību.

Dažādi MDP monomēri piedāvā dažādus tīrības līmeņus un atšķirīgu adhezīvo veiktspēju.

Tika sagatavoti trīs eksperimentāli paškodinoši praimeri, kas sastāvēja no 15 masas % 10-MDP, no dažādiem produktiem: KN (Kuraray Noritake Dental), PCM (Vācija) vai DMI (Designer Molecules Inc., ASV). Datus sniedza Dr. Kumiko Yoshihara.

Tomēr, lai adhezīvās kompozīta cementa sistēmas nodrošinātu spēcīgu saiti ar izcilu restaurāciju malas blīvumu, nepietiek tikai ar adhezīvo monomēru. Nepieciešama arī efektīva šī monomēra polimerizācija – un ne vienmēr tā ir tik viegli paveicama. Lai nodrošinātu efektīvu PANAVIA™ V5 sacietēšanu gan gaismā, gan tumsā, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izstrādāja Touch-Cure tehnoloģiju. Šīs tehnoloģijas galvenā sastāvdaļa ir jaunizstrādāts, ļoti aktīvs PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer polimerizācijas paātrinātājs, kas spēj darboties MDP monomēra radītajā skābajā vidē. Tas veicina polimerizāciju, sākot jau no vietas, kur zobs saskaras ar cementu uzreiz kā PANAVIA™ V5 cementa pasta tiek uzklāta uz zoba virsmas, kura iepriekš ir apstrādāta ar praimeri. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC ir gaismā cietējoša kompozīta cementa sistēma, kas darbojas ar tiem pašiem praimeriem, un kuram PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer polimerizācijas paātrinātājs nodrošina tādu pašu darbības mehānismu. Tas veicina adhezīvo virsmu polimerizāciju, savukārt PANAVIA™ Venner LC Paste nodrošina izcilu stabilitāti apkārtējā gaismā un tā polimerizācija notiek tikai gaismošanas laikā.

Piemēram, šī parādība tika novērtēta PANAVIA™ F2.0, kas ir PANAVIA™ V5 priekštecis. Pētījuma rezultāts: PANAVIA™ F2.0 uzrādīja daudz labākas restaurāciju malas blīvuma īpašības nekā citas novērtētās cementa sistēmas2. Šis dokumentētais drošais restaurāciju malu blīvums samazina malas sūces gadījumu skaitu, nodrošina ļoti augstu polimerizācijas pakāpi pat pašsacietēšanas režīmā (bez gaismošanas vai visur, kur gaismu bloķē restaurāciju materiāls) un līdz ar to panāk īpaši spēcīgu saiti.

Papildu ieguvums, kas rodas no polimerizācijas paātrinātāja iekļaušanas, ir tā spēcīga reducētāja funkcija. Tas neitralizē nātrija hipohlorītu, ko parasti izmanto kā skalošanas šķīdumu endodontiskās ārstēšanas laikā, un tādējādi novērš tā negatīvo ietekmi uz vēlāk uzklātās cementa pastas saites stiprību.

Vienkāršota stikla keramikas cementēšana

Mazāk pudeļu, mazāk soļu un racionalizētas cementēšanas procedūras – iemesli, kāpēc pašadhezīvie kompozīta cementi tika izstrādāti un ieviesti 2000. gadu sākumā. Tomēr lielākajai daļai šo produktu ir ierobežots indikāciju diapazons. Tie labi darbojas uz cirkonija, metāla, emaljas un dentīna, taču tie nav ieteicami, vai arī ir nepieciešams papildu silāna praimeris, lai veidotu saiti ar stikla keramiku. MDP saturošais PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal atšķiras ar citu Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. patentētu tehnoloģiju: LCSi monomēru, garās oglekļa ķēdes silāna savienojuma aģentu. Šis monomērs veido spēcīgu ķīmisko saiti ar kompozīta materiālu, porcelānu un silīcija keramiku (piemēram, litija disilikātu), tādējādi novēršot nepieciešamību pēc papildus silānu saturoša produkta (praimera vai adhezīva) lietošanas. Izmantojot šīs tehnoloģijas priekšrocības, PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal nepārprotami izceļas no citiem pašadhezīvajiem kompozīta cementiem kā patiesa vienkomponenta cementēšanas sistēma pat restaurācijām, kas izgatavotas no stikla keramikas.

Ja vēlaties, produkta saites stiprību ar zoba audiem var palielināt, izmantojot populāro universālo adhezīvu CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick ar Rapid Bond tehnoloģiju. Šo tehnoloģiju ir izstrādājusi Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., lai atrisinātu problēmas, kas saistītas ar lēnu adhezīva nonākšanu dziļāk zoba struktūrā, īpaši mitrā dentīnā, kas raksturīga universālajiem adhezīviem. Lai nodrošinātu pietiekamu adhezīva iesūkšanos zoba struktūrā, tie ir ilgstoši un aktīvi jāierīvē zoba struktūrā vai arī ārstam ir jāgaida ilgāks laiks, pirms slānis tiek nogaismots. Patentētā Rapid Bond tehnoloģija, kas sastāv no oriģinālā MDP monomēra apvienojumā ar hidrofilajiem amīda monomēriem, nodrošina augstu afinitāti pret ūdeni, kas nodrošina ātru un dziļu saites iespiešanos mitrā dentīnā. Rezultātā tiek saīsināts uzklāšanas laiks un vienkāršota apstrāde, negatīvi neietekmējot adhezīva veiktspēju.

Secinājums

Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izstrādātās tehnoloģijas ir būtiski veicinājušas adhezīvo cementēšanas sistēmu saites veiktspēju un patiesi universālu pašlīmējošo kompozīta cementu izmantošanu. Tā rezultātā uzņēmums spēj piedāvāt modernizētu augstas veiktspējas kompozīta cementu klāstu katram ārstam tipiskām klīniskajām situācijām. Nepieciešams mazāk komponentu un mazāk darbību, un procedūras ir vienkāršotas – mazāk iespēju pieļaut kļūdas un vieglāk nodrošināt ilgtspējīgas estētiskās restaurācijas. Papildus ar tehnoloģiju saistītajām priekšrocībām, minētie produkti piedāvā vairākas citas noderīgas funkcijas. Detalizēts apraksts ir atrodams tiešsaistē vietnē kuraraynoritake.eu.   

Atsauces

*) Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance.; Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, De Munck J,
Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1493-501.
**) Touch-Cure Polymerization at the Composite Cement-Dentin Interface.; Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Benino Y, Nakamura A, Hara T, Maruo Y, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek
B.J Dent Res. 2021 Aug;100(9):935-94

Daži uzņēmumi galvenokārt izmanto citu izstrādātās pamattehnoloģijas, lai uzlabotu savus produktus un ieviestu jaunus, savukārt citi uzņēmumi paši veic fundamentālus pētījumus un tehnoloģiju izstrādi. Vai šī atšķirība ir nozīmīga kādam, kurš katru dienu izmanto šos produktus zobārstniecības praksē vai laboratorijā? Tā ir – uzņēmumiem, kas visu izstrādā no nulles, parasti ir dziļāka izpratne par produktiem un to ražošanas procedūrām, un tas atvieglo specifisku īpašību modifikāciju, esošo problēmu risināšanu un tirgus vajadzību apmierināšanu. Šajā rakstā ir aprakstīta vairāku Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izstrādāto pamattehnoloģiju ietekme uz tiešo restaurāciju darba plūsmu.

Tiešās restaurācijas – no sarežģītām līdz vienkāršām

Adhezīvā restauratīvā zobārstniecība, izmantojot augstas veiktspējas zobu adhezīvus un kompozīta materiālus, šobrīd ir viens no populārākajiem veidiem, kā ārstēt zobus ar kariesa bojājumiem. Mūsdienās parasti pietiek ar vienas pudeles universālo adhezīvu un vienu vai diviem universālā kompozīta materiāla toņiem un opacitāti, lai radītu skaistu un izturīgu rezultātu, ja tiek izvēlēti pareizi materiāli. Tomēr ne vienmēr viss ir bijis tik vienkārši. Ilgu laiku tiešo restaurāciju process ir bijis diezgan sarežģīts: adhezīva aplicēšanai bija ļoti specifiska tehnika, vairāku pudeļu sistēmas un vairāku soļu sistēmas ar ilgu uzklāšanas laiku. No otras puses, kompozīta plombējamie materiāli radīja reālistiskus rezultātus tikai tad, ja tika pareizi apvienoti daudzi dažādi toņi un opacitātes. Un pat tad, ja sarežģītās procedūras tika veiktas pareizi, mikro sūces, krāsas maiņas un galu galā sekundāra kariesa risks bija salīdzinoši augsts. Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. pievērsās šo problēmu risināšanai diezgan agri, sākot ar 1981. gadā izstrādātā oriģinālā MDP monomēra izmantošanu.

Adhēzijas kvalitātes optimizēšana

Oriģinālais MDP monomērs atrisināja jautājumu par adhezīvo sistēmu ierobežoto ilgtermiņa adhēzijas veiktspēju. MDP hidrofilā (fosfāta) grupa veido īpaši spēcīgu un ilgstošu ķīmisku saiti ar kalciju, kas atrodas hidroksilapatītā – galvenajā emaljas un dentīna sastāvdaļā. Rezultējošais MDP-Ca sāls nodrošina pamatu stabilam, spēcīgam un izturīgam hibrīda slānim. Kombinācijā ar sveķiem, saistvielā pēc sacietēšanas gaismā tiek panākts blīvs kavitātes pildījums. Līdz pat mūsdienām MDP ir būtiska jebkura Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. adhezīvā produkta sastāvdaļa, un tā ir galvenā sastāvdaļa, kas ļāva CLEARFIL™ SE Bond kļūt par Zelta standarta pašlīmējošo līmēšanas sistēmu.

Tomēr, būdami pārliecināti, ka zobārstniecības adhezīvam ir jānodrošina vairāk nekā tikai spēcīga un ilgstoša saite, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. sāka pievērsties cita jautājuma risināšanai: demineralizācijas un tālāka kariesa riskam, ko izraisa kavitātē palikušās baktērijas. Pamatojoties uz savu pieredzi citu adhezīvu monomēru izstrādē, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izgudroja MDPB monomēru, kam piemīt antibakteriāls kavitāti attīrošs efekts. Atšķirībā no antibakteriālajiem līdzekļiem, kas var pasliktināt pēc tam uzklātā adhezīva saķeres stiprību, MDPB monomērs nogalina atlikušās baktērijas, neietekmējot savienošanas veiktspēju. Tas ir iekļauts divu pudeļu sistēmas pašadhezīvajā CLEARFIL™ SE Protect praimerī un tas tiek imobilizēts polimerizācijas ceļā.

Tiek uzskatīts, ka MDPB baktericīdais mehānisms ir līdzīgs labi zināmajam antibakteriālajam līdzeklim CPC (cetilpiridīnija hlorīds), kas ir daudzās zobu pastās un mutes skalošanas līdzekļos.

Lai gan divu pudeļu sistēmas pašadhezīvās saites jau ir vienkāršojušas adhēzijas procedūru, vienas pudeles universālie adhezīvi spēj paveikt vēl vairāk. Tas ir izaicinājums apvienot sastāvdaļas, kas sadalītas daudzpakāpju sistēmās vienā pudelē, neapdraudot produkta stabilitāti. Pašreizējās tehnoloģijas tagad to padara iespējamu. Lai pēc iespējas ātrāk pēc uzklāšanas noslēgtu virsmu, monomēru iekļūšanai zobu audos jābūt ātrai un efektīvai. Tomēr, šo iekļūšanu parasti palēnina monomēri, kuriem nepieciešams laiks, lai iekļūtu zoba struktūrā – īpaši mitrā dentīnā – un dažreiz pat to ir nepieciešams ierīvēt. Tāpēc Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. koncentrējās uz Rapid Bond tehnoloģijas izstrādi. Tas sastāv no oriģinālā MDP monomēra, kas apvienots ar nesen izstrādātiem hidrofiliem šķērssaistītiem amīda monomēriem un ir integrēts CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick. Hidrofilie amīda monomēri nodrošina ātru, dziļu un pilnīgu iekļuvi dentīnā un pēc sacietēšanas veido blīvu, šķērssavienotu polimēru tīklu, kas ir atbildīgs par spēcīgu un izturīgu saiti. Tādējādi tiek novērsts gaidīšanas un ierīvēšanas laiks, un pēc sacietēšanas gaismā tiek izveidota cieši, blīvi un ilgstoši noslēgta kavitāte.

Pateicoties to hidrofilitātei (ūdens pievilcībai), Rapid Bond Technology amīdu monomēri ļoti labi iekļūst dentīnā. Pēc sacietēšanas gaismā saite uzrāda zemu ūdens absorbciju un tādējādi augstu novecošanās izturību.

Tiešo restaurāciju optimizēšana

Vairāku slāņu, toņu un opacitāšu apvienošana: ļoti sarežģītu slāņošanas paņēmienu izmantošana reālistisku kompozīta materiālu restaurāciju izveidei, par laimi, daudzās klīniskās situācijās ir pagātne. Iemesls: augsti attīstīti kompozīta materiāli, kas nemanāmi saplūst ar blakus esošo zobu struktūru. Lai nodrošinātu šo labvēlīgo efektu, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. ir izstrādājis savu patentēto gaismas difūzijas tehnoloģiju (LDT). Tehnoloģija ir iestrādāta īpašos iepriekš polimerizētos filleros, kas darbojas kā miljoniem mikroprizmu, kas pārraida un lauž gaismu un krāsu no apkārtējās zoba struktūras. Pildvielas ar optimizētu izmēru, sadalījumu un refrakcijas indeksu attiecībā pret matricu, piedāvānepārspējamu dabisko sajaukšanos. Visa CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ kompozītmateriālu sērija satur šo patentēto pildvielu tehnoloģiju. Tā jaunākais produkts – CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal –, kurā Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izmanto nākamā līmeņa LDT, ļauj izmantot vienas krāsas tehniku ar vienkāršotu toņu izvēli: tas ir pieejams divos toņos priekšzobiem un vienā tonī aizmugurējam zobu reģionam, taču tas saplūst tik labi, ka aptver gandrīz katru VITA klasisko toni no A1 līdz A4.

Gaismas laušana un caurlaidība pareizajā veidā lieliskai optiskai integrācijai: CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 gaismas difūzijas pildvielas no Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.

Tā kā lielisks optiskais izskats ir atkarīgs ne tikai no optiskās integrācijas un nenosakāmām plombes robežām, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izstrādāja arī pildvielas, kas nodrošina pārējo – dabisku virsmas spīdumu un ilgstošu pulēšanas noturību. CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow integrētais risinājums ar trīs plūstamības līmeņiem tiek saukts par submikronu pildvielu tehnoloģiju, kas sastāv no spīdīgām submikrona izmēra pildvielām. Šīs pildvielas ir tik mazas, ka gaismas atstarošanās uzrāda dabisku efektu pat pēc nodiluma. Uzņēmuma Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. izcilā silāna tehnoloģija tiek izmantota, lai savienotu miljoniem šo submikronu pildvielu un laika gaitā saglabātu tās kopā. Tas pieļauj lielu pildvielu slodzi zemas viskozitātes kompozītmateriālos un ierobežo ūdens uzņemšanu, kas pretējā gadījumā izraisītu sacietējušā kompozīta materiāla degradāciju. Ideāls līdzsvars starp spīdīgajām submikronu pildvielām, gaismas difūzijas pildvielām, sveķu matricu un patentēto silāna tehnoloģiju ir atbildīgs par līdzsvarotu mehānisko un optisko
īpašību kombināciju.

Viena toņa restaurācijas piemērs, kas izgatavots no CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal.

Secinājums

Adhezīvie monomēri, pildvielu tehnoloģijas un silāna tehnoloģija nodrošina stabilu pildvielu, klasteru un sveķu matricas kombināciju: Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. nepārprotami ir uzticams eksperts adhezīvo restaurāciju jomā. Pēdējo desmitgažu laikā izstrādātās patentētās tehnoloģijas noteikti ir veicinājušas tiešo restaurāciju labāku (ilgtermiņa) veiktspēju un vieglāk sasniedzamus uzticamus un estētiskus rezultātus.

Interview with Andreas Chatzimpatzakis

Fewer bakes, fewer ceramic powders - there is clearly a trend toward simplification in the production of zirconia-based prosthetic work. This is also true for implant-based restorations, which often involve gum parts. DT Andreas Chatzimpatzakis, international trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., and the owner of ACH Dental Laboratory in Athens, Greece, shares his approach to high aesthetics in implant prosthodontics in the following conversation.

You are a user of the CERABIEN™ ZR portfolio from the outset. When did you test the products for the first time and why?

Well, it was many years ago when I finished my very first zirconia-based restoration. The reason to test CERABIEN™ ZR was that when I asked the dental technician who had milled the framework which porcelain system to use. He suggested to use CERABIEN™ ZR, which I did. I was immediately impressed by the system and by the outcome I was able to achieve on the first attempt.

Did you ever test any other porcelain systems for ceramic layering?

Yes. Before I becoming an international trainer for Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., I had the opportunity to test many other porcelain systems for layering on zirconia. Based on this experience, I can say that CERABIEN™ ZR is unique and the best system I have ever used. The reason is that its translucency and chroma are extremely close to natural teeth. In addition, due to a controlled firing shrinkage, a One-Bake Technique may be employed even in long-span restorations.

Your hands-on demonstration at the Kuraray Noritake Dental booth during the IDS 2023 in Cologne focused on White and Pink Aesthetics achieved with CERABIEN™ ZR. Is there a specific concept you use?

Nowadays, everyone producing dental restorations – no matter whether based on natural teeth or on implants – is confronted with increasing aesthetic demands of patients and dental practitioners. The high demands are developed because life-like restorations and cosmetic dental treatment outcomes are presented everywhere in the web and on social media. The showcased quality of outcomes is simply expected, even if the financial budget is limited. To be able to fulfil these demands in the field of implant-based prosthodontics, I have developed an approach that allows me to achieve high aesthetics with little effort. My concept is based on using not too many ceramic powders. For extra chroma and special characterization, I rely on the power of the internal live stain technique, first introduced by Hitoshi Aoshima-sensei.

Please summarize the most important details of your presentation.

The first important detail is the design and characterization of the framework. Before sintering, I apply Esthetic Colorant for KATANA™ Zirconia. After the sintering process, shade base stain and internal stains are mixed and applied. In this way, I create a nice canvas that helps me to achieve a life-like result with only a few selected ceramic powders. In most cases, three to five powders are enough to produce a great result. Among the powders used most frequently are Opacious Body, Body, LTX, Mamelon and CCV. After the first bake and a little grinding, I make use of internal stains again. They offer support in the controlling of the chroma and the integration of special characteristics. When this step is completed, the final build-up is done with one or two ceramic powders, most of the times LT1 and Enamel or LT0. Pink aesthetics are usually created with Tissue 1, 3 and 5. For the free gingiva, LT Coral is my go-to solution. The major goal is always to obtain maximum quality in a minimum of time. To achieve this, a good knowledge of the materials and of course practicing – on both, porcelain build-up and morphology – are strictly required.

Fig. 1. Complex implant-based restoration: Framework design.

Fig. 2. Esthetic Colorant …

Fig. 3.  … applied prior to the final sintering procedure.

Fig. 4. Appearance after sintering.

Fig. 5. Final outcome.

Are there any concrete tips and tricks you would like to share?

For the characterization of the framework, I mix the internal stains with shade base stain powders; mostly with SS Fluoro. For the first bake, especially when the restoration is large and the amount of ceramic to be applied huge, I reduce the heating rate up to 38 degrees per minute. I also increase the drying process up to 17 or even 20 minutes depending to the restoration. Experience shows that these measures optimize the aesthetic outcomes.

You often mention that it is extraordinarily important to understand the morphology of natural teeth to be able to produce beautiful restorations. Why is this the case?

A successful prosthetic restoration needs to offer proper function and aesthetics. Function means a precise fit, perfect contact points and occlusion, a proper emergence profile and interproximal embrasures for self-cleaning etc. All this is described by the term morphology. Aesthetics, on the other hand, is guided by shape and colour. The effort required to establish a proper morphology is much higher (about 70 percent of the total work) than the effort involved in obtaining the right translucency, opalescence and chroma.

What instruments do you use to imitate the morphology of natural teeth and how do you do it?

I usually make use of the Optimum™ Spring Ceramic Brush Size 8 (MPF Brush Co.), stones and diamond burs for detailed grinding and carving after the final bake. I studied morphology at the Osaka Ceramic Training Centre in Japan with Shigeo Kataoka-sensei. According to him, a key factor in creating a perfect macro and micro morphology lies in the shadows. To be able to take into account the interference of light and shadow during grinding, a light source is placed on one side of the restoration.

How many bakes do you need to produce highly aesthetic restorations?

It depends on the case, although in many situations, I nowadays opt for some kind of micro-layering. Lately, I have used micro-layering a lot with internal stain directly on the zirconia framework. In other cases, I do a quick first bake, then the internal staining, a final bake and glazing. For small or single-unit restorations in the posterior region, a One-Bake Technique is often sufficient. Even a Zero-Bake approach using Esthetic Colorant on a monolithic zirconia restoration may be appropriate here, and it is very convenient. If there is a restoration with high aesthetic demands – these are typically single anterior restorations – the technique I select depends on the shade. In some cases, using only the internal stain technique is enough to reach a high aesthetic level, while in other cases, additional steps need to be taken. To my mind, there is no single technique that fits all cases. As mentioned before, I try to achieve high aesthetics in a minimum of time.

Fig. 6. Clinical example of achieving high aesthetics in a minimum of time: Before …

Fig. 7. … and after crown placement.

Fig. 8. High aesthetics …

Fig. 9. … achieved in a minimum of time.

Did your approach change due to the availability of high-translucency zirconia materials with colour (and flexural strength) gradation?

Well, yes! My overall approach changed more to micro-layering. Several years ago, we needed to consider how to mask the framework and how to achieve translucency in areas with limited space. The problem was solved for single-unit and small anterior bridge restorations with the availability of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML and STML. With the introduction of KATANA™ Zirconia YML, a high-translucency material became available for long-span or implant-based restorations as well. We have strength and translucency all in one disc. In most of my cases, the framework material replaces the dentin with regard to morphology and shade. Hence, I need to focus on adding the enamel by applying the transparent and translucent powders. The powders of the internal stain technique are used to characterize the framework, and with a micro-layer of porcelain, the goal of creating an aesthetic restoration in the minimum of time is achieved. This is exactly why I am sure that micro-layering is the future.

What drives you to share your knowledge with others?

My passion! I love my work! And I love to see technicians become better and better. Dental technology is an exciting journey, a journey that begins when the first impression arrives in the dental laboratory, and it ends when the final restoration is cemented into the patient’s mouth. And this journey is so exciting because we change lives. We change people’s personalities, we give them back their smile, we give them back their self-respect. Consider that every day, every single moment working on our bench trying to imitate nature… there is nothing more exciting than that!!!

My approach as an instructor is to lead dental technicians to master the art of observing natural teeth. This is the way every individual will understand morphology and shade. You need no special talent to be a very good dental technician. You need to observe! Your eyes see, your mind understands, and your hands will follow.

Alexander (Alek) Aronin is a master dental technician who dedicated himself to the creation of high-end, handmade porcelain restorations. He runs a dental laboratory and morphology school in Spain, and travels the world as a lecturer and teacher.

The greatest source of inspiration in his professional life is the book Collection of Ceramic Works by Hitoshi Aoshima. Through reading it in 1996, he discovered superb outcomes of working with dental ceramics. Moreover, the book’s content made him realize that the creation of handmade porcelain work is a result of special education and manual skills. Those who want to become masters need a lot of commitment and a striving for continuous improvement, which Alek shows in his work and his classes. We talked to him about his philosophy and his enthusiasm for the creation of lifelike restorations. He shared with us his perspective on the future of dental technology and gave some practical tips on how to achieve a high level of professional satisfaction.

Photo courtesy of Dennis Debiase

Alek, many dental technicians decide to focus on CAD/CAM technology and automated processing of dental ceramics. Due to improvements on the material side, a handmade porcelain layer is no longer necessary in many clinical cases. In this context, the manual refinement process is reduced to a minimum. Why did you decide to take a completely different path and focus on fully manual dental craftsmanship?

The shift towards automated processing is not a matter of choice for dental technicians rather, it is a natural response to the evolution of technology. The high-end manual refinement process remains unchanged. The human element, from communication to hand crafting among skilled individuals and demanding clients, has been a constant so far throughout history. This traditional connection remains stable for centuries.

Digitalisation is not the revolution in the dental industry, and I do not see the benefit of it in our narrow specialization yet. In the area we are working, we do all steps of our case faster, incomparably more precise and more profitable. But we are keeping eye on machines and waiting for a suitable one.

Machines and automated processes widely serve mass production businesses focused on fast, affordable and uniform results in a highly competitive field. Our goal and workflow are different - we provide individual work and personal attention to each of our partners and patients.

So, we do not compete with the production labs and do not interrupt each other, we coexist in parallel worlds as always. A small number of dentists and their patients will always demand personal attention and valued restorations and service of the highest quality.

Many dental technicians admire your work. Yet, you continue to strive for improvement. Why is this the case?

On one side, we are limited by static ceramic material used to mimic dynamic natural teeth that keep changing for a lifetime. On the other side, we are limited by our manual skills. I am still far away from my teachers and Japanese colleagues. My target is to improve the fabrication process. My goal is to achieve the simplicity and imperfectness like Aoshima-sensei.

Alek lecturing at the IDS 2023 in Cologne.
Photo courtesy of Dennis Debiase

We are enjoying the outcome, but prefer to focusing on the improvement of the process, and move on to create a better one. This is what I am learning in Japan, and this is what I teach my students.

Talking about learning: What are the most important aspects a dental technician who wants to improve his skills should have in mind when looking for a good teacher?

Manual skills are very important, but not the only aspect that should be taken into account. Every individual should be motivated and guided and this is a teacher’s job.

I love the traditional Japanese way of teaching and learning: The teachers are passionate, leading the way by evoking emotions and manual skills to bring the best out of every single student. My personal advice for dental technicians who want to become masters in the creation of lifelike high-end dental restorations is to select their teachers carefully and go to a private school or courses whenever they have the chance.

What are the most important tools a dental technician needs to use when trying to create high-end lifelike restorations?

I suggest to focus on four aspects:

1. Documentary dental photography - required for documentation and communication with the dental office and patients using constant (once set and never changed) parameters of the photo equipment.
2. Focus to the biomimetic additive dentistry. This is a minimum machine invasive field. Dental technicians and dentists should be able to develop a deep knowledge about clinical and lab-side procedures to be able communicate with each other.
3. Mastering morphology and function (shape carving), and anatomy (internal staining), which comes with value control and mimicking fine tooth details for best integration in the mouth.
4. Written communication (stop phone calls) is very important, this is the way how to exchange the information between the patient, clinic and lab by strict protocols.

I teach these complex skills in my morphology school and in many of my trainings worldwide. Focusing on the four aspects, a dental technician has a great chance to become a good specialist in a relatively short period of time in a narrow field.

Is material selection important for achieving great results?

I’ve been using Noritake ceramic for most of my life, and the reason is simple: Noritake created their EX-3 porcelain over 40 years ago, and it was so well-made that it has not needed any changes since.

This is showing their consistently high quality and creates unbroken succession in the valuable tradition of passing on techniques and knowledge.

Today, among different generations of dental technicians, we can use and share the same methods, vocabulary and abbreviations, powders, and temperature charts developed by our skilled teachers 30 to 40 years ago. This unique feature sets Noritake and Creation porcelains apart from all other brands and systems in the world.

The other Noritake porcelain I use quite frequently is CERABIEN™ ZR, which is also well-tried and tested and has even some more advantages than EX3.

Is there any final advice you would like to give?

To become a good professional, I suggest to developing in four parallel directions:

1. Practicing on phantoms - fabricating cases and ceramic samples. It helps to experiment and practice with varied materials and techniques.
2. Implementing the achieved techniques in clinical cases.
3. Working with case presentation PowerPoint or Keynote: documenting the working steps in pictures and videos from beginning to end.
4. Mastering the communication using e-mails. Constantly calibrate and adjust the information exchange process between the clinic and lab. Acquire deeper knowledge about the work of each other.

Good luck!

Interview with Mitsunobu Kawashima
Manager, Technology Division of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.

In 1983 – exactly 40 years ago – PANAVIA™ EX was introduced in Japan as the first product of the PANAVIA™ family and the first product containing the original MDP monomer. Since then, the PANAVIA™ family of resin cements has been continuously expanded by developing new resin-cement materials that are precisely adjusted to the contemporary demands of dental practitioners. The current line-up of easy-to-use, high-performance adhesive luting materials is globally available and used by dental practitioners with high quality standards.

We had a conversation with Mr. Mitsunobu Kawashima about PANAVIA™ EX as a ground-breaking innovation in the field of dental resin cements and subsequent steps toward the current well-balanced resin cement portfolio. He is currently responsible for the development of chair-side materials in the Technology Division of Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc. (Kuraray Noritake Dental) and has been part of the team developing the many products of the PANAVIA™ family for more than 30 years.

The resin cements developed by the company before the introduction of PANAVIA™ EX contained the adhesive monomer Phenyl-P. Why did you decide not to use Phenyl-P in the new formulation?

At the time we decided to develop PANAVIA™ EX, we were engaged in the development of new adhesive monomers to replace Phenyl-P. The main aim of this project was an improvement of our products’ bond strength to metal alloys and dentin. Among the new adhesive monomers being developed, we decided to use the MDP monomer, because it features excellent bonding to tooth structure and metal alloys used in dentistry, as well as superb resistance to water. Incidentally, our first products to contain the original MDP monomer were the resin cement PANAVIA™ EX and the bonding agent CLEARFIL™ NEW BOND.

Where did the name PANAVIA™ come from?

The name “PANAVIA™” is a compound word consisting of “PAN” and “VIA”. The former is of Greek origin, and the latter is of Latin origin. “PAN” means “everything” and “VIA” means “way” or “method”. Consequently, the name “PANAVIA” describes a “method for bonding everything”; it represents our desire to have products launched under the umbrella of the PANAVIA™ brand recognized as dental materials that can bond to all types of restoration and tooth structure.

Would you please tell us the story behind the development of PANAVIA™ EX?

Back in the early 1980s, it was indispensable for us to develop new adhesive monomers as a part of our project to develop a new resin cement with unprecedented adhesive properties. In this context, we conducted a comprehensive literature search for compounds thought to be involved in adhesion. At the same time, we carried out a variety of R&D activities, including basic research to quantitatively clarify the relationship between the molecular structures of monomers and their adhesive qualities, synthesis trials of various monomers and bond strength tests. Consequently, we succeeded in developing the MDP monomer that had the physical properties we were working to obtain. Following the development of that MDP adhesive monomer, we were finally able to create PANAVIA™ EX in our laboratory. In early 1982, we completed the first prototype of PANAVIA™ EX for external evaluation and asked a dental college in Japan to evaluate it. He found that the prototype cement might cure too quickly in clinical use. This was due to the fact that we had not taken into account the difference between room temperature and intraoral temperature, which has a huge impact on the curing time. This error led us to recognize how important clinical evaluations are during the development of dental materials. To this day, we continue to place great importance on the opinions of clinicians whenever a new material is being developed.

The name “PANAVIA™” is a compound word consisting of “PAN” and “VIA”. The former is of Greek origin, and the latter is of Latin origin. “PAN” means “everything” and “VIA” means “way” or “method”.

What were the key technological features of this new PANAVIA™ EX cementation system?

The system had five key features: Appropriate film thickness, appropriate flow properties of the paste, radiopacity, improved bond strength and improved surface-cure characteristics. At the time that PANAVIA™ EX was developed, a film thickness of 30 μm or less was desired for luting cements. The largest components we wanted to use in the formulation – the silica filler particles present in our composite resin – had a maximum particle diameter of 50 μm. We were able to achieve a film thickness of 30 μm or less by significantly extending the silica grinding time, which made the filler particles much finer. An appropriate paste consistency – a low level of viscosity and good flowability – was achieved by using low-viscosity monomers for PANAVIA™ EX. In order to make the cement radiopaque, we dispersed radiopaque filler within the powder component. In fact, we were convinced that it was essential to be able to check for the presence of excess cement under the gingival margins after a restoration was placed. The increase in bond strength was achieved by blending the MDP monomer into the liquid component.

What about the surface-cure characteristics of the cement?

Every dental practitioner knows that the surface of resin cements must be protected from oxygen in the air in order to cure properly. For this purpose, we developed OXYGUARD, a water-soluble gel material. It is applied to the restoration margins to cover the unpolymerized resin cement surface and protect it from exposure to oxygen. In this way, the formation of an oxygen inhibition layer – a layer of uncured resin on the surface that compromises the marginal integrity of the restoration – is prevented and an intact, fully polymerized cement surface can develop. In this way, the use of OXYGUARD has contributed greatly to improving the cure characteristics of cements.

What do today’s PANAVIA™ products and PANAVIA™ EX have in common?

The PANAVIA™ family of products, including PANAVIA™ EX, share the concept of “being a resin cement product that opens new dimensions in dentistry”. PANAVIA™ EX was our first resin cement, and it was conceived as a cement for a new era. It can bond to tooth structure and dental metals very well, thanks to the use of the MDP monomer. This important adhesive monomer is still used today in many of our products. Ever since the launch of PANAVIA™ EX, Kuraray Noritake Dental has continued to take on new challenges and has developed many new products in the growing PANAVIA™ family. These include PANAVIA™ 21, a cement in paste form that has a self-etching primer as an accessory; PANAVIA™ Fluoro Cement, a dual-cure cement paste that releases fluoride; and PANAVIA™ F2.0, which can be used with an LED curing unit. The current portfolio consists of PANAVIA™ V5, which features the substantially improved bonding performance that was achieved after a major review of the basic composition of the series, PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal, which works as a standalone product without separate primers, and PANAVIA™ Veneer LC, PANAVIA™ family’s latest product. The latter is a light-curing resin cement with the specialized purpose of bonding laminate veneers.

In retrospect, what did the introduction of PANAVIA™ EX mean to Kuraray Noritake Dental?

In the development of new resin cements, it is important to quickly respond to the rapidly changing trends in the market. Whenever new prosthodontic treatment concepts appear – like adhesive bridges as a minimally invasive treatment option replacing a single tooth – or new restorative materials are introduced, such as different types of ceramics – we need to check if our resin cement systems are compatible with the tasks that come with these changes, as well as possibly developing new ones. Following the launch of PANAVIA™ EX, we received a wide range of feedback from experts working at dental clinics and laboratories. We leveraged this feedback in subsequent development projects, always striving to stick close to the clinical setting. After Kuraray Medical Inc. merged with Noritake Dental Supply Co., Limited, this ethos was embedded in the work ethic of all employees of Kuraray Noritake Dental.

Can you give us a brief history of the PANAVIA™ EX journey to the currently available PANAVIA™ family portfolio?

Since the launch of PANAVIA™ EX 40 years ago, six different PANAVIA™ products have been released. Each of them has received high acclaim for their unique features, both in the Japanese resin cement market and abroad. For 40 years, we have been improving PANAVIA™ in response to the demands of the times. We developed a product with increased adhesion when non-retentive preparation designs (adhesive bridges) and smaller bonding surfaces (due to less invasive preparations) became popular. And for users concerned about secondary caries, we developed a material with fluoride-releasing properties. At the same time, we focused strongly on making dental cementation easier by finding ways to make our resin cements bond well to various types of crown-restoration materials, including precious metals and ceramics. During these drives towards improvement, “achieving reliable general luting” has always been at the forefront of our goals. We believe that the successful evolution of the PANAVIA™ brand owes a great deal to our incessant efforts to obtain a high level of bond strength to dentin after chemical polymerisation”.

How did the R&D department evolve over the years?

Initially, our efforts in the development of dental materials had focused on bonding agents and restorative composite resins. PANAVIA™ EX was just one of our new development projects and only a few staff members were assigned to that product. After PANAVIA™ EX was launched in 1983 and it was accepted worldwide, our product line-up of resin cements was expanded considerably. Consequently, we have increased the number of development staff assigned to resin cements and set up a special development team responsible for the self-adhesive resin cement product line that includes PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. As a result, the size of the team assigned to resin cements has expanded substantially.

How did production change?

When PANAVIA™ EX was launched in 1983, the product was manufactured exclusively for the Japanese market in a relatively small facility. Today, in order to produce all products of the PANAVIA™ family for the global market, we have automated our production facilities and increased the production equipment and systems dedicated to producing the resin cement paste. To support our product quality, we have also set up a quality control system that assures we turn out safe and high-quality products, drawing on over 40 years of technical knowhow and experience in the production of resin cements.

For 40 years, we have been improving PANAVIA™ in response to the demands of the times.

When did external researchers start showing interest in PANAVIA™?

The development of PANAVIA™ EX was carried out with the active participation of researchers at a dental college in Japan, involving such activities as performing basic adhesion tests and experimenting with clinical applications using adhesive bridges. At that time, resin cements that provided a strong bond to tooth structure or metal alloys were not widely used. I believe that overseas researchers were interested in the development of PANAVIA™ EX at a relatively early stage, for this reason.

What current concept do you have in mind as you continue developing your adhesive cements?

We have two basic central concepts: “Achieving greater bond strength” and “Delivering easier handling characteristics”. I think that the shades of resin cements are also devised in each product in order to get the most of the characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. At our company, we have embodied “achieving greater bond strength” in PANAVIA™ V5, and “delivering easier handling characteristics” in PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. We will continue to explore the development and introduction of various new technological applications, to bring even higher performance products to market.

What do you think is the strength of Kuraray Noritake Dental’s R&D team?

We conduct R&D activities continuously, focusing on the development of luting materials. In our product development department, the same person is often responsible for one product category over long period of time. For example, I have been engaged in the development of PANAVIA™ products for much of my time with the company. The result is that each person in the development department can be said to be an expert in a certain category of products. They leverage the technical knowledge acquired in the past for the development of new products, resulting in entirely new discoveries.

Do you have any ideas about what the future of PANAVIA™ will be?

We will continue to focus on the development of even simpler, easier-to-use resin cements suitable for a wide range of applications – products based on the concept of universality. This should allow users to focus more on the actual treatment than ever before, while of course delivering a strong and durable bond between the tooth structure and the restoration.

MITSUNOBU KAWASHIMA

Eight-time DENTAL ADVISOR Top Product selection provides effective relief for a painful condition

Dentine hypersensitivity is a painful condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It generally occurs when tubules are exposed for any number of reasons, including gingival recession, dental erosion or excessive tooth brushing. It can also be a side effect of professional tooth cleaning, scaling and root planning, tooth whitening, or restorative procedures.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER, which was honored by DENTAL ADVISOR every year from 2015 to 2022 as a Top Product selection, allows an effective non-invasive approach to the treatment of hypersensitivity when used as directed by dental professionals.

TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER is designed to crystalize hydroxyapatite (HAp), a mineral that is naturally found in enamel and dentin, and is the human body’s strongest material. When applied to exposed, mechanically treated, or freshly prepared dentin, the calcium phosphate based mixture blocks the exposed tubules and provides immediate pain relief. During setting, HAp is formed, providing for long-term prevention of hypersensitivity. Further, when used in the context of restorative treatment, TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER does not have a negative effect on the bond strength of subsequently utilized dental adhesives or cements.

DENTAL ADVISOR clinical study found TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER effective in providing hypersensitivity relief immediately following and for up to six months after application. The study evaluated 27 patients diagnosed with gingival recession-related hypersensitivity, which was diagnosed using thermal testing with cold air. For the initial assessment, patients were asked to evaluate their level and frequency of hypersensitivity per tooth on a five-point scale. They were questioned about their level of sensitivity immediately after TEETHMATE™ DESENSITIZER was applied, according to the instructions for use, and again six months later. At baseline, 91 percent of the patients stated that they had no or only mild, sporadic sensitivity, which was still the case for 85 percent after six months.

This natural, tissue-friendly product is highly biocompatible and is free of gum irritants such as glutaraldehyde or methacrylates. It is indicated for use by dental professionals for all  sensitivity challenges in everyday practice, including prevention of cervical hypersensitivity before/after bleaching, scaling or root planning, and underneath restorations.

The Top Product or Preferred Product Awards conferred by US-based DENTAL ADVISOR were introduced to support potential users in identifying high-quality dental materials and determining which among them are best suited to fulfill their individual requirements. Awards are based on results of its practice-based clinical evaluations and product performance tests, which are conducted shortly after product launch.

Among products honored this year are five from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.: CLEARFIL™ SE Protect, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow (Low), and PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal were selected as Top Products; and CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick and CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS were chosen as Preferred Products.

Article by Dr. Adham Elsayed

High-performance adhesive resin cements are often the enablers of minimally invasive prosthodontic treatments. When the main aim is to save as much healthy tooth structure as possible, preparation designs that offer sufficient macro-mechanical retention for conventional cements are usually abandoned. The designs chosen instead need to rely on a strong and durable chemical adhesion established between the tooth structure and the restorative material – a task successfully accomplished by modern adhesive resin cement systems.

An excellent example of a minimally invasive, non-retentive preparation and restoration design is the single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDPs), nowadays usually made of 3Y-TZP zirconia. With its single cantilever bonded to the oral and proximal enamel surface of an adjacent tooth, it requires minimal to no healthy tooth structure removal. The RBFDP is often used to replace a congenitally missing tooth – in many cases a maxillary lateral incisor – in young patients with incomplete dentoalveolar development and narrow edentulous spaces unsuitable for conventional implant placement¹ (Fig. 1 and 2). Additional factors hindering implant therapy – like an insufficient bone volume or angulated roots – are also not an issue for this type of restoration. And compared to orthodontic gap closure, the treatment approach with a RBFDP is less risky, as it does not affect the vertical jaw relationship, prevent canine guidance or compromise the aesthetic appearance². Finally, it is much less invasive than conventional FDPs, which is usually not a treatment option for young patients in the anterior region. The level of patient satisfaction and the success rates of this treatment approach are impressive^3-7.

Fig. 1-2. Replacement of both congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors with single-retainer zirconia RBFDPs after soft tissue augmentation and gingival margin correction.

Despite the numerous advantages and excellent clinical performance – single-retainer RBFDP made of zirconia showed a survival of 98.2 percent and a success rate of 92.0 percent after ten years⁴ – many dental practitioners still opt for alternative treatment options. The reason may be a lack of trust in the bond strength and durability to zirconia. However, this bond can be very strong and durable – provided that a few rules are respected.

HOW TO ESTABLISH A STRONG BOND TO THE TOOTH STRUCTURE

In order to decide whether a missing tooth may be successfully replaced by a single-retainer RBFDP made of zirconia, the abutment tooth should be examined carefully. It needs to be vital and largely free of caries or direct restorations, while the oral enamel surface must be large enough for resin bonding¹. In addition, the space required for the placement of a retainer wing (thickness: about 0.7 mm) needs to be available, as a non-contact design is important for the success of the restoration. Among the preparation designs described in the literature is a lingual veneer and small proximal box preparation with retentive elements located in the enamel only¹, or no preparation at all⁷. For restoration placement, the abutment tooth is treated as usual: after cleaning e.g., with fluoride-free prophylaxis paste, phosphoric acid etchant is applied to the bonding surface, which is then thoroughly rinsed and dried.

HOW TO ESTABLISH A STRONG BOND TO THE RESTORATION

The recommended pre-treatment for the bonding surface of the retainer wing made of zirconia is small-particle (50 μm) aluminium oxide air-abrasion at a low pressure (approx. 1 bar)^8,9, followed by ultrasonic cleaning. Figures 3 (A-E) shows the sequence of surface treatment of zirconia restorations. As a visual aid for a controlled air-abrasion treatment, the marking of the surface with a pen has proven its worth. The whole air-abrasion procedure should be carried out after try-in, during which the tooth surface and the restoration usually becomes contaminated through contact with saliva and sometimes blood. Proteins present in saliva and blood that contaminate the bonding surface are safely removed in this way, while the required surface modification necessary to establish a strong and durable bond to the selected resin cement system is achieved¹⁰.

FIGURE 3: SEQUENCE OF SURFACE TREATMENT OF ZIRCONIA RESTORATION.

Fig. 3A. Cleaning of the restoration prior to luting with water steam cleaner.

Fig. 3B. Marking of the bonding surface as an visual aid for the air-abrasion.

Fig. 3C. Air-abrasion with 50-μm Al₂O₃ particles with 1 bar pressure.

Fig. 3D. Application of a primer containing 10-MDP.

Fig. 3E. Application of the composite resin cement.

WHICH RESIN CEMENT SYSTEM TO CHOOSE

Subsequently, the components of the resin cement system are applied. Regarding the selection of the system, it is generally recommended to use a restoration primer or resin cement that contains 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP)¹¹. In this way, a high-quality chemical bond is established. Among the resin cement systems used in the available long-term clinical studies is PANAVIA™ 21 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.)^4-6. Launched in 1993, this anaerobic-curing adhesive resin cement contains several important technologies like the MDP monomer and the Touch Cure Technology found in PANAVIA™ V5, the state-of-the art dual-cure multi-bottle adhesive resin cement system of the company. In order to further improve the bonding performance of this present product, however, the team of developers reviewed the basic composition, updated existing technologies and combined them with completely new ingredients.

Even with PANAVIA™ 21 introduced 30 years ago, high success rates were obtained^4-6. The few observed failures were mainly due to chipping of the veneering ceramic or debonding. Sometimes caused by traumatic incidents, the debondings resulted in no further damage and the restorations were simply rebonded using the same cementation system and procedure.

One might expect that with its improved formulation, PANAVIA™ V5 will offer an even stronger and more durable bond than predecessor products, so that it is even better suited for such demanding applications as the resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis. In a pilot study, this assumption was confirmed⁷. Without any preparation of the abutment tooth, but a defined size of the bonding surface of at least 35 mm², the team of researchers placed 24 monolithic zirconia resin-bonded bridges (made of KATANA™ Zirconia HT) to replace congenitally missing lateral incisors. The palatal sides of the central incisors were cleaned with pumice paste and treated with phosphoric acid, while the bonding surfaces of the restorations were sandblasted with aluminum oxide particles (50 μm, 2.5 bar pressure). Afterwards, twelve restorations were luted with PANAVIA™ V5, the other twelve with PANAVIA™ F2.0 (another earlier-version resin cement from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). After an observation period of 32 to 50.47 months, the success and survival rates in the PANAVIA™ V5 group were 100 percent. In the other group, a connector fracture, a chipping and two debondings occurred. Based on these results, the authors of the publication concluded that “it has been seen that the new generation cement (PANAVIA™ V5) is more successful”⁷.

CONCLUSION

For many years, minimally invasive indirect restorative approaches like the replacement of missing incisors with resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses have been performed successfully by some dental practitioners. Many others, however, still seem to be hesitant whether these approaches will lead to the desired results in their hands. The available clinical study results, however, have confirmed that the procedure is highly advantageous and successful, while ongoing development efforts in the field of adhesive resin cements have led to products further decreasing the failure rates related to debonding. Even if a debonding occurs, however, no damage is usually done, so that the restoration can be rebonded again with little effort. These findings – together with the well-known benefits of minimally invasive dentistry in general – should encourage dental practitioners to start exploring the full potential of adhesive dentistry for themselves. In this context, PANAVIA™ V5 is definitely an excellent choice.

References

1. Sasse M, Kern M. All-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: treatment planning, clinical procedures, and outcome. Quintessence Int. 2014 Apr;45(4):291-7. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a31328. PMID: 24570997.
2. Tetsch J, Spilker L, Mohrhardt S, Terheyden H (2020) Implant Therapy for Solitary and Multiple Dental Ageneses. Int J Dent Oral Health 6(6): dx.doi. org/10.16966/2378-7090.332.
3. Wei YR, Wang XD, Zhang Q, Li XX, Blatz MB, Jian YT, Zhao K. Clinical performance of anterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with different framework designs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 11. PMID: 26875611.
4. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 5. PMID: 28688950.
5. Kern M. Fifteen-year survival of anterior all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017 Jan;56:133-135.
6. Sasse M, Kern M. Survival of anterior cantilevered all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses made from zirconia ceramic. J Dent. 2014 Jun;42(6):660-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 5. PMID: 24613605.
7. Bilir H, Yuzbasioglu E, Sayar G, Kilinc DD, Bag HGG, Özcan M. CAD/CAM single-retainer monolithic zirconia ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures bonded with two different resin cements: Up to 40 months clinical results of a randomized-controlled pilot study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Oct;34(7):1122-1131. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12945. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35920051.
8. Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater. 2015 Jan;31(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PMID: 25059831.
9. Kern M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R, Kohal RJ, Kunzelmann KH, Mehl A, Pospiech P, Reis B. All-ceramics at a glance. An introduction to the indications, material selection, preparation and insertion techniques for all-ceramic restorations. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Keramik in der Zahnheilkunde. 3rd English edition, January 2017.
10. Comino-Garayoa R, Peláez J, Tobar C, Rodríguez V, Suárez MJ. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 22;14(11):2751.
11. Al-Bermani ASA, Quigley NP, Ha WN. Do zirconia single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses present a viable treatment option for the replacement of missing anterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Dec 7:S0022-3913(21)00588-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.015. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34893319.