Monolithic multilayer zirconia crowns in the esthetic zone

Case report by Dr. Wissam Dirawi, DDS

During the last decade, zirconia has increasingly established itself as the material of choice in oral prosthodontic rehabilitation. Its great mechanical and inert properties are the main reason for this trend. Since the introduction of multi-layered zirconia blanks more than ten years ago, the optical properties have been improved dramatically. The multi-layered zirconia used nowadays (e.g. KATANA™ Zirconia YML from Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) offers well-balanced mechanical properties, translucency and colour. It allows dental technicians from all over the world to produce aesthetic full-contour restorations that are merely stained.

Even in the anterior region, stained monolithic restorations may be an option. Factors such as the age of the patient, the internal colour structure of the adjacent dentition, the number of teeth to be restored (one versus all four or six maxillary anterior teeth), the aesthetic demands of the patient and financial aspects should be taken into account in the material selection process. In the case described below, full-contour zirconia was selected for several reasons.

BACKGROUND

The 71-year-old female presented in the clinical due to aesthetic problems in the maxillary anterior region. Oral hygiene was good and the patient was a non-smoker. Infraposition of the existing implant-based crown (Nobel Biocare Brånemark RP fixture) in the position of the right central incisor (tooth #11 according to the FDI notation) was evident. Moreover, gingival retraction was observed on the maxillary right lateral incisor (tooth #12), while the left lateral incisor (tooth #22) has a major composite filling with discolouration. The patient expressed the desire to adjust the gingival level differences and to restore the four maxillary incisors with all-ceramic crowns for optimal aesthetics.

Fig. 1. Initial situation: Frontal view.

Fig. 2. Initial situation: Facial view.

Fig. 3. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the maxilla.

Fig. 4. Initial situation: Occlusal view of the mandible.

MATERIAL SELECTION

Due to the decision to restore all four anterior incisors, monolithic zirconia was a suitable material option. It would allow the team to obtain the desired results within the financial framework. In order to meet the aesthetic demands of the patient, provide for the required mechanical properties and allow for proper masking of the underlying structures, KATANA™ Zirconia YML was selected. It offers colour, translucency and flexural strength gradation throughout the multi-layered blank.

TREATMENT PROCEDURE: FROM PREP TO TEMPORIZATION

In order to design the indirect restorations, a digital impression was taken with an intraoral scanner and the data was transferred to the dental laboratory Teknodont in Malmoe, Sweden. There, a digital wax-up was created. After patient approval, a matrix was produced and sent to the clinic. Here, the old restorations were removed and the three maxillary incisors (all but the one replaced by an implant) prepared for full coverage restorations. A healing abutment was placed on the implant and a temporary bridge produced chairside using the matrix and Protemp 4 Temporization Material (3M) in the shade A3. Subsequently, a gingivectomy was carried out with a ceramic burr (Ceratip, Kt.314.016 – KOMET) in the buccal aspect of the left central and lateral incisor.

Fig. 5. Chairside-produced temporary in the patient’s mouth.

After the patient’s approval of the aesthetics, phonetics and function of the temporary restoration, the situation was captured with an intraoral scanner again. This allowed the team to duplicate the shape of the construction. Based on the acquired data, a new set of splinted temporary crowns made of PMMA (HUGE Multilayer PMMA) in the shade A3 was milled in laboratory. They were placed to allow the patient to further evaluate the aesthetic appearance and function for a couple of weeks. The patient was happy with the phonetics, function and appearance of the crowns, which were merely slightly too bright in comparison to the adjacent teeth, and approved the shape for the production of the permanent restorations.

Fig. 6. Printed model …

Fig. 7. … with splinted PMMA crowns.

Fig. 8. Lab-made temporary restorations.

Fig. 9. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the right.

Fig. 10. Long-term temporary in place: Frontal view.

Fig. 11. Long-term temporary in place: Lateral view from the left.

FINAL RESTORATIONS: PRODUCTION AND CEMENTATION

Based on the dataset of the temporary restorations, four separate crowns – one implant and three tooth-based – were designed in full contour. Without any anatomical reduction, the restorations were milled from KATANA™ Zirconia YML. Based on the evaluation of the temporary restoration, the shade selected this time was A3.5. CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain was used for external staining and glazing of the surface. Still in the laboratory, the implant-based crown was cemented to the gold-shaded titanium abutment (Elos Medtech) with PANAVIA™ V5 (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.) in the shade opaque for an improved masking effect.

While the abutment crown was screwed onto the implant and the screw hole closed with composite, the three tooth-based crowns were placed using PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.).

Fig. 12. Final restorations on the model.

Fig. 13. Intraoral situation prior to restoration placement.

CONCLUSION

Multilayered zirconia is a suitable material for many clinical situations. Due to the availability of modern types of highly translucent, multi-layered blanks, it is possible to produce aesthetic outcomes even when using the material monolithically – not only in the posterior region, but also in the aesthetic zone in some indications. The present case shows that very good results and patient satisfaction can be obtained. And due to outstanding mechanical properties, these outcomes may be expected to last for a long time.

Fig. 14. Immediate treatment outcome: Facial view.

Fig. 15. Immediate treatment outcome: Frontal view.

Fig. 16. Immediate treatment outcome: Occlusal view.

Dentist:

WISSAM DIRAWI

Dr. Wissam Dirawi, Malmoe, Sweden. DDS.
Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics and Senior Adviser at Aqua Dental.

2000 Master´s degree in dentistry.
2000 - 2018 General Dentist in public dental care and private practice.
2011 - 2018 Part-time teacher and researcher at Malmö University, Faculty of Dentistry.
2018 Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics. Senior clinical adviser. Lecturer.

References

- Alfadhli R, Alshammari Y, Baig MR, Omar R. Clinical outcomes of single crown and 3-unit bi-layered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: An up to 6- year retrospective clinical study: Clinical outcomes of zirconia FDPs. J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104321.
- Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80.
- Alammar A, Blatz MB. The resin bond to high-translucent zirconia-A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jan;34(1):117-135.
- Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mat 2020; 36: 1–8.
- Mazza LC, Lemos CAA, Pesqueira AA, Pellizzer EP. Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 128: 566–74.
- Passia N, Mitsias M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Bond strength of a new generation of universal bonding systems to zirconia ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 62:268–274.
- Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31:603-623.
- Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31:624–639.

• 18 juin 2024

KATANA Zirconia YML Voir le produit