Peter Schouten

Unlock the power of zirconia: perfect for adhesive cementation, the ideal material for a wide range of indications, and essential in minimal invasive dentistry. Time to trust zirconia bonding!

This article demystifies zirconia bonding, providing clear, practical steps to ensure long-term functionality and patient satisfaction, all based on scientific research. Master the three adhesion pillars: mechanical retention, chemical activation, and wetting capacity. Discover how to successfully prepare zirconia surfaces, avoid pitfalls like misapplying silica coating and silane, and choose proven bonding systems for optimal results. Optimise retention even with minimal tooth preparation and achieve reliable zirconia restorations. Say goodbye to doubts and hello to successful zirconia bonding!

Factors influencing retention

Loss of retention due to de-cementation or debonding is a common cause of dental prostheses' failure.  First, let’s have a look at how to cope with the three main factors significantly influencing retention: tooth preparation, restoration pre-treatment, and cement type/bonding.

Tooth preparation

The abutment tooth's height, angle, and surface texture must be considered to achieve sufficient retention and resistance from the preparation. The retention form counteracts tensile stresses, whereas the resistance counteracts shear stresses ⁴. With the proper preparation, a restoration resists dislodgement and subsequent loss.

Full coverage restorations

To achieve sufficient retention and resistance for full-coverage crowns, the tooth abutment should be at least 4 mm high, and the convergence angle should range from 6 to 12 degrees with a maximum of 15 degrees ^{1, 5-8}.

Source; Conventional cementation or adhesive luting - A guideline, Dr. A. Elsayed, Prof. Dr Florian Beuer 

Adhering to the tooth preparation guidelines is crucial for full-coverage restorations (e.g., crowns, and FDPs). These practical guidelines are designed to achieve the required retention and resistance to make conventional luting possible. However, optimal retention and resistance are, in reality, hard to achieve. An unwanted amount of sound tooth substance often should be removed to achieve a highly retentive preparation. Moreover, several studies^2,3 show that, in daily practice, the preparation angle often exceeds 15 degrees.

Minimal-invasive restorations

Minimal-invasive restorations, such as single retainer FDPs, veneers, table-tops and inlay-retained FDPs, are based on a non- or low-retentive preparation form. In this case, retention shifts from (macro-)mechanical to micro-mechanical and chemical, necessitating the use of adhesive techniques ^9-11. Even though the preparations for minimal-invasive restorations largely lack mechanical retention, the long-term success of these types of restorations is well-documented when using a suitable resin cement (e.g. PANAVIA™, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Japan), including a proper pre-treatment and bonding procedure ^{10, 11}.

In high-retentive situations, conventional luting is acceptable for full-coverage restorations*. In all other cases, choosing a resin cement is a better solution. With proper tooth preparation (e.g., shaping, (self-)etching, abrasion) and the right adhesive resin cement system, a non-retentive preparation form provides a reliable basis using mainly chemical retention and micro-mechanical retention instead of macro-mechanical retention.

*Please review the articles available regarding the debate over whether to use a conventional cementation procedure, adhesive cementing, or selective adhesive luting

Restoration pre-treatment

Zirconia is densely sintered and does not contain a glass phase. Therefore, it cannot be etched with hydrofluoric acid to create a micro-retentive etching pattern. In addition, silanes cannot effectively promote zirconia bonding. Several studies have shown that air abrasion with 50-µm alumina at a reduced pressure of 0.5 bar (0.05 MPa; 7 psi) will create a sufficient micro-retentive pattern¹² and greatly enhances the wetting capacity.

In addition to air abrasion, chemical coupling agents such as bifunctional phosphate resin monomers are used on air-abraded zirconia. Bonding with phosphate monomer-containing adhesive resin systems gives very reliable results^27,28. The use of phosphate monomer-based resin cement systems (e.g., Panavia [Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan]) and/or phosphate monomer primers, such as CLEARFIL CERAMIC Primer Plus (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan)  on freshly air-abraded zirconia, offer the most reliable bonding methods today ^13,27,28. We therefor consider MDP-based composite resin cements the material choice for our bonding procedure. However, it must be stressed that contamination of the air-abraded zirconia with saliva, phosphoric acid or other contaminants will limit the formation of chemical bonds and, therefore, must be avoided.

Avoiding contamination

For optimal moisture control, absolute isolation of the working field is crucial. Minimising  the risk of contamination, avoiding exposure to oral fluids. Before restoration placement, a thorough cleaning of the abutment tooth is essential. Following trial placement, a meticulous recleaning step is recommended to remove any potential introduced contamination. KATANA Cleaner (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) is an ideal choice due to its unique properties. Its slightly acidic pH of 4.5 allows for effective cleaning intraoral and extraoral adhesion surfaces. Additionally, the incorporation of MDP monomer technology makes it highly efficient. The MDP salt in this product effectively bonds with contaminants, breaks them down and results in easy removal by water rinsing.

Cement type/bonding

After pre-treatment of surfaces to optimise the , it is important to understand that the properties of highly translucent zirconia differ highly from those of earlier generation zirconia. Early-generation zirconium oxides, including 3 mol% yttrium oxide (3Y-TZP), are high in strength and low in translucency. With the increase in yttria, creating 4-5 mol% yttria, or higher, zirconium oxides, the number of cubic crystals increases, resulting in higher translucency but leading to a reduction in strength. Therefore, attention must be paid to zirconia type, material thickness, restoration type, and application area. These factors may influence the choice of cement based on the adhesive properties demanded for lasting restorations and high aesthetic outcomes.

PANAVIA™ V5

For a resin cement system to deliver a strong bond, it is not always enough to have it contain an appropriate adhesive monomer. It is necessary for that adhesive monomer to be polymerised effectively under different circumstances. The PANAVIA™ V5 system contains an innovative “ternary catalytic system” consisting of a highly stable peroxide, a non-amine reducing agent* and a highly active polymerisation accelerator. Since this catalytic system is amine-free, the hardened cement has unsurpassed colour stability. In addition, the highly active polymerisation accelerator, one of the components in PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer, is not only an excellent reducer that promotes polymerisation effectively, but it is also capable of coexisting with the (in this product) acidic MDP. This makes it possible to create a single-bottle self-etching primer. This accelerator is also responsible for the so-called touch-cure reaction when it comes into contact with the paste. Resulting in the sealing of the dentin interface and, at the same time, allowing the paste to set even in situations where light curing is limited.

*PANAVIA™ V5 Tooth Primer applied and left for 20 seconds, followed by air drying.

The second primer in the PANAVIA V5 system is CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, which incorporates Kuraray Noritake Dental’s original MDP and a silane. This product is used to prime zirconia but is also an excellent choice for priming silica-based ceramics, composites, and metals.

CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS, which contains the original MDP, applied and dried.

The PANAVIA™ V5 full adhesive resin cement system consists of all three above-mentioned components, always used in the same way, independent of the material, for a straightforward procedure to ensure reliable bonding. The PANAVIA^TM V5 systems offer try-in pastes to visualise the final results before final cementing and confirm the appropriate shade of the resin cement to be used.

PANAVIA™ VENEER LC

Offering a flexible workflow and high bondability of thin, translucent restorations like veneers but also inlays and onlays, PANAVIA™ Veneer LC was designed. It is a light-curing resin cement system allowing a long working time of 200 seconds under ambient light*. This allows multiple veneers to be placed simultaneously without racing against the setting. The final light-curing can be started anytime after positioning the provisions. The PANAVIA™ Veneer LC cementing system includes PANAVIA™ Tooth Primer and CLEARFIL CERAMIC PRIMER Plus as primers to chemically interact with the adhesive surfaces.

PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste applied and the laminate veneer seated. In this case six veneers were simultaneously placed during one session.

Unpolymerized excess paste removed with a brush. PANAVIA™ Veneer LC Paste is a light-cured type rein cement, designed to provide sufficient working time.

This photo shows the results after the final light curing. Since the excess cement was easily removed, there were almost no cement residues.

PANAVIA™ SA CEMENT Universal

Still, clinicians seek efficiency and effectiveness in everyday practice by using a straightforward but durable resin cement solution. PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal is developed to offer this ease-of-use property without losing focus on bonding properties.  PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal is developed with the original MDP monomer in the hydrophilic paste compartment, allowing for chemical reactiveness with zirconia and tooth structure. The other compartment contains the hydrophobic paste, to which a unique silane coupling agent, LCSi monomer, is added, which allows the cement to deliver a strong and durable chemical bond to silica-based materials like porcelain, lithium disilicate and composite resin*. Furthermore, PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal is less moisture sensitive than full adhesive resin cement systems. This also makes it the ideal cement in situations where rubberdam isolation is difficult.

*The product is available in both auto mix and hand mix options.

*Old PFM bridge (shown here) removed, and existing preparations modified to accommodate a 3-unit KATANA™ Zirconia bridge. The upper right canine was prepared to receive a single-unit KATANA™ crown.

Before

After. Seating & Final Smile. PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal and CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick were used for cementation and bonding. “I love the ease of use and clean-up with PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal, and its MDP monomer creates a strong chemical bond to the tooth structure and zirconia. CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick has a quick technique without reducing bond strengths, releases fluoride and has a low film thickness. I simply rub CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick into the tooth for a few seconds and air dry. There is no need to light-cure, since it cures very well with PANAVIA™ SA Cement Universal. The patient was very happy with the results. She loved that she no longer saw metal margins, and her smile was much more uniform and lifelike.” Dr. Kristine Aadland

*Images are a part of a case by Dr. Kristine Aadland; 3-Unit anterior maxillary

Bonding to zirconia in three steps

Over the last century, the popularity of highly translucent zirconia has skyrocketed due to its excellent properties and wide range of anterior and posterior clinical applications. Because zirconium oxide prostheses are, if processed correctly, antagonist-friendly and easy (and relatively inexpensive) to fabricate, the material keeps gaining popularity in dentistry.

Several steps need to be taken into account for reliable and durable bonding. Years of research on achieving high and long-term bond strength to zirconia have concluded into three practical steps, summarised as the APC concept¹³ as a reliable procedure guideline.

APC-Step A

Zirconia should be air-particle abraded (APC-Step A) with alumina or silica-coated alumina particles; the sandblasting or micro-etching procedure. Air abrasion with a chairside micro-etcher using aluminium oxide particles (size: up to 50 μm) at a low pressure of 0,5 bar (0.05 – 0.25 MPa) is sufficient.^14,18,25-27

APC-Step P

The subsequent step includes applying a special ceramic primer (APC-Step P), which typically contains specially designed adhesive phosphate monomers, onto the zirconia adhesive surfaces.^29,30 The MDP monomer has been shown to be particularly effective at bonding to metal oxides like zirconium oxide.

APC-Step C

Dual- or self-cure resin cement systems should be used to reach an adequate C=C conversion rate underneath the zirconia restoration since the lack of translucency in zirconia reduces light transmission.¹³ However, in cases where high-translucent zirconia (HTZr0₂) is used, the zirconia transmits light so that the shade of composite or resin cement might influence the final appearance of such restorations. It is, thereforebased on the individual situation and shade of the abutment tooth.

The APC zirconia-bonding concept is not limited to intra-oral situations and can also be applied in the laboratory for implant reconstructions that include cemented zirconia components.

Conclusion

Rapid developments in high-quality translucent zirconia have made the utility and reliability of adhesive cementing systems even more crucial. This applies to fully opaque restorations but also minimally invasive and ultra-translucent restorations of low thickness. In all cases, the longevity of the bonding and, thus, the provision directly affects patient  satisfaction. By taking into account the three primary parameters we have discussed in this article and following the predictable APC protocol, you will successfully realise durable bonded zirconia restorations from now on.

References

1. Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(2):79-88.
   
   
2. Nam, Y., Eo, M.Y. & Kim, S.M. Development of a dental handpiece angle correction device. BioMed Eng OnLine17, 173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0606-1

3. Florian BEUER, Daniel EDELHOFF, Wolfgang GERNET, Michael NAUMANN, Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system, Dental Materials Journal, 2008, Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 814-820

4. Muruppel AM, Thomas J, Saratchandran S, Nair D, Gladstone S, Rajeev MM. Assessment of Retention and Resistance Form of Tooth Preparations for All Ceramic Restorations using Digital Imaging Technique. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(2):143-9.
   
   
5. Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:193-204.
   
   
6. Güth JF, Stawarczyk B, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A. Zirconia and its novel compositions: What do clinicians need to know? Quintessence Int. 2019;50(7):512-20.
   
   
7. Smith CT, Gary JJ, Conkin JE, Franks HL. Effective taper criterion for the full veneer crown preparation in preclinical prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 1999;8(3):196-200.
   
   
8. Uy JN, Neo JC, Chan SH. The effect of tooth and foundation restoration heights on the load fatigue performance of cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(5):318-24.
   
   
9. Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The Effect of Resin Bonding on Long-Term Success of High-Strength Ceramics. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):132-9.
   
   
10. Chaar MS, Kern M. Five-year clinical outcome of posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1411-5.
    
    
11. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent. 2017;65:51-5.

12. Kern M, Dr Med Habil, M. BONDING TO ZIRCONIA. Jerd_40. 3DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00403.x VOLUME 2 3 , NUMBER 2 , 2011

13. Blatz MB, Alvarez M, Sawyer K, Brindis M. How to Bond Zirconia: The APC Concept. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016 Oct;37(9):611-617; quiz 618. PMID: 27700128.

14. Blatz M.B., Oppes S., Chiche G., et al. Influence of cementation technique on fracture strength and leakage of alumina all-ceramic crowns after cycling loading. Quintessence Int. 2008; 39(1): 23-32

15. Burke F.J., Fleming G.J., Nathanson D., Marquis P.M. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1)): 7-22

16. Blatz M.B. Sadan A., Maltezos C., et al. In vitro durability of the resin bond to feldspathic ceramics. AM J Dent 2004;17 (3):169-172

17. Blatz M.B., Bergler M. Clinical applications of a new self-adhesive resin cement for zirconium-oxide ceramic crowns. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(10):776-781

18. Maggio M., Bergler M., Kerrigan D., Blatz M.D. Treatment of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis with zirconia-based all-ceramic resin bonded fixed partial dentures: a case report. Amer J esthet Dent. 2012;2(4):226-237
19. Ozer F., Blatz M.B., Self-etch and etch-and0rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Edus Dent. 2013;24 (1):12-20

20. Kern M., Thomson V.P., Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73 (3):240-249

21. Kern M., Wegner S.M., Bonding to zirconia ceramics: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):64-71

22. Wegner S.M., Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2 (2):139-147

23. Blatz M.B., Sadan A., Martin J., Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramics after long-term sorage and thermos cycling. J Posthet Dent. 2004;9(4):356-362

24. Blatz M.B., Chiche G., Holst S., Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strength of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int. 2007;38 (9):745-753

25. Quaas A.C., Yang B., Kern M., Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007;23(4):506-512

26. Song J.Y., Park S.w., Lee K., et al. Fracture strength and microstructire of Y-TZP zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(4):274-280

27. Koizumi H., Nakayama D., Komine F., et al. Bonding of resin-based luting cements to zirconia with and without the use of ceramic priming agent. J adhes Dent. 2012;14(4):385-392

28. Nakayama D., Koizumi H., Komine F., et al. Adhesive bonding of zirconia with single -liquid acidic primers and a tri-n0butylborane initiated acrylic resin. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12(4):305-310

29. Alnassar T., Ozer F., Chiche G., Blatz M.B. Effect of different ceramic primers on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to zirconia. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;DOI:10.1080/01694243.1184404

30. Blatz M.B. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(6):415-426

31. Mante F.K., Ozer F., Walter R., et al. The current state of adhesive dentistry: a guide for clinical practice. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34:Spec 9:2-8

32. Ozcan M., Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7-26

33. Inokoshi M., De Munck J., Minakuchi S., Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectivenss to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014;93(4):329-334

Article by Peter Schouten.

I am frequently asked questions about the intraoral repair of porcelain chippings. To achieve success in repairs, it is essential to consider several important issues.

Perhaps the single most crucial issue to recognise is why the chipping occurred in the first place. For example, if loading stress is the leading cause, this should be considered during the repair.

Other issues to consider are removal of contamination, optimal roughening and chemical activation of the surface, and the prevention of contamination during the repair. Also, a rubber dam should be used to isolate the working field.

FUNDAMENTALS OF ADHESION

Adhesive procedures can be only successful by using the proper substances and methods. Different kinds of surfaces often need different treatments for success. However, the three basic fundamentals of adhesion must be respected to achieve the best results.

1) Mechanical retention through a roughened surface.

2) Chemical activation through chemically active substances.

3) High energetic bonding surface allowing for optimal interaction (wetting capacity) between the surface and the applied medium. Contamination will lower the bonding capacities and must be avoided or removed in any case.

TYPES OF FRACTURE

The most frequent fractures are porcelain only and those that include exposure of the substructure in PFZ or PFM prosthesis.

Many cases present with only limited chipping to the porcelain, for example, at the incisal edge. To achieve a durable repair in this instance, start by increasing the bonding/repair area using a fine diamond burr to create a large bevel. A fine grit burr is preferable over a medium or coarse version because a higher number of shallow grooves deliver a more optimal bonding surface than lesser deeper ones do. Additional roughening of the adherent surface by sandblasting with alumina (50 µm grain size, 2 bar pressure) is highly recommended to increase the surface area further.

When repairing porcelain chippings where the substructure is exposed, it is essential to be aware that multiple substrates are dealt with, indicating a need to adjust the repair protocol accordingly.

Clean the roughened fractured surface thoroughly. KATANA™ Cleaner is the product of choice. It is a safe and easy to use product with high cleaning power. It can be used both intra and extra orally on all kinds of dental substrates. After rinsing and thorough drying, the surface is ready for the next step, chemical activation.

CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS contains both silane and MDP and effectively treats both silica-containing ceramics and metal oxides (zirconia) and metals. After application and thorough drying, the composite restoration can be carried out immediately without an extra bonding step. The composite of choice is a durable flowable, CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow. It has high flexural strength, even higher than most paste-type composites. Besides that, it adapts to the surface better and easier. Quick and easy polishing and gloss retention are other highly valuated qualities of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow.

HINTS AND TIPS

• Isolate the working field by using rubber dam
• Bevel the chipping extensively using a fine diamond burr
• Roughen the adherent surface, preferably by sandblasting
• Clean the bonding area with KATANA™ Cleaner
• Apply CLEARFIL™ CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS to the entire bonding area (including exposed zirconia or metal) and dry thoroughly
• Cover exposed metal with a thin layer of CLEARFIL™ ST OPAQUER and light cure
• Repair with a strong flowable composite, such as CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow

REPAIR OF PORCELAIN CHIPPINGS VIDEO

PETER SCHOUTEN

CIRKONIO

KRISTALIZACIJA

Cirkonis įsitvirtino odontologijoje. Nuo cirkonio pristatymo prieš kelis dešimtmečius jo naudojimo galimybės neįtikėtinai išsiplėtė. Bet kaip gaminamas šis mišinys? Kas vyksta sinterizavimo proceso metu, kokie tipai galimi ir kaip pasiekti norimą galutinio produkto formą ir atspalvį?

PSZ arba iš dalies stabilizuotas cirkonis buvo pirmasis cirkonio oksidas, panaudotas odontologijoje. Šio tipo cirkonis stabilizuotas naudojant itrį, o dabar jis jau nebenaudojamas. Jis susidėjo iš monoklinikinių, tetragonalinių ir kubinių kristalų mišinio.

Daugelį metų buvo naudojama vadinamoji Y-TXP rūšis (itrio tetragonalinis stabilizuotas cirkonio polikristalas). Jo lenkimo stipris išskirtinis (> 1,000 MPa), tačiau jo išvaizda neestetiškai matinė ir balta. Jis susideda daugiausia iš tetragonalinių kristalų, kurių skersmuo siekia šimtus nanometrų. Pridedama apie 3 mol% itrio, kad medžiaga būtų stabili kambario temperatūroje, tad ši rūšis kartais apibūdinama kaip 3Y cirkonis.

Naujos rūšys, kaip kubinis cirkonis, išplėtotos siekiant pagerinti medžiagos estetines savybes. Kubinis cirkonis apibūdinamas dideliu permatomumu, bet turi mažesnį lenkimo stiprį. Vis dėlto, nors šio tipo lenkimo stipris žymiai mažesnis nei tetragonalinės versijos, jis daug didesnis už ličio disilikatą. Ši forma taip pat turi daugiau itrio, jo kiekis siekia nuo 4 iki daugiau kaip 5 mol%.

KRISTALO FAZĖS

Šiuo metu žinome tris esmines cirkonio kristalų formas.

Monoklinikinė

Įprastai monoklinikinės fazės cirkonis egzistuoja tik kambario temperatūroje. Monoklinikinis cirkonis yra nelabai tvirtas ir permatomas.

Tetragonalinis

Šie cirkonio kristalai yra metastabilūs ir egzistuoja tik kambario temperatūroje po stabilizacijos, dažniausiai pridedant itrio. Nors tetragonalinis cirkonis yra tvirtas, jo estetinės savybės ribotos.

Kubinis

Kubiniai kristalai yra stabilūs ir suteikia geresnį permatomumą. Dėl didesnės procentinės dalies itrio pridėjimo kubinio cirkonio ruošiniai nėra tokie stiprūs kaip tetragonaliniai. Kita vertus, jie ypač estetiški ir todėl tinka monolitinėms restauracijoms, net ir priekinėje srityje.

KRISTALIZACIJOS PROCESAS

Cirkonis beveik visada siūlomas kaip iš dalies sinterizuota medžiaga. Šios formos jis visada matinis ir baltas, o tikroji spalva ir permatomumas pasirodo tik po sinterizavimo. Sinterizavimo metu medžiaga susitraukia iki savo mažiausio dydžio; daug mažų kristalų susijungia ir suformuoja didesnius kristalus, tačiau nors patys kristalai didėja, bendras tūris mažėja. Programinėje įrangoje reikia atsižvelgti į susitraukimo faktorių, kad galutinis produktas po sinterizavimo būtų ne tik neblunkančios spalvos, bet ir teisingo dydžio.

Maži kristalai susijungia į didesnius sinterizavimo proceso metu.

„KATANA™ Multilayer HTML“ prieš (kairėje) ir po sinterizavimo.

Pirmieji takieji kompozitai odontologijos rinkoje pasirodė XX a. 10-ajame dešimtmetyje.

Šių medžiagų sudėtis buvo visiškai pagrįsta esamais pakuojamais kompozitais: jose buvo tos pačios užpildo dalelės ir dervos matrica, tačiau mažesnis užpildo kiekis. Taigi, jų klampa buvo mažesnė, todėl takumo charakteristikos buvo geresnės, kad būtų lengviau modeliuoti ir pritaikyti prie ertmės, tačiau fizinės ir mechaninės savybės silpnesnės nei jų pakuojamų atitikmenų. Dėl to jie tapo tik naudingu papildymu prie esamo dervų pagrindu pagamintų kompozitų portfelio: kaip kiti, jie buvo plačiai naudojami kaip V klasės pažeidimų užpildymo medžiaga ir kaip pamušalas didelėse I ir II klasės ertmėse.

Norėdama išplėsti iš pradžių ribotą indikacijų spektrą, „Kuraray Noritake Dental“ nusprendė sutelkti dėmesį į takiųjų kompozitų mechaninių ir fizinių savybių gerinimą, sukurdama visiškai naują produktų asortimentą: „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ universalų takųjį kompozitą.

Nors jo pirmtakas „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ Flow“ turi didesnę užpildymo gebą ir panašias mechanines savybes, terminas „universalus“ reiškia, kad medžiagos yra universaliai pritaikomos. Iš tikrųjų galimos indikacijos yra didžiulės, palyginti su anstesnio takiojo kompozito indikacijų spektru. Nesvarbu, ar naudotojas nori jį naudoti kaip pamušalą, ar planuoja didelę II klasės restauraciją, „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ yra idealus pasirinkimas.

Trys takumo variantai

Kadangi „Kuraray Noritake Dental“ norėjo sukurti produktą, kuris dėl kiekvienos indikacijos veiktų kaip pageidaujama, „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ yra trijų takumo variantų. Didelio takumo medžiaga „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow High“ (su žalia etikete) buvo sukurta naudoti pamušalui, užpildyti smulkiems trūkumams ir restauruoti mažiems pažeidimams, todėl leidžia atlikti mikroinvazinius paruošimus. Vidutinio takumo variantas „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Low“ (su mėlyna etikete) yra pats universaliausias iš serijos ir gali būti naudojamas daugeliui indikacijų. Mažiausio takumo variantas yra „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low“ (su raudona etikete). Jis gali būti naudojamas kuriant didesnes galinių dantų restauracijas ir cementuojant įklotus ar užklotus.

Vertinama gydytojų

Tai, kad produktas gerai veikia odontologo rankose, patvirtino nepriklausomas leidinys „Dental Advisor“: 2019 m. sausio–vasario mėn. numeryje (36 tomas, 1 numeris) „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ pelnė „Dental Advisor“ skiriamą „Top Product Award“ apdovanojimą penktus metus iš eilės.

Ataskaitoje jis buvo apibūdintas kaip „universalus gerai užpildantis takusis kompozitas“, ir jis būtent toks yra!

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow won Dental Advisor’s Top Product Award for the fifth year in a row.

Skirtingai nuo ankstyvosios kartos takiųjų kompozitų, „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ turi didelę užpildymo gebą ir lenkimo stiprį, kuris yra didesnis nei dažniausiai naudojamų į pastą panašių kompozitų.

Visi trys variantai pasižymi dideliu stipriu. Palyginkite su savo esamais kompozitais.

Turint omenyje tai, kad universalus takusis kompozitas turi tiek daug naudingų savybių, odontologai gali susigundyti pakeisti iki šiol naudojamą pakuojamą kompozitą „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ kompozitu. Daugeliui indikacijų tai tikrai įmanoma. Tie, kurie taip padarys, taip pat pastebės, kad uždėjimas ir modeliavimas tiesiai iš švirkšto pavyksta labai gerai, todėl nereikalingas atskiras instrumentas.

Unikalios technologijos

Dėl ko medžiaga tokia unikali? Tikriausiai geresnės mechaninės savybės, didelis estetinis potencialas ir puikios tvarkymo charakteristikos gaunamos dėl egzistuojančių ir naujų technologijų derinio.

„Kuraray Noritake“ unikali šviesos difuzijos technologija, naudojama estetinio kompozito asortimente „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2“, taip pat naudojama „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“. Kartu su patentuota užpildo technologija ši naujoviška sudėtinė dalis yra atsakinga už tai, kad restauracijos, pagamintos iš „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ beveik automatiškai susilieja su aplinkine danties struktūra.

Trečiasis lemiamas komponentas yra silano technologija. „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ naudojamas ilgos grandinės silanas užtikrina optimalų užpildo dalelių drėkinamumą. Tai yra pagrindinė priežastis, kodėl galima padidinti užpildo procentą iki tokio aukšto lygio. Po polimerizacijos stiprus ryšys tarp užpildo ir sintetinės dervos, kurį sukelia silanas, sukuria ilgalaikį sukibimą. Todėl vandens absorbcija taip pat yra labai maža, tai gali būti žinoma visiems „Kuraray Noritake“ kompozitų naudotojams.

Dėl unikalios sudėties „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ taip pat pasižymi puikiomis poliravimo ir blizgesio išlaikymo savybėmis. Poliravimas nereikalauja pastangų. Net nuvalius alkoholiu bus gautas gana dailus blizgesys.

Sujungus visus šiuos privalumus viename produkte, „CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow“ užtikrina neprilygstamą patogumą atliekant restauracijas kompozitu. „Kuraray Noritake Dental“ didžiuojasi, kad paskatino technologines naujoves ir tinkamai pritaikė naujus kūrinius, kad naudotojui suteiktų begalę galimybių su universaliu takiuoju kompozitu.

Peter Schouten

Techninis vadovas

„Kuraray Europe Benelux“

No shade taking needed. Just one shade to cover all posterior cases. Even the larger Class I's and II's!

Anterior cases from B1 to C4 done with only two shades, without the need for shade taking. Can you imagine? No additional opake materials (light blockers) needed too.

Peter Schouten, Technical Manager at Kuraray Europe Benelux

Before universal adhesives were available, two major techniques were used: total-etching adhesives, which basically work with phosphoric acid etching on enamel and dentine; and self-etching adhesives, which can be used with or without the option of etching enamel selectively. Prior to the introduction of self-etching adhesives in the late 1990s, dentists used mostly total-etching techniques. While this procedure achieves strong enamel bonding, it can also be very technique-sensitive and involves several steps. As a consequence, dentists welcomed the development of simplified adhesives. In 2011, the new generation of universal adhesives was introduced, with the aim of replacing all previous generations.

The development of universal adhesives was firstly due to the success of self-etching adhesives, but total etching was still advocated. The result, a universal adhesive, must be considered a self-etching adhesive with a phosphoric acid conditioning option on enamel and/or dentine. Maximum flexibility resulting from the freedom of choice in etching technique and the preference of the practitioner was thus obtained.

CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick, manufactured by Kuraray Noritake Dental, is a single-component light-curing bonding agent indicated for all direct and indirect restorations in combination with all etching techniques (total-etching, self-etching or selective-etching). The adhesive is also indicated for the surface treatment of zirconia- and silica-based ceramics. When compared with other one-bottle universal adhesives, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick exhibits RAPID BOND TECHNOLOGY. We asked Peter Schouten, Technical Manager at Kuraray Europe Benelux and a chemist with decades of experience in the dental industry, about his views on universal adhesives and CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick.

Dental Tribune: Since the introduction of the first universal adhesive, a new generation of adhesives has been created that has enjoyed increasing popularity since then. What is your opinion about the system?

Peter Schouten: For me, the term “universal” remains debatable. There is no clear definition of a universal bonding system yet. When we look at what different manufacturers are saying about universal bonding systems, the term to me applies primarily to the etching technologies and the ability to adhere to all substrates currently used in dentistry, such as silica- or metal-based materials. In this case, we can really speak of “universal”.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of self-etching and total-etching technologies? How are universal adhesives positioned in relation to them?

In my home country of the Netherlands, there is a large group of self-etching users. In many other countries, most dentists still use the total-etching approach. And, of course, there are reliable three-step total-etching systems on the market. However, etching of dentine removes hydroxyapatite and creates a layer of collagen. Afterwards, the dentist tries his or her best to penetrate this layer again with a bonding system. Why not preserve the hydroxyapatite and create a reliable bonding to the hydroxyapatite itself? This is the basis of the gold standard two-step self-etching bonding, our CLEARFIL SE BOND. Now universal adhesives—at least CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick—provide the advantage that dentists can use any etching technique without worrying about results that are less than optimal. It really is an open system.

How do universal adhesives perform on wet and dry dentine, as well as enamel, in combination with all etching technologies?

I am a strong believer in the self-etching technique as we have proven already. The wetness and dryness of dentine is always an issue in total-etching techniques. With CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick, the instruction is to rinse and dry. Our universal adhesive has the capability of penetrating the dentine surface quickly and completely.

Kuraray is a pioneer in adhesive systems: the company introduced total-etching bonding in the 1970s and innovative self-etching technology in the 1990s. The secret to success of all universal adhesives seems to be the incorporation of the adhesive molecule MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate) developed in 1981 by Kuraray. What is the function of MDP?

Kuraray has over 40 years of experience in the development of phosphate monomers. In 1976, we had already developed Phenyl-P. By far the most important ingredient in our current bonding systems is the original MDP. We never would have reached the level at which we are today without this phosphate monomer. MDP is capable of creating a long-lasting bond to calcium in hydroxyapatite and to other metals. As MDP can chemically bond to Ca2+ ions, it forms stable, insoluble MDP–Ca salts present as nano-layers at the adhesive interface.

Kuraray Noritake Dental introduced CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick at this year’s International Dental Show. According to the company, CLEARFIL Universal Bond is the best one-step adhesive ever developed. Briefly, what do you find noteworthy about the bonding agent?

The most remarkable thing is RAPID BOND TECHNOLOGY, enabling us to introduce the benefit of no waiting. This technology works in three steps: first, rapid penetration; second, fast polymerisation; and third, quick formation of a hydrophobic, hydrolytically stable bonding layer. It took our research and development lead Dr Yamato Nojiri many years to develop a cocktail of amide monomers that is superhydrophilic and turns after curing into a stable hydrophobic polymer. The addition of this amide monomer makes it possible to skip the waiting step. Fast polymerisation is achieved by a modified photoinitiator, releasing twice as many radicals in comparison with other initiators. The quickly formed stable bond derives from the combined action of MDP and the amide monomer. MDP bonds to calcium and amide monomer turns into a highly cross-linked hydrophobic polymer network.

The motto of CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick is “Universal. Easy. Reliable.” Could you please explain that further?

I think that clinicians will be very satisfied with the bonding agent’s performance and wide indication range. It definitely will be used mainly for direct restorations with light-curing composite resins, but also for core build-ups, cavity sealing, treatment of exposed root surfaces and hypersensitive teeth. The pretreatment of the tooth can be done with any of the three etching procedures before applying this adhesive. For selective enamel etching and total-etching, phosphoric acid needs to be applied. I recommend K-ETCHANT Syringe etching gel. It is left in place for 10 seconds, followed by rinsing and drying. The product is very easy to use and not technique-sensitive. The result is a reliable bond because of the use of our proven MDP technology combined with the cross-linked hydrophobic polymer network.

Does CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick adhere to any dental substrate (lithium disilicate, zirconia and metals)?

Yes, it does. CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick is the ideal bonding agent in most situations. Bonding to tooth structure and to most direct and indirect filling materials can be performed with CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick. For the pretreatment of silica-based ceramics (glass-ceramics); however, we advise the use of CLEARFIL CERAMIC PRIMER PLUS for the most optimal results.

What is known regarding combining universal adhesives with light-curing, dual-curing and self-curing composites without the use of primers? Can the dentist really combine them without any problems?

It can be used with all light-curing composites and compomers, with the exception of silorane-based composites. For use with self- and dual-cure composites, CLEARFIL DC Activator is needed. This catalyst activates the dual-curing mechanism of this adhesive. However, the addition of CLEARFIL DC Activator to the adhesive is not required when using it with CLEARFIL DC CORE PLUS or PANAVIA SA Cement Plus.

What do you see for the future of universal adhesives? 

As long as we still need adhesives to bond our composites to tooth structure, I'm almost certain that single-bottle universal adhesives will become the most used systems. In vitro tests have shown good results. A universal, easy-to-use adhesive with few treatment steps and a short working time reduces the risks of errors. Of course, relevant long-term clinical research results are needed to prove the quality. Kuraray Noritake Dental, with its leading adhesive technology, will surely remain the leader in this field.