Users of dental zirconia are really spoilt for choice these days. Countless manufacturers offer zirconia materials that differ in their mechanical and optical properties and indication range. What is not apparent at first sight is that the available products also differ with respect to the quality of the CAD/CAM blanks offered. Blank quality is highly dependent on the quality of the raw materials and is affected by different aspects during raw material processing, pressing and pre-sintering. This has a huge impact on the surface quality, edge stability, fit and processing requirements of milled restorations.

Raw material production

Pre-shaded dental zirconia typically consists of metal oxides, including zirconium oxide, yttrium oxide and aluminium oxide, as well as additives like binders and colour pigments or ions. Most manufacturers of dental zirconia obtain pre-fabricated powder from an external industry partner, the most popular option being Tosoh Corporation. In contrast, Kuraray Noritake Dental relies on an end-to-end in-house process. This includes the production and addition of the components forming the company’s innovative multilayered technology, which makes it possible to match the shades in the polychromatic blanks precisely to the colours of the VITA classical A1-D4 shade guide.

At Kuraray Noritake Dental, the powder is produced in-house.

Since more powder production steps are carried out in-house, this gives the company full control of the quality of the raw materials, their grain size and the purity of the formulation. It also allows for a precise alignment of the mechanical and optical product properties. Properties of zirconia restorations that are affected by the powder quality and composition include translucency and shade appearance, flexural strength, ageing behaviour and sintering performance.

Blank pressing

Zirconia discs and blocks used for CAD/CAM processing are usually produced by uniaxial and isostatic pressing. In the uniaxial compaction process, pressure is applied to the powder from one direction (uniaxial) or two directions (biaxial), whereas the isostatic compaction process involves virtually equal pressure applied from all sides. Hence, isostatic pressing typically results in a more uniform density distribution throughout the blank and a higher material homogeneity. These factors are prerequisites for a predictable processing and sintering behaviour and affect the fit of the final restoration. For optimal mechanical and optical properties of the zirconia material, it is essential to avoid large porosities, air pockets and impurities caused by airborne particles that are trapped during pressing.

At Kuraray Noritake Dental, a unique and extremely meticulous pressing process achieves a uniform pressure distribution and low risk of contamination by airborne particles. This specific procedure reduces gravitation forces and contributes to having as high as possible density of zirconia material. All the high-level preparation processes from raw material production to pressing are responsible for the high edge stability and surface quality of restorations milled from KATANA™ Zirconia.”

Pre-sintering

The pre-sintering procedure is necessary in that it gives the pressed blanks the required stability to be machinable with milling tools. The selected temperature profile and duration of the pre-sintering cycle determine the material’s strength and processing properties and have an impact on the final sintering process.

The unique pre-sintering procedure carried out in the production facilities of Kuraray Noritake Dental results in blanks that are stable in their pre-sintered state. Although more stable, pre-sintered KATANA™ Zirconia is machinable with common diamond-coated milling tools without any increased risk of breakage or higher tool wear.

A KATANA™ Zirconia blank ready for milling.

Fast sintering for the laboratory

The unique procedure has a positive impact on the surface smoothness after milling and can significantly shorten sintering times. In fact, the speed sintering program offered for all variants of KATANA™ Zirconia is the fastest one on the market. In the dental laboratory, the sintering times may be reduced to 90 minutes^*for single-tooth restorations and bridges of up to three units.

^*The material is removed from the furnace at 800°C.

Overview of the recommended sintering protocols.

Fast sintering for chairside

Using the KATANA™ Zirconia block with Dentsply Sirona’s CEREC system, it is possible to sinter single crowns up to three-unit bridges in 18-30 minutes without compromising the mechanical or optical properties.

The KATANA™ Zirconia block displays superior optical properties after 18 minutes of sintering compared with representatives of major competitors’ raw material after 30-minute and 60-minute sintering programs designed by Kuraray Noritake Dental based on the manufacturer's recommendations.

Unique KATANA™ Zirconia properties

Together, these efforts taken by Kuraray Noritake Dental to produce dental zirconia of exceptionally high quality make all the difference. The KATANA™ Zirconia series - KATANA™ Zirconia Ultra Translucent Multi Layered (UTML), Super Translucent Multi Layered (STML), High Translucent Multi Layered (HTML) and KATANA™ Zirconia High Translucent Mono Layered (HT) - have a homogeneous, high-density structure with low porosity and a high level of purity. This optimises the performance of the blanks during machining.

Surface roughness

SEM image, magnification 33X, of competitor material surface roughness. Image courtesy of Dr Kunkela, Kunkela Research Academy.

SEM image, magnification 33X, of KATANA Zirconia surface roughness. Image courtesy of Dr Kunkela, Kunkela Research Academy.

SEM images of non-polished KATANA™ Zirconia and a competitor’s material at 33x magnification. The four images of each material show the surface structure at different areas of a molar crown. In all areas, the surface of the restoration made of the competitor’s material is rougher and shows more porosity than the surface of the KATANA™ Zirconia crown directly after milling, according to Dr Josef Kunkela’s research results. One of the contributing factors to this result is the more densely pressed blanks with smaller grain sizes of KATANA™ Zirconia.

An optimised processing behaviour leads to regular restoration margins, smooth surfaces and a precise fit of the restorations. The latter is due to the fact that the milling behaviour and volumetric shrinkage during final sintering are highly predictable, so that a user designing a 20 µm cement gap will get what he or she desires. Owing to the great control over optical properties and precise match to the VITA classical A1-D4 shades, KATANA™ Zirconia is considered to be one of the most aesthetic dental zirconia options available on the market.

Excellent marginal fit

SEM images revealing the fit of restorations made of two different materials (lithium disilicate and KATANA™ Zirconia Block STML) on a tooth abutment. The KATANA™ Zirconia restoration shows a more regular margin and more precise fit (with a cement gap of 19-21 µm) than the lithium disilicate crown (cement gap 26-45 µm). Images courtesy of Dr Kunkela, Kunkela Research Academy.

Extremely regular margins of a KATANA™ Zirconia crown after milling, which is also a result of the favourable material structure.

In order to ensure all the desired material properties, including aesthetics and strength, one thing is essential: the machining carried out in the dental laboratory - milling and sintering - needs to adhere to the recommended protocols. This means that the milling machine and furnace should be cleaned and calibrated on a regular basis, which provides the conditions for optimised zirconia processing from the powder to the final, true-to-life dental restoration.

By Dr Alessandro Devigus

Fig. 1. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown.

Fig. 2. Initial situation with fractured PFM crown – problem of deep bite.

Fig. 3. Situation after removal of old crowns and placement of retraction cord.

Fig. 4. Milled crowns before sintering with Speedfire.

Fig. 5. Crowns after sintering.

Fig. 6. Try-in of sintered crowns.

Fig. 7. Crowns after glaze and stain.

Fig. 8. Try-in of finished crowns.

Fig. 9. Crowns after adhesive cementation with PANAVIA™ V5 A2.

FINAL SITUATION

Dentist:

DR. ALESSANDRO DEVIGUS

Dr. Alessandro Devigus received his degree from Zurich University, Switzerland, in 1987. Since 1990 his working in his own private practice with a focus on CAD CAM and Digital Dentistry. He is also CEREC Instructor at the Zurich Dental School.

Dr. Alessandro Devigus is an active member of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED), founder of the Swiss Society of Computerized Dentistry, Neue Gruppe member, ITI fellow and speaker.

Dr. Devigus is editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, author of various publications and an international lecturer.

By Dr Luca Dusi

For purely aesthetic reasons, this patient asked for the reconstruction of her cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12). The patient was offered a treatment including a first phase of orthodontic therapy aimed at recovering the space necessary to be able to reconstruct the lateral incisor to its ideal size. As the patient refused to undergo this orthodontic therapy, it was decided to restore the tooth with resin composite and match its size to the space already available.

The adhesive system used was CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2, while the restoration was created with the new composite CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal. Although this material is designed for the single-shade technique with only two shades matching the anterior tooth shades, I decided to combine both pastes to achieve the best possible outcome. The shade UD (Universal Dark) was used to reconstruct the cervical and central portion of the lateral incisor. The incisal portion was restored with UL (Universal Light).

Fig. 1. Initial situation with a cone-shaped upper right lateral incisor (12).

Fig. 2. Image of the initial situation taken with a polarising filter for shade evaluation purposes.

Fig. 3. The new CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal composite with only two shades for the anterior region was chosen. It offers a good optical integration thanks to Kuraray Noritake Dental’s Light Diffusion Technology.

Fig. 4. Shade determination with the aid of cured samples of CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal UL (Universal Light) and UD (Universal Dark) on the tooth surfaces.

Fig. 5. Isolation with rubber dam.

Fig. 6. CLEARFIL™ SE BOND 2 used for the establishment of a strong bond between the tooth structure and the composite material.

FINAL SITUATION

Fig. 7. The universal composite blends in well with the adjacent teeth regarding its colour and surface finish.

Dentist:

• Graduated with honors in Dentistry and Dental Prosthetics at the University of Milan in 2010.
• In 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 he held the position of Adjunct Professor for the teaching of Prosthetic Technologies at the University of Milan-Bicocca.
• Member of SIdp (Italian Society of Periodontology) and AIC (Italian Academy of Conservation).

Time has always been limited in dental offices, and COVID-19 sanitisation requirements have constrained this even further. Streamlining procedures is a logical strategy for reducing chair time; however, this optimisation must still ensure a high treatment standard and aesthetic outcome.

The CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal shades concept from Kuraray Noritake Dental enables this: fast shade determination and creation of aesthetic, long-lasting direct restorations with a single shade in your regular cases; an opaquer or blocker is no longer needed.

CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal shades concept consists of a compact shade range:

• The universal (U) shade is for all posterior restorations.
• For the aesthetically more demanding anterior, the user is given two shade options: universal light (UL) and universal dark (UD).
• The universal white (UW) shade is employed for certain cases, such as the restoration of primary teeth.

This simplified shade concept works so well thanks to the integration of Kuraray Noritake Dental’s light diffusion technology, which makes restoration distort light in a similar way tooth structure does. Consequently, the applied material blends virtually invisibly into the surrounding tooth structure.

Convincing mechanical properties make CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal shades very well suited for posterior and anterior restorations alike. Just like other members of the CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 family, this innovative product offers high strength, favourable wear and balanced shrinkage stress for reliable performance — even in load-bearing posterior areas. The material is easily polished and retains its gloss, yielding a natural-looking appearance that is particularly beneficial in the anterior region.

The CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal shades, available in preloaded-tip capsules and syringes, provide a time-saving and simplified means of realising aesthetic, strong and lasting restorations.

This is streamlining of direct composite procedures in optimum form - in short: intelligent simplification!

Clinical case by Dr Zorzin.

Volume 7 of our "BOND" magazine is now published and ready to read!

Content Highlights:

• Composites versus hybrid ceramics
• Flowable composites a universal solution?
• Universal adhesives, is one bottle sufficient?

Start Reading: BOND | VOLUME 7 | 10/2020

Dental photography as a valuable documentation aid

The main purpose of photography in dentistry is documentation. The aim is to collect as much information as possible under reproducible conditions. For this purpose, the camera used, its accessories and the format and lighting of the intra- and extra oral recordings relevant to dentistry must be standardized. Under standardized photographic conditions, the recordings made can be compared with one another, even if the later recordings are made only after a long period of time and by different photographers. Only in this form can dental photography be used as a valuable documentation aid. The standards described by Wolfgang Bengel in 1985 are still valid, but they have to be updated and adapted to technical innovations.

In this webinar, the current development in the field of dental photography and related areas will be briefly explained.

Dr. Alessandro Devigus has had his own practice with a focus on CEREC since 1990, editor-in-chief of the International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry.

Topic: Dental photography as a valuable documentation aid
Date: Wednesday. October 14, 2020 - 17:00 - 18:30 CEST
Time: approx. 90 min (including discussion and questions)

ZIRCONIA: NEW INSIGHTS INTO TRIED AND PROVEN MATERIAL

You learn from your mistakes, but it’s better if you can learn from those of others. Dr. Dirawi will share his experience, tips and tricks when it comes to creating perfect Zirconia restorations.
Having great material like KATANA Zirconia is an excellent starting point. Yet to achieve highly aesthetic outcome you need to be aware of the unexpected pitfalls and challenges that can be prevented.
Join our webinar and learn what Dr. Dirawi has to say after years of using Zirconia. Bonus – we will have a conversation about cementation of zirconia as well, to achieve durable robust results.

DR WISSAM DIRAWI DDS, MALMÖ, SWEDEN

• Teacher at Malmö Dental University in Sweden
• Researcher in the fields of ceramics and implant complications
• Long clinical experience from public dental care and private dental care
• Expert in ceramics, implants and digital dentistry
• 2018 - Specialist in Oral Prosthodontics
• 2000 - DDS

Did you know that CERABIEN™ ZR FC Paste Stain has a layer of transparent liquid on top of the liquid ceramic?

This layer protects the material from dust and dirt.

Hence, it is best left in place.

The use of highly translucent, gradient pre-shaded zirconia brings more efficiency into the dental laboratory. Due to the advanced properties of the materials, e.g. from the KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered Series, true-to-life restorations may be created without any or with only a small vestibular layer of veneering porcelain. This saves a lot of time usually required for manual work around steps in the veneering of zirconia frameworks. At the same time, this also allows for a reduced wall thickness, beneficial in the context of minimally invasive dentistry.

In order to leverage the high aesthetic potential and balanced mechanical properties of these types of zirconia, however, it is essential that the restorations are processed under ideal conditions. The most advanced materials with the highest translucency are particularly sensitive to contamination during and after wet milling, contamination of the furnace chamber, and temperature variations during sintering. Possible undesirable effects include a grayish appearance of the restorations and low chroma, green, yellow, blue or gray traces in the restorations, white spots on the surface and variations in colour and translucency.

If carried out on a regular basis, the following measures will effectively eliminate these effects. Hence, they will support users in ensuring consistently beautiful results.

Optimizing the milling process

Blue or gray traces visible in the final restoration are usually the result of contamination of the cooling water with extrinsic particles in the context of wet milling, (which is usually conducted in chairside procedures). In most cases, silica particles left over from the processing of glass or silicate ceramics with the same milling unit are the root of the problem. The effect is easily avoided by thorough cleaning of the milling chamber, the water tank and the filter insert of the milling machine every time a different material needs to be processed. Another solution is dry instead of wet milling, which offers additional benefits such as shorter processing time and better quality edges and surfaces.

Decontamination of the furnace chamber

In general, the chamber of the sintering furnace should be cleaned before sintering. Important measures include the removal of dust inside the sintering chamber and cleaning of the heating elements, both done with a soft brush. The use of compressed air is contraindicated.

Unwanted optical effects that occur on restorations due to contamination of the sintering chamber include white spots on the restoration surface, a blue-grayish appearance and low chroma, and green or yellow traces in the material. White spots on a restoration surface are usually indicators of contaminated alumina sintering beads or the use of the wrong instruments for surface modification and sprue removal. The effect is avoidable through a monthly or even more frequent replacement of the sintering beads (as soon as they show any signs of discoloration) as well as the exclusive use of fine-grid diamond instruments for adjustments prior to sintering.

Alumina sintering beads may be the cause of white spots on a restoration surface if not replaced on a regular basis.

The blue-grayish appearance and low chroma may be attributed to mineral residues from dipping liquids in the chamber. They are effectively removed with the aid of a decontamination program to be selected in the furnace menu, which is run after inserting several residual pieces of a highly translucent, white zirconia blank. As soon as the decontamination cycle is completed, the chromatic intensity of the residual blank parts indicates whether a second cycle is required. In order to prevent the occurrence of a grayish appearance in new restorations, it is recommended to perform a decontamination program at least once per month.

Pieces of a white zirconia blank left over after milling.

MoSi₂ heating elements: Regeneration needed

If a restoration appears to be green or yellowish, it is most likely that the furnace is equipped with aging molybdenum disilicide (MoSi₂) heating elements in need of regeneration or replacement. The inner part of the elements is made of molybdenum (Mo), which is usually covered by a protective layer of silica (SiO₂). This layer is naturally built up during sintering at a temperature range between 1,000 and 1,600°C. As the thickness of the layer grows, its intrinsic residual compressive stress increases. This stress, as well as possible extrinsic influences, e.g. originating from acidic dipping liquids, may finally lead to cracks and a breakup of the protective layer. Once damaged, the molybdenum core is exposed. At a low temperature range of 400 to 600°C, the molybdenum reacts with oxygen in the sintering chamber, a process referred to as pest oxidation. The resulting molybdenum oxide (MoO₃), together with ions or metal oxides from colouring agents, is responsible for the green-yellowish discoloration on the surface of the restorations.

Restorations displaying greenish surface pigmentation.

Molybdenum disilicide heating element with a protective silica layer bursting off, leading to pest oxidation and the contamination of elements in the sintering chamber.

Regeneration firing, which involves a rapid heating rate and a long firing phase at approx. 1,450°C, aims at regenerating the layer of silica. This measure, however, works only a limited number of times, as a repeated process of pest oxidation and regeneration leads to aging of the heating element itself. Hence, it will ultimately lead to the need for replacement. The whole issue of pest oxidation may be effectively avoided by the use of a furnace with silicon carbide heating elements, which are highly aging-resistant and do not cause any discoloration. A positive side effect is that these types of heating elements deliver more constant temperatures.

Temperature control

Variations in translucency or chroma and pigmentation of restoration surfaces are often due to deviations of the actual sintering temperatures from the recommended temperature curve. The only way to solve this issue is temperature calibration. This measure is not only a prerequisite for aesthetic results, but also has a decisive impact on the mechanical properties of the restorations: if the maximum temperatures are too high, for example, the flexural strength of the zirconia materials may be expected to decrease¹.

Effect of temperature differences during sintering on restorations made of KATANA™ Zirconia UTML: The restorations were sintered at the same nominal temperatures in three different furnaces!

Temperature control is usually carried out with the aid of TempTABs or PTCRs (process temperature control rings). They are placed into the furnace on a sintering tray and typically processed by running a calibration cycle. After sintering, the tab or ring diameter is determined. As TempTABs and PCTRs exhibit controlled shrinkage, it is possible to calculate the actual sintering temperature based on the measured diameter. A conversion table supports the user in determining the deviation between the temperature actually reached and the temperature displayed on the furnace. Subsequently, the values displayed on the furnace are adjusted if necessary.

TempTAB on a sintering tray with restorations ready for sintering.

General recommendations

In order to set the stage for brilliant aesthetics and ideal properties of zirconia restorations, it is essential to ensure optimal processing conditions. Instead of troubleshooting carried out whenever discoloration appears after sintering, it is advisable to take the following actions on a regular basis as preventive measures:

• Cleaning of the milling machine’s water tank every time before starting to mill (wet milling only)
• Strict adherence to the sintering protocols recommended by the material manufacturer
• Removal of the dust from the sintering chamber and heating elements with a soft brush before each use
• Replacement of the alumina sintering beads whenever they show signs of discoloration (at least once per month)
• Exclusive use of fine-grid diamond instruments for sprue-removal and pre-sintering adjustments
• If possible: Use of furnace with silicon carbide heating elements
• Furnaces with molybdenum disilicide heating elements require constant visual control and regular regeneration cycles
• Running of a decontamination program with decontaminating powder or white zirconia residues (y-TZP) at least once per month
• Temperature control and calibration at least once per month

With these simple measures, it is possible to maximise the full potential of KATANA™ Zirconia Multi-Layered Series from Kuraray Noritake.

References
¹ Stawarczyk, B., Özcan, M., Hallmann, L. et al. The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratio. Clin Oral Invest 17, 269–274 (2013).

By Daniele Rondoni, RDT

Considering different criteria to select the ideal zirconia and frame design to meet the level of esthetics requested.

Step 1
Final Preparations.

Step 2
Zirconia Frame (KATANA Zirconia STML A2) cut-back designed to reproduce translucent incisal area.

Step 3
Application of 1st Internal Stain and firing.

Step 4
Application of 1st Luster, Clear Cervical and firing.

Step 5
Application of 2nd Internal Stain and firing.

Step 6
Application of 2nd Luster, and Opacious Body.

Step 7
Completion of firing.

Step 8
Completion of morphological correction.

Step 9
Post-operative view.