Article by Dr. Michał Jaczewski

FLOWABLE INJECTION AND STAMP TECHNIQUE: RESTORING TEETH IN THE POSTERIOR REGION

Restoring the occlusal surface of posterior teeth while preserving the natural morphology and re-establishing correct occlusal contacts has always been challenging for dental practitioners. Free-hand layering requires knowledge of tooth anatomy, composite handling skills and experience. When the occlusal surface of a tooth is damaged at the start of treatment (as is usually the case in teeth with large MOD cavities) or an increase of the vertical dimension of occlusion is planned (e.g. in severely worn teeth), the use of the flowable injection technique may be a suitable alternative. It truly speeds up and facilitates the process of building up the restoration to a natural shape, but requires thorough planning and preparation. In cases with an intact occlusal surface, the stamp technique might be the first choice.

FLOWABLE INJECTION TECHNIQUE: GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

It is up to the user how exactly the restorations, to be built up by flowable injection, are planned and how the plan is implemented: One can either opt for a conventional wax-up or make use of digital tools in the planning phase. Dedicated design software offers the benefit of facilitating the creation of a natural shape and morphology of the desired restoration and allows for the establishing of an ideal occlusal relationship. Once the wax-up is ready, it needs to be transferred into the patient’s mouth. This is accomplished via a printed or classical model with wax-up, which forms the basis for the production of a matrix or silicon index. This index is then used intraorally for the injection of the flowable composite. To enable proper light curing through the index, the index material should be as transparent as possible.

AREA-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS

In the posterior area, an index made of two different materials – a soft inner silicon structure and a hard outer shell – may be advisable. Due to its higher dimensional stability compared to a soft silicon index, it is possible to put pressure on it for proper adaptation to the isolated teeth and soft tissue without the risk of altering the shape of the tooth. Figure 1 shows such an index on and next to a printed model. It consists of a hard shell made of acrylic and a soft inner structure made of a transparent silicone material (e.g. EXACLEAR™, GC). For production, a high-capacity hydraulic pressure curing unit designed for use with self-curing resins (Aquapres™, Lang Dental) has proven its worth: It ensures a highly accurate reproduction of the (digital) wax-up.

Fig. 1. Printed model and silicone index.

Reconstruction of posterior teeth with the flowable injection technique requires prior removal of all carious lesions and reconstruction of the proximal surfaces to restore the contact points. Hence, the injected composite serves the exclusive purpose of restoring the occlusal surface. When several teeth are treated, a two-step procedure with an alternating technique is recommended to provide for proper separation of the teeth. Blocking the proximal surfaces below the contact point with PTFE tape will reduce the amount of excess material in these areas and make it easier to clean and prepare the proximal surfaces after flowable injection. Proximal and deeper occlusal lesions should be restored with the aid of a matrix, wedge and ring.

CLINICAL PROTOCOL

A possible clinical protocol is illustrated in Figures 2 to 5: After caries excavation and tooth preparation, sectional matrices, wedges and rings were placed to allow for simultaneous treatment of the mesial and occlusal cavities. Following etching and application of the universal adhesive CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), the cavities were restored with CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low in the shade A1 and CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal in the shade U. The distal cavity of the first molar was filled in the last step of the free-hand modeling procedure. In order to restore the occlusal surfaces in their original vertical dimension, every second tooth was isolated with rubber dam and the exposed molar etched (total-etch technique with K-ETCHANT Syringe, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.). the alternating index was positioned with some pressure and the flowable composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low) injected. Once light curing was completed, it was possible to remove the index, chip off the excess and finish and polish the restoration before repeating the procedure for the adjacent molar.

Fig. 2. Restoration of two molars: Teeth preparation and caries excavation.

Fig. 3. Restoration of two molars: Filling of the proximal and occlusal cavities.

Fig. 4.  Restoration of two molars: Re-establishing the occlusion with the aid of the flowable injection technique.

Fig. 5. Alternating approach: Restoration of the second molar by injecting flowable composite.

DISCUSSION

The use of the flowable injection technique allows for rapid restoration of teeth and the establishment of precise occlusal contacts. This reduces the time spend on occlusal surface modelling and minimizes the risk for prolonged treatment due to a repeated need for occlusal adjustments. In addition to saving time, it is possible with this technique to restore a greater number of teeth in a single appointment. The aesthetics of this type of restoration may be somewhat limited: A skilled practitioner is able to achieve better aesthetic results on the occlusal surface. However, with a detailed wax-up and high-quality model great outcomes can be obtained. The surface quality of printed models can be increased by adjusting the printing parameters including the layer height (Fig. 6). The use of a hydraulic pressure curing unit for silicone index production further increases the quality of the occlusal surface.

When planned and implemented correctly, the established occlusal surface and contacts reflect the natural anatomy without the need for adjustments (Fig. 7). Especially when restoring an entire quadrant, it is possible to increase the efficiency by opting for the flowable injection technique. Doing so reduces the number of appointments and the chair time decisively (Fig. 8).

STAMP TECHNIQUE: CONSIDERATIONS

If the occlusal surface of the tooth is intact, a wax-up may not be necessary. In this case, the better strategy is to duplicate what is still available before initiating treatment. A flowable composite or liquid rubber dam can be used for this purpose. It is important to coat the tooth surface with glycerin gel before applying the material. This will facilitate separation of the stamp from the tooth. It is always advisable to create a stamp that covers not only the details that need to be recorded and duplicated, but is extended over the cusps. This offers better stability in the restoration phase.

CLINICAL PROTOCOL

Figures 9 to 11 illustrate a possible clinical procedure. In this case, a molar with an occlusal carious lesion needed to be restored. The tooth surface was cleaned and a thin layer of glycerin gel applied, followed by a thick layer of liquid rubber dam, which covered the entire occlusal surface. Then, a micro applicator was immersed into the material and the stamp cured. After preparation, etching and application of the bonding system, the cavity was restored with flowable composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES Flow Super Low in the shade A2). When the cavity is larger and depending on personal preferences, a paste-type composite (CLEARFIL MAJESTY™ ES-2 Universal) may also be used. Prior to light curing of the composite, the occlusal surface was covered with PTFE tape and the stamp pressed onto it. After firm pressing, the tape and excess material were removed and the restoration polymerized. This restoration faithfully reproduces the occlusal surface and did not require any occlusal adjustments.

Fig. 6. Stamp production with liquid rubber dam.

Fig. 7. The stamp.

Fig. 8. Restoration procedure: From preparation to bonding.

Fig. 9. Restoration procedure: Filling with flowable composite.

Fig. 10. Restoration procedure: Duplication the original occlusal surface with the stamp.

Fig. 11. Tooth before and after treatment using the stamp technique.

CONCLUSION

Techniques that add simplicity and efficiency to clinical procedures are always welcome in the busy practice environment. Depending on the information available at the start of treatment and the number of teeth to be restored, the flowable injection or the stamp technique may be an ideal choice. They are easily implemented and speed up the clinical procedure, but most importantly support predictable outcomes. This saves time in the finishing phase and minimized the risk of repeated adjustments, hence protecting everyone involved from additional appointments and frustration. Especially for practitioners with limited routine in free-hand modelling and for those with maximum patient comfort in mind, both techniques are worth being integrated in their clinical procedures.

Dentist:

MICHAL JACZEWSKI

Michał Jaczewski graduated from Wroclaw Medical University in 2006 and today runs his private practice in the city of Legnica, Poland. He specializes in minimally invasive dentistry and digital dentistry and is the founder of the Biofunctional School of Occlusion. Here he lectures and runs workshops with focus on full comprehensive patient treatments.

• 2024. gada 17. sept.

CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow Apskatīt produktu

K-ETCHANT Syringe Apskatīt produktu

CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2 Universal Apskatīt produktu